Vemulapalli, Hema Srikanth

Abstract Aims Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and atrial fibrillation present a challenge for thromboembolic prevention, given their elevated risks of both thromboembolism and bleeding. Anticoagulants carry a higher bleeding risk in this population without clear evidence of thromboembolic benefit. This study aims to define the role of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) as a preventive strategy for patients with ESRD. Methods and results A systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies reporting outcomes in patients with ESRD who underwent LAAO. Meta-analyses of aggregate and individual patient data were performed to evaluate acute and long-term outcomes and compare them with those of patients without ESRD. Seventeen studies reporting data from 24 127 patients, including 1047 with ESRD, were included. Procedural complications were more common in patients with ESRD (RR 2.23; P = 0.02), with a pooled rate of 4% (95% CI, 1–9%). There was no significant difference in thromboembolic event rates during follow-up between the groups (IRR 1.44; P = 0.16), but major bleeding incidence was higher among patients with ESRD (IRR 1.84; P < 0.01). Individual patient-level data from seven studies comprising 4745 patients (268 with ESRD) were obtained and analysed. Similarly, there was no significant association between ESRD and stroke/TIA incidence (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.66–2.26), but major bleeding was higher on patients with ESRD (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.01–2.69). Conclusion LAAO represents a feasible option for thromboembolic prevention in patients with ESRD, although these patients have an increased risk of complications and bleeding.

ABSTRACT Cavotricuspid isthmus ablation (CTI) is a first‐line therapy in patients with typical atrial flutter. With the advent of pulsed field (PF) as a new energy source, we sought to evaluate the use of PF for CTI ablation. A systematic literature search was conducted on the use of PF for CTI‐flutter up to December 2024. A meta‐analysis was performed for studies reporting pooled data, while individual case reports were reviewed and summarized. The mean number of PF applications, acute success rate, and prevalence of coronary vasospasm were evaluated. Eleven studies with pooled data from 155 patients were included. All patients had an acute block of the CTI. The mean number of PFA applications was 7.78 (95% CI 6.53–9.48). The incidence of ST‐elevation was 0.04% (95% CI 0–2.23%). Subclinical vasospasm was documented in 45% (95% CI 32%–59%) of patients who underwent periprocedural coronary angiography. Prophylactic use of nitrates showed a trend toward reducing the incidence of subclinical vasospasm (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.06–1.06, p = 0.059). Twelve cases with patient‐level data were included; six reported complications, including ST elevation and conduction disturbances. PFA for CTI flutter demonstrates high acute success; however, evidence regarding the durability of the block is limited. Clinical vasospasm with ST segment elevation is uncommon but can lead to life‐threatening complications. The incidence of subclinical vasospasm is high, and nitrates tend toward reducing this phenomenon. To date, the role of PFA for this condition appears to be limited.

Abstract Background Epicardial access for ventricular arrhythmia (VA) ablation has become integral, particularly in non-ischemic and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. General anesthesia (GA) or conscious sedation (CS) is typically employed to minimize patient discomfort and movement during epicardial access. This study aimed to identify key differences in baseline characteristics and procedural outcomes between patients undergoing GA or CS. Purpose This study seeks to compare baseline characteristics, procedural details, and outcomes between patients receiving GA versus CS during epicardial access for VA ablation. Understanding these differences may inform procedural planning and patient selection to optimize outcomes. Methods Patients who underwent epicardial access for VA ablation from 2004 to 2024 were included. Baseline characteristics, procedural details, and outcomes were collected and compared using t-tests between GA and CS patients. Additionally, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was conducted to compare survival in GA and CS groups, stratified by VA type (Ventricular Tachycardia (VT) and Premature Ventricular Complexes (PVC)). Results The study included 265 patients, with 148 receiving GA and 117 receiving CS. Significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed between the groups. CS patients had a higher ejection fraction (48.71% vs. 40.97%, p < 0.01) and a greater proportion of structurally normal hearts (35% vs. 8%, p < 0.01). GA patients had a higher comorbidity burden, including a greater prevalence of diabetes (21% vs. 10%, p = 0.02), heart failure (70% vs. 41%, p < 0.01), hypertension (48% vs. 33%, p = 0.01), device in-situ (80% vs. 50%, p < 0.01), and ischemic heart disease (25% vs. 12%, p = 0.01). PVC ablation was more common in CS patients (37% vs. 18%, p < 0.01). Fluoroscopy time was longer in CS patients (74.94 vs. 60.42 mins, p < 0.01), and GA patients required more ablation lesions (34.13 vs. 24.06, p < 0.01). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no significant differences in survival between GA and CS groups for either VT or PVC. Complication rates and the combined endpoint of recurrence, heart transplant, or death also did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusions Patients undergoing epicardial access with GA had a higher burden of comorbidities and required more ablation lesions, while those with CS generally had better baseline cardiac function and were more frequently treated for PVCs. Although fluoroscopy time was longer in CS patients, complication rates and the combined outcome of recurrence, heart transplant, or death did not significantly differ between groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis further demonstrated similar survival outcomes between GA and CS groups for both VT and PVC. These findings suggest that both GA and CS can be safely used for epicardial access in VA ablation, with each approach tailored to the patient’s clinical profile and procedural needs.Table 1 Figure 1

