Nkomo, Vuyisile T.

Abstract Background Secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) impacts outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) but whether it is a specific therapeutic target in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is less clear. Purpose The aims of this study were to investigate whether surgical or trans-catheter intervention reduces SMR and improves outcomes compared to optimal medical therapy in HFpEF patients. Methods We retrospectively identified 120 HFpEF patients with moderate-to-severe or greater SMR from January 1, 2007, until December 31, 2017. Moderate-to-severe SMR was defined as an effective regurgitant orifice area of >0.3cm2, and/or a regurgitation volume of >45ml per beat. Those with primary mitral regurgitation, endocarditis, HFrEF, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, congenital heart disease, and history of valve intervention were excluded. All-cause mortality was analyzed and correlated to clinical and echocardiographic characteristics. Amongst the 120 patients, 36 received surgical or trans-catheter procedure in addition to medical therapy (procedure group) and 84 patients received optimal medical therapy only (conservative treatment group). The median follow-up period was 864 (15–3553) days. Results Patients in the procedure group were younger (75±8 vs 81±10, P=0.0002) and with fewer comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index 7.0±2.4 vs 8.0±2.0, P=0.022) compared to the conservative treatment group. In addition, the procedure group had larger left ventricular end-diastolic diameters and higher SMR volume at baseline. During follow-up, SMR decreased by ≥2 grades in 75% of patients (27/36) in the procedure group compared to 20% of patients (12/60) in the conservative treatment group. After adjusting for age and comorbidities, the procedure group showed better overall survival compared to the conservative treatment group (HR 0.37; 95% CI 0.17–0.80; P=0.011). On multivariate analysis for the different groups (procedure group vs. conservative treatment group) (HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.17–0.91; P=0.019), increasing Charlson Comorbidity Index (HR 1.16; 95% CI 1.02–1.32; P=0.028) and average mitral E/e' ratio (HR 1.06; 95% CI 1.01–1.11; P=0.031) were independent predictors of increased all-cause mortality. Kaplan-Meier Survival Curve Conclusion Among heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction and moderate-to-severe or severe SMR, surgical or trans-catheter mitral-valve repair or replacement resulted in lower all-cause mortality compared to conservative treatment after 9 years of follow-up.

Abstract Background Currently data on the risk stratification of patients with moderate aortic stenosis (AS) are very limited. Method Patients diagnosed with moderate AS in 2012 (aortic valve area [AVA]: >1 and ≤1.5cm2) were identified. Patients were stratifying by LV diastolic function (normal vs high filling pressure), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≥50 vs <50%) and stroke volume index (SVI ≥35 vs <35 ml/m2). High filling pressure was defined as average E/e' ≥14 or septal E/e' ≥11 when atrial fibrillation was present. The prognosis was compared to age- and sex-matched general population. Results 898 patients were included (age 74 years, 58% male, AVA 1.25 cm2). During a median follow-up of 2.9 years, there were 346 deaths. In patients with moderate AS, mortality was higher than expected (P<0.001, Fig 1A). LV high filling pressure, LVEF<50% and SVI<35ml/m2 were present in 416 (55%), 140 (17%) and 81 (9%) patients, respectively. Those with normal filling pressure had similar prognosis when compared to controls (Fig 1C, P=0.35); whereas mortality rates remained higher than reference even when LVEF≥50% or SVI≥35ml/m2 (Fig 1E, 1G, P<0.001). Amongst all groups, mortality rates were the highest in patients with LVEF <50% or SVI <35 ml/m2 (Fig 1D, 1F, P<0.001); mortality ratios were 3.78 (95% CI 3.01–4.67) and 6.91 (95% CI 5.13–9.11), respectively. Noteworthy, high filling pressure allowed further risk stratification when LVEF or SVI was preserved (Fig 2, P<0.001). Figures 1 & 2 Conclusions Patients with moderate AS showed poor survival. A clinical trial examining role of aortic valve replacement would be beneficial not only in patients with reduced LVEF or SVI but also in those with high LV filling pressures.

