Huang, Harvey

Abstract Human visual cortex comprises three interacting streams, but anatomy and correlated activity cannot determine the direction or reliability of interareal influence. Characterizing directional interactions among these streams can reveal the architecture through which activity can propagate across the visual system. Here, we used single-pulse electrical stimulation during intracranial EEG recordings in 17 patients to map directed causal influences among 22 atlas-defined visual cortical areas. The resulting effective connectivity matrix revealed a selective and asymmetric architecture of interareal influence. Feedforward influences from early visual areas to the dorsal, lateral, and ventral streams were more reliable and more prevalent than feedback influences. Cross-stream interactions favored temporal-to-parietal over parietal-to-temporal influence, with higher response reliability and a greater proportion of significant responses among sampled connections. Network-level profiles were consistent with source-like organization in early visual areas and the ventral stream, and integrator-like organization in the dorsal and lateral streams. Independent visual-task data collected in three of the same patients illustrated how stimulation-derived connectivity may relate to functional responses across connected visual regions. These findings reveal a directional architecture for activity propagation across the human visual cortex and provide empirical constraints for biologically grounded models of visual processing.

Objective The effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) manifest across multiple timescales, spanning seconds to months, and involve direct electrical effects, neuroplasticity, and network reorganization. In epilepsy, the delayed impact of DBS on seizures presents challenges for optimization. Single‐pulse stimulation and resulting brain stimulation evoked potentials (BSEPs) provide a means to assess effective connectivity and network excitability. This study integrates BSEPs and short trials of DBS during stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) to map seizure network engagement, modulate network dynamics, and monitor excitability and interictal abnormalities for biomarker informed neuromodulation. Methods Ten individuals with drug resistant epilepsy undergoing clinical sEEG were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study of epilepsy neuromodulation biomarkers. Each patient underwent a trial of high frequency (145Hz) thalamic DBS. BSEPs were acquired before and after DBS trials. Baseline BSEP amplitude assessed seizure network engagement, and modulation of amplitude (pre vs post DBS) assessed change in network excitability. Interictal epileptiform discharges were tracked by an automated classifier. Results Baseline BSEPs delineated distinct patterns of network engagement between thalamic subfields with maximal frontotemporal engagement achieved with stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus‐ventral anterior nucleus junction. DBS delivered for >1.5 hours reduced BSEP amplitudes compared to baseline, and the degree of modulation correlated with baseline connectivity strength. Shorter DBS trials did not induce reliable BSEP amplitude suppression, but did immediately suppress interictal epileptiform discharge rates in well‐connected seizure networks. Interpretation BSEPs and trials of DBS during sEEG provide novel network biomarkers to evaluate the modulation of large‐scale networks across multiple timescales, advancing biomarker informed neuromodulation. ANN NEUROL 2026;99:748–760

Abstract Electrical stimulation is increasingly used to modulate brain networks for clinical purposes. The basic unit of neurostimulation, a single electrical pulse, can travel through white matter to influence connected neuronal populations. However, the mechanisms by which it influences connected populations is not well understood: stimulation may excite, inhibit, or add noise to neuronal population activity. In this study, we investigated how single pulses modulate the neuronal processing of images in a well-controlled visual paradigm. In two human subjects implanted with iEEG electrodes for clinical purposes, single pulses were delivered to electrodes in white matter tracts connected to measurement electrodes in visual cortex. Images appeared on-screen at 0, 100, or 200 ms after each pulse. Using finite impulse response modeling, we decomposed the broadband and evoked potential responses into separate components induced by electrical stimulation and by visual processing. Single pulses induced transient broadband increases followed by suppression, but they did not modulate the visual broadband responses (i.e., stimulation response was additive to visual response). In contrast, single pulses elicited prominent brain stimulation evoked potentials and they modulated the visual evoked potentials. Specifically, visual evoked potentials were larger when stimulation occurred closer to visual onset. This indicates that a single electrical pulse can increase the strength or synchrony of visual inputs. Overall, these findings suggest that the effects of electrical stimulation in the visual system are two-fold: stimulation induces additive effects on broadband power, possibly by adding noise, and it interacts with synchronous visual inputs to amplify them.

Abstract Brain responses to sensory stimuli depend on the specific task performed by the observer. Previously, fMRI measurements in ventral temporal cortex (VTC) showed that BOLD responses to visual input scale with task demands. This scaling of BOLD responses is thought to be driven by the engagement of cognitive functions required for the task. To better understand how these cognitive task demands influence neural activity in VTC, we measured electrocorticography (ECoG) responses to images of varying contrast in two human participants during either a fixation or image categorization task. ECoG high frequency broadband activity (>70 Hz) showed that local neuronal responses increased with image contrast as expected for sensory encoding, and were scaled by task demands approximately 200 ms after stimulus onset. In contrast, ECoG low frequency activity in the alpha/beta range (8-28 Hz) was insensitive to image contrast and showed larger decreases with increasing task demands. These results indicate that high frequencies in VTC reflect both the encoding of sensory inputs and task demands, similar to prior BOLD response measurements, whereas low frequency oscillations represent task demands, not sensory inputs per se. In line with the interpretation that low frequency oscillations reflect pulsed inhibition, we speculate that a power decrease in low frequency oscillations amplifies neural activity in VTC in support of visual task demands.

Abstract The pulvinar has been proposed as an effective neuromodulation target for patients with posterior quadrant and temporal epilepsies. However, the pulvinar has a large tissue volume, multiple subnuclei, and widespread cortical connections. It remains unknown whether electrical stimulation of distinct pulvinar subregions affects the temporal, occipital, and parietal areas differently. To address this gap, we delivered single-pulse electrical stimulation to the pulvinar and measured the resulting brain stimulation evoked potentials in twelve patients undergoing stereotactic EEG for drug-resistant epilepsy. Brain stimulation evoked potentials were parameterized across the occipital, temporal and parietal cortex. Stimulation of the lateral pulvinar elicited significant brain stimulation evoked potentials in striate and extrastriate areas that diminish as stimulation shifts towards the medial pulvinar. Conversely, stimulation of the ventral aspect of the medial pulvinar produced significant lateral temporal evoked potentials, which diminish with lateral pulvinar stimulation. We also found that stimulation of the dorsomedial pulvinar evoked significant parietal responses with limited striate/extrastriate and lateral temporal responses. These results demonstrate that electrical stimulation of specific pulvinar subregions influences distinct occipital, parietal and lateral temporal areas. Selective targeting of pulvinar subregions to maximize seizure network engagement may be essential for individualized treatment of posterior quadrant and temporal epilepsies.