Abstract Background Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a rare condition associated with electrical conduction disturbances. Ventricular tachycardia (VT) may be a life-threatening manifestation of CS. Immunosuppressants and antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) are considered first-line management, but for refractory cases, an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and VT ablation may be required. Purpose This study aims to document predictors for complete acute success after VT ablation in patients with CS. Methods This was a post hoc analysis from an observational study that included patients who underwent VT ablation for cardiac sarcoidosis at our institution from 2007 to 2024. Patients with suspected, clinically diagnosed, or histologically diagnosed CS, according to the JCS 2016 guidelines, were included. The cohort was divided into two groups: patients with complete acute success, defined as no VT induced at the end of the procedure, and patients with no acute success, which included patients with partial success, unsuccessful procedures, and no inducibility test at the end of the procedure. After univariate analysis, variables with an uneven distribution between the two groups (p < 0.1) were included in a multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results A total of 95 patients were enrolled. Complete acute success was achieved in 40 patients (42%). The mean age was 56.7 ± 10.1 years, and 14 (15%) patients were female. Extracardiac sarcoidosis involvement was reported in 38 (40%) patients. Only one patient in the complete acute success group did not have an ICD. Before VT ablation admission, 40 (42%) patients were on immunomodulators, and 78 (82%) on AADs. The mean ejection fraction in the complete acute success group was 44.5% ± 11.9, compared to 41.7 ± 12.0 in the no-complete success group. Among the 53 patients who underwent a PET scan in the 6 months before ablation, 17 (32%) showed active inflammation based on 18FDG uptake, with no significant difference between the two groups. LGE was present in 57 of 58 patients with a cardiac MR before ablation. Septal involvement was more common in the complete success group (86% versus 58%; OR, 4.41; 95% CI, 1.02-27.5; P = 0.039). A multifocal distribution was also more common in the complete success group (95% versus 67%; OR, 10.17; 95% CI, 1.3-468; P = 0.011). Fluoroscopy and total procedure time were comparable between both groups. The presence of clinical VT with an RBBB morphology was more common in the no-complete success group (54% versus 79%; OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.09-1.02; P = 0.03). In the multivariate analysis, epicardial LGE was associated with lower odds of complete acute success (adjusted OR, 0.087; 95% CI, 0.008-0.944; P = 0.04). Conclusions In our population, the presence of epicardial LGE on cardiac MR prior to VT ablation was an independent predictor of no complete acute success.

Background: Cavotricuspid isthmus ablation (CTI) is a first line therapy in patients with typical atrial flutter. With the advent of Pulsed Field (PF) as a new energy source, we sought to evaluate the use of PF for CTI ablation. A systematic literature search was conducted on the use of PF for CTI-flutter up to December 2024. A meta-analysis was performed for studies reporting pooled data, while a patient-level summary was done for reports with available individual data. The mean number of PF applications, acute success rate, and prevalence of coronary vasospasm were evaluated. Results: Eleven studies with pooled data from 155 patients were included. All patients had an acute block of the CTI. The mean number of PFA applications was 7.78 (95% CI 6.53–9.48). The incidence of ST-elevation was 0.04% (95% CI 0-2.23%). Subclinical vasospasm was documented in 45% (95% CI 32%–59%) of patients who underwent periprocedural coronary angiography. Prophylactic use of nitrates showed a trend toward reducing the incidence of subclinical vasospasm (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.06–1.06, p=0.059). Twelve cases with patient-level data were included; six reported complications, including ST elevation and conduction disturbances. Conclusion: PFA for CTI flutter demonstrates high acute success; however, evidence regarding the durability of the block is limited. Clinical vasospasm with ST segment elevation is uncommon but can lead to life-threatening complications. The incidence of subclinical vasospasm is high, and nitrates trend toward reducing this phenomenon. To date, the role of PFA for this condition appears to be limited.

