Pockaj, BA

Abstract Introduction: Clonal heterogeneity in cancer is associated with resistance to therapies and evolution of metastatic disease. Clinical management of breast cancer relies on the status of estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR), and Her2 receptors in diagnostic biopsies. Results for these biomarkers rely on IHC and FISH assays that incorporate staining intensity and percentage of positive cell numbers for each sample of interest. Heterogeneous results for one or more of these biomarkers suggest the presence of multiple tumor populations within a biopsy. However the impact of clonal heterogeneity on clinical biomarkers has not been rigorously evaluated. Methods: We interrogated the clonal composition of 3 treatment-naïve surgically excised invasive ductal carcinomas. Patient #1 cancer, (pT2, pN0) was grade 3, ER+, PR+, and Her2-- with a germ line BRCA2Q49X mutation. Patient #2 cancer (pT2, pN0) was grade 3, ER+ PR- Her2+. Patient #3 was a locally advanced cancer with both axillary and supraclavicular lymph node (LN) involvement (pT2, pN3c, and was grade 3, ER+PR-Her2+ by core but found to be ER+PR-Her2- on the resection specimen. We applied DNA content flow cytometry to multiple (8-18) mapped biopsies in each case. Each sorted tumor population was interrogated with whole exome sequencing, and whole genome array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). Single cell analysis of aneuploid populations present in the primary tumor and lymph nodes in patient 3 was done to further assess clonal heterogeneity. Results: Tumor from patient #1 had a single ploidy with stable copy number profiles including an interstitial 13q deletion that converted a germ line BRCA2Q49X mutation to homozygosity, and a clonal homozygous deletion in Numb in each of 4 tumor biopsies. Tumor from patient #2 had a dominant ploidy (3.2N) in each of 10 (A1-A10) primary tumor biopsies but with a second co-existing ploidy (3.6N) in one (A2) biopsy. A homozygous somatic BRCA2r3129x mutation was identified in all 10 biopsies and in both ploidies; however the genomes had heterogeneous aCGH profiles. In contrast, 12 primary biopsies from Patient #3 contained 6 distinct ploidies with highly aberrant but homogenous genomes, characterized by SARC amplification, homozygous deletion of ROBO1 and ROBO2, and clonal mutations in TP53, NF1, and PIK3CA. One of the ploidies, (5.8N) was present in an adjacent node and another (5.0N) in both the adjacent and distant nodes. Single cell analyses of the 5.0N and 5.8N populations revealed that allele frequencies of driver mutations were stable in the tumor and become homozygous in the LNs. There were no Her2 amplicons or mutations in biopsies analyzed in Patients #2 and #3 further contradicting the heterogeneous staining for ER, PR and Her2. Conclusion: Tumor heterogeneity includes variations in ploidies, copy number aberrations, and allele frequencies. However even highly aberrant aneuploid genomes can be stable within multiple primary and lymph node sites. Rigorous interrogation of flow sorted tumor populations, in contrast to inferring heterogeneity in bulk samples, identifies driver aberrations in single biopsies, challenges heterogeneous results with clinical biomarkers, and distinguishes allelic heterozygosity from tumor heterogeneity in highly aberrant aneuploid tumor genomes. Citation Format: Barrett MT, Lenkiewicz E, Malasi S, Webster T, Wison Sayres MA, McCullough AE, Anderson KS, Pockaj BA. Clonal heterogeneity in breast cancer and its impact on clinical biomarkers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-05-12.

