Vega, Francisco

Abstract Recent introduction of 2 different lymphoma classifications has raised concerns about consistency in diagnosis, management, and clinical trial enrollment. Data from a large cohort reflecting real-world clinical practice suggest that differences between the classifications will affect <1% of non-Hodgkin lymphomas.

PURPOSE Nodular lymphocyte–predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) is a rare cancer, and large international cooperative efforts are needed to evaluate the significance of clinical risk factors and immunoarchitectural patterns (IAPs) for all stages of pediatric and adult patients with NLPHL. METHODS Thirty-eight institutions participated in the Global nLPHL One Working Group retrospective study of NLPHL cases from 1992 to 2021. We measured progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), transformation rate, and lymphoma-specific death rate. We performed uni- and multivariable (MVA) Cox regression stratified by management to select factors for the lymphocyte-predominant international prognostic score (LP-IPS) validated by five-fold cross-validation. RESULTS We identified 2,243 patients with a median age of 37 years (IQR, 23-51). The median follow-up was 6.3 years (IQR, 3.4-10.8). Most had stage I to II (72.9%) and few B symptoms (9.9%) or splenic involvement (5.4%). IAP was scored for 916 (40.8%). Frontline management included chemotherapy alone (32.4%), combined modality therapy (30.5%), radiotherapy alone (24.0%), observation after excision (4.6%), rituximab alone (4.0%), active surveillance (3.4%), and rituximab and radiotherapy (1.1%). The PFS, OS, transformation, and lymphoma-specific death rates at 10 years were 70.8%, 91.6%, 4.8%, and 3.3%, respectively. On MVA, IAPs were not associated with PFS or OS, but IAP E had higher risk of transformation (hazard ratio [HR], 1.81; P < .05). We developed the LP-IPS with 1 point each for age ≥45 years, stage III-IV, hemoglobin <10.5 g/dL, and splenic involvement. Increasing LP-IPS was significantly associated with worse PFS (HR, 1.52) and OS (HR, 2.31) and increased risk of lymphoma-specific death (HR, 2.63) and transformation (HR, 1.41). CONCLUSION In this comprehensive study of all ages of patients with NLPHL, we develop the LP-IPS to identify high-risk patients and inform upcoming prospective clinical trials evaluating de-escalation of therapy for patients with low LP-IPS scores (<2).

AbstractTo address the current and long‐term unmet health needs of the growing population of non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients, we established the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes (LEO) cohort study (NCT02736357; https://leocohort.org/). A total of 7735 newly diagnosed patients aged 18 years and older with NHL were prospectively enrolled from 7/1/2015 to 5/31/2020 at 8 academic centers in the United States. The median age at diagnosis was 62 years (range, 18–99). Participants came from 49 US states and included 538 Black/African‐Americans (AA), 822 Hispanics (regardless of race), 3386 women, 716 age <40 years, and 1513 rural residents. At study baseline, we abstracted clinical, pathology, and treatment data; banked serum/plasma (N = 5883, 76.0%) and germline DNA (N = 5465, 70.7%); constructed tissue microarrays for four major NHL subtypes (N = 1189); and collected quality of life (N = 5281, 68.3%) and epidemiologic risk factor (N = 4489, 58.0%) data. Through August 2022, there were 1492 deaths. Compared to population‐based SEER data (2015–2019), LEO participants had a similar distribution of gender, AA race, Hispanic ethnicity, and NHL subtype, while LEO was underrepresented for patients who were Asian and aged 80 years and above. Observed overall survival rates for LEO at 1 and 2 years were similar to population‐based SEER rates for indolent B‐cell (follicular and marginal zone) and T‐cell lymphomas, but were 10%–15% higher than SEER rates for aggressive B‐cell subtypes (diffuse large B‐cell and mantle cell). The LEO cohort is a robust and comprehensive national resource to address the role of clinical, tumor, host genetic, epidemiologic, and other biologic factors in NHL prognosis and survivorship.

