Vierkant, RA

Abstract Background Women with benign breast disease (BBD) have an increased risk for breast cancer (BC). Almost 30% of all BCs develop in women with prior BBD. Information about the features of the expected BCs after BBD would enable individualized surveillance and prevention strategies for these women. We sought to characterize BCs developing in a large cohort of women with BBD. Methods Our cohort includes 13,485 women who underwent breast biopsy for mammographic or palpable concern between 1967-2001. Biopsy slides were reviewed and classified as nonproliferative (NP), proliferative disease without atypia (PDWA), or atypical hyperplasia (AH). BCs were identified by follow-up questionnaires, medical records, and Tumor Registry data. BC tissues were obtained and reviewed. Results With a median follow-up of 15.8 years, 1273 women developed BC. Most BCs were invasive (81%), among which 61% were ductal, 13% mixed ductal/lobular, and 14% lobular. Two thirds were intermediate or high-grade, and 29% were node positive. Cancer characteristics were similar across the three histologic categories of BBD, with similar frequency of DCIS and invasive disease, tumor size, time to invasive BC, histologic type of BC, nodal positivity and HER2 positivity. Women with AH had a higher frequency of ER+ BC (91%) vs women with PD (80%) or NP (85%), p=0.02. Conclusion A substantial proportion of all BCs develop in women with prior BBD. We show that the majority of BCs after BBD are invasive tumors of ductal type, with a substantial proportion node positive. 84% of cancers were ER-positive. Chemoprevention should be strongly encouraged in higher-risk women with BBD. Citation Format: Visscher DW, Frost MH, Hartmanan LC, Frank RD, Vierkant RA, McCullough AE, Winham SJ, Vachon C, Ghosh K, Brandt KR, Farrell AM, Tarabishy Y, Hieken TJ, Haddad TC, Kraft RA, Radisky DC, Degnim AC. Clinicopathologic features of breast cancers that develop in women with previous benign breast disease. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-10-19.

Abstract Background Women with atypical hyperplasia (AH) are at an approximately four-fold increased risk of subsequent breast cancer (BC). Mammographic breast density (MBD) is a well-established risk factor for BC, but its contribution to BC risk in women with AH remains an open question. We previously reported no association between MBD [measured by Wolfe's parenchymal pattern (PP)] and BC risk in a cohort of 147 women with AH. Here, we present results in an expanded cohort of 459 women diagnosed with AH between 1985 and 2001. Methods The Mayo Clinic Benign Breast Disease Cohort includes 13,485 women who had benign core and/or excisional biopsy 1967-2001. Biopsy tissues were reviewed by our study pathologist to determine presence of AH. MBD was available from clinical records starting in 1985, coded as PP (the standard for 1985-1996) or BI-RADS (1997-2001) density criteria. The original four-level PP (N1-fatty, P1-ductal prominence <25% of breast, P2-ductal prominence >25%, DY-dysplasia) and BI-RADS (fatty, scattered densities, heterogeneously dense, extremely dense) measures were re-categorized as low, moderate or high MBD by combining the middle two categories for each. BC events and clinical information were obtained by questionnaires, medical records and the Mayo Clinic Tumor Registry. Women were followed from benign biopsy to date of BC, death or last contact. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were generated overall and within subgroups defined by density measure (PP vs. BI-RADS), number of atypical foci, and BMI by dividing the observed number of BCs by population-based expected values. Cox regression was used to estimate MBD hazard ratios after adjustment for demographic and clinical variables. Results Of the 551 women diagnosed with AH between 1985 and 2001, 459 (83%) had MBD data within 1 year prior to biopsy. Of these, 68 (15%) had low, 221 (48%) had moderate, and 170 (37%) had high MBD, respectively. Over a median follow-up of 11.7 years, 80 BCs were observed. SIRs for breast cancer did not differ significantly across density categories, overall or within any subgroups examined (see Table). Cox regression adjusting for age, BMI and density measure (PP vs. BI-RADS) also failed to identify an association with MBD (p=0.55). Low MBDModerate MBDHigh MBD N / BCsSIR (95% CI)N / BCsSIR (95% CI)N / BCsSIR (95% CI)P-valueOverall68/123.5 (1.8,6.1)221/393.6 (2.5,4.9)170/293.4 (2.3,4.8)0.97MBD Measure PP59/113.6 (1.8,6.5)85/153.0 (1.7,5.0)130/243.3 (2.2,5.0)0.87BI-RADS9/12.7 (0.1,14.7)136/244.0 (2.6,6.0)40/53.4 (1.1,7.9)0.90No. Atypical Foci 147/62.3 (0.9,5.1)123/182.8 (1.7,4.4)96/163.5 (2.0,5.8)0.63214/47.5 (2.0,19.1)58/134.8 (2.6,8.3)41/62.5 (0.9,5.5)0.213+7/26.7 (0.8,24.0)40/84.4 (1.9,8.6)33/74.0 (1.0,8.2)0.83BMI <2525/21.5 (0.2,5.4)75/184.9 (2.9,7.7)101/173.4 (2.0,5.5)0.1625-2919/54.9 (1.6,11.3)68/92.8 (1.3,5.2)36/42.1 (0.6,5.4)0.4530+23/54.8 (1.6,11.2)76/123.0 (1.6,5.3)32/74.0 (1.6,8.2)0.67SIRs compare observed numer of BCs to expected using Iowa SEER data. Analyses account for the effects of age and calendar period. P-value is test of heterogeneity in SIRs across columns. Conclusions We found no evidence of an association between MBD and subsequent BC in women with AH. Citation Format: Vierkant RA, Degnim AC, Hartmann LC, Frank RD, Radisky DC, Visscher DW, Frost MH, Winham SJ, Ghosh K, Vachon CM. No evidence of association between mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer in women with atypical hyperplasia. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-09-05.