Abstract Introduction: We have previously identified a 9p24.1 amplicon targeting PD-L1/JAK2 (PDJ) in subset (26.7%) of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. The PDJ amplicon is common in newly diagnosed and chemotherapy treated TNBCs and is associated with a worse prognosis. Our goal in this study was to determine whether immunohistochemistry (IHC) evaluation could identify those patients who harbor the PDJ amplicon. Methods: TNBC patients from 1999 to 2015 whose tumors were flow-sorted and evaluated by array-based comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) were identified; paraffin slides were obtained for IHC staining evaluation of JAK-2, phosphorylated STAT3 (pSTAT3), and PD-L1. Pathologic analysis consisted of scoring the stains for intensity (0-3+) and the relative percent of tumor cells with positive staining; positive score was defined as 3+ for any percent staining. Statistical analysis of IHC staining was performed to determine association with the PDJ amplicon defined by focal 9p24.1 copy number gain with CGH log2ratios of >1.0 for each sorted TNBC sample. Results: Eleven of 43 TNBC patients evaluable by IHC had the PDJ amplicon. There was no association between PDJ amplification and IHC staining for JAK-2, pSTAT3, or PD-L1 regardless of staining intensity or percentage tumor cells positive. Table 1 describes PDJ amplicon status and positivity for JAK2, pSTAT3 and PD-L1. Of PDJ-positive samples, 64%, stained positive for JAK2, 27% positive for pSTAT3, but 0% for PD-L1 in tumor cells. However, in the PDJ-negative group, 69% still stained positive for JAK2, 19% positive for pSTAT3, and 9% for PD-L1. Table 1: PDJ amplicon status and IHC staining JAK2 (3+) (n;%)pSTAT3 (3+) (n;%)PD-L1 (3+) (n;%)PDJ - (n=32)22;69%6;19%3;9%PDJ + (n=11)7;64%3;27%0;0% JAK2: Most PDJ-positive samples (10/11, 91%) showed some JAK-2 staining. Although one had only 1+ staining at 5% of the cells, the majority (7/11, 64%) had staining of 3+ and >10% of the cells with 2 patients demonstrating 3+ staining of 75% and 90% of the cells. However, those patients without the PDJ amplicon also exhibited JAK2 staining, with 66% (n= 22) of PDJ-negative cases staining strongly for JAK-2 (3+) and > 10% of cells. pSTAT3: All but one PDJ-positive case demonstrated some staining (1+ or greater) for pSTAT3; the staining intensity and percent positivity were much less than the JAK-2 staining with only 2 cases (18%) having 3+ staining of > 10%. Similar staining was seen in the PDJ-negative cohort; 75% of PDJ-negative patients had some pSTAT3 staining (1+ or greater) and 1 patient (5%) exhibited 3+ staining > 10%. PD-L1: Finally, the PD-L1 staining was low overall with only 18% of PDJ-positive cases demonstrating some staining for PD-L1. Notably, only one case stained 3+ with 20% positivity while the majority of the samples had a 2+ intensity encompassing 5-50% of the cells. Conclusions: IHC staining for JAK2, pSTAT3, or PD-L1 was not associated with the presence of the PDJ amplicon. Notably positive IHC staining for JAK2 was observed for both PDJ-positive and PDJ-negative tumor cells, thereby nullifying its application as a screening tool for PDJ amplification. Alternative methods, such as fluorescence in situ hybridization, are needed to identify PDJ-positive patients for further study. Citation Format: Linnaus ME, Kosiorek H, Ocal IT, Dixon L, Barrett MT, Gawryletz CD, Anderson KS, McCullough AE, McEachron TA, Pockaj BA. Immunohistochemistry cannot be used to detect PD-L1/JAK-2 amplification [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-03-13.