Introduction: The use of standardized, evidence-based classification systems is crucial for the accurate diagnosis and treatment of diseases. Moreover, standardized classification facilitates research and epidemiologic studies and promotes consistency in communication among healthcare professionals. Since 2016, the revised 4 th edition of the World Health Organization classification (WHO-HAEM4R) has been the global standard for diagnosis of lymphoid malignancies. With the emergence of new data, 2 new classification systems were developed and published in 2022: the 5 th edition of the WHO Classification (WHO-HAEM5) and the International Consensus Classification (ICC). Both WHO-HAEM5 and ICC maintain a shared fundamental concept of disease classification that integrates clinical, pathologic, and molecular data. However, they differ on nomenclature, establishment of new entities, and/or diagnostic criteria for some disease categories. To evaluate the impact of these differences on real-world diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), we examined the diagnostic classification of NHL in the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes (LEO) Cohort Study (NCT02736357). Methods: Initiated in 2015, LEO is an ongoing prospective observational study of patients aged ≥18 years with newly diagnosed NHL. Patients are enrolled at 8 major U.S. medical centers. Clinical, epidemiologic, pathologic, and treatment data are abstracted at baseline and active follow-up is conducted for all patients. Lymphoma subtype is coded for each case based on expert hematopathology re-review of the diagnostic pathology slides, the pathology report, biomarker data, and clinical data. Of note, NHL subtype distribution is similar to SEER data. We studied all patients enrolled in LEO between 7/1/2016 (the date LEO pathology review started using WHO-HAEM4R diagnostic codes) and 5/31/2020. WHO-HAEM4R diagnoses and additional clinicopathologic data, when relevant, were used to map cases into the corresponding WHO-HAEM5 and ICC diagnoses. Differences between WHO-HAEM5 and ICC were annotated for each case as: None - same disease entity; Minor - difference in nomenclature with similar diagnostic criteria; Major - difference in disease category and/or diagnostic criteria; or Unevaluable - insufficient data to assign WHO-HAEM5 and/or ICC diagnosis. Results: LEO enrolled 6143 patients during the study period. Of these, comparison between WHO-HAEM5 and ICC was evaluable in 5730 (93.3%). Unevaluable cases included those without a specific WHO-HAEM4R diagnosis at enrollment (N=384; e.g., patients with a low-grade B-cell lymphoma that could not be definitively sub-classified) and those with a specific WHO-HAEM4R diagnosis, but with insufficient clinicopathologic data to assign a specific WHO-HAEM5 and/or ICC diagnosis (N=29). Of the 5730 evaluable cases, 5376 (93.8%) showed no difference between WHO-HAEM5 and/or ICC diagnosis, 311 (5.4%) showed minor differences (nomenclature only), and 43 (0.8%) showed major differences (Table 1). The 43 major differences all involved B-cell NHLs; 20 (46.5%) were attributable to different approaches to classifying double-hit lymphomas, 21 (48.9%) to classification of splenic/leukemic B-cell lymphomas, and 2 (4.6%) to classification of B-cell lymphomas occurring at specific anatomic sites (Table 2). Conclusion: In a large, prospective lymphoma cohort reflecting real-world clinical practice at 8 major U.S. medical centers, major diagnostic differences in the classification of NHL using WHO-HAEM5 or ICC classification criteria were seen in 0.8%, whereas the remaining 99.2% of diagnoses were either the same or showed differences in nomenclature only. The existence of 2 concurrent classification systems presents potential for discrepancies in pathologic diagnosis, clinical practice, clinical trials, and other lymphoma research. Furthermore, some of the differences between WHO-HAEM5 and ICC are clinically and potentially therapeutically significant, and their resolution requires further study. Nevertheless, our findings argue that the proportion of patients affected would be small in real-world practice settings. This appears largely related to incidence rates of specific lymphoma subtypes, with major differences between the 2 classifications predominantly affecting rare entities, while there is general concordance on the most common forms of NHL.