Abstract Background: Fibroadenoma (FA) is a relatively common benign breast tumor that can occur in women of any age, with a peak incidence during the second and third decades. The only previous study of this lesion reported that FAs are associated with a 2.2 times increased risk of developing invasive breast cancer (BC) compared to matched controls [1]. This relative risk may increase to 3.1 among patients with complex FA, and remains elevated for decades after diagnosis. However, this study did not thoroughly account for other forms of concomitant risk factors. Our investigative team sought to examine breast cancer risk among women with non-complex and complex FA, overall and stratified by other BC risk factors. Materials and Methods: The study cohort included women between ages 18 to 85 in the Mayo Benign Breast Disease (BBD) Cohort who underwent excisional breast biopsy between 1967and1991 and were found to have a FA. FA was defined histologically as a combination of epithelial and stromal proliferation. Complex FA was defined as FA associated with any of the following features: sclerosing adenosis, epithelial calcifications, papillary apocrine change, and microcysts greater than 3.0 mm. The primary endpoint was a diagnosis of BC, determined using the Mayo medical record and questionnaire information from study participants. A single breast pathologist, blinded to the initial diagnosis and clinical outcome, performed pathology review. Observed vs. expected BC risk across levels of FA was assessed via standardized incidence ratios (SIRs), using age-stratified incidence rates from the Iowa Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry. Analyses were carried out overall and within subgroups of involution status (none, partial, complete) and overall histology (non-proliferative disease [NP], proliferative disease without atypia [PDWA] or atypical hyperplasia [AH]). Results: Of 9097 women in the Mayo BBD Cohort, FA were identified in 2139- non-complex in 1903 (20.9%) and complex in 236 (2.6%). The greatest proportion of FA occurred in the 40–69 age range. The mean ages for women with non-complex FA and complex FA were 45.7 and 50.2 years respectively. The SIR of breast cancer in the overall BBD cohort was 1.5 (95% CI [1.4–1.6]). The SIR among women with non-complex FA was 1.5 (95% CI [1.3–1.8]), and for complex FA increased to 2.41 (95% CI [1.7–3.4]). However, women with complex FA were more likely to have other concomitant high-risk histologic features such as PDWA and incomplete involution. In stratified analyses accounting for involution status and PDWA, complex FA did not demonstrate an independent increase in BC risk. Conclusion: Complex FA does not confer an increased risk for BC beyond other established histologic features. Therefore, women with complex FA should be managed based upon a risk level consistent with the major histologic category of PDWA and/or AH. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-01-08.