Abstract Introduction: Triple negative breast carcinoma (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer with a paucity of therapeutic targets and a poor prognostic phenotype. In a retrospective cohort, we sought to determine the prevalence of the amplicon targeting the 9p24.1 locus, resulting in over-expression of PD-L1, PD-L2, and JAK2 (PDJ), and potentially actionable therapeutic targets. We then probed the genomic landscape of these PDJ positive tumors and identified co-occurring copy number aberrations, including focal amplifications and homozygous deletions. The presence of the PDJ amplicon and selected co-occurring aberrations provide a unique description of a clinically relevant subtype of TNBC. Methods: We evaluated fresh frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tumor samples from 64 patients with triple negative breast cancer whom underwent definitive surgical resection. Clinical annotation was available in 60 of the samples. Tumor populations (diploid, tetraploid, and aneuploidy) were sorted from each biopsy using DNA content flow cytometry. Each sorted sample was interrogated with oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). All microarray slides were scanned using an Agilent 2565C DNA scanner and the images were analyzed with Agilent Feature Extraction version 10.7. The aCGH data was assessed with a series of QC metrics then analyzed using an aberration detection algorithm. Results: We detected a high level (log2ratio greater than or equal to 2) amplicon targeting 9p24.1 in 18 of 64 patients (28%) genomic profiles with triple negative breast carcinoma. In the PDJ positive population, we detected 8 of 18 patients (44%) with co-amplification targeting myc at 8q24, 3 of 18 patients (17%) with co-amplifications targeting EGFR at 7p11, 3 of 18 patients (17%) with co-amplifications targeting PIK3CA. These co-occurring genomic events in PDJ positive tumors may provide clinically actionable targets. Other selected amplifications detected included NOTCH3, KRAS, RUNX1, TUBAL3, FGFR2, AKT1, AKT2, YPEL2, PBXL7, KIT. We detected PTEN homozygous deletion in 2 of 18 patients (11%) PDJ positive tumors. Other homozygous deletions identified in the genomic landscape included FAT1, SOX3, Park2, TNFAIP3, GPC3, RB1, and CREBBP. Conclusions: In our retrospective analysis, the amplification of chromosome 9p24.1 involving PD-L1, PD-L2, and JAK2 is present in approximately 28% of triple negative breast cancer patients. The genomic landscape of these PDJ positive TNBCs include recurring high-level focal amplifications and targeted homozygous deletions of clinically relevant genes. The clinical implications of these data are under current investigation using model systems and are in early phase clinical trials. The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors including nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and JAK2 inhibitors including ruxolitinib, in PDJ positive triple negative breast carcinoma is intriguing and remains to be elucidated. Citation Format: Gawryletz CD, Anderson KS, Cunliffe HE, Northfelt DW, McCullough AE, Lenkiewicz E, Malasi S, Pockaj BA, Barrett MT. The genomic landscape of PD-L1, PD-L2, Jak2 (PDJ) amplified triple negative breast carcinoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-03-13.

Abstract Background A subset of triple negative breast cancers (TNBC) has somatic amplification of chromosome 9p24.1, encoding PD-L1, PD-L2, and JAK2 (the "PDJ" amplicon). The JAK/STAT pathway promotes malignant transformation and proliferation, and the JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib is being evaluated in early phase clinical trials in breast cancer. This study was designed to measure the frequency of PDJ copy number gain in existing TNBC cell lines, and determine the impact of targeted JAK2 inhibition on cellular proliferation. Methods: Copy number alterations were measured in nine TNBC cell lines (MDA-MB-453, MDA-MB-436, BT549, MDA-MB231, MFM-223, MDA-MB-468, H5578T, MDA-MB-157, HCC1937) by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). JAK2 and pSTAT3 expression was measured by immunoblot in four of the TNBC lines (HCC1937, MDA-MB-468, MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-436) and compared with MCF10A, SK-BR3, and T47D. To selectively inhibit JAK2, lentiviral vectors encoding five different shRNA targeting JAK2 were generated. Ruxolitinib treatment was performed at 25 uM for 48 hrs and 72 hrs. Cell proliferation was measured by CellTiter-Glo. Results: All TNBC cell lines had an elevated level of baseline protein expression of JAK2 and pSTAT3 compared to SK-BR3, T47D, and MCF10A. Of the nine TNBC cell lines, only MDA-MB-436 and BT549 had copy number gain of 9p24.1 (log2ratio<1). Four independent shRNA efficiently silenced over 90% of JAK2 expression in MDA-MB-231. The inhibition of JAK2 in MDA-MB-231 was associated with a decrease in both JAK2 and pSTAT3 protein expression and reduction in cell proliferation compared to control shRNA after 96 hrs (p<0.0001). Inhibition of proliferation was also observed for both MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-436 after ruxolitinib treatment. Conclusion These results demonstrate that existing TNBC cell lines have varying copy number alterations of chromosome 9p24.1 encoding JAK2, and targeted JAK2 inhibition in TNBC inhibits cell proliferation. Citation Format: Chen M, Andreozzi M, Gonzalez-Malerva L, Eaton S, Pockaj B, Barrett MT, Anderson KS. JAK2 copy number and targeted JAK2 inhibition of TNBC cell lines. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-04-19.