Background Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) comprise a rare, heterogeneous group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas of mature T-cell origin. Most systemic (s) PTCL subtypes typically have poor outcomes with conventional anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Biomarker-driven and subtype-specific treatments are promising but unmet needs. Few benchmark studies exist to characterize the current real-world landscape of clinical and pathologic practice. We report the patterns of care and updated outcome data for PTCL patients enrolled in the LEO-MER multi-center prospective cohort study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02736357). Methods Patients aged 18 years or older with newly diagnosed PTCL were prospectively enrolled in the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic MER cohort (2002-2015) or the expanded LEO cohort (2015-2020). Clinical, pathology, treatment, and outcome data were abstracted from medical records using a standard protocol in both cohorts. Pathology underwent expert re-review based on WHO criteria. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from date of diagnosis to date of death or last follow-up. Event-free survival (EFS) was calculated from date of diagnosis to disease progression, initiation of 2 nd line therapy, or death from any cause. EFS and OS were evaluated using Cox model and Kaplan-Meier estimator. Log-rank test was used to test the significance of difference between groups. Results LEO-MER enrolled 1132 PTCL patients during the study period (462 MER and 670 LEO). Of these, 722 were sPTCLs (281 MER and 441 LEO), including PTCL-NOS (N=253, 35%), anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL; N=180, 24.9% [74 ALK+, 106 ALK-]), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL, N=164, 22.7%), extranodal NK-TCL (N=50, 6.9%), adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (N=33, 4.6%), enteropathy-associated TCL (N=19, 2.6%), and hepatosplenic TCL (N=13, 1.8%) ( Table 1). Median age at diagnosis was 60 years. M:F ratio was 1.5. Comparing LEO to MER, African American population was 15.4% vs 0.7%, and Hispanic was 10% vs 2.2%. Clinical characteristics were comparable between MER and LEO overall: PS≥2, 20.9%; elevated LDH, 50.7%; stage III-IV, 67.6%; and IPI 2-5, 65.7%. The most common 1 st line chemotherapy regimens overall were CHOP-based (N=506, 70%), including 60% receiving CHOP-like chemotherapy in both MER and LEO cohorts (CHOP [N=268, 37%], CHOEP [N=91, 13%] or EPOCH [N=75, 10%]), and 16% with CHOP-like in combination with novel agents in LEO cohort (BV+ [N=41, 9.3%], azacitidine+ [N=11, 2.5%], pralatrexate+ [N=10, 2.3%], lenalidomide+ [N=8, 1.9%]) ( Table 1). More patients received etoposide in LEO (40.3%) than in MER (20.3%). 74 patients (10.3%) underwent consolidative SCT following induction chemotherapy (71 auto and 3 allo). 65 patients (11.2%) received frontline therapy on clinical trials. At a median follow-up of 9.4 years in MER and 4 years in LEO, 177 (MER) and 269 (LEO) events, and 150 (MER) and 206 (LEO) deaths were observed, respectively. The 3-year EFS and 4-year OS estimates for sPTCL were 46.3% and 59.1% in MER, and 40.4% and 51.3% in LEO. EFS and OS correlated with IPI scores and differed by sPTCL subtypes ( Figure 1). ALCL had superior survival, with 3-year EFS and 4-year OS of 78.2% and 90.5% for ALK+, and 65.9% and 76.9% for ALK-. Non-ALCL subtypes including PTCL-NOS and AITL had inferior outcomes, with 3-year EFS and 4-year OS of 31.4% and 42.8% for PTCL-NOS, and 33.4% and 50.7% for AITL. In subset analysis, the addition of etoposide to CHOP chemotherapy as either CHOEP or EPOCH was associated with improved OS for ALK- ALCL (p=0.038, log-rank), but not for ALK+ ALCL (p=0.75) or non-ALCL subtypes of PTCL-NOS and AITL (p=0.88). Conclusion The LEO-MER study is the largest prospective cohort study of PTCL to date. Patterns of care in the LEO cohort begin to incorporate novel agents in frontline therapy. Outcomes continue to mature with longitudinal follow-up and ongoing accrual, which poise to shape benchmarks in the contemporary era. The lack of benefit of etoposide adding to CHOP induction and poor overall survival of non-ALCL subtypes underscores the unmet need of therapeutic breakthrough for non-ALCL frontline treatment, particularly through clinical trials with biomarker-guided approaches incorporating novel agents.

