Back to Authors

Lee, Matthew A.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6262-3447

Mayo Clinic

Centre international de recherche sur le cancer

Citations 2

Transcriptome-wide Mendelian randomization exploring dynamic CD4+ T cell gene expression in colorectal cancer development
Deslandes, Benedita , Wu, Xueyan , Lee, Matthew A. , Goudswaard, Lucy J. , Gsur, Andrea , Lindblom, Annika , Ogino, Shuji , Wolk, Alicja , Wu, Anna H. , Huyghe, Jeroen R. , Peters, Ulrike , Phipps, Amanda I. , Pai, Rish K. , Grant, Robert C. , Zheng, Jie , Hazelwood, Emma , Vincent, Emma E. , Gsur, Andrea , Ogino, Shuji , Wolk, Alicja , Wu, Anna H. , Peters, Ulrike , Zheng, Jie , Hazelwood, Emma , Vincent, Emma E , Lindblom, Annika , Jones, Gareth Wyn , Vymetalkova, Veronika Polakova , Thomas, Claire E. , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Yarmolinsky, James , Gunter, Marc J.

Journal of Leukocyte Biology | September 15, 2025 | Volume: 117 | Issue: 10 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/jleuko/qiaf131 Get It

Abstract Recent research suggests higher circulating lymphocyte counts may protect against colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the role of specific lymphocyte subtypes and activation states remain unclear. CD4+ T cells—a highly dynamic lymphocyte subtype—undergo gene expression changes upon activation that are critical to their effector function. Previous studies using bulk tissue have limited our understanding of their role in CRC risk to static associations. We applied Mendelian randomization (MR) and genetic colocalisation to evaluate causal relationships of gene expression on CRC risk across multiple CD4+ T cell subtypes and activation states. Genetic proxies were obtained from single-cell transcriptomic data, allowing us to investigate the causal effect of expression of 1,805 genes across CD4+ T cell activation states on CRC risk (78,473 cases; 107,143 controls). Analyses were stratified by CRC anatomical subsites and sex, with sensitivity analyses assessing whether the observed effect estimates were likely to be CD4+ T cell-specific. We identified 6 genes—FADS2, FHL3, HLA-DRB1, HLA-DRB5, RPL28, and TMEM258—with strong evidence for a causal role in CRC development (FDR-P < 0.05; colocalisation H4 > 0.8). Causal estimates varied by CD4+ T cell subtype, activation state, CRC subsite and sex. However, many of genetic proxies used to instrument gene expression in CD4+ T cells also act as eQTLs in other tissues, highlighting the challenges of using genetic proxies to instrument tissue-specific expression changes. We demonstrate the importance of capturing the dynamic nature of CD4+ T cells in understanding CRC risk, and prioritize genes for further investigation in cancer prevention.
Adiposity distribution and risks of 12 obesity-related cancers: a Mendelian randomization analysis
Hazelwood, Emma , Goudswaard, Lucy J. , Lee, Matthew A. , Vabistsevits, Marina , Pournaras, Dimitri J. , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Gruber, Stephen B. , Gsur, Andrea , Li, Li , Vodičková, Ľudmila , Grant, Robert C. , Samadder, N. Jewel , Timpson, Nicholas J. , Vincent, Emma E. , Brenner, Hermann , Buchanan, Daniel D , Gruber, Stephen B , Gsur, Andrea , Li, Li , Vodickova, Ludmila , Samadder, N Jewel , Gunter, Marc J , Yarmolinsky, James , Richardson, Tom G , Freisling, Heinz , Vincent, Emma E , Hazelwood, Emma , Brenner, Hermann , Gunter, Marc J. , Schuster‐Böckler, Benjamin , Murphy, Neil

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | September 12, 2025 | Volume: 117 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 2621-2642

10.1093/jnci/djaf201 Get It

Abstract Introduction There is convincing evidence that overall adiposity increases the risks of several cancers. Whether the distribution of adiposity plays a similar role is unclear. Methods We used 2-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) to examine causal relationships of 5 adiposity distribution traits (abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (ASAT); visceral adipose tissue (VAT); gluteofemoral adipose tissue (GFAT); liver fat; and pancreas fat) with the risks of 12 obesity-related cancers (endometrial, ovarian, breast, colorectal, pancreas, multiple myeloma, liver, kidney (renal cell), thyroid, gallbladder, esophageal adenocarcinoma, and meningioma). Results Sample size across all genome-wide association studies (GWAS) ranged from 8407 to 728 896 (median: 57 249). We found evidence that higher genetically predicted ASAT increased the risks of endometrial cancer, liver cancer, and esophageal adenocarcinoma (odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) per standard deviation (SD) higher ASAT = 1.79 (1.18 to 2.71), 3.83 (1.39 to 10.53), and 2.34 (1.15 to 4.78), respectively). Conversely, we found evidence that higher genetically predicted GFAT decreased the risks of breast cancer and meningioma (ORs and 95% CIs per SD higher genetically predicted GFAT = 0.77 (0.62 to 0.97) and 0.53 (0.32 to 0.90), respectively). We also found evidence for an effect of higher genetically predicted VAT and liver fat on increased liver cancer risk (ORs and 95% CIs per SD higher genetically predicted adiposity trait = 4.29 (1.41 to 13.07) and 4.09 (2.29 to 7.28), respectively). Discussion Our analyses provide novel insights into the relationship between adiposity distribution and cancer risk. These insights highlight the potential importance of adipose tissue distribution alongside maintaining a healthy weight for cancer prevention.