Cehula, Juli

Abstract Background Tau phosphorylation and aggregation are hallmark features of Alzheimer's disease pathology(AD). Previous studies have shown that plasma phosphorylated tau( p ‐tau) at threonine 217 can detect AD‐related tau tangle pathology. However, the head‐to‐head association between p ‐tau217 and different tau PET tracers remains unexplored. Here, we conducted a head‐to‐head comparison of the association between plasma p ‐tau217 and four distinct tau PET tracers[MK6240, Flortaucipir(FTP), PI2620, RO948]. Method We studied 338 individuals across the AD continuum from the HEAD study[190 cognitively unimpaired elderly(CU), 109 with mild cognitive impairment(MCI), and 39 with dementia] with available FTP, MK6240, and plasma p ‐tau217 measured by ALZpath assay. A subset of 64 individuals(28 CU, 25 MCI, and 11 dementia) also had PI2620 and RO948, and p ‐tau217 measured by Lumipulse. The strength of the association was determined using t‐value maps from regression models testing the association between each tau PET tracer and plasma p ‐tau217, and the extent was measured by the percentage of significant voxels(t‐value>3.2). R‐square metric was used to determine how much of the variance in tau PET tracer estimates was explained by plasma p ‐tau217 concentrations. Associations between p ‐tau217 with tau PET were evaluated using the Spearman test. Result We found that in CU, both the extent and magnitude of the association with plasma p ‐tau217 were higher for MK6240 compared to FTP (Figure 1A‐D). Plasma p ‐tau217 explained a greater proportion of the variance in MK6240 than in FTP (Figure 1E‐F). In CI, the extent and magnitude of the association were similar for MK6240 and FTP. Additionally, plasma p ‐tau217 explained a similar proportion of the variance in MK6240 and FTP. Using the subset of individuals who had all tau tracers, MK6240 showed a slightly higher extent of association with p ‐tau217, followed by FTP, PI2620, and RO948 (Figure 2A‐B). The magnitude of association was stronger for MK6240, followed by PI2620, RO948, and FTP (Figure 2C‐D). Plasma p ‐tau217 explained a greater proportion of the variance in MK6240, followed by FTP, RO948, and PI2620 (Figure 2E‐F). We compared the associations between different p ‐tau217 assays, and both assays presented similar associations with all tau PET tracers (Figure 3). Conclusion In summary, our results indicate that the four tau PET tracers exhibit robust associations with plasma p ‐tau217 in similar topographical regions.

Abstract Background Standardizing tau pathology quantification in vivo is challenged by inherent characteristics of tau‐PET tracers. The HEAD study aims to generate a leading, longitudinal head‐to‐head dataset of MK‐6240, Flortaucipir, RO948, and PI‐2620 tau‐PET to harmonize tracers' outcomes and develop tools to generalize findings across studies and trials. Here, we provide an update on the progression of the HEAD study. Method HEAD is a multicentric study comprising nine performance sites. Recruitment aimed for 620 individuals between 18‐28 or 50‐90 years, classified as Young/CU/MCI/Dementia. The HEAD protocol involves clinical assessment utilizing the NACC Uniform Data Set, blood collection for banking of plasma/serum/buffy coat/whole blood, and MRI acquisition based on ADNI4. All participants undergo amyloid‐PET with either PiB/NAV4694/Florbetaben/Flutemetamol. All undergo head‐to‐head tau‐PET with at least two tracers, including MK‐6240 (90‐110), Flortaucipir (80‐100), PI‐2620 (45‐75), and RO948 (70‐90). PET data is reconstructed and processed uniformly similarly to ADNI4. The Laboratory of Neuroimaging (LONI) provides centralized databasing, and the National Centralized Repository for ADRD (NCRAD) provides the blood biorepository for all samples. All study procedures are repeated at 18 months. Result Over 26 months, N = 679 participants were enrolled into HEAD, exceeding our proposed enrollment by 9.5%. Mean age of older adults is 72.1 years, female distribution is 54%, and 24% of individuals are from underrepresented groups (race/ethnicity/rurality). Progression in data collection has led to N = 551 (81%) of enrolled participants having a completed initial timepoint, and 1,489 total acquired head‐to‐head tau‐PET scans (mean acquisition window=34.9 days). Clinical characteristics including group distribution, APOEε4 carriership, plasma biomarker distribution (Aβ42/40 ratio/NfL/GFAP/PTau217), consensus visual rating of amyloid‐PET, and Braak stage classification are summarized in Figure 1. Two representative cases (CU/AD) of head‐to‐head tau‐PET with four tau tracers are shown in Figure 2. Longitudinal data collection has been initiated in N = 95 participants. Figure 3. demonstrates two cases (CU/MCI) of 18‐month longitudinal head‐to‐head tau‐PET with MK‐6240 and Flortaucipir. Conclusion The HEAD study cohort represents a continued effort in the optimization of AD imaging biomarkers. Cross‐sectional and longitudinal data collection in HEAD are ongoing, in addition to comprehensive plasma biomarker measurements. Generation of findings from HEAD cohort data will provide novel and crucial guidance on the use of tau‐PET tracers.

