Cehula, Juli

Abstract Background Standardizing tau pathology quantification in vivo is challenged by inherent characteristics of tau‐PET tracers. The HEAD study aims to generate a leading, longitudinal head‐to‐head dataset of MK‐6240, Flortaucipir, RO948, and PI‐2620 tau‐PET to harmonize tracers' outcomes and develop tools to generalize findings across studies and trials. Here, we provide an update on the progression of the HEAD study. Method HEAD is a multicentric study comprising nine performance sites. Recruitment aimed for 620 individuals between 18‐28 or 50‐90 years, classified as Young/CU/MCI/Dementia. The HEAD protocol involves clinical assessment utilizing the NACC Uniform Data Set, blood collection for banking of plasma/serum/buffy coat/whole blood, and MRI acquisition based on ADNI4. All participants undergo amyloid‐PET with either PiB/NAV4694/Florbetaben/Flutemetamol. All undergo head‐to‐head tau‐PET with at least two tracers, including MK‐6240 (90‐110), Flortaucipir (80‐100), PI‐2620 (45‐75), and RO948 (70‐90). PET data is reconstructed and processed uniformly similarly to ADNI4. The Laboratory of Neuroimaging (LONI) provides centralized databasing, and the National Centralized Repository for ADRD (NCRAD) provides the blood biorepository for all samples. All study procedures are repeated at 18 months. Result Over 26 months, N = 679 participants were enrolled into HEAD, exceeding our proposed enrollment by 9.5%. Mean age of older adults is 72.1 years, female distribution is 54%, and 24% of individuals are from underrepresented groups (race/ethnicity/rurality). Progression in data collection has led to N = 551 (81%) of enrolled participants having a completed initial timepoint, and 1,489 total acquired head‐to‐head tau‐PET scans (mean acquisition window=34.9 days). Clinical characteristics including group distribution, APOEε4 carriership, plasma biomarker distribution (Aβ42/40 ratio/NfL/GFAP/PTau217), consensus visual rating of amyloid‐PET, and Braak stage classification are summarized in Figure 1. Two representative cases (CU/AD) of head‐to‐head tau‐PET with four tau tracers are shown in Figure 2. Longitudinal data collection has been initiated in N = 95 participants. Figure 3. demonstrates two cases (CU/MCI) of 18‐month longitudinal head‐to‐head tau‐PET with MK‐6240 and Flortaucipir. Conclusion The HEAD study cohort represents a continued effort in the optimization of AD imaging biomarkers. Cross‐sectional and longitudinal data collection in HEAD are ongoing, in addition to comprehensive plasma biomarker measurements. Generation of findings from HEAD cohort data will provide novel and crucial guidance on the use of tau‐PET tracers.

Abstract Background Tau phosphorylation and aggregation are hallmark features of Alzheimer's disease pathology(AD). Previous studies have shown that plasma phosphorylated tau( p ‐tau) at threonine 217 can detect AD‐related tau tangle pathology. However, the head‐to‐head association between p ‐tau217 and different tau PET tracers remains unexplored. Here, we conducted a head‐to‐head comparison of the association between plasma p ‐tau217 and four distinct tau PET tracers[MK6240, Flortaucipir(FTP), PI2620, RO948]. Method We studied 338 individuals across the AD continuum from the HEAD study[190 cognitively unimpaired elderly(CU), 109 with mild cognitive impairment(MCI), and 39 with dementia] with available FTP, MK6240, and plasma p ‐tau217 measured by ALZpath assay. A subset of 64 individuals(28 CU, 25 MCI, and 11 dementia) also had PI2620 and RO948, and p ‐tau217 measured by Lumipulse. The strength of the association was determined using t‐value maps from regression models testing the association between each tau PET tracer and plasma p ‐tau217, and the extent was measured by the percentage of significant voxels(t‐value>3.2). R‐square metric was used to determine how much of the variance in tau PET tracer estimates was explained by plasma p ‐tau217 concentrations. Associations between p ‐tau217 with tau PET were evaluated using the Spearman test. Result We found that in CU, both the extent and magnitude of the association with plasma p ‐tau217 were higher for MK6240 compared to FTP (Figures 1A‐D). Plasma p ‐tau217 explained a greater proportion of the variance in MK6240 than in FTP (Figures 1E‐F). In CI, the extent and magnitude of the association were similar for MK6240 and FTP. Additionally, plasma p ‐tau217 explained a similar proportion of the variance in MK6240 and FTP. Using the subset of individuals who had all tau tracers, MK6240 showed a slightly higher extent of association with p ‐tau217, followed by FTP, PI2620, and RO948 (Figures 2A‐B). The magnitude of association was stronger for MK6240, followed by PI2620, RO948, and FTP (Figures 2C‐D). Plasma p ‐tau217 explained a greater proportion of the variance in MK6240, followed by FTP, RO948, and PI2620 (Figures 2E‐F). We compared the associations between different p ‐tau217 assays, and both assays presented similar associations with all tau PET tracers (Figure 3). Conclusion In summary, our results indicate that the four tau PET tracers exhibit robust associations with plasma p ‐tau217 in similar topographical regions.