Prat, Aleix

Abstract Background: Quality of life (QOL) in breast cancer patients (pts) can be greatly impacted by initial treatment and ongoing therapy, particularly if side effects and symptoms are not well tolerated. The PALLAS trial investigated whether the addition of 2 years of palbociclib (palbo) to adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) improved invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) over adjuvant ET alone. We report on the main patient-reported outcome (PRO) quality of life (QOL) and symptom severity results of this trial by treatment arm. Methods: PALLAS is an ongoing multicenter, open label phase 3 trial that enrolled hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative, stage II-III breast cancer patients at 406 cancer centers across 21 countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either 2 years of palbo (125mg/day, 3 weeks on 1 week off) plus ongoing provider or patient-choice adjuvant ET (palbo+ET) versus ongoing ET alone. The primary study endpoint was iDFS. Treatment with palbo in all pts stopped at the time of the second interim analysis (5/2020) due to futility; all pts then moved to follow up. The PRO analyses were triggered for completion after awareness of the pre-specified 469 iDFS cases in November 2020. Eight PRO endpoints were measured serially (i.e., day 1 of each monthly cycle for the first 3 months, then every 3 months for the first 2 years, and once at year 3). The endpoints were the EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status/QOL score, the Brief Fatigue Inventory score, the modified Brief Pain Inventory severity and pain interference scores, the EORTC QLQ-BR23 alopecia score, and the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial hot flash symptoms, vaginal problems, and musculoskeletal pain scores. Linear mixed models compared the average difference between arms across time points during the initial 2-year treatment period adjusting for cycle 1 day 1 (C1D1) PRO scores, demographic and clinical variables. The average differences between arms (palbo+ET vs ET alone) and the two-sided (1-[0.05/8]) x 100% confidence intervals, adjusted for multiple comparisons, were calculated. Analysis of covariance compared the average between-arm differences by endpoint at 3 years. Results: The PRO intention to collect population included 4688 (81%) of the overall trial pts, and was clinically and demographically representative of the remaining 1073 pts. Each analysis population, with measures at C1D1 and at least 1 post-C1D1 assessment for each PRO endpoint, comprised ≥ 89% of the 4688 pts and the proportions were similar between arms. After adjustment for baseline covariates, on average, no clinically important differences between arms were observed for any of the eight endpoints over the 2 year treatment period (Table 1). All effect sizes were below the pre-specified 0.2 threshold. These PRO results were similar at the 3 year time point. Conclusions: No clinically significant differences in either patient-reported QOL or symptom severity were found, on average, between participants in the two PALLAS treatment arms while either taking palbo+ET or ET alone, or after study-wide termination of palbo. In general, the addition of palbociclib in the adjuvant breast cancer setting did not contribute to increased symptom burden within this survivorship population. Further analyses will examine the relationship between PROs and treatment discontinuation by arm and study time point. Support: AFT, Pfizer, https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org Table 1.Results of the Patient-Reported QOL and Symptom Severity Analyses Between the Two Treatment Arms During the First 2 Years of PALLASPRO Endpoint *Palbo + ET Adjusted average score (95% CI)ET alone Adjusted average score (95% CI)Average Difference + (Palbo + ET vs ET alone)[99.38% CI] Clinically ++ Important DifferenceEORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL71.7 (71.2, 72.2)74.0 (73.5, 74.5)-2.3 (-3.3, -1.4)**NoBrief Fatigue Inventory Score2.3 (2.2, 2.3)2.1 (2.0, 2.1)0.2 (0.1, 0.3)NoModified Brief Pain Inventory - Severity Score2.3 (2.2, 2.3)2.4 (2.4, 2.5)-0.2 (-0.3, -0.1)NoModified Brief Pain Inventory - Interference Score1.7 (1.6, 1.7)1.7 (1.6, 1.7)0.0 (-0.1, 0.1)NoEORTC QLQ-BR23 Alopecia1.4 (1.4, 1.4)1.3 (1.3, 1.3)0.1 (0.1, 0.1)NoBreast Cancer Prevention Trial - Hot Flash Symptoms1.2 (1.2, 1.3)1.2 (1.2, 1.3)0.0 (-0.1, 0.1)NoBreast Cancer Prevention Trial - Vaginal Problems0.8 (0.8, 0.8)0.8 (0.7, 0.8)0.0 (0.0, 0.1)NoBreast Cancer Prevention Trial - Musculoskeletal Pain1.2 (1.2, 1.2)1.3 (1.3, 1.3)-0.1 (-0.2, 0.0)No* For the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL subscale, higher scores indicate better QOL. For all other PRO endpoints, higher scores indicate worse symptom levels. ** The lower bound of the one-sided CI (adjusted for multiple comparisons) was -3.3. Because the lower limit is greater than the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of -3.44, non-inferiority of palbo+ET relative to ET-alone was concluded. The non-inferiority margin corresponds to a 0.2 SD in the EORTC QLQ-C30 global health/QOL score. +The average difference was adjusted for the following baseline covariates: Cycle 1 day 1 score, region (if applicable), age category, first adjuvant ET, race, ethnicity, N-stage, T-stage, histological grade, PgR, prior chemotherapy, ECOG Performance Status. ++Based on each instrument’s published clinically relevant cut-offs, if available. After calculating Cohen’s d treatment effect sizes, (i.e. by dividing the average difference by the ET-alone arm standard deviation from cycle 1 day 1), all effect sizes were below the pre-specified 0.2 threshold, and would not be considered clinically important. Citation Format: Michelle Joy Naughton, David Zahrieh, Michael Gnant, Nicholas Zdenkowski, Julie Lemieux, Jun J Mao, Vesna Bjelic-Radisic, Eileen Shinn, Marija Balic, Christoph Thomssen, Jane Neisel, Manuel Ruiz-Echarri, Sibylle Loibl, Claudine Isaacs, David Cameron, Fernando Manuel Henao Carrasco, Matthew Goetz, Viktor Wette, Gustavo Werutsky, Hope Rugo, Marcus Vetter, Ling-Ming Tseng, Kathy Miller, Florian Fitzal, Juan Miguel Gil Gil, Haeseong Park, Barbro Linderholm, Emilio Bajetta, Zoneddy Dayao, Aleix Prat, Karin Ehrhardt, Otto Metzger, Amal Arahmani, Ernest Law, Ann Partridge, Lisa Carey, Alex Zoroufy, Amylou Dueck, Dominik Hlauschek, Angela DeMichele, Erica Mayer. Quality of life and symptom severity in the PALLAS randomized trial of palbociclib with adjuvant endocrine therapy in early breast cancer (AFT-05) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-10-01.

Breast cancer is a heterogenous disease with variability in tumor cells and in the surrounding tumor microenvironment (TME). Understanding the molecular diversity in breast cancer is critical for improving prediction of therapeutic response and prognostication. High-plex spatial profiling of tumors enables characterization of heterogeneity in the breast TME, which can holistically illuminate the biology of tumor growth, dissemination and, ultimately, response to therapy. The GeoMx Digital Spatial Profiler (DSP) enables researchers to spatially resolve and quantify proteins and RNA transcripts from tissue sections. The platform is compatible with both formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded and frozen tissues. RNA profiling was developed at the whole transcriptome level for human and mouse samples and protein profiling of 100-plex for human samples. Tissue can be optically segmented for analysis of regions of interest or cell populations to study biology-directed tissue characterization. The GeoMx Breast Cancer Consortium (GBCC) is composed of breast cancer researchers who are developing innovative approaches for spatial profiling to accelerate biomarker discovery. Here, the GBCC presents best practices for GeoMx profiling to promote the collection of high-quality data, optimization of data analysis and integration of datasets to advance collaboration and meta-analyses. Although the capabilities of the platform are presented in the context of breast cancer research, they can be generalized to a variety of other tumor types that are characterized by high heterogeneity.