Abstract Background Standardizing tau pathology quantification in vivo is challenged by inherent characteristics of tau‐PET tracers. The HEAD study aims to generate a leading, longitudinal head‐to‐head dataset of MK‐6240, Flortaucipir, RO948, and PI‐2620 tau‐PET to harmonize tracers' outcomes and develop tools to generalize findings across studies and trials. Here, we provide an update on the progression of the HEAD study. Method HEAD is a multicentric study comprising nine performance sites. Recruitment aimed for 620 individuals between 18‐28 or 50‐90 years, classified as Young/CU/MCI/Dementia. The HEAD protocol involves clinical assessment utilizing the NACC Uniform Data Set, blood collection for banking of plasma/serum/buffy coat/whole blood, and MRI acquisition based on ADNI4. All participants undergo amyloid‐PET with either PiB/NAV4694/Florbetaben/Flutemetamol. All undergo head‐to‐head tau‐PET with at least two tracers, including MK‐6240 (90‐110), Flortaucipir (80‐100), PI‐2620 (45‐75), and RO948 (70‐90). PET data is reconstructed and processed uniformly similarly to ADNI4. The Laboratory of Neuroimaging (LONI) provides centralized databasing, and the National Centralized Repository for ADRD (NCRAD) provides the blood biorepository for all samples. All study procedures are repeated at 18 months. Result Over 26 months, N = 679 participants were enrolled into HEAD, exceeding our proposed enrollment by 9.5%. Mean age of older adults is 72.1 years, female distribution is 54%, and 24% of individuals are from underrepresented groups (race/ethnicity/rurality). Progression in data collection has led to N = 551 (81%) of enrolled participants having a completed initial timepoint, and 1,489 total acquired head‐to‐head tau‐PET scans (mean acquisition window=34.9 days). Clinical characteristics including group distribution, APOEε4 carriership, plasma biomarker distribution (Aβ42/40 ratio/NfL/GFAP/PTau217), consensus visual rating of amyloid‐PET, and Braak stage classification are summarized in Figure 1. Two representative cases (CU/AD) of head‐to‐head tau‐PET with four tau tracers are shown in Figure 2. Longitudinal data collection has been initiated in N = 95 participants. Figure 3. demonstrates two cases (CU/MCI) of 18‐month longitudinal head‐to‐head tau‐PET with MK‐6240 and Flortaucipir. Conclusion The HEAD study cohort represents a continued effort in the optimization of AD imaging biomarkers. Cross‐sectional and longitudinal data collection in HEAD are ongoing, in addition to comprehensive plasma biomarker measurements. Generation of findings from HEAD cohort data will provide novel and crucial guidance on the use of tau‐PET tracers.

