Dueck, A. C.

Abstract Previous findings suggested that patients (pts) with copy number alterations of MYC (8q24) and centromere 8 (CEN 8) in the setting of HER2-positive breast cancer may be associated with improved outcome to adjuvant trastuzumab. Our tissue microarray (TMA) data suggested that alternate cutpoints for MYC copy number anomalies [of 802 pts, those with MYC:CEN8 ratio ≥1.3 or <1.3 & polysomy 8 (N=658; 82%) had a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.44 (P<0.001) and those with MYC copy number ≥2.5 (N=669; 84%) had a HR of 0.42 (P<0.001)] were potentially predictive of benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab when administered concurrently with chemotherapy in the NCCTG N9831 HER2+ phase III trial. Purpose: We were interested in determining whether MYC is the target protein responsible for the suggested benefit from trastuzumab. We evaluated the association between MYC protein expression and disease-free survival (DFS) of pts randomized to receive chemotherapy alone (Arm A) or chemotherapy with sequential (Arm B) or concurrent trastuzumab (Arm C) using N9831 TMAs. Patients/Methods: This analysis included 1220 pts from Arms A, B, and C. The percentage of strong (3+) nuclear staining was determined in TMA sections containing 3 cores per block using immunohistochemistry (IHC; clone 9E10, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). A patient's tumor was considered positive (MYC+) if the maximum nuclear 3+ staining percentage across cores was >30% a priori. Median follow-up was 5.8 years. Results: Of 1220 pts with completed IHC analyses, 557 (46%) were MYC+. MYC+ was associated with a higher rate of hormone receptor positivity (58% vs 48%, chi-sq P<0.001) and higher rate of nodal positivity (92% vs 84%, chi-sq P<0.001) but not associated with age, race, tumor histology, tumor grade, or tumor size. In comparing DFS between arms C and A, MYC+ and MYC-pts had HRs of 0.46 (p=0.002; A: 187 pts, 57 events, C: 161 pts, 25 events) and 0.70 (p=0.09; A: 213 pts, 59 events, C: 208 pts, 38 events), respectively (interaction p=0.20). In comparing DFS between arms B and A, MYC+ and MYC-pts had HRs of 0.74 (p=0.11; B: 209 pts, 52 events) and 0.81 (p=0.29; B: 242 pts, 53 events), respectively (interaction p=0.80) (Figure). In addition, pts with nuclear MYC staining of 3+ in 0-9%, 10-30%, 31-60%, and 61-100% of cells had HRs (C vs A) of 0.98 (95% CI 0.53-1.82), 0.54 (95% CI 0.30-0.97), 0.55 (95% CI 0.27-1.12), and 0.37 (95% CI 0.19-0.75). Conclusions: In our analysis of 1220 pts, we observed that MYC protein expression positively correlated with hormone receptor positivity and nodal status. We observed a trend towards greater trastuzumab benefit among MYC+ as compared to MYC-pts. A rising trend in trastuzumab benefit was observed with increasing MYC protein expression. Analyses including pts with whole sections and outcome by MYC protein and gene copy number will be presented. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-09-08.

Purpose Findings from the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) –positive National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B31 trial suggested that MYC/HER2 coamplification (> 5.0 copies/nucleus) was associated with additional benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab in patients with early-stage breast cancer. To further explore this relationship, we investigated associations between MYC amplification and disease-free survival (DFS) in a similar adjuvant trastuzumab HER2-positive breast cancer trial—North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) N9831. Patients and Methods This analysis included 799 patients randomly assigned to receive chemotherapy alone or with concurrent trastuzumab on N9831. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed by using a dual-probe mixture for MYC and centromere 8 (MYC:CEP8) on tissue microarrays. MYC amplification was prespecified as MYC:CEP8 ratio > 2.2 or average MYC copies/nucleus > 5.0. Exploratory variables included polysomy 8. Results In comparing DFS (median follow-up, 4.0 years) between treatments, patients with MYC:CEP8 ratio ≤ 2.2 (n = 618; 77%) and > 2.2 (n = 181; 23%) had hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.46 (P < .001) and 0.67 (P = .33), respectively (interaction P = .38). Patients with MYC copies/nucleus ≤ 5.0 (n = 534; 67%) and > 5.0 (n = 265; 33%) had HRs of 0.52 (P = .002) and 0.48 (P = .02), respectively (interaction P = .94). Patients with MYC:CEP8 ratio < 1.3 with normal chromosome 8 copy number (n = 141; 18%) and ≥ 1.3 or < 1.3 with polysomy 8 (n = 658; 82%) had HRs of 0.66 (P = .28) and 0.44 (P < .001), respectively (interaction P = .23). Patients with MYC copies/nucleus < 2.5 (n = 130; 16%) and ≥ 2.5 (n = 669; 84%) had HRs of 1.07 (P = .87) and 0.42 (P < .001), respectively (interaction P = .05). Conclusion We did not confirm the B31 association between MYC amplification and additional trastuzumab benefit. Exploratory analyses revealed potential associations between alternative MYC/chromosome 8 copy number alterations and differential benefit of adjuvant trastuzumab.

