Prajapati, Poojan

ABSTRACT Background Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is an emerging non‐thermal ablation modality with proven safety in atrial arrhythmia ablation. However, data on its performance for ventricular arrhythmias (VA) remain limited. Objective To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of PFA for complex VA in a multicenter real‐world US registry. Methods This retrospective study included consecutive patients undergoing PFA for ventricular tachycardia (VT) or premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) at three Mayo Clinic centers (April 2024 to July 2025). The primary feasibility outcome was the successful delivery of PFA lesions to the intended target substrate. Primary efficacy outcomes included acute procedural success; sustained VT recurrence requiring implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) shocks or multiple antitachycardia pacing therapies; and ≥ 80% reduction in PVC burden. Safety outcomes included procedural complications, valvular function, thromboembolic events, renal function, and conduction disturbances. Results Twenty‐six patients were included (13 PVC, 13 VT). Acute success was achieved in all VT ablations (69.2% complete; 30.8% partial) and in 92.3% of PVC ablations. Complications occurred in 11.5% of patients (transient LBBB [ n = 1] and vascular complications [ n = 2]). No thromboembolic events, intracardiac thrombus, or acute kidney injury were observed. Lesions near the mitral valve apparatus did not worsen mitral regurgitation, including in patients with pre‐existing valve disease. After a median follow‐up of 365 days, one patient experienced VT recurrence requiring ICD shocks. Estimated recurrence‐free survival after VT ablation was 61.5% at 12 months; 58.3% of PVC patients achieved ≥ 80% burden reduction. Conclusion PFA for VA appears feasible and acutely effective, with a low rate of procedure‐related complications. While acute success was high, long‐term outcomes were acceptable for VT ablation and relatively modest for PVC ablation, highlighting the need for continued refinement of technology and energy‐delivery strategies. Larger prospective studies are warranted.

Abstract Aims Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and atrial fibrillation present a challenge for thromboembolic prevention, given their elevated risks of both thromboembolism and bleeding. Anticoagulants carry a higher bleeding risk in this population without clear evidence of thromboembolic benefit. This study aims to define the role of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) as a preventive strategy for patients with ESRD. Methods and results A systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies reporting outcomes in patients with ESRD who underwent LAAO. Meta-analyses of aggregate and individual patient data were performed to evaluate acute and long-term outcomes and compare them with those of patients without ESRD. Seventeen studies reporting data from 24 127 patients, including 1047 with ESRD, were included. Procedural complications were more common in patients with ESRD (RR 2.23; P = 0.02), with a pooled rate of 4% (95% CI, 1–9%). There was no significant difference in thromboembolic event rates during follow-up between the groups (IRR 1.44; P = 0.16), but major bleeding incidence was higher among patients with ESRD (IRR 1.84; P < 0.01). Individual patient-level data from seven studies comprising 4745 patients (268 with ESRD) were obtained and analysed. Similarly, there was no significant association between ESRD and stroke/TIA incidence (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.66–2.26), but major bleeding was higher on patients with ESRD (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.01–2.69). Conclusion LAAO represents a feasible option for thromboembolic prevention in patients with ESRD, although these patients have an increased risk of complications and bleeding.