Jenkins, RB

Establishing causal links between inherited polymorphisms and cancer risk is challenging. Here, we focus on the single-nucleotide polymorphism rs55705857, which confers a sixfold greater risk of isocitrate dehydrogenase ( IDH) –mutant low-grade glioma (LGG). We reveal that rs55705857 itself is the causal variant and is associated with molecular pathways that drive LGG. Mechanistically, we show that rs55705857 resides within a brain-specific enhancer, where the risk allele disrupts OCT2/4 binding, allowing increased interaction with the Myc promoter and increased Myc expression. Mutating the orthologous mouse rs55705857 locus accelerated tumor development in an Idh1 R132H -driven LGG mouse model from 472 to 172 days and increased penetrance from 30% to 75%. Our work reveals mechanisms of the heritable predisposition to lethal glioma in ~40% of LGG patients.

Abstract Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant gliomas are the most common adult, malignant primary brain tumors diagnosed in patients younger than 50, constituting an important cause of morbidity and mortality. In recent years, there has been significant progress in understanding the molecular pathogenesis and biology of these tumors, sparking multiple efforts to improve their diagnosis and treatment. In this consensus review from the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO), the current diagnosis and management of IDH-mutant gliomas will be discussed. In addition, novel therapies, such as targeted molecular therapies and immunotherapies, will be reviewed. Current challenges and future directions for research will be discussed.

Abstract Knowledge about inherited and acquired genetics of adult diffuse glioma has expanded significantly over the past decade. Genomewide association studies (GWAS) stratified by histologic subtype identified six germline variants that were associated specifically with glioblastoma (GBM) and 12 that were associated with lower grade glioma. A GWAS performed using the 2016 WHO criteria, stratifying patients by IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion (as well as TERT promoter mutation), discovered that many of the known variants are associated with specific WHO glioma subtypes. In addition, the GWAS stratified by molecular group identified two additional novel regions: variants in D2HGDH that were associated with tumors that had an IDH mutation and a variant near FAM20C that was associated with tumors that had both IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion. The results of these germline associations have been used to calculate polygenic risk scores, from which to estimate relative and absolute risk of overall glioma and risk of specific glioma subtypes. We will review the concept of polygenic risk models and their potential clinical utility, as well as discuss the published adult diffuse glioma polygenic risk models. To date, these prior genetic studies have been done on European populations. Using the published glioma polygenic risk model, we show that the genetic associations published to date do not generalize across genetic ancestries, demonstrating that genetic studies need to be done on more diverse populations.

Abstract Background Survival in patients with IDH1/2-mutant (mt) anaplastic astrocytomas is highly variable. We have used the prospective phase 3 CATNON trial to identify molecular factors related to outcome in IDH1/2mt anaplastic astrocytoma patients. Methods The CATNON trial randomized 751 adult patients with newly diagnosed 1p/19q non-codeleted anaplastic glioma to 59.4 Gy radiotherapy +/− concurrent and/or adjuvant temozolomide. The presence of necrosis and/or microvascular proliferation was scored at central pathology review. Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip arrays were used for genome-wide DNA methylation analysis and the determination of copy number variations (CNV). Two DNA methylation-based tumor classifiers were used for risk stratification. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed using 1 of the 2 glioma-tailored NGS panels. The primary endpoint was overall survival measured from the date of randomization. Results Full analysis (genome-wide DNA methylation and NGS) was successfully performed on 654 tumors. Of these, 432 tumors were IDH1/2mt anaplastic astrocytomas. Both epigenetic classifiers identified poor prognosis patients that partially overlapped. A predictive prognostic Cox proportional hazard model identified that independent prognostic factors for IDH1/2mt anaplastic astrocytoma patients included; age, mini-mental state examination score, treatment with concurrent and/or adjuvant temozolomide, the epigenetic classifiers, PDGFRA amplification, CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion, PI3K mutations, and total CNV load. Independent recursive partitioning analysis highlights the importance of these factors for patient prognostication. Conclusion Both clinical and molecular factors identify IDH1/2mt anaplastic astrocytoma patients with worse outcome. These results will further refine the current WHO criteria for glioma classification.

AbstractBackgroundOligodendroglioma is genetically defined by concomitant IDH (IDH1/IDH2) mutation and whole-arm 1p/19q codeletion. Codeletion of 1p/19q traditionally evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) cannot distinguish partial from whole-arm 1p/19q codeletion. Partial 1p/19q codeletion called positive by FISH is diagnostically a “false-positive” result. Chromosomal microarray (CMA) discriminates partial from whole-arm 1p/19q codeletion. Herein, we aimed to estimate the frequency of partial 1p/19q codeletion that would lead to a false-positive FISH result.MethodsFISH 1p/19q codeletion test probe coordinates were mapped onto Oncoscan CMA data to determine the rate of partial 1p/19q codeletion predicted to be positive by FISH. Diffuse astrocytic gliomas with available CMA data (2015–2018) were evaluated and classified based on IDH1-R132H/ATRX/p53 immunohistochemistry, IDH/TERT promoter targeted sequencing, and/or CMA according to classification updates. Predicted false-positive cases were verified by FISH whenever possible.ResultsThe overall estimated false-positive FISH 1p/19q codeletion rate was 3.6% (8/223). Predicted false positives were verified by FISH in 6 (of 8) cases. False-positive rates did not differ significantly (P = .49) between IDH-mutant (4.6%; 4/86) and IDH-wildtype (2.9%; 4/137) tumors. IDH-wildtype false positives were all WHO grade IV, whereas IDH-mutant false positives spanned WHO grades II-IV. Testing for 1p/19q codeletion would not have been indicated for most false positives based on current classification recommendations.ConclusionSelective 1p/19q codeletion testing and cautious interpretation for conflicting FISH and histopathological findings are recommended to avoid potential misdiagnosis.