Abstract Abstract #6149 Background: Internal Review Boards and Data and Safety Monitoring Boards often require protocol-specified adverse event (AE) stopping rules for safety monitoring. However, availability of safety data for investigational agent(s) may be limited at the time of protocol development in the phase II setting. This meta-analysis was undertaken to quantify the variability of AE rates in North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) phase II metastatic breast cancer (MBC) clinical trials and to investigate whether study factors are associated with AE rates for the development of AE stopping rules in future phase II clinical trials.&#x2028; Methods: All closed NCCTG phase II MBC clinical trials using CTC v2.0 or CTCAE v3.0 for AE monitoring were selected. Rates of G3/4 AEs (overall, hematologic [H], and non-hematologic [NH]) and of study discontinuation [SD] due to AEs were calculated for each trial. Associations between study factors [number of agents (single vs combination); line of therapy (first-line only vs other); and type of therapy (chemotherapy vs other)] and AE rates were assessed via Wilcoxon rank sum tests.&#x2028; Results: 15 trials met inclusion criteria. 7 used CTCAE v3.0; 6 investigated single agents; 5 investigated first-line therapy; and 11 investigated chemotherapy regimens. 694 pts were evaluable for AE analysis. The G3/4 AE rate across trials was 68% (16-98%) overall, 45% (0-96%) H, and 51% (16-78%) NH. The overall rate of SD due to AEs was 13% (0-40%). The overall rate of G3/4 AEs was significantly lower in single agents vs combination regimens (30% vs 86%, p=0.004). This association held for H (2% vs 66%, p&lt;0.0001) and NH (27% vs 57%, p=0.03) Aes. The rate of SD due to AEs was also significantly lower in single agents vs combination regimens (0.5% vs 15%, p=0.04). The rate of G3/4 AEs was significantly higher in first-line only trials vs other trials (overall: 90% vs 47%, p=0.04; H: 73% vs 5%, p=0.02; NH: 66% vs 41%, p=0.08). The rate of SD due to AEs was also significantly higher in first-line only trials (18% vs 4%, p=0.008). The only significant association with chemotherapy vs other therapy was G3/4 H AE rates (51% vs 2%, p=0.02).&#x2028; Discussion: High variability in G3/4 AE rates overall and in H and NH AEs was noted in these 15 trials. There is also high variability in the rates of SD due to AEs. The data suggest that clinical trials with single agent regimens have lower AE rates than combination regimens and, surprisingly, trials of first-line therapy only have higher AE rates than other trials. This may be due to more aggressive therapy being tested in the first-line setting. Although data from previous trials with the investigational agent(s) should be used for developing AE stopping rules when available, this study suggests that study factors such as number of agents and line of therapy can be useful when previous data are limited. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 6149.

