Fiorella, David

OBJECTIVEThe authors performed a pooled analysis of 3 studies—IntrePED (International Retrospective Study of the Pipeline Embolization Device), PUFS (Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms Study), and ASPIRe (Aneurysm Study of Pipeline in an Observational Registry)—in order to assess angiographic outcomes and clinical safety of the Pipeline embolization device (PED).METHODSIntrePED was a retrospective study, while PUFS and ASPIRe were prospective studies. For each patient included in these studies, the authors collected baseline demographic data, aneurysm characteristics, and procedural details. The primary outcomes for this combined analysis were clinical outcomes, including neurological morbidity and mortality and major ipsilateral intracranial hemorrhage and ischemic stroke. The secondary outcomes were angiographic occlusion rates, which were available for ASPIRe and PUFS only.RESULTSA total of 1092 patients with 1221 aneurysms were included across the 3 studies. The mean aneurysm size was 12.0 ± 7.8 mm and the mean neck size was 6.6 ± 4.8 mm. The major ipsilateral ischemic stroke rate was 3.7% (40/1091). The major ipsilateral intracranial hemorrhage rate was 2.0% (22/1091). The major neurological morbidity rate was 5.7% (62/1091). The neurological mortality rate was 3.3% (36/1091). The combined major morbidity and neurological mortality rate was 7.1% (78/1091). The complete occlusion rates were 75.0% at 180 days (111/148) and 85.5% at 1 year (94/110). The overall aneurysm retreatment rate was 3.0% (33/1091) at a mean follow-up time of 10.2 ± 10.8 months.CONCLUSIONSEndovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the PED is safe and effective. Angiographic occlusion rates progressed with follow-up. Rates of stroke, hemorrhage, morbidity and mortality, and retreatment were low, especially given the fact that the aneurysms treated were generally large and wide necked.

OBJECTIVEThe long-term effectiveness of endovascular treatment of large and giant wide-neck aneurysms using traditional endovascular techniques has been disappointing, with high recanalization and re-treatment rates. Flow diversion with the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) has been recently used as a stand-alone therapy for complex aneurysms, showing significant improvement in effectiveness while demonstrating a similar safety profile to stent-supported coil treatment. However, relatively little is known about its long-term safety and effectiveness. Here the authors report on the 3-year safety and effectiveness of flow diversion with the PED in a prospective cohort of patients with large and giant internal carotid artery aneurysms enrolled in the Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms (PUFS) trial.METHODSThe PUFS trial is a prospective study of 107 patients with 109 aneurysms treated with the PED. Primary effectiveness and safety end points were demonstrated based on independently monitored 180-day clinical and angiographic data. Patients were enrolled in a long-term follow-up protocol including 1-, 3-, and 5-year clinical and imaging follow-up. In this paper, the authors report the midstudy (3-year) effectiveness and safety data.RESULTSAt 3 years posttreatment, 74 subjects with 76 aneurysms underwent catheter angiography as required per protocol. Overall, complete angiographic aneurysm occlusion was observed in 71 of these 76 aneurysms (93.4% cure rate). Five aneurysms were re-treated, using either coils or additional PEDs, for failure to occlude, and 3 of these 5 were cured by the 3-year follow-up. Angiographic cure with one or two treatments of Pipeline embolization alone was therefore achieved in 92.1%. No recanalization of a previously completely occluded aneurysm was noted on the 3-year angiograms. There were 3 (2.6%) delayed device- or aneurysm-related serious adverse events, none of which led to permanent neurological sequelae. No major or minor late-onset hemorrhagic or ischemic cerebrovascular events or neurological deaths were observed in the 6-month through 3-year posttreatment period. Among 103 surviving patients, 85 underwent functional outcome assessment in which modified Rankin Scale scores of 0–1 were demonstrated in 80 subjects.CONCLUSIONSPipeline embolization is safe and effective in the treatment of complex large and giant aneurysms of the intracranial internal carotid artery. Unlike more traditional endovascular treatments, flow diversion results in progressive vascular remodeling that leads to complete aneurysm obliteration over longer-term follow-up without delayed aneurysm recanalization and/or growth.Clinical trial registration no.: NCT00777088 (clinicaltrials.gov)

OBJECT Neuroophthalmological morbidity is commonly associated with large and giant cavernous and supraclinoid internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms. The authors sought to evaluate the neuroophthalmological outcomes after treatment of these aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED). METHODS The Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms (PUFS) trial was an international, multicenter prospective trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of the PED. All patients underwent complete neuroophthalmological examinations both before the PED procedure and at a 6-month follow-up. All examinations were performed for the purpose of this study and according to study criteria. RESULTS In total, 108 patients were treated in the PUFS trial, 98 of whom had complete neuroophthalmological follow-up. Of the patients with complete follow-up, 39 (40%) presented with a neuroophthalmological baseline deficit that was presumed to be attributable to the aneurysm, and patients with these baseline deficits had significantly larger aneurysms. In 25 of these patients (64%), the baseline deficit showed at least some improvement 6 months after PED treatment, whereas in 1 patient (2.6%), the deficits only worsened. In 5 patients (5%), new deficits had developed at the 6-month follow-up, while in another 6 patients (6%), deficits that were not originally assumed to be related to the aneurysm had improved by that time. A history of diabetes was associated with failure of the baseline deficits to improve after the treatment. The aneurysm maximum diameter was significantly larger in patients with a new deficit or a worse baseline deficit at 6 months postprocedure. CONCLUSIONS Patients treated with the PED for large and giant ICA aneurysms had excellent neuroophthalmological outcomes 6 months after the procedure, with deficits improving in most of the patients, very few deficits worsening, and few new deficits developing.