Background: Mitral stenosis frequently coexists in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Mitral stenosis severity evaluation is challenging in the setting of combined aortic stenosis and mitral stenosis because of hemodynamic interactions between the 2 valve lesions. The impact of aortic valve replacement (AVR) for severe aortic stenosis on mitral stenosis is unknown. This study aimed to assess the effect of AVR on mitral stenosis hemodynamics and the clinical outcomes of patients with severe aortic stenosis with and without mitral stenosis. Methods: We retrospectively investigated patients who underwent surgical AVR or transcatheter AVR for severe aortic stenosis from 2008 to 2015. Mean transmitral gradient by Doppler echocardiography ≥4 mm Hg was identified as mitral stenosis; patients were then stratified according to mitral valve area (MVA, by continuity equation) as >2.0 cm 2 or ≤2.0 cm 2 . MVA before and after AVR in patients with mitral stenosis were evaluated. Clinical outcomes of patients with and without mitral stenosis were compared using 1:2 matching for age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction, method of AVR (surgical AVR versus transcatheter AVR) and year of AVR. Results: Of 190 patients with severe aortic stenosis and mitral stenosis (age 76±9 years, 42% men), 184 were matched with 362 with severe aortic stenosis without mitral stenosis. Among all mitral stenosis patients, the mean MVA increased after AVR by 0.26±0.59 cm 2 (from 2.00±0.50 to 2.26±0.62 cm 2 , P <0.01). MVA increased in 105 (55%) and remained unchanged in 34 (18%). Indexed stroke volume ≤45 mL/m 2 (odds ratio [OR] 2.40; 95% CI, 1.15–5.01; P =0.020) and transcatheter AVR (OR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.17–4.77; P =0.017) were independently associated with increase in MVA. Of 107 with significant mitral stenosis (MVA ≤2.0 cm 2 ), MVA increased to >2.0 cm 2 after AVR in 52 (49%, pseudo mitral stenosis) and remained ≤2.0 cm 2 in 55 (51%, true mitral stenosis). During follow-up of median 2.9 (0.7–4.9) years, true mitral stenosis was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.20–2.94; P <0.01). Conclusions: MVA improved after AVR in nearly half of patients with severe aortic stenosis and mitral stenosis. MVA remained ≤2.0 cm 2 (true mitral stenosis) in nearly half of patients with severe aortic stenosis and significant mitral stenosis; this was associated with worse survival among patients undergoing AVR for severe aortic stenosis.

Abstract Background: Aortic valve stenosis (AS) commonly causes left ventricular (LV) pressure overload; thus, identifying patients with adverse remodeling/early LV dysfunction is critical. We compared 2-dimensional (2D) to 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiographic measures of LV myocardial deformation in patients with severe AS and studied the relation of LV preload and afterload (Zva) to myocardial deformation. Methods: We prospectively included 168 symptomatic patients (72±12 years) with severe AS and ejection fractions ≥50%. Strain parameters from those patients were compared with normal values found in the literature. 3D full-volume and 2D images were analyzed for global longitudinal strain (GLS), global radial strain (GRS), global circumferential strain (GCS), systolic strain rate (SRs), basal rotation (Rotmax-B), apical rotation (Rotmax-A), and peak systolic twist (Twistmax). Results: 2D–GLS and 2D–GCS decreased significantly compared with normal values (P˂.001 and P=.02, respectively); 2D Rotmax-B and Twistmax increased (P˂.001 vs normal values). Agreement between 2D–GLS and 3D–GLS by concordance correlation coefficient was 0.49 (95% CI, 0.39-0.57) in patients with AS. Both 2D– and 3D–GLS correlated with valvulo-arterial impedance (Zva) (r=0.34, P<.001; and r=0.23, P=.003, respectively). Conclusion: In patients with severe AS, GLS and GCS decreased, and basal rotation and twist increased to maintain LV ejection fraction. 2D– and 3D–GLS had a relatively fair agreement. Both 2D– and 3D–GLS correlated modestly with Zva.

Objective This study aimed to identify characteristics, spectrum of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) severity and treatment patterns in patients considered for intervention of severe TR at a tertiary centre. The population being considered for TR intervention is currently not well defined and the role of transcatheter interventions is unclear. Methods The study involved 87 patients with severe TR considered for intervention from 1 March 2016 to 12 November 2018 at Mayo Clinic. Patients receiving medications alone were compared with those receiving intervention to identify patterns in demographics, clinical/echocardiographic associations and survival. Results Mean age was 80±9 (56% female), 93% had atrial fibrillation and 64% had chronic kidney disease ≥3 a. Follow-up was 331±276 days; 95% were symptomatic with 6 min walk distance of 270±110 m. Loop diuretics were used in 93%; aldosterone antagonists in 35%. Mean tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion was 15.6±3.8 mm, effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) 82±32 mm2 and stroke volume index 39±11 mL/m2; 48% had at least moderate right ventricular (RV) dysfunction, and 75% did not undergo intervention. Patients receiving intervention showed trends towards larger EROA (93±33 vs 75±31 mm2), better right ventricular function and more severe symptoms. Overall group 30-day and 1-year survival were 100% and 76%, respectively. Conclusions Patients with severe TR considered for intervention are commonly elderly with atrial fibrillation, advanced TR and RV dysfunction; 75% were treated with medications alone and not offered intervention. Patients with greater EROA, better RV function and more severe symptoms were more likely to receive intervention. These findings have implications for future trial design.