ABSTRACT Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia, and atrioventricular (AV) node ablation with pacemaker implantation is a therapeutic option for refractory cases. However, AV node ablation in patients with bioprosthetic tricuspid valves poses technical challenges. Methods An 84‐year‐old male with an EVOQUE transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement underwent AV node ablation (AVNA) under intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) guidance. Results Successful AV block was achieved with precise catheter positioning, improving the patient's symptoms and ventricular rate control. Conclusion This case demonstrates the feasibility of AVNA in patients with tricuspid bioprostheses, demonstrating feasibility with ICE guidance.

This is the first reported case of atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA) in a patient with an EVOQUE transcatheter tricuspid valve, performed for refractory atrial fibrillation with uncontrolled ventricular rates. This case highlights the feasibility and importance of advanced imaging techniques in managing arrhythmias in patients with bioprosthetic valves, offering insights into expanding therapeutic options for complex cardiovascular conditions.

Introduction: Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common complication of right ventricle lead extraction (RVLE) in 5 to 10% of cases. This study aims to identify clinical outcomes such as predictors of heart failure hospitalization, need for tricuspid valve intervention, and death among patients with new severe TR after device lead removal (DLR). Methods: Patients who underwent DLR (pacemaker/ICD) between 3/1997 and 3/2024 were identified. Those who had an echocardiogram before and after RVLE with evidence of new severe TR were included. Cox univariable regression controlling for current age was used to assess association with death. Prentice Williams Peterson total time (PWPTT) Cox univariable regression was used to determine the rate of heart failure hospitalization up to three events per subject. Bivariable cox regression was used to control for ejection fraction for ICD and coil removal. Analysis was conducted using Stata IC16. Results: We identified 2,122 people who underwent RVLE, of whom 90 (4.24%) developed new severe TR and were included in the analysis. There were 68 hospitalizations among 38 people at a median of 2 years following lead extraction (IQR 0.57 to 4.5 years). The rate of hospitalization was 11.60 [9.14 to 14.71] per 100 person-years. Removal of an ICD was associated with increased hospitalization (HR 5.48 p<0.001) but not mortality (HR 1.21, p=0.707). Removal of a single coil ICD lead was associated with increased hospitalization rate (HR 3.01, p=0.031) but not mortality (HR =0.51, p=0.380). Removal of dual coil ICD lead was associated with more than a tenfold increase in hospitalization rate (HR 11.55, p=0.001) and four times the mortality rate (HR 4.05, p=0.031) (Figures 1&2). The presence of an abandoned (pacemaker/ICD) lead was associated with increased hospitalization (HR 5.75, p=0.004) and mortality (HR4.95, p=0.034). There was no change in hospitalization rate following tricuspid valve replacement (HR 1.33, p=0.716, n=18). Conclusion: Among people with new severe TR following DLR, the characteristics of the leads are strongly correlated with morbidity and mortality.

Background: Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a rare condition marked by conduction disturbances, and ventricular tachycardia (VT) resulting from reentrant pathways. VT ablation is typically considered for patients with refractory VT. This systematic review aims to synthesize reported outcomes and identify potential predictors for the success of VT ablation in CS patients. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines, searching PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Scopus databases up to May 2024. A random-effects model was used to evaluate electrophysiologic and procedural variables and compare outcomes to identify potential predictors of success. Results: After excluding duplicates, 473 titles and abstracts were screened. Twenty-five studies were fully reviewed, and 9 studies comprising data from 311 CS patients who underwent VT ablation were included. The mean age of patients was 50.5 years, with 30% being female. Epicardial mapping was performed in 29% (CI 22-36%; 72/251) of cases, and 96% (CI 77-100%; 65/72) of those underwent epicardial ablation. The prevalence of VT storm before the procedure was 28% (CI 16-42%; 89/259), with a suppression success rate of 84% (CI 73-93%; 64/76). The acute complete success rate defined as lack of inducibility was 58% (CI 49-66%; 174/307). During follow-up, which ranged from 19 to 58 months, 34% (CI 21-48%; 113/271) of patients survived free from the composite outcome of death, transplantation, or VT recurrence. Patients with acute success had fewer inducible VTs (MD –1.1; CI: -1.8 to -0.5; p < 0.001). No other variables were significantly associated with acute success. However, patients with acute success tended to be older than those with partial or unsuccessful outcomes (MD 7.5; CI: -0.2 to 15.1; p = 0.055). Conclusion: VT ablation in patients with CS shows acceptable acute success rates. Patients presenting with VT storm have a high rate of arrhythmia acute suppression. A lower number of inducible VTs is associated with higher acute success rates. Despite these results, the prognosis remains poor, with a significant proportion of patients experiencing disease recurrence, death, or requiring heart transplantation.