Maguire, Alanna

Abstract Background Primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare, aggressive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma confined to the CNS, with poor outcomes. Virally associated PCNSL, including AIDS-related PCNSL (AR-PCNSL) and CNS post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (CNS-PTLD) accounts for ~10% of cases and is strongly linked to EBV infection and poor prognosis. In our prior Blood (Gandhi et al. 2021) study, targeted sequencing showed that EBV⁺ PCNSL lacks canonical MYD88, CD79B, and PIM1 mutations and retains intact HLA class I/II, suggesting distinct immunobiology. However, questions remain regarding the immune microenvironment, broad mutational landscape, and intratumoral heterogeneity. Here, we present the first large-scale comprehensive integrated analysis of virally associated PCNSL to define subtype-specific vulnerabilities and therapeutic implications. Methods FFPE brain biopsies from 72 PCNSL patients (40 EBV- de novo PCNSL, 32 EBV+ PCNSL including 18 AR-PCNSL and 14 CNS-PTLD) were analyzed. Immune gene expression was profiled using the NanoString PanCancer Immune Panel. Whole exome sequencing (WES) defined recurrent driver mutations, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and LymphGen classification (excluding A53 subtype). Single nuclei RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq) using the 10x Genomics Chromium Flex platform characterized cellular heterogeneity. Results WES demonstrated a marked reduction in canonical mutations (MYD88L265P, CD79B, PIM1, CARD11) in CNS-PTLD (0%) and AR-PCNSL (29%) vs. de novo PCNSL (87.5%; p<0.0001). AR-PCNSL had a distinct mutational signature when compared with CNS-PTLD and de novo PCNSL. NOTCH1/2 mutations were significantly enriched in AR-PCNSL (71%) vs. CNS-PTLD (9%) and de novo PCNSL (33%) (p<0.01). NLRC5 mutations were present in 64% of AR-PCNSL cases, higher than the 25% observed in de novo PCNSL and were absent in CNS-PTLD. TMB was significantly elevated in AR-PCNSL (mean 26.27 mutations/Mb) vs. de novo PCNSL (17.22) and CNS-PTLD (11.01; p=0.0018) underscoring pronounced genomic instability and suggesting HIV may exert a mutagenic influence beyond immunosuppression. EBV driven subtypes lacked MCD features and were more often classified as ST2 or unassigned. Despite NOTCH2 mutations, AR-PCNSL cases were not classified under the BN2 subtype, further highlighting limitations in current molecular classification systems to accurately stratify virally associated PCNSL. Immune transcriptomic profiling revealed further distinctions within EBV+ PCNSL. CNS-PTLD showed increased expression of genes related to antigen presentation (p<0.0001), cytotoxicity (p=0.0019), and T cell function (p<0.0001), suggesting retained immune responsiveness. AR-PCNSL exhibited significant suppression of HLA class I/II genes (p=0.0027 and p<0.0001 respectively), despite intact genomic loci, implicating post-transcriptional or epigenetic silencing. Immune cell composition revealed reduced macrophage infiltration and suppressed CD4 expression in AR-PCNSL. CNS-PTLD showed higher expression of checkpoint molecules LAG3, TIM3, and CTLA4, consistent with T cell exhaustion. snRNA-seq profiling of AR-PCNSL identified distinct malignant and non-malignant cell populations, including a reduced CD4⁺ compartment and altered microglial/macrophage populations and cell states compared to de novo PCNSL, corroborating bulk transcriptomic data, amongst other ongoing analysis. Conclusion This study represents the largest and most comprehensive immunogenomic investigation of virally associated PCNSL. AR-PCNSL and CNS-PTLD lack canonical PCNSL driver mutations and instead harbor distinct mutational signatures, including NOTCH pathway alterations in AR-PCNSL. These findings underscore divergent pathogenic mechanisms and support tailored therapies. AR-PCNSL is marked by high TMB, suppressed antigen presentation, and reduced CD4⁺ infiltration, indicating profound immune dysfunction. CNS-PTLD retains immune functionality but shows checkpoint upregulation and T cell exhaustion. Despite both being EBV-driven and CNS-restricted, they display distinct molecular and immunological programs, suggesting context specific EBV mechanisms. These findings challenge existing classification systems and support CNS-specific molecular frameworks to guide therapeutic interventions including BTK inhibition for NOTCH-mutated lymphoma. They lay the foundation for precision approaches in EBV⁺ PCNSL, including immune restoration, antigen-specific T cell therapy, and epigenetic modulation.