Abstract Introduction: Malignant phyllodes tumors are rare breast malignancies (0.1% of all breast tumors) with limited effective treatment options for recurrent and metastatic disease. Recent trials indicated a potential for anti-angiogenic therapy in soft tissue sarcomas, which led us to investigate these pathways. Materials and Methods: Thirty-five malignant phyllodes tumors (including two cases with matched primary and metastatic tumors) were profiled using gene sequencing (Next-generation and Sanger), gene copy number analysis (in-situ hybridization), whole genome RNA expression, and protein expression (immunohistochemical assay). Results: RNA microarray assay showed consistent over-expression of genes involved in angiogenesis including VEGFA, Angiopoietin2, VCAM1, PDGFRA, PTTG1, and CYP3A5 in all cases analyzed (n=5). No mutations in KDR (VEGFR2) were detected (0/26). EGFR protein overexpression was observed in 25/26 (96%) of cases with amplification of the EGFR gene in 8 cases (33%). EGFR gene mutations were identified in 2 cases (8%) including one case with presumed pathogenic V774M mutation and one case with EGFRvIII mutation. The most common mutations included those of TP53 (50%) and PIK3CA (15%) while other mutations (BRCA1, BRCA2, RET, CDH1, MLH1, ATM) were rare affecting single phyllodes cases. Two cases with matched primary and metastatic cancers harbored the same mutations in both sites (PIK3CA/KRAS and RB1 gene mutations, respectively). Conclusions: Comprehensive multiplatform profiling approach to phyllodes tumors identifies various molecular alterations of which some are potentially actionable. Our data suggests that anti-angiogenic therapy may also be effective in patients with malignant phyllodes tumor. Evaluation of EGFR pathway discovered consistent protein over-expression but rare activating mutations, which necessitates refinement in patient selection targeting these pathways. Citation Format: Gatalica Z, Vranic S, Ghazalpour A, Xiu J, Ocal I, McGill J, Bender R, Discianno E, Sanati S, Reddy S, Pockaj B. Comprehensive multiplatform molecular profiling identifies potentially targetable biomarkers in malignant phyllodes tumors of the breast. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-09-19.

Abstract Introduction: In a pilot study, we recently described amplification of chromosome 9p24 encoding PD-L1, PD-L2, and JAK2 (the PDJ amplicon) in 29% of early stage triple negative breast cancers (TNBC). Amplification was associated with poor DFS and OS. The impact of this amplicon on immune function is not known. Methods: Fresh frozen tumor samples from 36 subjects with newly-diagnosed TNBC (stages I-III) were evaluated for copy number aberrations using DNA-based flow cytometry to enrich nuclei based on ploidy status (tetraploidy or aneuploidy), followed by oligonucleotide CGH arrays. Targeted immune expression profiling was performed using the Nanostring PanCancer Immune Profiling Panel (n=770 genes). Results: 23 samples had measurable abnormal ploidy (evidence of sufficient tumor content) for CGH analysis; the remaining samples were omitted from analysis. High level (log2ratio >1) amplification was detected in 6/23 (26.1%) of TNBCs, and low-level copy number gain (CN log2ratio >0 and<1) was detected in 3/23 (13.0%). The remaining samples had no copy number change (n=9) or low level copy number loss (CN log2ratio>-1 and <0, n=5). Increased RNA expression of STAT1, STAT2, STAT3, and STAT6 was associated with PDJ amplification, as well as upregulation of the immune regulatory genes CD47 and IDO1. Conclusion: Amplification of chromosome 9p24.1 involving PD-L1, PD-L2, and JAK2 is present in a significant proportion of TNBCs. This amplicon is associated with altered gene expression of the tumor microenvironment. Citation Format: Anderson KS, Andreozzi M, Pockaj BA, Hopper M, McCullough AE, Barrett MT. Amplification of chromosome 9p24 targeting PD-L1 and JAK2 correlates with altered tumor microenvironment expression profiles in triple negative breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-04-02.