Abstract Background: Optimal early detection and prevention strategies for breast cancer are predicated on our ability to accurately identify women at increased risk for disease. Current breast cancer risk prediction models rely on clinical and epidemiologic features. As demonstrated with other cancers, such as those of the cervix and colon, cancer risk assessment is enhanced when the tissue at risk is examined for evidence of premalignant abnormalities. Here, we present a multivariate model for individualized breast cancer risk prediction that incorporates tissue features identified from biopsies from women with benign breast disease (BBD). Methods: We used our cohort of more than 9000 women diagnosed with BBD at the Mayo Clinic from 1967–1991, and identified a nested case:control series of 377 women who developed cancer (cases) matched with 734 women who did not (controls). We identified a set of variables that either alone or in two-way interactions contributed to a multivariable risk prediction model. We combined this relative risk model with the baseline incidence of breast cancer and the baseline hazard of death from our full BBD cohort to develop a risk prediction tool that computes absolute risk estimates for breast cancer. We calculated 5-year risk predictions for these cases and controls using our model and using the Gail model and compared c-statistics from these risk predictions. We validated our model using an independent set of 378 breast cancer cases and 728 matched controls drawn from our BBD cohort. Results: Cases and controls in the model development data set differed significantly on a number of features when examined individually. Those included in a multivariable relative risk model for breast cancer among women with BBD are shown below. After including interactions between lobular involution, and histologic impression, with age at first live birth/number of children, and degree of involution with sclerosing adenosis, we devised a model that predicts the absolute risk of breast cancer. Predicted five-year risks in the model development series, we observed a c-statistic of 0.66, higher than the c-statistic of 0.61 for the Gail model. With risk prediction estimates from our validation series of cases and matched controls, the c-statistic of our model decreased to 0.59 and the c-statistic for the Gail model was 0.55. Conclusion: We have identified an initial risk prediction model for breast cancer in women with BBD. The identified model includes basic demographic information as well as a number of histologic features of the tissue samples. Its initial performance is promising, providing improved discrimination over the Gail model in our replication data set. Further work is needed to identify features which might provide additional predictive information for breast cancer risk. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-12-03.

Abstract The association between hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and breast cancer risk in women with benign breast disease (BBD) is unclear. However, others have shown that HRT use is associated with the development of proliferative breast disease (Rohan et. al, CEBP 2008). To better clarify potential risks associated with postmenopausal hormone use in women with BBD, we performed a nested case control study within the Mayo Clinic Benign Breast Disease Cohort. In the cohort, there are 11,079 women who had benign breast biopsies between 1967 and 1996 and for whom we have outcome and risk factor data, including use of HRT. We studied 947 cases (breast cancer after BBD) and two controls matched to each case based on age and year of BBD. Information on use of HRT was obtained through use of questionnaires and medical record review with a mean time of follow up of 17.4 years. HRT use, histology, involution status, and family history were all evaluated for impact on breast cancer risk in a multivariate model. As shown in Table 1, when looking at effects of histology, involution, and family history, we confirmed previously reported findings of risk (Hartmann LC et. al, NEJM 2005). Specifically, we saw increased risk in women with AH vs. PDWA or NP, decreased risk with complete involution vs. partial or no involution, and increased risk with strong family history vs. weak or no family history. Associations of hormone replacement therapy and other relevant clinical variables with risk of breast cancer Multivariate model simultaneously including all variables listed in the table. HRT=hormone replacement therapy. NP=non-proliferative. PDWA=proliferative disease without atypia. AH=atypical hyperplasia We found that women who had used HRT had no higher risk of developing breast cancer than women who had not used HRT. Specifically, with Never Users as the reference group, those with 5 years or less exposure had OR 0.80 (0.56-1.15); 6-10 years, 0.85 (0.56-1.28) and 11+ years, 0.51 (0.36-0.72), p =0.002. In conclusion, we found that HRT use among postmenopausal women with BBD was not associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. In this case-control set, we confirmed previous findings regarding well established risk factors of histology, involution status, and family history. While HRT use may contribute to the development of proliferative breast disease, we do not see that HRT is associated with additional breast cancer risk, beyond that of the proliferative disease itself. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-09-03.