Introduction: HIV-associated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (HIV-DLBCL) is a significant complication in HIV-positive individuals, presenting unique clinical challenges and a poorer prognosis compared to patients with de novo DLBCL. Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) status is a critical factor influencing the pathogenesis, clinical behavior, and therapeutic responses in these lymphomas. Plasmablastic lymphomas (PBL) have shared some overlapping genomic abnormalities with HIV-DLBCL including MYC rearrangements. This study aims to elucidate the differences in the genetic profiles and pathway activations between EBV(+) and EBV(-) HIV-DLBCL through comprehensive genomic profiling. Methods: Cases of DLBCL were identified in patients living with HIV from a multi-institute cooperative group. Cases of Burkitt lymphoma and PBL were excluded. We performed whole exome sequencing (WES) on 106 tumors of HIV-DLBCL and RNA sequencing on 39 tumors and mapped the reads to hg38 reference genome using BWA and STAR, respectively. EBV status of cases was determined by in situ hybridization and/or reads mapped on EBV genome in sequencing data. Somatic mutations were identified using variant callers (Strelka2, Mutect2) with WES data. For those mutated genes in COSMIC, allele frequency cutoff was set at 0.03. Mutations with an artifact score larger than 0.7 in SOBDetector and those located in segmental duplications were further removed. They were annotated with Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor, manually checked, and plotted with maftools. RNAseq read counts aligned to each gene were obtained by featureCounts and DEseq2 was used for differential expression (DE) analysis between EBV positive and negative groups. Pathway analysis with the DE genes was performed using GSEA. FISH analysis was performed using MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 break-apart probes. Results: There were 41 cases of EBV(+) HIV-DLBCL and 65 cases of EBV(-) HIV-DLBCL. FISH of EBV(+) HIV-DLBCL identified 42% (3/7) with MYC rearrangement (MYCr), none with BCL2 rearrangements (BCL2r) (0/6), and 33% (2/6) positive for BCL6 rearrangement (BCL6r) with 1 tumor having a MYCr/BCL6r. For EBV(-) HIV-DLBCL, there were 35% with a MYCr (6/17), 18% with BCL2r (2/11), and 27% with a BCL6r (3/11) with 2 tumors with MYCr/BCL6r, and 1 tumor with MYCr/BCL2r/BCL6r. The most frequent mutations seen in EBV(+) HIV-DLBCL were STAT3 (32%), DDX3X (22%), and TP53 (15%). For EBV(-) HIV-DLBCL, the most frequent mutations were KMT2D (25%), TP53 (23%), GNA13 (22%), and TET2 (22%). Pathways that were most commonly associated with EBV(+) HIV-DLBCL were JAK/STAT (42%) (STAT3, JAK1) and NF-kB (39%)(DDX3X, TNFAIP3) while EBV(-) HIV-DLBCL was associated with epigenetic modifiers (62%)(KMT2D, TET2, EP300), JAK/STAT (45%)(SOCS1, JAK3) and PI3K/mTOR (40%)(GNA13, MTOR). Significant disparities between EBV(+) and EBV(-) were KMT2D (24% vs 50%, P=0.0025), TET2 (10% vs 26%, P=0.008), SOCS1 (29% vs 39%, P=0.04), DDX3X (15% vs 5%, P=0.03), and GNA13 (5% vs 24%, P=0.001). RAS mutations (KRAS, NRAS) were infrequent in HIV-DLBCL (EBV(+), 12%; EBV(-), 6%), in contrast to prior studies of PBL. Gene expression profiling showed enrichment of MYC targets, oxidative phosphorylation, and the mTORC pathway in EBV(+) as compared to EBV(-) HIV-DLBCL. Conclusion: EBV(+) HIV-DLBCL show a distinct mutational profile compared to EBV(-) HIV-DLBCL, with EBV(+) cases showing frequent mutations with STAT3 and DDX3X in contrast to EBV(-) cases with frequent mutations associated with epigenetic modification pathways (KMT2D, TET2). These genetic profiles underscore the need for tailored therapeutic approaches depending on EBV status. Although the analysis is limited and requires confirmation in a larger cohort, this is the largest study at present evaluating these tumors.