1011 Background: Several trials have shown 25-30% pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in patients with HER2+ BC treated with LT therapy (+ endocrine therapy if ER+), but no chemotherapy (CTX). We hypothesize that a multiparameter classifier, comprised of HER2 gene and protein levels, intratumor heterogeneity (ITH), HER2-enriched (E) subtype, and PIK3CA mutation status can identify patients whose tumors are “addicted” to HER2 signaling and are likely to achieve pCR from a CTX-sparing de-escalation strategy. Methods: Baseline specimens from 2 trials (TBCRC023 [NCT00999804] and PAMELA [NCT01973660]) of neoadjuvant CTX-sparing LT (+ endocrine therapy if ER+) in HER2+ BC were used. HER2 protein and ITH (scored for % 3+ by IHC), and gene amplification (HER2:CEP17 ratio and copy number (CN) by CISH) were measured on the same slide by the dual gene protein assay (GPA). HER2-E and PIK3CA mutation status were assessed by research-based PAM50 and MSK-IMPACT platforms, respectively. A decision tree algorithm was used to determine the GPA cutoffs and to construct the classifier of response (by pCR) in TBCRC023, which was then validated in PAMELA. Results: Of the evaluable patients from TBCRC023 (N = 130) and PAMELA (N = 151), GPA data were available for 121 and 94 cases, respectively. Both cohorts exhibited similar distributions for HER2 ratio, CN, and % 3+, and a strong correlation between HER2 ratio and CN (R > 0.92). In TBCRC023, 73 cases had data from GPA, PAM50, and IMPACT, of which 15 had pCR. Recursive partitioning identified cutoffs of HER2 ratio > 4.6 and % 3+ > 97.5% in both the GPA data cohort (N = 121) and complete data cohort (N = 73). With PAM50 and IMPACT data, the model added HER2-E and PIK3CA wild-type (wt). For practical reasons, the classifier was locked as HER2 ratio ≥ 4.5 AND % 3+ ≥ 90% AND PIK3CA-wt AND HER2-E, which yielded a PPV of 55% and NPV of 94%. Validation in PAMELA using 45 cases with data for all 3 assays yielded PPV of 44% and NPV of 82%. 29 TBCRC023 cases without IMPACT data could be predicted to be non-pCR, of which 26 were correct (NPV = 89%). In PAMELA, 66 additional cases could be predicted to be non-pCR, of which 54 were correct (NPV = 81%). Conclusions: We have constructed a multiparameter classifier that can predict pCR with targeted therapy alone that compare to pCR rates of CTX + dual anti-HER2 in unselected patients. Prospective validation in a clinical trial is warranted. [Table: see text]

Abstract Background We investigated the clinical outcomes and behavior of HER2+ EBC according to centrally tested HR status in pts treated with modern chemotherapy (CT) and trastuzumab (T)-based regimens. Patients and methods ALTTO is an international phase 3 trial in HER2+ EBC pts randomized to 4 adjuvant anti-HER2 treatment arms: T alone, lapatinib (L) alone, their sequence (T->L) or their combination (T+L). Pts in the L alone arm were excluded from the present analysis. HER2 and HR status were centrally tested for all patients. HER2 status was defined based on the 2007 ASCO/CAP guidelines. HR-positive (HR+) was defined as ≥1% tumor cells with expression of estrogen (ER) and/or progesterone receptors.We investigated the prognosis of pts with HR+ or negative (HR-) HER2+ EBC, the risk of developing early (years 0-5) and late (years 6-8) recurrences, the factors impacting this risk, and the patterns of relapse according to HR status. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare hazard rates within the HR subgroups; a conditional landmark analysis was conducted to investigate late recurrences. For the hazard ratios for HR status, an interaction between log(time) and HR status was included as proportional hazard assumption was not satisfied. Results This analysis included 6,271 HER2+ pts of whom 3,601 (57%) had HR+ and 2,670(43%) HR- EBC. Median follow-up was 6.93 years (range 6.81-6.96). 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 86% (85-87) in HR+ and 83% (82-85) in HR- pts; 8-year DFS was 80% (78-81) in HR+ and 79% (77-81) in HR- pts. The mean annual hazards of recurrence in years 0-5 were 3% in HR+ and 4% in HR- pts, while in years 6-8 they were 3% in HR+ and 2% in HR- pts. The hazard ratios for HR status (ref=HR-) were 0.60 (0.51-0.72) overall, 0.74 (0.65-0.85) for years 0-5 and 1.61 (1.17-2.24) for years 6-8. In HR+ pts, risk factors for recurrence overall were age ≥65 (p=0.01), tumor size pT3-4 (p<0.001), nodal status pN1-3 (p<0.001), tumor grade 2 or 3 (p<0.001), anthracycline-only CT (p<0.001), no use of aromatase inhibitors (p<0.001), and ER<10% (p=0.01). Main risk factors for recurrence in both years 0-5 and years 6-8 were pN2-3 (p=0.04 for both) and high (≥5) HER2 FISH ratio (p=0.02 for both). In HR- pts, risk factors for recurrence overall were BMI (obesity or underweight; p=0.01), pT3-4 (p<0.001), pN1-3 (p<0.001) and anthracycline-only CT (p<0.001). No significant risk factors for recurrence in years 0-5 were identified. Main risk factor for recurrence in years 6-8 was BMI (obesity; p=0.002). HR+ pts had lower incidence of visceral disease (58.8% vs. 69.6%; p=0.005) and lung metastasis (18.5% vs. 27.8%; p=0.006); bone was the most common site of first recurrence (30%). Conclusions This large analysis of centrally tested HR+ and HR- HER2+ EBC provides strong evidence on the existence of two different diseases within the HER2+ population based on HR expression. These up-to-date estimates of pts outcomes after modern CT and T-based regimens may be used as “historical control” for the design of future de-escalation or escalation trials separately in HR+ and HR- HER2+ EBC pts. Citation Format: Lambertini M, Campbell C, Gelber RD, Viale G, McCullough A, Tonghua L, Hilbers F, Korde LA, Werner O, Chumsri S, Jackisch C, Wolff AC, Vaz-Luis I, Ferreira AR, Prat A, Moreno Aspitia A, Piccart M, Loi S, de Azambuja E. Dissecting the effect of hormone receptor (HR) status expression in patients (pts) with HER2-positive (HER2+) early breast cancer (EBC): Exploratory analysis from the ALTTO (BIG 2-06) trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-08-14.