Abstract Abstract #62 Background: Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in younger women (25 to 49 years of age). Young women with breast cancer also have worse overall survival and increased risk of recurrence compared to older women with breast cancer. Innovative approaches to understanding risk factors and tissue characteristics for the younger population can improve understanding of breast cancer etiology and enhance risk-stratification for these women. This study was aimed at examining breast cancer risk factors among young women (<50 years) with BBD. Materials and Methods: Utilizing the Mayo Clinic Surgical and Pathology Indices, women ages 18 to 85 who had benign excisional breast biopsy between January 1, 1967 and December 31, 1991 were identified. The diagnosis of breast cancer served as the study endpoint and was determined using the Mayo medical record and questionnaire information from study participants. The breast pathologist, blinded to the initial diagnosis and clinical outcome, performed pathology review. BBD was classified as non-proliferative disease (NPD), proliferative disease without atypia (PDWA), or atypical hyperplasia (AH). Age-related lobular involution (reduction in number and size of acini per lobule) was classified as none-0%, partial- 1 to74%, or complete- >75% involution. Relative risk (RR) was estimated by comparing the number of observed breast cancers with the number expected, based on breast cancer rates in the Iowa Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry. Results: Of the 9376 women in the Mayo BBD cohort, 4460 women were aged <50 years at BBD diagnosis and formed the study cohort. The mean age at BBD diagnosis was 39.4 (+ 8.3) years. With a median follow-up of 20 years, 326 breast cancer cases were identified. The histologic findings were NPD in 72% of women, PDWA in 26%, and AH in 2%. The relative risk of breast cancer for the overall cohort of young women with BBD was 1.5 (95% CI [1.4, 1.7]). The relative risk among those with AH was 6.9 (95% CI [4.6, 10.1), compared with a RR of 2.0 (95% CI [1.7, 2.4]) for PDWA, and RR of 1.2 (95% CI [1.0, 1.4]) for NPD. Risk was associated with extent of lobular involution (RR for no involution was 1.7 (95%CI [1.4, 2.1]); partial involution 1.4 (95%CI [1.2, 1.7]); complete involution 0.7 (95%CI [0.3, 1.4]). Family history was available for 83% of the cohort and RR was 2.2 (95% CI [1.7, 2.8]) for women with strong family history and was 1.3 (95% CI [1.1, 1.6]) for women with no family history. Discussion: Young women with BBD are at increased risk of breast cancer. Risk is high in women with atypical hyperplasia, and those with a family history of breast cancer. Lobular involution is associated with reduced breast cancer risk in this population, suggesting a role in modifying breast cancer risk. These findings suggest the need for further research in this population, along with tissue-based studies to examine the processes leading to breast cancer, and enable identification of those women at highest risk. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 62.

Abstract Abstract #5008 Background: Accurate, individualized risk prediction for breast cancer is lacking. Tissue-based features, such as the terminal duct lobular unit (TDLU), may help to stratify women into different risk levels as breast lobules are the anatomic sites of origin of breast cancer. As women age, these lobular structures should regress, which results in reduced breast cancer risk. Regression, however, does not occur in all women.
 Materials and Methods: We have quantified the extent of lobule regression on a benign breast biopsy in 85 breast cancer cases and 142 age-matched controls from the Mayo Benign Breast Disease Cohort, by determining number of acini/lobule and lobular area. We also calculated Gail model 5-year predicted risks for these women.
 Results: There is a step-wise increase in breast cancer risk with increasing numbers of acini/lobule (p=0.0004). Adjusting for Gail model score, parity, histology, and family history did not attenuate this association.
 
 Lobular area was similarly associated with risk. The Gail model estimates were associated with risk of breast cancer (p=0.03). We examined the individual accuracy of these measures using the concordance (c) statistic. The Gail model c-statistic was 0.60 (95% CI; 0.50-0.70); the acinar count c-statistic was 0.65 (95% CI; 0.54-0.75). Combining acinar count and lobular area, the c-statistic was 0.68 (95% GI; 0.58-0.78). Adding the Gail model to these did not improve the c-statistic.
 
 Discussion: Novel, tissue-based features that reflect the status of a woman's normal breast lobules are strongly associated with breast cancer risk. These features appear to provide more accurate risk assessment than the currently used Gail model. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 5008.