Introduction: We previously showed that HIV associated EBV negative (-) diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) of germinal center origins (GCB) have enhanced genomic stability and increased expression of DNA repair genes compared to their HIV negative counterparts (Maguire et al 2019). Given that immune deficiency can be induced virally or therapeutically, including the administration of immunosuppressive drugs post solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplant, we questioned whether these observations are specific to HIV or if they represent a more global immune impaired signature. Here we assessed the genomic stability of monomorphic DLBCL post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) and the potential role of DNA repair. Methods: A total of 49 monomorphic DLBCL PTLDs (26 EBV(-), 23 EBV positive (+)) and 170 immune competent (IC) DLBCL (EBV status unknown) were studied. All were pathologically reviewed and samples with <60% tumor content were macro-dissected before RNA/DNA extraction. Cell of origin (COO) profiles were assessed using the DLBCL90 molecular assay which can distinguish primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBL) from GCB, Activated B-cell (ABC) and unclassified (UNC) DLBCL (Ennishi et al 2019). NanoString gene expression profiling (GEP) was performed using the PanCancer Pathways panel and analyzed using NanoString nSolver Advanced Analysis. Copy number (CN) analysis was performed on a subset of samples (45 PTLD, 41 DLBCL) using the OncoScan CN assay and analyzed using Chromosome Analysis Suite (ChAS) v4.1. All p-values listed were Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted and Mann-Whitney tested for the GEP and CN data respectively. Results: In contrast to IC-DLBCL which are GCB enriched (50%), COO profiling revealed PTLD to be ABC enriched (43%). CN analyses revealed that the median CN/sample for PTLD (0.57, p<0.001), EBV(+)PTLD (0.25, p<0.001) and EBV(-)PTLD (0.80, p = 0.050) tumors were significantly less aberrant than IC-DLBCL (1.01). The data also showed that EBV(+)PTLD are less aberrant than EBV(-)PTLD tumors (0.25 vs 0.80, p<0.001). GEP pathway analysis identified DNA repair as downregulated in PTLD and EBV(+)PTLD but upregulated in EBV(-)PTLD compared IC-DLBCL. Nine DNA repair genes ( RAD51, CCNA2a, CHEK1b, POLR2Da, PCNAa, WHSC1a, GTF2H3a, ATM c, EP300 c) were differentially expressed (DE) in EBV(-)PTLD compared to IC-DLBCL (7 increased, 2 decreased, p ≤ 0.0425): where the most overexpressed gene RAD51, a critical mediator of Homologous Recombination (HR) and the Fanconi Anemia (FA) DNA repair pathways, was not DE in PTLD or EBV(+)PTLD compared to IC-DLBCL. Five a genes were increased in PTLD (p ≤ 0.0204) but not EBV(+)PTLD, 1 b was decreased in EBV(+)PTLD (p = 0.01) but not PTLD and 2 c were reduced in PTLD regardless of EBV status compared to IC-DLBCL (p ≤ 0.0024). Twenty-8 genes were DE in EBV(+)PTLD compared to IC-DLBCL. Of these, 23 were downregulated (p ≤ 0.0418) and included HR, FA and mismatch repair genes ( CHEK1, CHEK2, BRAC1/FANCS, FANCA, FANCB, FANCE, MSH2, MSH6). All but 2/23 were similarly expressed in PTLD compared to IC-DLBCL of which 11 were significant (p ≤ 0.0356). The five upregulated genes ( ZBTB32, DDB2, NBN, POLB, RBX1, p ≤ 0.0092) were also upregulated in PTLD (p ≤ 0.0042) but not EBV(-)PTLD compared to IC-DLBCL. Two additional genes ( SKP1, FBXW7) were also identified as increased in EBV(+)PTLD and PTLD (p ≤ 0.0204) compared to IC-DLBCL. In contrast, SKP1 was increased (p = 2.7E-4) and FBXW7 was decreased (p = 0.3610) in EBV(-)PTLD compared to IC-DLBCL. Together the protein products of RBX1, SKP1 and FBXW7 comprise the functional cores of a complete UPS complex, the SCF FBXW7 E3 ubiquitin ligase which have been reported to regulate the DNA damage response and promote genomic stability. Conclusions: Like HIV associated DLBCL, these results show that PTLD is more genomically stable than IC-DLBCL, and that genomic stability is further enhanced in EBV(+)PTLD which have increased expression of UPS related genes. In contrast, EBV(-)PTLD have increased expression of DNA damage repair genes, including RAD51. In summary, monomorphic DLBCL PTLD tumors have enhanced genomic stability that appears to be mediated by two distinct mechanisms stratified by EBV status. Further work is required to assess if this stratification of mechanisms is unique to PTLD or reflects a more global immune impaired EBV related signature.

