Back to Authors

Balf, Dragos

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic Health System

Citations 2

Atrial and Ventricular Dyssynchrony, Cardiomyopathy, and Atrial Fibrillation: To Synchronize or to Ablate First?
Dai, Qiying , Asirvatham, Samuel J. , Cha, Yong‐Mei , Balf, Dragos, Hart, Courtney, Liu, Xiaoke , Asirvatham, Samuel J , Hart, Courtney, Liu, Xiaoke

Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology | November 25, 2025 | Volume: 49 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 161-165

10.1111/pace.70095 Get It

ABSTRACT Background Optimal management in patients presenting with persistent atrial fibrillation, cardiomyopathy, and atrial as well as ventricular dyssynchrony with left bundle branch block is unclear. Results and Methods A 67‐year‐old female patient presented with persistent atrial fibrillation, cardiomyopathy with a newly reduced ejection fraction (EF), increased P wave duration on electrocardiogram (ECG) and left bundle branch block. After shared decision making, the patient elected to proceed with Bachman bundle/left bundle branch area pacing plus atrioventricular (AV) node ablation. At 6‐month follow‐up post procedure, a repeat echocardiogram showed normalized atrial size and EF (65%). Device interrogation demonstrated no recurrent atrial fibrillation with the patient off antiarrhythmic and heart failure medical therapy. Conclusions Integrated atrial and ventricular synchronization through Bachmann bundle and left bundle branch area pacing may help break the cycle of dyssynchrony, remodeling, and arrhythmia. In combination with AV node ablation, it may be considered as an alternative treatment option in certain cases after shared decision making.
Successful management of complete heart block in checkpoint inhibitor induced myocarditis by left bundle branch area pacing: a case report
Balf, Dragos, Raza, Mohammad Q. , Meyers, Michael, Liu, Xiaoke , Meyers, Michael, Liu, Xiaoke

European Heart Journal - Case Reports | November 15, 2024 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 11 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/ehjcr/ytae579 Get It

Abstract Background Optimal management of checkpoint inhibitor-induced complete heart block is unknown. Previous reports showed relatively high incidence of pacing failure due to the co-existing myocarditis. Case summary A 71-year-old male with a prior history of stage IV metastatic squamous cell lung cancer presents was admitted for dyspnoea and hypotension 10 days after checkpoint inhibitor treatment using pembrolizumab. He was found to have myocarditis, third-degree AV block, severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction with EF 35%, and required pressure support. A dual chamber pacemaker using left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) was urgently placed that immediately improved his haemodynamics. Both the cathode and anode were able to capture the ventricle at different pacing outputs. The patient was taken off all intravenous pressors and successfully transferred to a larger centre for further management of the myocarditis with no further arrhythmia or hypotension. Discussion In conclusion, because of the unique ability to capture a large amount of myocardium from both the tip and ring electrodes as well as the ability to deliver cardiac resynchronization therapy, LBBAP may be the preferred pacing strategy in patients who develop complete heart block due to checkpoint inhibitor-induced myocarditis.