Abstract Background: Breast and other solid tumors exhibit high and varying degrees of intra-tumor heterogeneity that make the management and treatment of these diseases rather difficult. In order to study clinically relevant tumor heterogeneity in detail we performed an in-depth analysis of the clonal architecture of primary chemoradiation-naive breast cancers and their lymph node metastases. We combined DNA content-based flow cytometry and ploidy analysis with high-definition array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and next-generation sequencing technologies to interrogate the genomes and transcriptomes of multiple biopsies from the tumors and involved lymph nodes. Thus rather than inferring the presence of distinct tumor cell populations, our flow-sorting based approach of first identifying and defining the clonal populations and then interrogating their genomes provides a highly objective method of exploring the clinical significance of tumor heterogeneity in solid tumors. Material and methods: We used DAPI-based DNA content measurements and flow sorting to isolate nuclei from distinct clonal populations of diploid and aneuploid tumor cells in surgical tumor samples and distant lymph nodes from chemoradiation naive patients. In parallel, matching samples were processed for pathological, transcriptome, and IHC based assays. Each distinct sorted tumor cell population was then interrogated with aCGH and next generation sequencing. For each patient, the detailed profiles of ploidy, copy number aberrations and mutations were used to recreate and map the lineages present in the primary tumor and lymph. In one detailed case, we used 12 fresh frozen sections morphologically mapped from within a chemo-naïve primary invasive ductal carcinoma of histological grade 3 with lymph node involvement, 2-3 fresh frozen sections from 2 out of 5 lymph nodes with metastatic carcinoma, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections from 2 more of the involved lymph nodes and 5 morphologically mapped FFPE samples of normal tissue adjacent to the tumor. Results: We identified multiple coexisting aneuploid populations within biopsies from individual patients. Our clonal analysis determined the genomic aberrations arising in lineages that spread throughout the primary tumor and later bifurcated to distinct lymph nodes, revealing distinct therapeutic targets in the trunk and branches of the tumor. We identified driver events including high-level focal amplifications (e.g. SARC) and homozygous deletions (e.g. ROBO1 and ROBO2), that converge on distinct cellular signaling pathways. Conclusion: The approach highlighted here has broad implications in the study of tumor heterogeneity in breast and other solid tumors by providing a unique ultra-high resolution view of tumor heterogeneity that can advance more effective treatment and clinical management of patients with this disease. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr PD4-7.

Abstract Background: Estrogen receptor beta (ERβ), unlike ERα, classically functions as a tumor suppressor in vitro. However, ERβ's biological functions in vivo and predictive/prognostic value in breast cancer are controversial. Methods: Expression of ERβ protein was determined using a well characterized and validated ERβ specific monoclonal antibody that only recognizes the full-length form of this receptor (PPG5/10) in the following 3 cohorts: 1) a cohort with all breast cancer subtypes (n = 182), 2) a prospective NCCTG adjuvant tamoxifen trial for postmenopausal women with ERα positive breast cancer with long-term follow-up (n = 198) and 3) a cohort of 80 triple negative breast cancers (TNBCs). To elucidate the biological functions of ERβ in breast cancer, novel ERβ expressing MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines were developed and characterized using multiple techniques and were examined for responsiveness to various ERβ targeted therapies. Results: About one-third of all breast tumors, regardless of sub-type, were shown to express nuclear ERβ and this expression was independent of ERα or HER2. In the NCCTG 89-30-52 cohort, breast cancer recurrence rates were significantly associated with ERβ protein expression with 10 year recurrence rates of 25%, 15% and 4% for zero, low or high levels of ERβ expression respectively. Interestingly, in TNBCs, nuclear ERβ was expressed at intermediate or high levels in 24% of tumors. In the triple negative MDA-MB-231 cell line, expression of ERβ led to inhibition of proliferation and induction of apoptosis in response to estrogen and multiple ERβ specific agonists. Conversely, these same treatments induced proliferation of ERβ-expressing