Introduction: Previously we demonstrated that HIV associated diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) of Germinal Center B-cell subtype (GCB) are more proliferative, with enhanced genomic stability and increased expression of DNA repair genes, particularly Fanconi anemia (FA) and homologous recombination (HR) genes compared to their HIV negative counterparts (Maguire et al, 2019). It is unknown if this signature is unique to the GCB subtype or if it is also observed in Activated B-cell (ABC) and Unclassified (UNC) DLBCL. Herein we validate our HIV associated GCB DLBCL findings in a larger independent cohort and report for the first time the aberrational profile of molecularly profiled HIV associated ABC DLBCL compared to their HIV negative counterparts respectively. Methods: An independent cohort of 353 DLBCL FFPE cases was assembled, including 125 HIV-DLBCL samples. All samples underwent hematopathological review to confirm diagnosis and determine tumor content. Samples with <60% tumor content were macro-dissected before they were RNA/DNA extracted. Cell of origin (COO) profiles were assessed using the Lymph3Cx molecular assay which can distinguish primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBL) like from GCB, ABC and UNC DLBCL (Mottok et al 2018). Copy number (CN) analyses were performed on samples with sufficient DNA (41 HIV neg, 32 HIV pos) using the OncoScan FFPE assay kit and the resulting data analyzed using Chromosome Analysis Suite (ChAS) v4.1 and the multisample viewer module of Reproductive Health Research Analysis Software (RHAS) v1.1. Additional digital gene expression profiling was performed using the Pan-Cancer panel (NanoString, Seattle, WA) customized to include 9 BCL2 family genes for a total of 739 genes and analyzed using the NanoString nSolver Advanced Analysis module. Results: GCB, ABC, UNC and PMBL-like proportions were 50%, 30%, 14% and 6% in HIV unassociated (HIV neg) and 50%, 23%, 25% and 2% in HIV pos tumors respectively, confirming both cohorts were GCB-enriched by molecular profiling. PMBL-like cases were excluded from further analyses. OncoScan CN analyses showed that HIV pos DLBCL were significantly less aberrant than HIV neg DLBCL (median CN per sample 0.56 vs 1.01, p<0.001). HIV pos GCB tumors were significantly less aberrant than both HIV neg GCB tumors (median CN per sample 0.50 vs 1.11, p<0.001), and HIV pos ABC tumors (median CN per sample 0.50 vs 0.81, p=0.009). HIV pos ABC tumors were also less aberrant than HIV neg ABC tumors, however, the difference was not significant overall (median CN per sample 0.81 vs 1.03, p=0.162) or for gain/amplifications (median CN per sample 0.38 vs 0.42, p=0.814), but was borderline significant for loss/deletions (median CN per sample 0.31 vs 0.47, p=0.06). GEP analyses identified Cell Cycle and DNA repair as the top two upregulated pathways in HIV pos GCB tumors compared to HIV neg GCB tumors. In contrast, Cell Cycle and DNA repair were downregulated in HIV pos ABC tumors compared to HIV neg ABC tumors. However, one gene ( RBX1) was identified as significantly upregulated in both pathways in HIV pos GCB (adjusted p-value 0.0215) and HIV pos ABC (adjusted p-value 0.0046) tumors compared to their HIV neg counterparts. A second gene ( SKP1) was also significantly upregulated in HIV pos GCB (adjusted p-value 3.94E-5) and HIV pos ABC (adjusted p-value 0.0031) tumors. Together RBX1 and SKP1 encode the two principal functional subunits of the SKP1, CUL1, F-box protein (SCF) complex which is part of the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) and has been reported as essential for maintaining genome and chromosome stability (Thompson et al 2021). Conclusions: These results demonstrate that HIV pos DLBCL tumors are less aberrant than their HIV neg counterparts irrespective of COO subtype. However, the degree of genomic stability differs by COO, with HIV pos GCB tumors being more genomically stable than HIV pos ABC tumors. Although both have enhanced expression of UPS related SCF genes ( RBX1, SKP1), only HIV pos GCB tumors have enhanced expression of key DNA repair genes as well including Fanconi Anemia ( BRCA2/FANCD1, FANCL) and mismatch repair ( MSH2, MSH6) genes (adjusted p-values of ≤ 0.0263). Given the reported role of SCF in genomic stability maintenance, the HIV pos COO CN differences could be due to the contributions of both DNA repair and SCF mechanisms in HIV pos GCB and mainly SCF mechanisms in HIV pos ABC tumors.

