Lindström, Sara

Abstract Background: Unnecessary intervention and overtreatment of indolent disease are common challenges in clinical management of prostate cancer. Improved tools to distinguish lethal from indolent disease are critical. Methods: We performed a genome-wide survival analysis of cause-specific death in 24,023 prostate cancer patients (3,513 disease-specific deaths) from the PRACTICAL and BPC3 consortia. Top findings were assessed for replication in a Norwegian cohort (CONOR). Results: We observed no significant association between genetic variants and prostate cancer survival. Conclusions: Common genetic variants with large impact on prostate cancer survival were not observed in this study. Impact: Future studies should be designed for identification of rare variants with large effect sizes or common variants with small effect sizes. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 24(11); 1796–800. ©2015 AACR.

Abstract Telomeres are complex structures that cap chromosome ends, protecting them from degradation, double strand breaks and end-to-end fusions. Telomeres are maintained by the enzyme telomerase, which is made up of a reverse transcriptase encoded by TERT, and an RNA template encoded by TERC. The telomere structure itself is composed of proteins encoded by ACD, ACYP2, BICD1, DKC1, DCLRE1B, MPHOSPH6, NAF1, NOLA1, NOLA2, NOLA3, OBFC1, PIK3C3, POT1, RTEL1, TEP1, TERF1, TERF2, TERF21P, TINF2, TNKS/PINX1, TPP1 and ZNF208. Several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the TERT and adjoining CLPTM1L gene region are associated with multiple cancer types, and some are associated with both increased and decreased risks across different cancer types. We systematically characterized the patterns of association between variants in these 25 telomere structure and maintenance genes and risk across five cancer types in the Genetic Association and Mechanisms in Oncology (GAME-ON) consortium. We performed a subset-based meta-analysis (ASSET) of 209,367 directly measured and imputed SNPs, one megabase up- and downstream of these genes, across genome-wide association studies of colorectal (5,100 cases, 4,831 controls), lung (12,160 cases, 16,838 controls), breast (15,748 cases, 18,084 controls), ovarian (4,369 cases, 9,123 controls) and prostate (14,160 cases, 12,724 controls) cancers. Correlations (r2) between SNPs were examined in Haploview using the 1000 Genomes Project CEU population. A total of 87 TERT, 123 TERC and 26 DCLRE1B SNPs were associated with cancer risk at gene-level Bonferroni-corrected p-values of 4.2-7.8×10−6. Patterns of association were similar for prostate and colorectal cancers in DCLRE1B. Much stronger associations were observed in TERT and TERC, with 63 and 24 SNPs reaching genome-wide significance (p<5.0×10−8), respectively. Of these, 9 TERT and 9 TERC SNPs were correlated at r2<0.75. The most strongly associated SNPs in TERT (rs37004, p = 2.6×10−11) and TERC (rs76925190, p = 1.5×10−15) are in regions containing documented risk loci for lung and prostate cancers, respectively. TERT rs37004 (p = 1.2×10−13) and 6 of the other 9 SNPs in TERT were associated only with lung cancer risk. For the other 2 SNPs, there was a suggestion that patterns of risk were opposite for lung and prostate cancers. While TERC rs76925190 was strongly associated with prostate cancer risk (p = 5.4 x10−17), it was also suggestively associated with colorectal cancer risk (p<0.005). This pattern was similar for another 2 of the 9 SNPs, while for the rest, associations were limited to prostate cancer. The complex patterns of association in telomere structure and maintenance genes observed across cancer types may provide insight about the mechanisms through which telomere dysfunction in different tissues influences cancer risk. Citation Format: Sara Karami, Younghun Han, Fredrick R. Schumacher, Zsofia Kote-Jarai, Sara Lindstrom, John S. Witte, Iona Cheng, Shenying Fang, Jiali Han, Peter Kraft, Fengju Song, Rayjean J. Hung, James McKay, Stephen J. Chanock, Mala Pande, Angela Risch, Hongbing Shen, Christopher A. Haiman, Lisa Boardman, Cornelia M. Ulrich, Graham Casey, Ulrike Peters, Nilanjan Chatterjee, Brandon Pierce, Wei Zheng, Christopher I. Amos, Jennifer A. Doherty. Risk loci in telomere structure and maintenance genes across five cancer types: GAME-ON Consortium. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 4609. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-4609

Abstract Mammographic density measures adjusted for age and body mass index (BMI) are heritable predictors of breast cancer risk, but few mammographic density-associated genetic variants have been identified. Using data for 10,727 women from two international consortia, we estimated associations between 77 common breast cancer susceptibility variants and absolute dense area, percent dense area and absolute nondense area adjusted for study, age, and BMI using mixed linear modeling. We found strong support for established associations between rs10995190 (in the region of ZNF365), rs2046210 (ESR1), and rs3817198 (LSP1) and adjusted absolute and percent dense areas (all P < 10−5). Of 41 recently discovered breast cancer susceptibility variants, associations were found between rs1432679 (EBF1), rs17817449 (MIR1972-2: FTO), rs12710696 (2p24.1), and rs3757318 (ESR1) and adjusted absolute and percent dense areas, respectively. There were associations between rs6001930 (MKL1) and both adjusted absolute dense and nondense areas, and between rs17356907 (NTN4) and adjusted absolute nondense area. Trends in all but two associations were consistent with those for breast cancer risk. Results suggested that 18% of breast cancer susceptibility variants were associated with at least one mammographic density measure. Genetic variants at multiple loci were associated with both breast cancer risk and the mammographic density measures. Further understanding of the underlying mechanisms at these loci could help identify etiologic pathways implicated in how mammographic density predicts breast cancer risk. Cancer Res; 75(12); 2457–67. ©2015 AACR.

Abstract Percent mammographic breast density (PMD) is a strong heritable risk factor for breast cancer. However, the pathways through which this risk is mediated are still unclear. To explore whether PMD and breast cancer have a shared genetic basis, we identified genetic variants most strongly associated with PMD in a published meta-analysis of five genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and used these to construct risk scores for 3,628 breast cancer cases and 5,190 controls from the UK2 GWAS of breast cancer. The signed per-allele effect estimates of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) were multiplied with the respective allele counts in the individual and summed over all SNPs to derive the risk score for an individual. These scores were included as the exposure variable in a logistic regression model with breast cancer case–control status as the outcome. This analysis was repeated using 10 different cutoff points for the most significant density SNPs (1%–10% representing 5,222–50,899 SNPs). Permutation analysis was also conducted across all 10 cutoff points. The association between risk score and breast cancer was significant for all cutoff points from 3% to 10% of top density SNPs, being most significant for the 6% (2-sided P = 0.002) to 10% (P = 0.001) cutoff points (overall permutation P = 0.003). Women in the top 10% of the risk score distribution had a 31% increased risk of breast cancer [OR = 1.31; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.08–1.59] compared with women in the bottom 10%. Together, our results show that PMD and breast cancer have a shared genetic basis that is mediated through a large number of common variants. Cancer Res; 72(6); 1478–84. ©2012 AACR.