Frank, RD

Abstract Background Women with benign breast disease (BBD) have an increased risk for breast cancer (BC). Almost 30% of all BCs develop in women with prior BBD. Information about the features of the expected BCs after BBD would enable individualized surveillance and prevention strategies for these women. We sought to characterize BCs developing in a large cohort of women with BBD. Methods Our cohort includes 13,485 women who underwent breast biopsy for mammographic or palpable concern between 1967-2001. Biopsy slides were reviewed and classified as nonproliferative (NP), proliferative disease without atypia (PDWA), or atypical hyperplasia (AH). BCs were identified by follow-up questionnaires, medical records, and Tumor Registry data. BC tissues were obtained and reviewed. Results With a median follow-up of 15.8 years, 1273 women developed BC. Most BCs were invasive (81%), among which 61% were ductal, 13% mixed ductal/lobular, and 14% lobular. Two thirds were intermediate or high-grade, and 29% were node positive. Cancer characteristics were similar across the three histologic categories of BBD, with similar frequency of DCIS and invasive disease, tumor size, time to invasive BC, histologic type of BC, nodal positivity and HER2 positivity. Women with AH had a higher frequency of ER+ BC (91%) vs women with PD (80%) or NP (85%), p=0.02. Conclusion A substantial proportion of all BCs develop in women with prior BBD. We show that the majority of BCs after BBD are invasive tumors of ductal type, with a substantial proportion node positive. 84% of cancers were ER-positive. Chemoprevention should be strongly encouraged in higher-risk women with BBD. Citation Format: Visscher DW, Frost MH, Hartmanan LC, Frank RD, Vierkant RA, McCullough AE, Winham SJ, Vachon C, Ghosh K, Brandt KR, Farrell AM, Tarabishy Y, Hieken TJ, Haddad TC, Kraft RA, Radisky DC, Degnim AC. Clinicopathologic features of breast cancers that develop in women with previous benign breast disease. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-10-19.

Abstract Background Women with atypical hyperplasia (AH) are at an approximately four-fold increased risk of subsequent breast cancer (BC). Mammographic breast density (MBD) is a well-established risk factor for BC, but its contribution to BC risk in women with AH remains an open question. We previously reported no association between MBD [measured by Wolfe's parenchymal pattern (PP)] and BC risk in a cohort of 147 women with AH. Here, we present results in an expanded cohort of 459 women diagnosed with AH between 1985 and 2001. Methods The Mayo Clinic Benign Breast Disease Cohort includes 13,485 women who had benign core and/or excisional biopsy 1967-2001. Biopsy tissues were reviewed by our study pathologist to determine presence of AH. MBD was available from clinical records starting in 1985, coded as PP (the standard for 1985-1996) or BI-RADS (1997-2001) density criteria. The original four-level PP (N1-fatty, P1-ductal prominence <25% of breast, P2-ductal prominence >25%, DY-dysplasia) and BI-RADS (fatty, scattered densities, heterogeneously dense, extremely dense) measures were re-categorized as low, moderate or high MBD by combining the middle two categories for each. BC events and clinical information were obtained by questionnaires, medical records and the Mayo Clinic Tumor Registry. Women were followed from benign biopsy to date of BC, death or last contact. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were generated overall and within subgroups defined by density measure (PP vs. BI-RADS), number of atypical foci, and BMI by dividing the observed number of BCs by population-based expected values. Cox regression was used to estimate MBD hazard ratios after adjustment for demographic and clinical variables. Results Of the 551 women diagnosed with AH between 1985 and 2001, 459 (83%) had MBD data within 1 year prior to biopsy. Of these, 68 (15%) had low, 221 (48%) had moderate, and 170 (37%) had high MBD, respectively. Over a median follow-up of 11.7 years, 80 BCs were observed. SIRs for breast cancer did not differ significantly across density categories, overall or within any subgroups examined (see Table). Cox regression adjusting for age, BMI and density measure (PP vs. BI-RADS) also failed to identify an association with MBD (p=0.55). Low MBDModerate MBDHigh MBD N / BCsSIR (95% CI)N / BCsSIR (95% CI)N / BCsSIR (95% CI)P-valueOverall68/123.5 (1.8,6.1)221/393.6 (2.5,4.9)170/293.4 (2.3,4.8)0.97MBD Measure PP59/113.6 (1.8,6.5)85/153.0 (1.7,5.0)130/243.3 (2.2,5.0)0.87BI-RADS9/12.7 (0.1,14.7)136/244.0 (2.6,6.0)40/53.4 (1.1,7.9)0.90No. Atypical Foci 147/62.3 (0.9,5.1)123/182.8 (1.7,4.4)96/163.5 (2.0,5.8)0.63214/47.5 (2.0,19.1)58/134.8 (2.6,8.3)41/62.5 (0.9,5.5)0.213+7/26.7 (0.8,24.0)40/84.4 (1.9,8.6)33/74.0 (1.0,8.2)0.83BMI <2525/21.5 (0.2,5.4)75/184.9 (2.9,7.7)101/173.4 (2.0,5.5)0.1625-2919/54.9 (1.6,11.3)68/92.8 (1.3,5.2)36/42.1 (0.6,5.4)0.4530+23/54.8 (1.6,11.2)76/123.0 (1.6,5.3)32/74.0 (1.6,8.2)0.67SIRs compare observed numer of BCs to expected using Iowa SEER data. Analyses account for the effects of age and calendar period. P-value is test of heterogeneity in SIRs across columns. Conclusions We found no evidence of an association between MBD and subsequent BC in women with AH. Citation Format: Vierkant RA, Degnim AC, Hartmann LC, Frank RD, Radisky DC, Visscher DW, Frost MH, Winham SJ, Ghosh K, Vachon CM. No evidence of association between mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer in women with atypical hyperplasia. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-09-05.