Abstract Introduction: Diffuse Large B cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) is up to 80-fold more likely to occur and follows a more aggressive clinical course in HIV positive (+) individuals compared to HIV negative (-) individuals. Moreover, the vast majority frequently present at advanced stages with high tumor burdens with poor prognosis. The molecular pathology underpinning the clinical features of DLBCL in HIV(+) patients relative to the general population is poorly understood; however, it is suspected to depend on decreased host immune surveillance and alternative mechanisms of tumorogenesis. In this study, we sought to identify the differences in gene expression between HIV(+) and HIV(-) DLBCL cohorts that may contribute to the unique features of HIV(+) DLBCL. Methods: We performed a retrospective gene expression profiling (GEP) study using a total of 70 DLBCL cases, 31 HIV(+) obtained from AIDS Cancer Specimen Resource Network (https://acsr.ucsf.edu/) and 39 HIV(-) institutional cases. The H&Es for all cases were reviewed by a hematopathologist and tumor content determined. Cases that did not meet the minimum tumor content threshold of 70% were macro-dissected. RNA was extracted from 4x 5µm formalin fixed, paraffin embedded (FFPE) sections using the Qiagen AllPrep DNA/RNA FFPE Kit and quantified using a NanoDrop. The Lymph2Cx assay, which accurately subtypes DLBCL in FFPE tissues (Scott et al 2014), was used to determine the cell of origin (COO) subtypes: Germinal Center B cell (GCB), Activated B cell (ABC) and Unclassifiable (UNC). Digital GEP was performed using the NanoString PanCancer Pathways and Immunology panels, targeting a total of over 1300 genes with known roles in cancer or immune signaling. Results: Of the 31 HIV(+) cases, Lymph2Cx subtyping showed 74% (23/31) were GCB, 13% (4/31) were ABC and 13% (4/31) were UNC. In a similar distribution to the HIV(+), and comparable to prior literature, 54% (21/39) of HIV(-) cases were GCB, 31% (12/39) were ABC and 15% (6/39) were UNC. Differential gene expression was observed between HIV(+) and HIV(-) cases, but no association with COO subtype was found. When the data was re-analyzed within the GCB subtype alone, stratification by HIV status was observed. Particularly, reduced expression of genes associated with immune regulation was observed in HIV(+) GCB cases compared to HIV(-) GCB cases. In contrast, expression of genes associated with cell cycle regulation and homologous recombination (the predominate double stranded DNA repair pathway employed during the cell cycle), were higher in HIV(+) cases compared to HIV(-) GCB cases. Conclusions: The results show, that within the GCB subtype, marked differences in gene expression are associated with HIV status. Our results suggest that the aggressive nature of DLBCL in HIV(+) patients may, in part, be mediated by enhanced cell proliferation potentiated by aberrant DNA repair. Disclosures Fogel: Natural Selection Inc: Employment. Liu: Natural Selection Inc: Employment. Lamers: Bioinfoexperts LLC: Employment.