Abstract Background Tau phosphorylation and aggregation are hallmark features of Alzheimer's disease pathology(AD). Previous studies have shown that plasma phosphorylated tau( p ‐tau) at threonine 217 can detect AD‐related tau tangle pathology. However, the head‐to‐head association between p ‐tau217 and different tau PET tracers remains unexplored. Here, we conducted a head‐to‐head comparison of the association between plasma p ‐tau217 and four distinct tau PET tracers[MK6240, Flortaucipir(FTP), PI2620, RO948]. Method We studied 338 individuals across the AD continuum from the HEAD study[190 cognitively unimpaired elderly(CU), 109 with mild cognitive impairment(MCI), and 39 with dementia] with available FTP, MK6240, and plasma p ‐tau217 measured by ALZpath assay. A subset of 64 individuals(28 CU, 25 MCI, and 11 dementia) also had PI2620 and RO948, and p ‐tau217 measured by Lumipulse. The strength of the association was determined using t‐value maps from regression models testing the association between each tau PET tracer and plasma p ‐tau217, and the extent was measured by the percentage of significant voxels(t‐value>3.2). R‐square metric was used to determine how much of the variance in tau PET tracer estimates was explained by plasma p ‐tau217 concentrations. Associations between p ‐tau217 with tau PET were evaluated using the Spearman test. Result We found that in CU, both the extent and magnitude of the association with plasma p ‐tau217 were higher for MK6240 compared to FTP (Figures 1A‐D). Plasma p ‐tau217 explained a greater proportion of the variance in MK6240 than in FTP (Figures 1E‐F). In CI, the extent and magnitude of the association were similar for MK6240 and FTP. Additionally, plasma p ‐tau217 explained a similar proportion of the variance in MK6240 and FTP. Using the subset of individuals who had all tau tracers, MK6240 showed a slightly higher extent of association with p ‐tau217, followed by FTP, PI2620, and RO948 (Figures 2A‐B). The magnitude of association was stronger for MK6240, followed by PI2620, RO948, and FTP (Figures 2C‐D). Plasma p ‐tau217 explained a greater proportion of the variance in MK6240, followed by FTP, RO948, and PI2620 (Figures 2E‐F). We compared the associations between different p ‐tau217 assays, and both assays presented similar associations with all tau PET tracers (Figure 3). Conclusion In summary, our results indicate that the four tau PET tracers exhibit robust associations with plasma p ‐tau217 in similar topographical regions.

AbstractBackgroundStandardizing tau pathology quantification in vivo is challenged by differences in binding characteristics between tau‐PET tracers. The HEAD study aims to generate a leading, longitudinal head‐to‐head dataset of MK‐6240, Flortaucipir, RO948, and PI‐2620 tau‐PET to harmonize these tracers' outcomes and develop tools allowing for the generalization of findings across large studies and trials. Here, we present current advancements in building the HEAD study cohort and dataset.MethodsThe HEAD study is managed at the University of Pittsburgh. HEAD comprises several sites across the US and Canada in which 620 subjects (young, cognitively unimpaired, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer’s disease (AD)) will undergo tau‐PET with at least two tracers, amyloid‐PET with PiB or NAV4694, MRI, blood collection, and standardized neuropsychological testing at baseline and at 18‐month follow‐up. PET and MRI acquisition parameters are based on ADNI4 protocols and neuropsychological testing employs the NACC Uniform Data Set. The National Centralized Repository for AD serves as the biorepository for blood samples and the Laboratory of Neuroimaging provides a centralized database for imaging and neuropsychological archiving. PET data is reconstructed to maximize cross‐scanner harmonization and is processed uniformly similarly to ADNI4 PET.ResultsIn one year of active enrollment (Jan 2023‐Jan 2024), 362 participants were enrolled at six active sites; over 80% of participants completed neuropsychological testing and MRI, and over 70% completed Flortaucipir, MK‐6240, and amyloid‐PET, with a mean tau‐PET acquisition window of 29.1 days. RO948 and PI‐2620 tau‐PET are additionally acquired in a subset currently including 41 participants (Figure 1). Current HEAD cohort demographics including age, sex, underrepresented populations, and group distributions, APOEε4 carrier status, and amyloid positivity are shown in Figure 2. A case of a subject with AD with all 4 tau‐PET tracers acquired head‐to‐head within 49 days is shown in Figure 3.ConclusionThe HEAD study represents a continued effort in the optimization of AD imaging biomarkers. Baseline data collection is projected to be completed in 2024; results being generated by multiple groups from this dataset will provide novel and crucial guidance on the use of tau‐PET tracers in research, clinical trials, and prospectively in clinical practice.

