Boccardi, Edoardo

OBJECT Flow-diversion treatment has been shown to be associated with high rates of angiographic obliteration; however, the treatment is relatively contraindicated in the acute phase following subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) as these patients require periprocedural dual antiplatelet therapy. Acute coiling followed by flow diversion has emerged as an intriguing and feasible treatment option for ruptured complex and giant aneurysms. In this study the authors report outcomes and complications of patients with ruptured aneurysms undergoing coiling in the acute phase followed by planned delayed flow diversion. METHODS This case series includes patients from 2 institutions. All patients underwent standard endovascular coiling in the acute phase after SAH with the intention and plan to proceed with flow diversion at a later date. Outcomes studied included angiographic occlusion, procedure-related complications, and long-term clinical outcome as measured using the modified Rankin Scale. RESULTS A total of 31 patients underwent coiling in the acute phase with the intention to undergo flow diversion at a later date. The mean aneurysm size was 15.8 ± 7.9 mm. Of the 31 patients undergoing coiling, 4 patients could not undergo further flow-diverter therapy: 3 patients (9.7%) died of complications of subarachnoid hemorrhage and 1 patient had permanent morbidity as a result of perioperative ischemic stroke (3.1%). Twenty-seven patients underwent staged placement of flow diverters after adequate recovery. The median time to treatment was 16 weeks. There was one case of aneurysm rebleeding following coil treatment. There were no cases of permanent morbidity or mortality resulting from flow-diverter treatment. Twenty-four patients underwent imaging follow-up; 18 of these patients had aneurysms that were completely or nearly completely occluded (58.1% on an intent-to-treat basis). At last follow-up (mean 18.3 months), 25 patients had mRS scores ≤ 2 (80.6% on an intent-to-treat basis). CONCLUSIONS Staged treatment of ruptured complex and giant intracranial aneurysms with coiling in the acute phase and flow-diverter treatment following recovery from SAH is both safe and effective. In this series, no cases of rebleeding occurred during the interval between coiling and flow diversion. This strategy should be considered as a valid option in patients presenting with these challenging ruptured aneurysms.

Purpose To determine the rates of neurologic adverse events following Pipeline Embolic Device (PED) placement for intracranial aneurysm treatment. Methods A retrospective review of medical records was performed at 19 centres to identify consecutive intracranial aneurysms treated with the PED following regulatory approval for marketing the device in the given country. All patients in whom at least one PED was placed and in whom follow-up was available prior to IRB or ethics panel approval were enrolled. Three anatomic/size subgroups were defined, including 1) pre-PComm, internal carotid artery aneurysms 10mm or greater (“large ICA”), 2) ICA aneurysms >10mm and/or at/distal to the PComm region (“other anterior circulation”), and 3) posterior circulation aneurysms. “Primary safety events” included stroke, haemorrhage, parent artery stenosis, permanent cranial neuropathy, and spontaneous rupture of the target aneurysm. Severe safety events were defined as any event causing significant impairment of functioning causing the inability of the subject to carry out usual activities. Statistical analysis was performed using standard summary statistics; p-values comparing subgroups were computed using Pearson's chi-square test for discrete variables and analysis of variance for continuous variables. Results To date, 580 aneurysms, including 183 large ICA, 344 other anterior circulation, and 53 posterior circulation aneurysms have been treated and followed for a mean duration of 7.8 months (SD 7.3, range 0.1 - 40.8). 437 (76%) of 580 aneurysms were saccular and 80 (14%) were fusiform; 32 (5.5%) were classified as giant (<25mm diameter). 549 (93%) were unruptured. 241 (42%) were treated with multiple PEDs. Primary safety events were noted in 62 (12%) cases. Severe neurological events occurred in 35 (6.8%) cases, and occurred more frequently in posterior circulation aneurysms (7 (13%)) than in either large ICA or other anterior circulation aneurysms (15 (8.8%) and (13 (4.5%), respectively, p=.035). Major stroke occurred in 20 (3.9%) of 515 subjects (4.1%, 3.1%, and 7.5% in large ICA, other anterior circulation, and posterior circulation aneurysms, respectively, p=.31). Ipsilateral intracranial haemorrhage occurred in 12 (2.3%) subjects (3.5%, 1.7%, and 1.9% in large ICA, other anterior circulation, and posterior circulation aneurysms, respectively, p=.47). Spontaneous aneurysm rupture occurred in 3 (0.6%) aneurysms, all of which were giant, resulting in a 9% incidence of rupture in giant aneurysms. Mortality rate was 4.3% and was significantly higher for posterior circulation aneurysms (11.3%) as compared to anterior circulation aneurysms (3.5%, p=.019). Conclusions Preliminary data indicates that in approximately 7% of aneurysms treated with PED, substantial neurologic complications occurred, with rates of both severe neurologic events and mortality occurring significantly higher in the posterior as compared to the anterior circulation. Both ipsilateral haemorrhage and spontaneous aneurysm rupture were rare, with the latter event limited to giant aneurysms. Disclosures D. Kallmes: 1; C; MicroVention, Sequent, Benvenue, eV3. 2; C; General Electric, Codman, eV3. E. Boccardi: None. A. Bonafe: None. S. Cekirge: None. D. Fiorella: 2; C; Pipeline proctor, consultant, (<10K, EV3). R. Hanel: None. P. Jabbour: None. E. Levy: None. D. Lopes: 6; C; Receives compensation for training & proctoring for Pipeline devices. P. Lylyk: None. C. McDougall: None. A. Siddiqui: None. I. Szikora: None. H. Woo: None.