Rosa‐Neto, Pedro

Abstract Background Variability in meningeal signal has been observed with various tau‐PET tracers. Differences have been observed in sex and age. Furthermore, the potential role of glymphatic clearance in this variability remains unclear. Here we compare meningeal signal of [ 18 F]MK6240 and [ 18 F]FTP tau‐PET tracers in cognitively unimpaired (CU) amyloid‐β‐ (Aβ‐) individuals, in relation to age, sex and glymphatic clearance. Methods 92 CU Aβ‐ (7 CU young [18‐35yo] and 85 CU old) underwent [ 18 F]MK6240 and [ 18 F]FTP tau‐PET scans, structural MRI, and resting‐state functional MRI (rsfMRI). In native space, we defined nine distinct levels representing meningeal regions, organized from those closest to the cortex (1) to those furthest away (9). Glymphatic clearance, measured as gBOLD/CSF coupling, was calculated for each participant; a lower value means a more efficient glymphatic clearance. Associations between meningeal tracer signal and factors such as sex, age, and glymphatic clearance were analyzed using t‐tests and linear regression models. Results All 9 meningeal regions were tested and rendered similar results; we will be showing those for meninges level 2. [ 18 F]MK6240 and [ 18 F]FTP meningeal signal significantly correlated with each other in both sexes (Figure 1). We observed higher [ 18 F]MK6240 meningeal signal in females compared to males while no difference was found for [ 18 F]FTP signal (Figure 2). In females, [ 18 F]MK6240 meningeal signal did not show a significant association with age, whereas in males, a significant relationship was observed. Both males and females exhibited lower [ 18 F]FTP meningeal signal with increasing age (Figure 3A). Additionally, glymphatic clearance was significantly associated with age for females with [ 18 F]MK6240. No significant associations were found in males with [ 18 F]MK6240 or in either sex for [ 18 F]FTP (Figure 3B). Conclusion Our findings demonstrate that meningeal signal of [ 18 F]MK6240 is significantly associated with glymphatic clearance in females, while in males, it is associated with age. In contrast, [ 18 F]FTP signal is primarily influenced by age in both sexes. These results highlight the distinct relationship between [ 18 F]MK6240 signal and glymphatic function in females, while age appears to play a significant role in both males and females for other tracer signal patterns.

Abstract Background Standardizing tau pathology quantification in vivo is challenged by inherent characteristics of tau‐PET tracers. The HEAD study aims to generate a leading, longitudinal head‐to‐head dataset of MK‐6240, Flortaucipir, RO948, and PI‐2620 tau‐PET to harmonize tracers' outcomes and develop tools to generalize findings across studies and trials. Here, we provide an update on the progression of the HEAD study. Method HEAD is a multicentric study comprising nine performance sites. Recruitment aimed for 620 individuals between 18‐28 or 50‐90 years, classified as Young/CU/MCI/Dementia. The HEAD protocol involves clinical assessment utilizing the NACC Uniform Data Set, blood collection for banking of plasma/serum/buffy coat/whole blood, and MRI acquisition based on ADNI4. All participants undergo amyloid‐PET with either PiB/NAV4694/Florbetaben/Flutemetamol. All undergo head‐to‐head tau‐PET with at least two tracers, including MK‐6240 (90‐110), Flortaucipir (80‐100), PI‐2620 (45‐75), and RO948 (70‐90). PET data is reconstructed and processed uniformly similarly to ADNI4. The Laboratory of Neuroimaging (LONI) provides centralized databasing, and the National Centralized Repository for ADRD (NCRAD) provides the blood biorepository for all samples. All study procedures are repeated at 18 months. Result Over 26 months, N = 679 participants were enrolled into HEAD, exceeding our proposed enrollment by 9.5%. Mean age of older adults is 72.1 years, female distribution is 54%, and 24% of individuals are from underrepresented groups (race/ethnicity/rurality). Progression in data collection has led to N = 551 (81%) of enrolled participants having a completed initial timepoint, and 1,489 total acquired head‐to‐head tau‐PET scans (mean acquisition window=34.9 days). Clinical characteristics including group distribution, APOEε4 carriership, plasma biomarker distribution (Aβ42/40 ratio/NfL/GFAP/PTau217), consensus visual rating of amyloid‐PET, and Braak stage classification are summarized in Figure 1. Two representative cases (CU/AD) of head‐to‐head tau‐PET with four tau tracers are shown in Figure 2. Longitudinal data collection has been initiated in N = 95 participants. Figure 3. demonstrates two cases (CU/MCI) of 18‐month longitudinal head‐to‐head tau‐PET with MK‐6240 and Flortaucipir. Conclusion The HEAD study cohort represents a continued effort in the optimization of AD imaging biomarkers. Cross‐sectional and longitudinal data collection in HEAD are ongoing, in addition to comprehensive plasma biomarker measurements. Generation of findings from HEAD cohort data will provide novel and crucial guidance on the use of tau‐PET tracers.