Suddendorf, Scott H.

Electromagnetic Interference with Ventricular Assist DeviceBackgroundHemodynamic instability hinders activation and entrainment mapping during ventricular tachycardia ablation. The Impella 2.5 microaxial flow device (MFD; Abiomed Inc., Danvers, MA, USA) is used to prevent hemodynamic instability during electrophysiologic study. However, electromagnetic interference (EMI) generated by this device can preclude accurate electroanatomic mapping.MethodsImpella was placed in the left ventricle of 7 canines for circulatory support. Electroanatomic mapping during sinus rhythm, ventricular pacing, and ventricular fibrillation (VF) was performed using magnet‐ (CARTO3, Biosense Webster Inc., Diamond Bar, CA, USA) and impedance‐ (EnSite Velocity System/EnSite NavX, St. Jude Medical Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA) based systems. Distance from device to points with severe EMI precluding acquisition was compared to points with mild/no EMI. Two methods were used to reduce EMI: (1) titration of MFD performance, and (2) impedance‐only mapping combined with manual annotation of activation.ResultsSevere EMI did not occur during impedance‐based mapping. Severe EMI was observed using CARTO3 at 9.4% of all points attempted at maximum performance level (P8) of device. Severe EMI occurred at points closer to device (40.1 ± 16.8 mm) versus (55.5 ± 20.0 mm) for mild/no EMI, P < 0.0001. Severe EMI using CARTO3 was resolved by either (1) reduction of performance from P8 to P6 or (2) impedance‐only mapping with manual annotation.ConclusionConcurrent use of MFD caused EMI to prevent acquisition of points with magnet‐based mapping. Predictors for EMI were distance from device and performance level. Temporary reductions to P6 or impedance‐only mapping are 2 methods to resolve EMI.

Objective To determine the hemodynamic effect of an off-pump Apicoaortic valved graft (AAVG) implantation, we performed a quantitative coronary flow analysis in a swine model of severe aortic stenosis. Methods In 10 swine, cardiac output, coronary flow, right common carotid artery flow, and internal mammary artery flow were measured along with left and right ventricular pressures and aortic and pulmonary artery pressures. A novel AAVG was implanted off-pump on the left ventricular (LV) apex using a specially designed implantation tool and anastomosed to the descending thoracic aorta. Aortic flow was measured proximally and distally of the AAVG-to-descending thoracic aorta anastomosis. After AAVG implantation, epicardial echo confirmed occlusion of the LV outflow tract by a valvuloplasty balloon. Baseline simultaneous measurements of all parameters were repeated after AAVG implantation and intravenous Dobutamine administration. Results The AAVG was implanted without any blood loss. After AAVG implantation and LV outflow tract occlusion, the aortic flow proximal to the AAVG-to-descending thoracic aorta anastomosis changed from antegrade (1508 ± 435 mL/min) to retrograde (–529 ± 241 mL/min, P < 0.001). All other measured parameters remained unchanged compared with baseline. After intravenous Dobutamine administration, LV pressure increased from 88 ± 20 to 184 ± 36 mm Hg (+209%, P < 0.0001) and coronary flow increased from 75 ± 34 to 193 ± 90 mL/min (+257%, P = 0.001). Conclusions The off-pump implantation of an AAVG is bloodless, safe, reproducible and has no negative impact on coronary flow and hemodynamics. In addition, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study where blood flow in all coronary arteries was measured simultaneously during an AAVG implantation.