AbstractBackgroundUtilizing PET amyloid‐beta (Aβ) and tau for staging Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) has demonstrated potential in identifying individuals with varying degrees of disease severity, applicable to both clinical trials and practice. However, the diverse binding characteristics of tau tracers pose challenges to the application of this staging across different ligands. In this study, we evaluate a novel staging framework proposed by the AA working group, employing Aβ PET and either [18F]MK6240 or [18F]Flortaucipir in individuals participating in a head‐to‐head study of tau PET tracers. This will provide insights into the robustness of this framework when applied across different tau ligands.MethodWe evaluated 154 people (89 CU and 65 CI), with MK6240, Flortaucipir, Aβ‐PET, MRI. SUVRs used inferior cerebellar gray as reference. Participants were categorized in Aβ positivity(A), using visual read, and tau positivity (T) in medial temporal lobe(MTL) and neocortex(NEO). Tau MTL(TMTL) and NEO positivity were defined as average +3 SD of youngs. NEO moderate(TMOD) and high(THIGH) was defined as below and above median SUVR of NEO‐positive individuals. Individuals were grouped as: A‐T‐, A+T‐, A+TMTL+(early), A+TMOD+(intermediary), and A+THIGH+(advanced).ResultsWe found that the distribution of the number of individuals across the five AD stages was comparable when using both MK6240 and Flortaucipir tracers (Figure 1). However, upon examining the concordance within each group, we found a low concordance of 30% (3/10) between tracers in the early tau stage (A+TMTL+). Concordance increased in the intermediary stage A+TMOD+, with a rate of 65% (9/14), and further increased to 79% (11/14) in the advanced stage (A+THIGH+). The A+T‐ group exhibited the highest concordance between tracer results, at 95% (21/22).ConclusionOur findings indicate that the application of this framework across different populations using different tau tracers can lead to a compatible distribution among groups. However, in a direct comparison, we noted that this did not necessarily result in high concordance between groups, as group shifts were observed that depended on the cutoffs used (data not shown). These results emphasize the necessity for harmonization of tau PET tracers prior to their utilization for stage determination.

AbstractBackgroundTau PET tracers are employed to measure the accumulation of tau in vivo in the brain. Each tau tracer possesses unique characteristics, including binding affinity, sensitivity, and specificity to tau aggregates. This study leverages the HEAD study dataset, which is currently performing baseline tau PET tracers and conducting multiple clinical and cognitive assessments. The objective of this study is to elucidate the relationship between tau PET tracers [18F]Flortaucipir and [18F]MK6240 and commonly used tests of general cognitive performance.MethodsWe assessed 170 individuals (107 cognitively unimpaired, and 63 cognitively impaired) with available PET [18F]Flortaucipir [18F]MK6240 and cognitive assessments (MoCA, MMSE, and CDR‐SB). We calculated tau PET SUVR for [18F]Flortaucipir and [18F]MK6240 using the inferior cerebellar grey matter as a reference. Pearson correlations were performed between SUVR values for each Braak region and MoCA, MMSE, and CDR‐SB. In addition, linear regression models accounting for age, sex, years of education, HEAD site, and diagnosis were used to estimate the relationships. The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) was utilized to evaluate the models, with smaller AIC values signifying better performance.ResultsPerson correlation coefficients (r), which were calculated without considering any covariates, demonstrated higher numerical values between [18F]MK6240 and the scores of MoCA, MMSE, and CDR‐SB across the Braak regions (Figure 1). Similarly, when we performed linear regressions that accounted for relevant covariates, we found that the [18F]MK6240 SUVR in Braak 1 and Braak 4 regions exhibited a stronger association with cognitive tests than in other Braak regions or any region with [18F]Flortaucipir SUVR (Figure 2).ConclusionsBoth [18F]Flortaucipir and [18F]MK6240 SUVR demonstrated a robust association with tests of general cognitive performance commonly used in AD research and clinical practice. Generally, Braak regions 1 and 4 exhibited a stronger association with general cognitive performance using all tests, whereas Braak regions 5‐6 showed the weakest association.