Introduction: Previously we demonstrated that HIV associated diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) of Germinal Center B-cell subtype (GCB) are more proliferative, with enhanced genomic stability and increased expression of DNA repair genes, particularly Fanconi anemia (FA) and homologous recombination (HR) genes compared to their HIV negative counterparts (Maguire et al, 2019). It is unknown if this signature is unique to the GCB subtype or if it is also observed in Activated B-cell (ABC) and Unclassified (UNC) DLBCL. Herein we validate our HIV associated GCB DLBCL findings in a larger independent cohort and report for the first time the aberrational profile of molecularly profiled HIV associated ABC DLBCL compared to their HIV negative counterparts respectively. Methods: An independent cohort of 353 DLBCL FFPE cases was assembled, including 125 HIV-DLBCL samples. All samples underwent hematopathological review to confirm diagnosis and determine tumor content. Samples with &lt;60% tumor content were macro-dissected before they were RNA/DNA extracted. Cell of origin (COO) profiles were assessed using the Lymph3Cx molecular assay which can distinguish primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBL) like from GCB, ABC and UNC DLBCL (Mottok et al 2018). Copy number (CN) analyses were performed on samples with sufficient DNA (41 HIV neg, 32 HIV pos) using the OncoScan FFPE assay kit and the resulting data analyzed using Chromosome Analysis Suite (ChAS) v4.1 and the multisample viewer module of Reproductive Health Research Analysis Software (RHAS) v1.1. Additional digital gene expression profiling was performed using the Pan-Cancer panel (NanoString, Seattle, WA) customized to include 9 BCL2 family genes for a total of 739 genes and analyzed using the NanoString nSolver Advanced Analysis module. Results: GCB, ABC, UNC and PMBL-like proportions were 50%, 30%, 14% and 6% in HIV unassociated (HIV neg) and 50%, 23%, 25% and 2% in HIV pos tumors respectively, confirming both cohorts were GCB-enriched by molecular profiling. PMBL-like cases were excluded from further analyses. OncoScan CN analyses showed that HIV pos DLBCL were significantly less aberrant than HIV neg DLBCL (median CN per sample 0.56 vs 1.01, p&lt;0.001). HIV pos GCB tumors were significantly less aberrant than both HIV neg GCB tumors (median CN per sample 0.50 vs 1.11, p&lt;0.001), and HIV pos ABC tumors (median CN per sample 0.50 vs 0.81, p=0.009). HIV pos ABC tumors were also less aberrant than HIV neg ABC tumors, however, the difference was not significant overall (median CN per sample 0.81 vs 1.03, p=0.162) or for gain/amplifications (median CN per sample 0.38 vs 0.42, p=0.814), but was borderline significant for loss/deletions (median CN per sample 0.31 vs 0.47, p=0.06). GEP analyses identified Cell Cycle and DNA repair as the top two upregulated pathways in HIV pos GCB tumors compared to HIV neg GCB tumors. In contrast, Cell Cycle and DNA repair were downregulated in HIV pos ABC tumors compared to HIV neg ABC tumors. However, one gene ( RBX1) was identified as significantly upregulated in both pathways in HIV pos GCB (adjusted p-value 0.0215) and HIV pos ABC (adjusted p-value 0.0046) tumors compared to their HIV neg counterparts. A second gene ( SKP1) was also significantly upregulated in HIV pos GCB (adjusted p-value 3.94E-5) and HIV pos ABC (adjusted p-value 0.0031) tumors. Together RBX1 and SKP1 encode the two principal functional subunits of the SKP1, CUL1, F-box protein (SCF) complex which is part of the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) and has been reported as essential for maintaining genome and chromosome stability (Thompson et al 2021). Conclusions: These results demonstrate that HIV pos DLBCL tumors are less aberrant than their HIV neg counterparts irrespective of COO subtype. However, the degree of genomic stability differs by COO, with HIV pos GCB tumors being more genomically stable than HIV pos ABC tumors. Although both have enhanced expression of UPS related SCF genes ( RBX1, SKP1), only HIV pos GCB tumors have enhanced expression of key DNA repair genes as well including Fanconi Anemia ( BRCA2/FANCD1, FANCL) and mismatch repair ( MSH2, MSH6) genes (adjusted p-values of ≤ 0.0263). Given the reported role of SCF in genomic stability maintenance, the HIV pos COO CN differences could be due to the contributions of both DNA repair and SCF mechanisms in HIV pos GCB and mainly SCF mechanisms in HIV pos ABC tumors.

Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) encompasses a diverse group of post-thymic lymphomas, with ~40% of cases not further classifiable and designated as PTCL-not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS). Two molecular prognostic subtypes of PTCL-NOS, PTCL-TBX21 and PTCL-GATA3, were identified through gene expression profiling (GEP). A subset of PTCL-NOS with T-follicular helper (TFH) differentiation was subsequently categorized as nodal PTCL with TFH phenotype (PTCL-TFH), also known in current classifications as nodal PTCL-TFH, NOS, or TFH lymphoma, NOS. However, the boundary between PTCL-NOS and PTCL-TFH remains poorly defined. To refine these subtypes, 101 PTCL-NOS with centralized pathology review and extensive immunophenotyping by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using 22 antibodies, digital GEP (nCounter, NanoString Inc) (n= 70), and RNA sequencing (n= 73) were included in this study. IHC was used to identify PTCL-TFH cases (those with strong expression of more than two TFH markers); the remaining patients were classified as PTCL-GATA3 