Donato, Leslie J.

Purpose of review The success of LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) as a predictor of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and a therapeutic target is indisputable. Apolipoprotein B (apoB) is a more contemporary and physiologically relevant measure of atherogenic lipoproteins. This report summarizes recent comparisons of apoB and LDL-C as biomarkers of cardiovascular risk. Recent findings Multiple recent reports have found that LDL-C methods perform poorly at low concentrations (<70 mg/dl). Several meta-analyses from randomized controlled trials and large prospective observational studies have found that apoB and LDL-C provide equivalent information on risk of cardiovascular disease. More innovative analyses have asserted that apoB is a superior indicator of actual risk when apoB and LDL-C disagree. Summary ApoB is more analytically robust and standardized biomarker than LDL-C. Large population studies have found that apoB is at worst clinically equivalent to LDL-C and likely superior when disagreement exists. Realistically, many obstacles prevent the wide spread adoption of apoB and for now providers and their patients must weigh the costs and benefits of apoB.

Abstract BACKGROUND We assessed the impact of clinical decision support (CDS) rules within the electronic health record for ionized calcium (iCa), serum magnesium (Mg), and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in intensive care unit (ICU) inpatients at a large academic center. METHODS A repeat order for measurement of iCa or Mg placed within 24 (iCa) or 48 (Mg) h of a previously nonactionable result, or additional orders for NT-proBNP beyond 1 within a single hospitalization, triggered a CDS pop-up alert showing the prior result and offering the opportunity to cancel the order or to place the order after entering an indication for repeat testing. The number of tests performed for each of these analytes and incidence of adverse clinical outcomes potentially associated with hypocalcemia or hypomagnesemia were compared between the 90-day period before CDS implementation and two 90-day periods immediately following. RESULTS iCa test volumes decreased by 48%, Mg by 39%, and NT-proBNP by 28% in the 90-day period immediately following implementation and remained decreased by 54%, 49%, and 22%, respectively, during the following 90-day period (all P values &lt;0.0002). Adverse clinical outcomes potentially associated with hypocalcemia or hypomagnesemia did not increase (all P-values &gt;0.17). CONCLUSIONS Implementation of CDS dramatically decreased repeat testing of iCa, Mg, and NT-proBNP without adversely impacting clinical outcomes in the ICU. Expansion of the rules from the ICU units to include the entire hospitalized patient population and expansion to additional analytes is expected to lead to further reductions in testing.

Summary Background About one‐third of patients with IBS ‐diarrhoea (irritable bowel syndrome‐D) have evidence of increased bile acid synthesis or excretion. Aims To assess effects of the bile acid sequestrant, colesevelam, on faecal excretion of BA s, hepatic BA synthesis and diarrhoea in IBS ‐D; to appraise whether individual or random stool samples accurately reflect 48‐h total faecal bile acid excretion and proportions of the main bile acids excreted and to study the faecal fat excretion in response to colesevelam. Methods A single‐centre, unblinded, single‐dose trial of effects of colesevelam, 1875 mg [3 tablets (625 mg tablets)] orally, twice daily, for 10 days on total 48‐h faecal bile acid excretion and fasting serum C4 (7α‐hydroxy‐4‐cholesten‐3‐one; surrogate of hepatic bile acid synthesis). Stool diaries documented bowel functions for 8 days prior and 8 days during colesevelam treatment. Stool 48‐h samples and fasting serum were collected for faecal fat, faecal bile acid and serum C4. Results Colesevelam was associated with significantly increased faecal total bile acid excretion and deoxycholic acid excretion, increased serum C4 and more solid stool consistency. There was a significant inverse correlation between number of bowel movements per week and the total bile acid sequestered into stool during the last 48 h of treatment. Random stool samples did not accurately reflect 48‐h total or individual faecal bile acid excretion. Sequestration of bile acids by colesevelam did not increase faecal fat. Conclusions Colesevelam increases delivery of bile acids to stool while improving stool consistency, and increases hepatic bile acid synthesis, avoiding steatorrhoea in patients with IBS ‐D. Overall effects are consistent with luminal bile acid sequestration by colesevelam.

AbstractBackgroundA valid biomarker is ‘an indicator of normal biologic or pathogenic processes, or pharmacological responses to a therapeutic intervention’. There is no validated biomarker for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The aim of the study was to assess ability of three quantitative traits to identify treatable processes to discriminate between IBS‐diarrhea (IBS‐D) patients, IBS‐constipation (IBS‐C) patients and healthy volunteers (HV).MethodsIn 30 HV, 30 IBS‐C patients and 64 IBS‐D patients, we characterized bowel symptoms and quantitated pathophysiological mechanisms: bile acid (BA) synthesis (serum C4 and FGF19), fecal BA and fat, colonic transit (CT), and intestinal permeability (IP). We used multiple logistic regression and receiver‐operating characteristic (ROCAUC) to appraise three factors (fecal BA, CT, and IP) individually and in combination to identify discriminant targets for treatment in IBS.Key ResultsThere were significant associations between the three subgroups and symptoms reflecting bowel function and the quantitative traits. There were significant associations between fecal BA and CT at 48 h (r = 0.43; p < 0.001) and between fecal BA and IP (r = 0.23; p = 0.015). Individually, fecal BA and CT48 (but not IP) were significant independent predictors for distinguishing HV from IBS. In combination, they discriminated HV from IBS‐D patients (ROCAUC 0.70), HV from IBS‐C patients (ROCAUC 0.73), and IBS‐C patients from IBS‐D patients (ROCAUC 0.86). Colonic transit and fecal BA excretion together discriminate between healthy volunteers and IBS‐C patients or IBS‐D patients, or between the IBS subgroups with 75–90% specificity at 60% sensitivity.Conclusions & InferencesColonic transit and fecal BA individually and together constitute useful biomarkers to identify treatable mechanisms in IBS and to differentiate subgroups of IBS.

The pathobiology of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is multifaceted. We aimed to identify candidate genes predisposing to quantitative traits in IBS. In 30 healthy volunteers, 30 IBS-constipation, and 64 IBS-diarrhea patients, we measured bowel symptoms, bile acid (BA) synthesis (serum 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one and FGF19), fecal BA and fat, colonic transit (CT by scintigraphy), and intestinal permeability (IP by 2-sugar excretion). We assessed associations of candidate genes controlling BA metabolism ( KLB rs17618244 and FGFR4 rs351855), BA receptor ( GPBAR1 rs11554825), serotonin (5-HT) reuptake ( SLC6A4 through rs4795541 which encodes for the 44-bp insert in 5HTTLPR), or immune activation ( TNFSF15 rs4263839) with three primary quantitative traits of interest: colonic transit, BA synthesis, and fecal BA excretion. There were significant associations between fecal BA and CT at 48 h ( r = 0.43; P < 0.001) and IP ( r = 0.23; P = 0.015). GPBAR1 genotype was associated with CT48 ( P = 0.003) and total fecal BA [ P = 0.030, false detection rate (FDR) P = 0.033]. Faster CT48 observed with both CC and TT GPBAR1 genotypes was due to significant interaction with G allele of KLB, which increases BA synthesis and excretion. Other univariate associations ( P < 0.05, without FDR correction) observed between GPBAR1 and symptom phenotype and gas sensation ratings support the role of GPBAR1 receptor. Associations between SLC6A4 and stool consistency, ease of passage, postprandial colonic tone, and total fecal BA excretion provide data in support of future hypothesis-testing studies. Genetic control of GPBAR1 receptor predisposing to pathobiological mechanisms in IBS provides evidence from humans in support of the importance of GPBAR1 to colonic motor and secretory functions demonstrated in animal studies.