AbstractBackgroundStandardizing tau pathology quantification in vivo is challenged by differences in binding characteristics between tau‐PET tracers. The HEAD study aims to generate a leading, longitudinal head‐to‐head dataset of MK‐6240, Flortaucipir, RO948, and PI‐2620 tau‐PET to harmonize these tracers' outcomes and develop tools allowing for the generalization of findings across large studies and trials. Here, we present current advancements in building the HEAD study cohort and dataset.MethodsThe HEAD study is managed at the University of Pittsburgh. HEAD comprises several sites across the US and Canada in which 620 subjects (young, cognitively unimpaired, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer’s disease (AD)) will undergo tau‐PET with at least two tracers, amyloid‐PET with PiB or NAV4694, MRI, blood collection, and standardized neuropsychological testing at baseline and at 18‐month follow‐up. PET and MRI acquisition parameters are based on ADNI4 protocols and neuropsychological testing employs the NACC Uniform Data Set. The National Centralized Repository for AD serves as the biorepository for blood samples and the Laboratory of Neuroimaging provides a centralized database for imaging and neuropsychological archiving. PET data is reconstructed to maximize cross‐scanner harmonization and is processed uniformly similarly to ADNI4 PET.ResultsIn one year of active enrollment (Jan 2023‐Jan 2024), 362 participants were enrolled at six active sites; over 80% of participants completed neuropsychological testing and MRI, and over 70% completed Flortaucipir, MK‐6240, and amyloid‐PET, with a mean tau‐PET acquisition window of 29.1 days. RO948 and PI‐2620 tau‐PET are additionally acquired in a subset currently including 41 participants (Fig.1). Current HEAD cohort demographics including age, sex, underrepresented populations, and group distributions, APOEe4 carrier status, and amyloid positivity are shown in Fig.2. A case of a subject with AD with all 4 tau‐PET tracers acquired head‐to‐head within 49 days is shown in Fig.3.ConclusionThe HEAD study represents a continued effort in the optimization of AD imaging biomarkers. Baseline data collection is projected to be completed in 2024; results being generated by multiple groups from this dataset will provide novel and crucial guidance on the use of tau‐PET tracers in research, clinical trials, and prospectively in clinical practice.

AbstractBackgroundUtilizing PET amyloid‐beta (Aß) and tau for staging Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) has demonstrated potential in identifying individuals with varying degrees of disease severity, applicable to both clinical trials and practice. However, the diverse binding characteristics of tau tracers pose challenges to the application of this staging across different ligands. In this study, we evaluate a novel staging framework proposed by the AA working group, employing Aß PET and either [18F]MK6240 or [18F]Flortaucipir in individuals participating in a head‐to‐head study of tau PET tracers. This will provide insights into the robustness of this framework when applied across different tau ligands.MethodWe evaluated 154 people (89 CU and 65 CI), with MK6240, Flortaucipir, Aß‐PET, MRI. SUVRs used inferior cerebellar gray as reference. Participants were categorized in Aß positivity(A), using visual read, and tau positivity (T) in medial temporal lobe(MTL) and neocortex(NEO). Tau MTL(TMTL) and NEO positivity were defined as average +3 SD of youngs. NEO moderate(TMOD) and high(THIGH) was defined as below and above median SUVR of NEO‐positive individuals. Individuals were grouped as: A‐T‐, A+T‐, A+TMTL+(early), A+TMOD+(intermediary), and A+THIGH+(advanced).ResultsWe found that the distribution of the number of individuals across the five AD stages was comparable when using both MK6240 and Flortaucipir tracers (Figure 1). However, upon examining the concordance within each group, we found a low concordance of 30% (3/10) between tracers in the early tau stage (A+TMTL+). Concordance increased in the intermediary stage A+TMOD+, with a rate of 65% (9/14), and further increased to 79% (11/14) in the advanced stage (A+THIGH+). The A+T‐ group exhibited the highest concordance between tracer results, at 95% (21/22).ConclusionOur findings indicate that the application of this framework across different populations using different tau tracers can lead to a compatible distribution among groups. However, in a direct comparison, we noted that this did not necessarily result in high concordance between groups, as group shifts were observed that depended on the cutoffs used (data not shown). These results emphasize the necessity for harmonization of tau PET tracers prior to their utilization for stage determination.