Purpose To determine the rates of neurologic adverse events following Pipeline Embolic Device (PED) placement for intracranial aneurysm treatment. Methods A retrospective review of medical records was performed at 19 centres to identify consecutive intracranial aneurysms treated with the PED following regulatory approval for marketing the device in the given country. All patients in whom at least one PED was placed and in whom follow-up was available prior to IRB or ethics panel approval were enrolled. Three anatomic/size subgroups were defined, including 1) pre-PComm, internal carotid artery aneurysms 10mm or greater (“large ICA”), 2) ICA aneurysms >10mm and/or at/distal to the PComm region (“other anterior circulation”), and 3) posterior circulation aneurysms. “Primary safety events” included stroke, haemorrhage, parent artery stenosis, permanent cranial neuropathy, and spontaneous rupture of the target aneurysm. Severe safety events were defined as any event causing significant impairment of functioning causing the inability of the subject to carry out usual activities. Statistical analysis was performed using standard summary statistics; p-values comparing subgroups were computed using Pearson's chi-square test for discrete variables and analysis of variance for continuous variables. Results To date, 580 aneurysms, including 183 large ICA, 344 other anterior circulation, and 53 posterior circulation aneurysms have been treated and followed for a mean duration of 7.8 months (SD 7.3, range 0.1 - 40.8). 437 (76%) of 580 aneurysms were saccular and 80 (14%) were fusiform; 32 (5.5%) were classified as giant (<25mm diameter). 549 (93%) were unruptured. 241 (42%) were treated with multiple PEDs. Primary safety events were noted in 62 (12%) cases. Severe neurological events occurred in 35 (6.8%) cases, and occurred more frequently in posterior circulation aneurysms (7 (13%)) than in either large ICA or other anterior circulation aneurysms (15 (8.8%) and (13 (4.5%), respectively, p=.035). Major stroke occurred in 20 (3.9%) of 515 subjects (4.1%, 3.1%, and 7.5% in large ICA, other anterior circulation, and posterior circulation aneurysms, respectively, p=.31). Ipsilateral intracranial haemorrhage occurred in 12 (2.3%) subjects (3.5%, 1.7%, and 1.9% in large ICA, other anterior circulation, and posterior circulation aneurysms, respectively, p=.47). Spontaneous aneurysm rupture occurred in 3 (0.6%) aneurysms, all of which were giant, resulting in a 9% incidence of rupture in giant aneurysms. Mortality rate was 4.3% and was significantly higher for posterior circulation aneurysms (11.3%) as compared to anterior circulation aneurysms (3.5%, p=.019). Conclusions Preliminary data indicates that in approximately 7% of aneurysms treated with PED, substantial neurologic complications occurred, with rates of both severe neurologic events and mortality occurring significantly higher in the posterior as compared to the anterior circulation. Both ipsilateral haemorrhage and spontaneous aneurysm rupture were rare, with the latter event limited to giant aneurysms. Disclosures D. Kallmes: 1; C; MicroVention, Sequent, Benvenue, eV3. 2; C; General Electric, Codman, eV3. E. Boccardi: None. A. Bonafe: None. S. Cekirge: None. D. Fiorella: 2; C; Pipeline proctor, consultant, (<10K, EV3). R. Hanel: None. P. Jabbour: None. E. Levy: None. D. Lopes: 6; C; Receives compensation for training & proctoring for Pipeline devices. P. Lylyk: None. C. McDougall: None. A. Siddiqui: None. I. Szikora: None. H. Woo: None.

Objective A study was undertaken to estimate the fraction of intracranial aneurysms that might be amenable to treatment with the pipeline embolization device (PED), a current flow diverter device, and to determine the types of aneurysms that are probably not amenable to treatment with this device. Methods A retrospective analysis of 200 consecutive intracranial aneurysms as seen on three-dimensional rotational angiography images was conducted. Based on aneurysm and parent artery morphology, four independent observers experienced in the use of the PED judged the likelihood that a given aneurysm could theoretically be treated with one or more PED using a 5-point scale: grades 1 and 2 indicated amenability to treatment with multiple devices; grade 3 indicated amenability to treatment with one device; and grades 4 and 5 indicated the aneurysm would not be amenable to treatment with the PED. Aneurysms were analyzed on the basis of anatomical factors only. Rupture status was not considered. Interobserver agreement was determined. Results 94 of 200 aneurysms (47%) were judged to be likely to be amenable to treatment with the PED; 50 cases (25%) were judged to be amenable to the use of multiple overlapping devices while, in 44 cases (22%), coverage with a single device was preferred. There was a significant relationship between the location of the aneurysm and the grade of the aneurysm (p<0.0001). Conclusion On the basis of anatomical configuration, nearly half of the aneurysms in this study were likely to be amenable to treatment with the PED.