Abstract Background: Fibroadenoma (FA) is a relatively common benign breast tumor that can occur in women of any age, with a peak incidence during the second and third decades. The only previous study of this lesion reported that FAs are associated with a 2.2 times increased risk of developing invasive breast cancer (BC) compared to matched controls [1]. This relative risk may increase to 3.1 among patients with complex FA, and remains elevated for decades after diagnosis. However, this study did not thoroughly account for other forms of concomitant risk factors. Our investigative team sought to examine breast cancer risk among women with non-complex and complex FA, overall and stratified by other BC risk factors. Materials and Methods: The study cohort included women between ages 18 to 85 in the Mayo Benign Breast Disease (BBD) Cohort who underwent excisional breast biopsy between 1967and1991 and were found to have a FA. FA was defined histologically as a combination of epithelial and stromal proliferation. Complex FA was defined as FA associated with any of the following features: sclerosing adenosis, epithelial calcifications, papillary apocrine change, and microcysts greater than 3.0 mm. The primary endpoint was a diagnosis of BC, determined using the Mayo medical record and questionnaire information from study participants. A single breast pathologist, blinded to the initial diagnosis and clinical outcome, performed pathology review. Observed vs. expected BC risk across levels of FA was assessed via standardized incidence ratios (SIRs), using age-stratified incidence rates from the Iowa Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry. Analyses were carried out overall and within subgroups of involution status (none, partial, complete) and overall histology (non-proliferative disease [NP], proliferative disease without atypia [PDWA] or atypical hyperplasia [AH]). Results: Of 9097 women in the Mayo BBD Cohort, FA were identified in 2139- non-complex in 1903 (20.9%) and complex in 236 (2.6%). The greatest proportion of FA occurred in the 40–69 age range. The mean ages for women with non-complex FA and complex FA were 45.7 and 50.2 years respectively. The SIR of breast cancer in the overall BBD cohort was 1.5 (95% CI [1.4–1.6]). The SIR among women with non-complex FA was 1.5 (95% CI [1.3–1.8]), and for complex FA increased to 2.41 (95% CI [1.7–3.4]). However, women with complex FA were more likely to have other concomitant high-risk histologic features such as PDWA and incomplete involution. In stratified analyses accounting for involution status and PDWA, complex FA did not demonstrate an independent increase in BC risk. Conclusion: Complex FA does not confer an increased risk for BC beyond other established histologic features. Therefore, women with complex FA should be managed based upon a risk level consistent with the major histologic category of PDWA and/or AH. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-01-08.

Abstract Background: Optimal early detection and prevention strategies for breast cancer are predicated on our ability to accurately identify women at increased risk for disease. Current breast cancer risk prediction models rely on clinical and epidemiologic features. As demonstrated with other cancers, such as those of the cervix and colon, cancer risk assessment is enhanced when the tissue at risk is examined for evidence of premalignant abnormalities. Here, we present a multivariate model for individualized breast cancer risk prediction that incorporates tissue features identified from biopsies from women with benign breast disease (BBD). Methods: We used our cohort of more than 9000 women diagnosed with BBD at the Mayo Clinic from 1967–1991, and identified a nested case:control series of 377 women who developed cancer (cases) matched with 734 women who did not (controls). We identified a set of variables that either alone or in two-way interactions contributed to a multivariable risk prediction model. We combined this relative risk model with the baseline incidence of breast cancer and the baseline hazard of death from our full BBD cohort to develop a risk prediction tool that computes absolute risk estimates for breast cancer. We calculated 5-year risk predictions for these cases and controls using our model and using the Gail model and compared c-statistics from these risk predictions. We validated our model using an independent set of 378 breast cancer cases and 728 matched controls drawn from our BBD cohort. Results: Cases and controls in the model development data set differed significantly on a number of features when examined individually. Those included in a multivariable relative risk model for breast cancer among women with BBD are shown below. After including interactions between lobular involution, and histologic impression, with age at first live birth/number of children, and degree of involution with sclerosing adenosis, we devised a model that predicts the absolute risk of breast cancer. Predicted five-year risks in the model development series, we observed a c-statistic of 0.66, higher than the c-statistic of 0.61 for the Gail model. With risk prediction estimates from our validation series of cases and matched controls, the c-statistic of our model decreased to 0.59 and the c-statistic for the Gail model was 0.55. Conclusion: We have identified an initial risk prediction model for breast cancer in women with BBD. The identified model includes basic demographic information as well as a number of histologic features of the tissue samples. Its initial performance is promising, providing improved discrimination over the Gail model in our replication data set. Further work is needed to identify features which might provide additional predictive information for breast cancer risk. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-12-03.