Abstract Currently the use of anti-HER2 directed therapy (HDT) is predicated on the identification of HER2-postive breast cancers. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH) are the most common (and FDA-approved methods) for detecting HER2-positive breast cancers. While IHC and ISH are generally robust testing modalities, both can be subject to various pre-analytic, analytic and post-analytic issues/problems. In response to these issues/problems, ASCO and CAP formed a joint HER2 Guideline Committee. The initial guidelines of this committee were released in 2007 and a first revision of the guidelines was released in 2013. Since 2013, additional issues with HER2 testing have arisen and the ASCO/CAP Committee will be releasing a second revision to the guidelines in late 2017 or early 2018. This educational presentation will discuss HER2 testing – with a focus on fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). It will outline the 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines and describe some of the issues that have arisen with these guidelines. The presentation will conclude with a discussion of the pending 2017/2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines for HER2 testing. Citation Format: Jenkins RB. Her2 testing - 2017 guidelines for HER2 testing [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr ES4-1.

Abstract Introduction: The appropriate assessment of HER2 amplification status is critical to determining which patients should receive HER2-directed therapy. An alternative to FISH is D-ISH (Ventana Medical Systems Tucson, Arizona) which utilizes chromogenic HER2 and chromosome 17 probes. Both FISH and D-ISH utilize formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) human breast cancer tissue specimens. D-ISH has two principle advantages over FISH: it can be visualized using light microscopy and after analysis the specimens can be archived. Methods: We tested 250 samples with FISH and with D-ISH. Fifty specimens were controls: 25 cases with no HER2 or CEP17anomaly and 25 cases with HER2 amplification. There were also 200 test subjects of 50 cases each of chromosome 17 aneusomy, HER2 deletion (HER2/CEP17 ratio <0.8), HER2 duplication (HER2/CEP17 ratio 1.3–1.8), and equivocal results (HER2/CEP17 ratios between 1.8 and 2.2). FISH (Abbott Molecular) and D-ISH analysis were performed using methods described in the appropriate clinical kit package inserts, with the following exception: Four cases with CEP17 and HER2 co-amplification were also included and for FISH analysis these cases were reflexed to the use of chromosome 17 control probe (D17S122). Results: Four samples failed testing by D-ISH. There was a 63% (155/246) concordance between FISH and D-ISH by anomaly (aneusomy, duplication, deletion, etc.) and an 83% concordance by amplification status (non-amplified, equivocal, and amplified). D-ISH detected 18 (62%) of F-ISH-amplified cases. D-ISH resulted in lower estimates of HER2/CEP17 ratios than FISH, and many cases that were equivocal by FISH were normal by D-ISH. D-ISH did not detect HER2 amplification in any of the four HER2 and CEP17 co-amplified cases. Conclusions: We observed a lower concordance rate between FISH and D-ISH than the ∼95% rate in the D-ISH package insert. This lower concordance rate is likely a result of how this study was designed: it was biased toward common chromosome 17 anomalies and difficult specimens. Such specimens comprise about 60% of our current clinical HER2 biomarker practice. D-ISH may underestimate the HER2/CEP17 ratio, or FISH may overestimate this ratio. D-ISH also does not reliably detect HER2 amplification when the centromere of chromosome 17 is also co-amplifed. Compared to FISH, in this study cohort D-ISH had a significant false negative rate for the detection of HER2 amplification. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD02-05.

Abstract Background: Prediction of benefit from trastuzumab in patients (pts) with HER2+ breast cancer remains an important goal. We sought to investigate the predictive value of quantitative measurement of HER2, HER3, HER4, EGFR, ER and PTEN protein expression on the benefit of trastuzumab in the phase III HER2+ adjuvant N9831 study for pts randomized to chemotherapy alone (Arm A) or chemotherapy with sequential (Arm B) or concurrent trastuzumab (Arm C). Methods: For each marker, we evaluated quantitative expression, relationship with demographic data, and association with disease-free survival (DFS) of pts. Freshly cut tissue microarray slides with up to three-fold redundancy per specimen from the N9831 cohort were treated identically using the AQUA (Camp, et al; Nat Med 2002, JCO 2008) method of quantitative immunofluorescence for each marker. HER2 was tested with CB11 (mouse monoclonal, Biocare, Inc.) and preliminary results were available for 698 of nearly 1400 pt specimens to be tested. The minimum value per pt was used in statistical analysis. Specimens were classified with high versus low expression based on a median value cutpoint for each marker. Median follow-up was 7.0 yrs. Results: Quantitative HER2 was compared with centrally performed HER2 testing by IHC and FISH. Median quantitative HER2 via AQUA was 10,017 units for the HER2 IHC 3+ group (n=607) versus 1058, 831, and 970 for the HER2 IHC 2+ (n=68), 1+ (n=11), and 0 (n=11) groups, respectively. The Spearman correlation between quantitative HER2 and FISH HER2/CEP17 ratio was 0.32 (p<0.001). High quantitative HER2 was associated with lower percentage of hormone receptor positivity (48% vs 59%, chi-sq p=0.003) but not associated with age, race, nodal positivity, tumor histology, grade, or size. High HER2 did not impact DFS in any arm of the study (See Table). Data for additional HER2 testing, HER3, HER4, EGFR, ER and PTEN are in process and will be ready by September, 2011. Conclusions: Similar to results based on standard HER2 testing by IHC and FISH in N9831, quantitative HER2 did not impact benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab. Results for additional markers will be presented. Our complete quantitative results for a second epitope on HER2, HER3, HER4, ER and EGFR will be the first report of these markers in a large patient cohort in the adjuvant setting. Disease Free Survival Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD05-03.