Abstract Background: Pre-clinical data and results from early phase clinical trials point to synergistic antitumor activity and potential efficacy of palbociclib when given in combination with anti-HER2 therapy (tx). The aim of PATINA is to determine the effect of adding palbociclib to anti-HER2 and ET maintenance after induction tx in the 1st line setting for HR+/HER2+ MBC. Trial Design: The PATINA trial (AFT-38/NCT02947685) is a pivotal, open-label, international, phase III study. Following 6-8 cycles of chemotherapy (taxane or vinorelbine) with anti-HER2 tx for MBC participants will be randomized 1:1 to standard anti-HER2 tx (trastuzumab +/- pertuzumab) in combination with ET with or without palbociclib until disease progression. ET options are either an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant. Premenopausal patients (pts) must receive ovarian suppression. The trial is open to men or women with histologically confirmed HR+/HER2+ MBC provided they are without evidence of disease progression by local assessment after induction tx. Total planned accrual is 496 pts. Primary objective is to demonstrate that the combination of palbociclib with anti-HER2 tx plus ET is superior to anti-HER2 tx plus ET alone in prolonging progression-free survival (PFS). Key secondary objectives are measures of tumor control, overall survival, safety and Quality of Life. The main translational science objective is to compare PFS estimates according to PIK3CA mutation status. The study has a 90% power to detect a hazard ratio of 0.667 in favor of the palbociclib arm. All pts approached to participate in PATINA will be asked to share remaining biospecimens and clinical data with the Mastering Breast Cancer Initiative. This initiative was created in order to understand the natural history of MBC and how it envolves over time with the aim to develop new treatments for this patient population. Recruitment has started in 07/2017 and is planned for approximately 22 months in 140 sites in Australia, Germany, Italy, France, New Zealand, Spain, and the US. 69 pts have been recruited so far. The study is sponsored by Alliance Foundation Trials (AFT) and financially supported by Pfizer Citation Format: Metzger O, Mandrekar S, Loibl S, Mundhenke C, Seiler S, Valagussa P, Lim E, Tripathy D, Winer EP, Huang C, Carey L, Francis P, Miller K, Goetz MP, Prat A, Loi S, Krop I, Gianni L, Delalogue S, Vaz-Luis I, Dockter T, Lanzillotti J, Ciruelos E, DeMichele AM. PATINA: A randomized, open label, phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of palbociclib + anti-HER2 therapy + endocrine therapy (ET) vs. anti-HER2 therapy + ET after induction treatment for hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-02-07.

Purpose Preoperative aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment promotes breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for estrogen receptor (ER) –positive breast cancer. To study this treatment option, responses to three AIs were compared in a randomized phase II neoadjuvant trial designed to select agents for phase III investigations. Patients and Methods Three hundred seventy-seven postmenopausal women with clinical stage II to III ER-positive (Allred score 6-8) breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive neoadjuvant exemestane, letrozole, or anastrozole. The primary end point was clinical response. Secondary end points included BCS, Ki67 proliferation marker changes, the Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index (PEPI), and PAM50-based intrinsic subtype analysis. Results On the basis of clinical response rates, letrozole and anastrozole were selected for further investigation; however, no other differences in surgical outcome, PEPI score, or Ki67 suppression were detected. The BCS rate for mastectomy-only patients at presentation was 51%. PAM50 analysis identified AI-unresponsive nonluminal subtypes (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 enriched or basal-like) in 3.3% of patients. Clinical response and surgical outcomes were similar in luminal A (LumA) versus luminal B tumors; however, a PEPI of 0 (best prognostic group) was highest in the LumA subset (27.1% v 10.7%; P = .004). Conclusion Neoadjuvant AI treatment markedly improved surgical outcomes. Ki67 and PEPI data demonstrated that the three agents tested are biologically equivalent and therefore likely to have similar adjuvant activities. LumA tumors were more likely to have favorable biomarker characteristics after treatment; however, occasional paradoxical increases in Ki67 (12% of tumors with > 5% increase after therapy) suggest treatment-resistant cells, present in some LumA tumors, can be detected by post-treatment profiling.