and PTCL-TBX21 using pre-defined GEP signatures. Cases were reclassified into PTCL-NOS (n= 63) and PTCL-TFH (n= 38), with PTCL-NOS subclassified into PTCL-GATA3 (n= 22; 34%) and PTCL-TBX21 (n= 41; 66%) and showing significant differences in OS (p&lt;0.001). PTCL-GATA3 was characterized by medium to large transformed cells (average= 90%, 70-100%) and had minimal tumor microenvironment (TME) (TME-poor: 100%). In contrast, PTCL-TBX21 was more heterogeneous, associated with pleomorphic cells in a polymorphous background (TME-rich: 78%), including Lennert lymphoma-like cases (22%). mRNA and CIBERSORT analysis substantiated the findings and identified a subset enriched in cytotoxic features in the PTCL-TBX21 subtype. IHC indicated that PTCL-GATA3 cases were CD4+/CD8- (83%) or CD4-/CD8- (17%) and lacked expression of CD8 or cytotoxic markers compared to PTCL-TBX21 (p&lt;0.01). PTCL-GATA3 showed significantly higher expression of LEF1 (average= 80%), Ki67 (80%), and MYC (25%) than PTCL-TBX21 (25%, 30%, &lt;5%, respectively, p&lt;0.01). mRNA and protein expression of these biomarkers showed a significant positive correlation (r=0.5, p&lt;0.001), and expectedly higher mRNA expression of LEF1 and MYC was observed in the PTCL-GATA3 versus PTCL-TBX21 (p&lt;0.05). Strong expression of CD30 (&gt;50% of cells) was only seen in PTCL-GATA3 cases. EBER positivity, found only in rare background cells, was not significantly different (18% of PTCL-GATA3 vs. 12% of PTCL-TBX21). Within PTCL-TBX21, we identified cytotoxic and non-cytotoxic subsets with divergent morphological, phenotypic, and clinical findings. The cytotoxic PTCL-TBX21 exhibited an activated cytotoxic phenotype (23/25, 96%), denoted by TIA1 and granzyme-B and/or perforin expression. Extranodal involvement and single-cell apoptosis were observed in 17% and 45% of the cytotoxic cases, respectively, but absent in non-cytotoxic PTCL-TBX21 cases. A trend towards higher Ki67 expression (average= 40% vs. 20%, p= 0.08) was seen in the cytotoxic subgroup. In contrast, the non-cytotoxic PTCL-TBX21 was associated with a CD4+/CD8- phenotype and higher ICOS expression (average= 30%) and CCR4 (60%) compared to the cytotoxic PTCL-TBX21 (p= 0.001). PTCL-TFH cases showed a CD4+/CD8- phenotype (90%) and rarely a CD4-/CD8- phenotype (10%). While a subset of PTCL-TFH cases had AITL-like features such as numerous clear cells and/or prominent vasculature (31% of cases), which were not seen in the other subgroups, the remaining cases exhibited morphology that was indistinguishable from other PTLC-NOS cases including sheets of transformed cells or pleomorphic cells in a polymorphous background. Morphologically, PTCL-TFH cases, like PTCL-TBX21 were associated with a rich TME (TME-rich: 75%). CIBERSORT analysis showed enrichment of plasma cells (p&lt;0.01) in PTCL-TFH, compared to PTCL-TBX21, and validated by morphology (30% of cases vs. 5%). Expression of one TFH marker was frequent in some PTCL-NOS cases (PTCL-GATA3= 41% of cases, PTCL-TBX21-non cytotoxic= 47%, PTCL-TBX21-cytotoxic= 5%). Conclusion: Our comprehensive evaluation underscores the importance of integrating morphology, immunophenotyping, and GEP in achieving an accurate diagnosis, potentially leading to more tailored treatment strategies for PTCL. Correlation with pending whole-exome sequencing studies will be provided at the time of presentation.

Abstract In the pivotal study ECHELON-1, brentuximab vedotin (BV), doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (A + AVD) demonstrated superior efficacy compared with bleomycin + AVD for the treatment of advanced-stage classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). However, there are minimal available data regarding the frequency of dose reductions or omission of BV during curative therapy and the potential impact on patient outcomes. In a real-world analysis, we retrospectively reviewed the characteristics and outcomes of 179 patients with stage III or IV cHL treated with frontline A + AVD from January 2010 to April 2022. Treatment consisted of up to 1.2 mg/kg of BV and standard dose AVD IV on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle for up to 6 cycles. At the time of treatment, the median patient age was 37 years, and a high-risk International Prognostic Score was observed in 46% of patients. Overall, 91% of patients received 6 cycles of AVD; 55% of patients did not receive the intended cumulative dose of BV (CDB); 28% of patients received two-thirds or less than the planned CDB. At a median follow-up time of 27.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 24.8-29), the median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached, and the 12-month PFS was 90.3% (95% CI, 85.9-95.0). The impact of CDB on PFS was not significant (P = .15), nor was high CDB significantly associated with increased adverse events. In real-world experience, A + AVD is a highly effective treatment for patients with advanced-stage cHL, including for patients with prominent dose reductions of BV.