Ashikhmina, Elena

Background: National data about the outcomes of children undergoing mechanical mitral valve replacement (m-MVR) are scarce. Methods: A retrospective review of hospitalizations from the Kids’ Inpatient Database was performed for patients ≤18 years of age in the United States. A total of 500 patients underwent m-MVR in 2009, 2012, 2016, and 2019. Patients with single ventricle physiology were excluded (n = 13). These patients were categorized into three groups according to age: neonates (<1 month, n = 20), infants (1-12 months, n = 76 patients), and children (1-18 years, n = 404). Outcomes were compared between the three groups. Results: The proportion of m-MVR involving children undergoing MV procedures (repair and replacement) has increased from 17.3% in 2009 to 30.8% in 2019 (Ptrend < .01). History of cardiac surgery was present in 256 patients (51.2%). Concomitant procedures were performed in 119 patients (23.8%). Intra- or postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was required in 19 patients (3.8%). The overall in-hospital mortality was 4.8% and was significantly higher in neonates and infants compared with older children (10% vs 11.8% vs 3.2%, P = .003). The length of hospital stay was longer in the neonatal group (median, 57 days, interquartile range, [24.8-90] vs 29.5 days [15.5-61] vs 10 days [7-18], P < .01). Nonhome discharges were more common in neonates and infants (40% vs 36.8% vs 13.1%, P < .01). Conclusion: Mechanical mitral valve replacement is increasingly performed over time with acceptable in-hospital morbidity and mortality, especially in older children and adolescents. Neonates and infants are associated with worse hospital survival, prolonged hospitalization, and significant rates of nonhome discharges.

Objective: To identify risk factors for pediatric mechanical mitral valve replacement (mMVR) to improve management in this challenging population. Methods: From 1993 to 2019, 93 children underwent 119 mMVR operations (median age, 8.8 years [interquartile range [IQR]: 2.1-13.3], 54.6% females) at our institution. Twenty-six (21.8%) patients underwent mMVR at ≤2 years and 93 (78.2%) patients underwent mMVR at >2 years. Median follow-up duration was 7.6 years [IQR: 3.2-12.4]. Results: Early mortality was 9.7%, but decreased with time and was 0% in the most recent era (13.9% from 1993 to 2000, 7.3% from 2001 to 2010, 0% from 2011 to 2019, P = .04). It was higher in patients ≤2 years compared to patients >2 years (26.9% vs 2.2%, P < .01). On multivariable analysis for mitral valve reoperation, valve size <23 mm was significant with a hazard ratio of 5.38 (4.87-19.47, P = .01);. Perioperative stroke occurred in 1% and permanent pacemaker was necessary in 12%. Freedom from mitral valve reoperation was higher in patients >2 years and those with a prosthesis ≥23 mm. Median time to reoperation was 7 years (IQR: 4.5-9.1) in patients >2 years and 3.5 years (IQR: 0.6-7.1) in patients ≤2 years ( P = .0511), but was similar between prosthesis sizes ( P = .6). During follow-up period (median 7.6 years [IQR: 3.2-12.4], stroke occurred in 10%, prosthetic valve thrombosis requiring reoperation in 4%, endocarditis in 3%, and bleeding in 1%. Conclusion: Early and late outcomes of mMVR in children are improved when performed at age >2 years and with prosthesis size ≥23 mm. These factors should be considered in the timing of mMVR.

Background— Few data exist on long-term outcomes of elderly patients after aortic valve replacement. We evaluated latest follow-up information for patients ≥70 years of age after aortic valve replacement. Methods and Results— Late overall survival of 2890 consecutive patients ≥70 years of age who underwent aortic valve replacement between January 1993 and December 2007 was reviewed retrospectively, analyzed, and stratified by preoperative and intraoperative variables. Observed 5-, 10-, and 15-year late postoperative survival was lower than generally expected (68%, 34%, and 8% versus 70%, 42%, and 20%, respectively; P <0.001). Independent predictors of late death included older age, renal failure, diabetes mellitus, stroke, myocardial infarction, immunosuppression, prior coronary artery bypass grafting, implanted pacemaker, lower ejection fraction, hypertension, and New York Heart Association class III or IV. After stratification by age–comorbidity risk score, 10-year survival for the lowest-risk group (n=946 [33%]) was similar to expected survival (55% versus 55%; P =0.50), but for the highest-risk group (n=564 [20%]), survival was significantly lower than expected (9% versus 26%; P <0.001). For 229 pairs of propensity-matched patients with mechanical or biological prostheses, survival was not significantly different (67%, 40%, and 19% versus 71%, 45%, and 7% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively; P =0.81). Structural deterioration of bioprostheses occurred in 64 patients (2.4%). Conclusions— Survival of elderly patients after aortic valve replacement is influenced by age and preoperative comorbidities; 33% at lowest risk had overall survival similar to that of an age- and sex-matched general population. There was no sufficient evidence that valve type affected survival. Structural deterioration of aortic bioprostheses was rare.