MCF7 cells which endogenously express ERα. However, ERβ expression sensitized MCF7 cells to the anti-proliferative effects of anti-estrogens. Microarray analysis and RT-PCR profiling of MDA-MB-231-ERβ cells revealed that estrogen and ERβ agonists highly induced the expression of multiple cystatins, a family of small secreted cysteine protease inhibitors which function as tumor suppressors, and potently inhibited canonical TGFβ signaling. Conditioned media isolated from estrogen or ERβ agonist treated MDA-MB-231-ERβ cells suppressed the proliferation rates and inhibited TGFβ signaling in other TNBC cell lines, effects that were completely reversed following the depletion of cystatins from the conditioned media. Conclusions: These data demonstrate that ERβ is expressed in a substantial proportion of breast cancers and may have value as a predictive and/or prognostic biomarker. Therapeutic targeting of ERβ may have clinical benefit in multiple breast cancer sub-types; however, the specific drug of choice may vary based on ERα status. Specifically, we have demonstrated that ERβ expression in ERα+ MCF7 cells sensitizes them to the effectiveness of anti-estrogens, an observation that was confirmed in women enrolled in a prospective adjuvant tamoxifen trial. In TNBCs, where targeted therapies are lacking, our data suggest that targeting ERβ with either estrogen or ERβ specific agonists will elicit anti-tumor effects through the induction of cystatins and inhibition of TGFβ signaling resulting in tumor regression and improved patient outcomes. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P6-04-03.

Abstract Abstract #5110 Background: It has been demonstrated that certain chemotherapeutic drugs such as taxanes increases cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) levels. Upregulation of COX-2 may be a resistance mechanism of the tumor, or a method to modulate toxic effects of the agent. COX-2 is associated with less differentiated and more aggressive breast cancers, and the expression may be a prognostic indicator of disease. Studies defining the “true” impact of therapy on COX-2 activity are lacking. Hypothesis: Chemotherapy increases COX-2 function in patients with invasive breast cancer. This leads to increased PGE2, VEGF, and downregulation of immune responses. Objective: Patients with stage II or III breast cancer were enrolled in a phase II preoperative chemotherapy trial of docetaxel and carboplatin administered every two weeks (4 cycles). We evaluated circulating PGE2, VEGF, and immune cell phenotype at diagnosis and after chemotherapy. Results: Fifty seven patients were enrolled in the study and 32 were analyzed in the lab, most of them being infiltrating ductal carcinoma. Four had complete response, 20 had partial response, and 8 were non-responders. Due to low numbers of patients analyzed, statistical significance was not achieved in most instances. Nevertheless, intriguing data has been generated that warrants further investigation. VEGF/PGE2 versus clinical response to chemotherapy: 86% of the patients in whom VEGF levels decrease post chemotherapy were responders compared to 60% in which VEGF remained unchanged or increased slightly. Responders had decreased VEGF levels on average, while the non-responders increased. Interestingly, even with low sample size, if both VEGF and PGE2 levels increase post treatment the response rate to chemotherapy is significantly lower (55% versus 88% if both VEGF and PGE2 decrease post treatment, p=0.05). Thus, both VEGF and PGE2 are critical factors in determining response rate. Whether COX-2 activity is driving both factors or whether VEGF is independently regulated is yet to be determined. Clinical Response versus Dendritic cell (DCs) / T-cell data: Data revealed highly important trends that warrant future investigation. Patients with increased B7H4 (an immunosuppressive molecule expressed on tolerizing DCs) were non-responders while patients with decreased B7H4 were responders. In contrast, responders had increased levels of CD80 and CD86 (co-stimulatory molecules expressed on activating DCs). VEGF/PGE2 Change versus Dendritic/T-cell data: When VEGF increased post treatment, B7H4 and FoxP3 (T regulatory cells) increased, while CD80, CD86, and CD8 decreased. The association between VEGF and immune cells post chemotherapy treatment is the first indication that VEGF may regulate immune cell function possibly independent of COX-2 activity. These data suggest that anti-VEGF therapy (which may include COX-2 inhibitor) may not only augment responses to chemotherapy but may also augment immune responses post chemotherapy. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 5110.