AbstractBackgroundThe effect of utilizing transapical (TA) access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) on cardiac function has not been well studied.AimsThe aim of this retrospective study is to determine the direct effects of TA access for TAVR on myocardial function parameters and their correlation with 4‐year survival.MethodsThree hundred and thirty propensity matched patients, who underwent TAVR using Sapien valve (Edwards Lifesciences Corp, Irvine, CA) between February 15, 2012 and June 17, 2016 (115 TA and 115 transfemoral [TF] routes) were studied. The pre‐ and 1 month post‐TAVR echocardiographic features of both groups were compared. The 4‐year survival in both groups was analyzed.ResultsBaseline clinical characteristics, diastolic function parameters, left ventricular (LV) chamber size, and ejection fraction were similar between matched TA and TF groups. At 1 month following TAVR, there was a significant increase in stroke volume index (SVI) in both TA (mean increase 7 cm3/m2; P = 0.03) and TF groups (mean increase 7 cm3/m2; P < 0.001). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) significantly increased post TF TAVR (mean increase 2%; P = 0.008), but no significant increase was observed post TA TAVR (mean increase 1%; P = 0.27). Both groups had significant improvement in aortic valve (AV) hemodynamics post‐TAVR (P < 0.001). Overall, there were no significant differences in the mean change of SVI, LVEF, or left ventricular end diastolic dimensions (LVEDDs) post TA versus TF TAVR. There was no significant difference in 4‐year survival in the TF compared to TA group (49% vs 50%, P = 0.43).ConclusionBoth TA and TF TAVR were equally associated with favorable changes in LV SVI and AV hemodynamics in 30 days. TA TAVR patients had similar 4 year survival to propensity matched TF TAVR; therefore, TA TAVR remains an acceptable alternative access route in patients not amenable to TF TAVR.

Objective The presence of aortic paravalvular leak (PVL) is associated with lower survival, but a direct comparison of its impact after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) has not been performed. This study sought to determine the differential influence of PVL on survival following TAVR versus SAVR and in patients with varying levels of risk as defined by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk score. Methods Patients with and without postprocedural PVL were identified from 2290 patients undergoing TAVR or SAVR at Mayo Clinic between 2008 and 2014. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Results There were 588 patients with PVL (374 TAVR, 214 SAVR): age 78±11 years, 63% male and mean follow-up of 3±2 years. PVL was trivial/mild in 442 (75%) patients. In propensity-matched analyses (n=86 per group), the overall survival at 1 and 4 years was 93% and 56% vs 89% and 61% in patients with PVL after TAVR versus SAVR, respectively (p=0.43). The presence or degree of PVL severity had no influence on survival of patients with high STS score (≥8%), while the presence of greater than mild PVL predicted worse survival in those with STS score <8%. During the first year after PVL diagnosis, while either improvement or stable PVL grade was seen in the majority of patients, worsening of PVL grade was more common in the TAVR group (19%) versus the SAVR group (4%) (p<0.0001). Conclusions At mid-term follow-up, the presence of PVL was associated with equally unfavourable outcomes following SAVR or TAVR. In patients with high STS risk score, the presence of PVL was not independently associated with increased mortality.

Objectives The objective was to assess the impact of procedural characteristics on risk of stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Methods We included 370 consecutive patients who underwent balloon-expandable TAVR from 1 November 2008 to 30 June 2014. Procedural characteristics that may be associated with stroke/TIA were assessed. The primary outcome was stroke/TIA at 30 days. A propensity score was constructed using a logistic regression model with 29 parameters. Cox proportional hazards models were used with a propensity score covariate. Results Mean age was 80.9±7.9 years and mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 8.3±5.0. The total number of balloon dilations ranged from 2 to 7. Out of 370 patients, 13 patients (3.5%) suffered stroke/TIA in the first 30 days after TAVR. In univariate analysis, postdeployment balloon dilation (PD) (HR 3.8, 95% CI 1.24 to 11.61; p=0.02) and emergent cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (HR 9.66, 95% CI 2.66 to 35.15; p<0.001) were significantly associated with 30-day stroke/TIA. In the multivariable Cox-proportional hazards model, PD (HR 4.95, 95% CI 1.02 to 24.03; p=0.04) and emergent CPB (HR 7.15, 95% CI 1.39 to 36.89; p=0.02) were independently associated with increased risk of 30-day stroke/TIA after adjusting for propensity score, total number of balloon dilations and periprosthetic regurgitation. Conclusion Postdilation as compared with total number of dilations, and emergent CPB were independently associated with increased risk of clinical neurological events in the first 30 days after TAVR. Reduction in balloon postdilation with appropriate valve sizing may reduce the risk of stroke or TIA after TAVR.