Suhy, Joyce

AbstractBackgroundMagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) is a non‐invasive technique assessing the concentration of various metabolites within the brain, both cross‐sectionally to characterize disease type and severity, and longitudinally to assess disease progression and potential treatment efficacy in the context of disease‐modifying interventions. In such context, the involvement of multiple imaging facilities inevitably introduces variability, whose amount must be known to inform on comparability between sites and sensitivity to change. Our objective is to study variability in the concentration of various brain metabolites using a dedicated MRS phantom and assess impact of field strength.Methods30 sites are being considered to participate in an on‐going clinical trial in metachromatic leukodystrophy. Site qualification mandates the scanning of a dedicated MRS phantom. 30 of these HD‐polyethylene spheres were simultaneously manufactured and filled with the same mixture of chemicals mimicking main metabolite concentrations. To date, 14 sites provided data (5 1.5T scanners and 9 3T). All sites implemented a standardized single‐voxel MRS sequence. MRS voxel was placed within the phantom and acquisition repeated 3 times. Spectra were centrally analyzed using LCModel v6.3 and quality controlled by Bioclinica. Repeat acquisitions were requested for parameter deviations, voxel positioning and/or shimming issues. Results only include passing datasets. Coefficient of Variation (CV) was calculated for NAA/Cr, Cho/Cr, mI/Cr, Glx/Cr and Lac/Cr ratios for each site and overall. LCModel quality metrics (FHWM and S/N) were also extracted to assess spectra quality. Comparison between field strengths was carried out using t‐tests.ResultsAverage CV by site was 2.0% for NAA/Cr (2.5% at 1.5T and 1.8% at 3T), 2.4% for Cho/Cr, 3.0% for mI/Cr, 4.5% for Glx/Cr and 6.1% for Lac/Cr. CVs were generally lower at 3T (except for Lac/Cr) although difference was not significant. As expected, Signal‐to‐Noise was higher at 3T (p=0.05). Overall CV by metabolite across scanners was much higher (ranging from 4.6% for Cho/Cr up to 12.1% for Lac/Cr).ConclusionMRS measures of metabolite concentrations have low variability at scanner‐level, insensitive to field strength. Nevertheless, variability across sites is much higher and would require, if possible, cross‐calibration. These phantom data make such calibration possible and will improve sensitivity of subject data analyses.

AbstractBackgroundRegulatory qualification of a biomarker for a defined context of use provides scientifically robust assurances to sponsors and regulators that accelerate appropriate adoption of biomarkers into drug development.MethodsThe Coalition Against Major Diseases submitted a dossier to the Scientific Advice Working Party of the European Medicines Agency requesting a qualification opinion on the use of hippocampal volume as a biomarker for enriching clinical trials in subjects with mild cognitive impairment, incorporating a scientific rationale, a literature review and a de novo analysis of Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative data.ResultsThe literature review and de novo analysis were consistent with the proposed context of use, and the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use released an opinion in November 2011.ConclusionsWe summarize the scientific rationale and the data that supported the first qualification of an imaging biomarker by the European Medicines Agency.

AbstractThe Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) three‐dimensional T1‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisitions provide a rich data set for developing and testing analysis techniques for extracting structural endpoints. To promote greater rigor in analysis and meaningful comparison of different algorithms, the ADNI MRI Core has created standardized analysis sets of data comprising scans that met minimum quality control requirements. We encourage researchers to test and report their techniques against these data. Standard analysis sets of volumetric scans from ADNI‐1 have been created, comprising screening visits, 1‐year completers (subjects who all have screening, 6‐ and 12‐month scans), 2‐year annual completers (screening, 1‐year and 2‐year scans), 2‐year completers (screening, 6‐months, 1‐year, 18‐months [mild cognitive impaired (MCI) only], and 2‐year scans), and complete visits (screening, 6‐month, 1‐year, 18‐month [MCI only], 2‐year, and 3‐year [normal and MCI only] scans). As the ADNI‐GO/ADNI‐2 data become available, updated standard analysis sets will be posted regularly.

BackgroundThe promise of Alzheimer's disease biomarkers has led to their incorporation in new diagnostic criteria and in therapeutic trials; however, significant barriers exist to widespread use. Chief among these is the lack of internationally accepted standards for quantitative metrics. Hippocampal volumetry is the most widely studied quantitative magnetic resonance imaging measure in Alzheimer's disease and thus represents the most rational target for an initial effort at standardization.Methods and ResultsThe authors of this position paper propose a path toward this goal. The steps include the following: (1) Establish and empower an oversight board to manage and assess the effort, (2) adopt the standardized definition of anatomic hippocampal boundaries on magnetic resonance imaging arising from the European Alzheimer's Disease Centers–Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative hippocampal harmonization effort as a reference standard, (3) establish a scientifically appropriate, publicly available reference standard data set based on manual delineation of the hippocampus in an appropriate sample of subjects (Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative), and (4) define minimum technical and prognostic performance metrics for validation of new measurement techniques using the reference standard data set as a benchmark.ConclusionsAlthough manual delineation of the hippocampus is the best available reference standard, practical application of hippocampal volumetry will require automated methods. Our intent was to establish a mechanism for credentialing automated software applications to achieve internationally recognized accuracy and prognostic performance standards that lead to the systematic evaluation and then widespread acceptance and use of hippocampal volumetry. The standardization and assay validation process outlined for hippocampal volumetry was envisioned as a template that could be applied to other imaging biomarkers.

BackgroundCerebral vasogenic edema (VE) has been reported to occur during antiamyloid immunotherapy. VE may be associated with central nervous system pathology with blood–brain barrier disruptions; however, less is known about the prevalence of naturally occurring VE in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD).MethodsFluid‐attenuated inversion recovery imaging sequences were obtained from four ongoing multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase 3 trials in patients with mild‐to‐moderate AD. The first set of baseline scans was from patients in volumetric magnetic resonance imaging addenda in the Interrupting Alzheimer's Dementia by EvaluatiNg Treatment of Amyloid PaThologY (IDENTITY) studies examining semagacestat, a γ‐secretase inhibitor (cohort 1, n = 621). The second set of baseline scans was from the EXPanding Alzheimer's Disease InvestigaTIONs (EXPEDITION) studies examining solanezumab, an anti‐Aβ monoclonal antibody (cohort 2, n = 2141). Readers were blinded to patient‐identifying information and future treatment. A third set of baseline scans was from the first 700 patients who underwent protocol‐specified magnetic resonance imaging before randomization in the EXPEDITION studies (cohort 3). The analysis used three neuroradiologists: two performed independent primary interpretations and the third was the adjudicator. Readers were blinded to patient information, treatment, protocol, and time point.ResultsFour cases of asymptomatic VE were detected at baseline/screening. Two VE cases were due to underlying extra‐axial mass lesions. The third VE case was associated with numerous microhemorrhages in keeping with cerebral amyloid angiopathy‐related inflammation or Aβ‐related angiitis. The final VE case demonstrated localized sulcal fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery imaging hyperintensity. No VE was detected in cohort 3 by readers blinded to patient baseline status.ConclusionsVE seems to be rare at baseline in patients with AD in clinical trials, 2 of 2762 associated with AD. Additional cohorts should be evaluated to support these findings.