Summary Even in the era of highly active combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), patients with HIV have a disproportionate risk of developing aggressive lymphomas that are frequently Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV)‐related. Here, we investigate HIV‐associated diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (HIV‐DLBCL) and compare EBV‐positive and EBV‐negative cases. HIV‐DLBCL were identified from two academic medical centres and characterised by immunohistochemistry, EBV status, fluorescence in situ hybridisation, cell of origin determination by gene expression profiling, and targeted deep sequencing using a custom mutation panel of 334 genes. We also applied the Lymphgen tool to determine the genetic subtype of each case. Thirty HIV‐DLBCL were identified, with a median patient age of 46 years and male predominance (5:1). Thirteen cases (48%) were EBV‐positive and 14 (52%) EBV‐negative. Nine of the 16 tested cases (56%) had MYC rearrangement, three (19%) had BCL6 (two of which were double hit MYC / BCL6 ) and none had BCL2 rearrangements. Using the Lymphgen tool, half of the cases (15) were classified as other. All HIV‐DLBCL showed mutational abnormalities, the most frequent being TP53 (37%), MYC (30%), STAT3 (27%), HIST1H1E (23%), EP300 (20%), TET2 (20%), SOCS1 (17%) and SGK1 (17%). EBV‐negative cases were mostly of germinal centre B‐cell (GCB) origin (62%), showed more frequent mutations per case (a median of 13·5/case) and significant enrichment of TP53 (57% vs. 15%; P = 0·046), SGK1 (36% vs. 0%; P = 0·04), EP300 (43% vs. 0%; P = 0·02) and histone‐modifying gene (e.g. HIST1H1E , HIST1H1D , 79% vs. 31%; P = 0·02) mutations. EBV‐positive cases were mostly of non‐GCB origin (70%), with fewer mutations per case (median 8/case; P = 0·007), and these tumours were enriched for STAT3 mutations ( P = 0·10). EBV‐positive cases had a higher frequency of MYC mutations but the difference was not significant (36% vs. 15%; P = 0·38). EBV‐association was more frequent in HIV‐DLBCLs, arising in patients with lower CD4 counts at diagnosis (median 46·5 vs. 101, P = 0·018). In the era of cART, approximately half of HIV‐DLBCL are EBV‐related. HIV‐DLBCL are enriched for MYC rearrangements, MYC mutations and generally lack BCL2 rearrangements, regardless of EBV status. Among HIV‐DLBCL, tumours that are EBV‐negative and EBV‐positive appear to have important differences, the latter arising in context of lower CD4 count, showing frequent non‐GCB origin, lower mutation burden and recurrent STAT3 mutations.

Abstract Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is confined to the brain, eyes, and cerebrospinal fluid without evidence of systemic spread. Rarely, PCNSL occurs in the context of immunosuppression (eg, posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders or HIV [AIDS-related PCNSL]). These cases are poorly characterized, have dismal outcome, and are typically Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated (ie, tissue-positive). We used targeted sequencing and digital multiplex gene expression to compare the genetic landscape and tumor microenvironment (TME) of 91 PCNSL tissues all with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma histology. Forty-seven were EBV tissue-negative: 45 EBV− HIV− PCNSL and 2 EBV− HIV+ PCNSL; and 44 were EBV tissue-positive: 23 EBV+ HIV+ PCNSL and 21 EBV+ HIV− PCNSL. As with prior studies, EBV− HIV− PCNSL had frequent MYD88, CD79B, and PIM1 mutations, and enrichment for the activated B-cell (ABC) cell-of-origin subtype. In contrast, these mutations were absent in all EBV tissue-positive cases and ABC frequency was low. Furthermore, copy number loss in HLA class I/II and antigen-presenting/processing genes were rarely observed, indicating retained antigen presentation. To counter this, EBV+ HIV− PCNSL had a tolerogenic TME with elevated macrophage and immune-checkpoint gene expression, whereas AIDS-related PCNSL had low CD4 gene counts. EBV-associated PCNSL in the immunosuppressed is immunobiologically distinct from EBV− HIV− PCNSL, and, despite expressing an immunogenic virus, retains the ability to present EBV antigens. Results provide a framework for targeted treatment.

Objective: The increased risk for persons living with HIV to develop diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) even in the post-antiretroviral therapy eras suggests a role beyond immunosuppression in lymphoma development. However, the mechanisms leading to lymphoma in the HIV setting are not fully understood. HIV is known to induce activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) levels in nonneoplastic B cells in vitro and chronic AID expression may play an important role in lymphomagenesis. Although AID expression is observed in B-cell lymphoma, studies in HIV-associated DLBCL are limited. Design: In this study, we conducted a retrospective review of DLBCL tissues from patients with and without HIV infection to compare expression of AID and B-cell receptors potentially involved in HIV and B-cell interaction. Methods: We evaluated DLBCL formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues from 72 HIV-seropositive and 58 HIV-seronegative patients for AID, DC-SIGN, and CD40 protein expression. BCL2 and MYC, two well established prognostically significant oncoproteins in DLBCL, were also assessed at the protein and mRNA levels. Subset analysis was performed according to DLBCL subtype and EBV status. Results: Of note, AID expression was more frequent in HIV-associated DLBCL compared with non-HIV-associated DLBCL regardless of cell-of-origin subtype, and also displayed significantly less BCL2 expression. Despite no direct correlation with AID expression, the HIV-DLBCL tissues also exhibited high levels of the DC-SIGN receptor. Conclusion: Collectively, these findings support a potential role for AID in the pathogenesis of HIV-associated lymphomas and suggest the need of further investigations into the involvement of the DC-SIGN receptor-signaling pathway.