Abstract Abstract #6147 Background: Phase II metastatic breast cancer (MBC) clinical trials evaluating efficacy of cancer treatments are often designed using a binary primary endpoint (i.e., each evaluable patient [pt] is classified as a “success” or “failure”). In the era of novel agents in cancer research, endpoints such as 6-month progression-free survival [PFS6] for measuring efficacy of cytostatic agents are more commonly being used. This meta-analysis was undertaken to compare two binary classifications of PFS6 and to compare these binary endpoints with other efficacy endpoints in the phase II setting.&#x2028; Material and Methods: All closed North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) phase II MBC clinical trials using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) with at least 1 year of follow-up since last pt accrued were selected. All eligible pts initiating treatment were included. Two binary classifications of PFS6 were computed for each trial. Success for PFS6-1 is defined as on study treatment 6 months from registration without documentation of disease progression. Success for PFS6-2 does not require a pt to be on study treatment at 6 months. Also computed for each trial are Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates of PFS6 (PFS6-KM) and 1-year overall survival (OS1-KM). Trial-level endpoints were summarized using descriptive statistics and compared using weighted (by trial sample sizes) Pearson correlations. Lastly, the concordance rate of PFS6-1 and PFS6-2 status with OS status at 1 year at the pt level was computed across all pts (pts censored for OS prior to one year were excluded [n=10]).&#x2028; Results: 11 trials met inclusion criteria. All trials required measurable disease and had a single arm. 485 evaluable pts were accrued (median 48 pts per trial [range 19-77]). Median PFS6-1 was 27% (range 10-44%) and median PFS6-2 was 34% (range 10-73%). The median trial-level difference between PFS6-1 and PFS6-2 was 5% (range 0-43%). The correlation between PFS6-1 and PFS6-2 was 0.81 (p&lt;0.01). Among the endpoints, PFS6-2 and PFS6-KM had the highest correlation (&gt;0.99, p&lt;0.01) due to only 2 pts being censored for PFS prior to 6 months. Among the PFS endpoints, OS1-KM was most highly correlated with PFS6-1 (0.79, p&lt;0.01) with the correlations with PFS6-2 and PFS6-KM not being statistically different from zero (both 0.59 with p&gt;0.05). However, overall patient-level concordance between PFS6 status and OS status at 1 year was higher using PFS6-2 (68%) than PFS6-1 (59%).&#x2028; Discussion: Differences were observed between the two binary classifications of PFS6. PFS6 with (as compared to without) the requirement that a pt be on study treatment at 6 months appears to have higher correlation with OS at 1 year at the trial level but lower concordance with OS status at 1 year at the pt level. Selection of the historical control should take into consideration the definition of PFS6 being used. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 6147.

Abstract Abstract #6074 Objective: To analyze blood-serum biomarkers (HER2, EGFR, uPA, and TIMP-1) for prediction of response to treatment in conjunction with Study 96-32-55, a multicenter phase II trial assessing the efficacy and tolerability of two irinotecan schedules in anthracycline- or taxane-refractory MBC patients.&#x2028; Methods: MBC patients who experienced disease progression after one to three chemotherapy regimens, including at least one anthracycline- or taxane-based regimen, were randomly assigned to irinotecan in 6-week cycles comprising 100 mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks, then a 2-week rest or 240 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. During this study the serum samples from each patient were collected at a possibility of three time points; prior to treatment, at the first occurrence of response, and at completion of or withdrawal from treatment. Response prediction was analyzed using predetermined elevated/non-elevated serum biomarker cutoffs. Percentage changes from baseline to first response and disease progression were analyzed.&#x2028; Results: In the weekly arm, the objective response (CR+PR) rate was 23% (95% CI, 13% to 37%), and in the every-3-weeks arm, the objective response rate was 14% (95% CI, 6% to 26%). Serum biomarker levels were determined for HER2, EGFR, uPA, and TIMP-1 prior to treatment for 91 patients. Of these 91 patients, 17 had serum measurements at first response, and 38 had serum measurements at their completion of study due to disease progression. Only 7 patients had serum-levels collected at all three event-points. The baseline levels of sHER2, EGFR, uPA, and TIMP-1 were not different among responders and non-responders (Fisher's Exact p=0.41, 0.26, 0.68, 0.75). sHER2 level increased by 20.6% from baseline to disease progression (p=0.01). TIMP-1 level was 15.2% lower than baseline at first response (p=0.03), 16.5% higher than baseline at disease progression (p=0.01), and for 7 patients with all three event-point measures, TIMP-1 was 21.8% lower than baseline at first response and was 22.3% higher than baseline at disease progression (p=0.02, 0.04).&#x2028; Conclusions: In this study, serum levels of HER2, EGFR, uPA, and TIMP-1 do not appear to be predictive of response. However, interpretation of the data is compromised due to limited availability of serum at all 3 points. Serum HER2 appears higher at disease progression than at baseline. Serum TIMP-1 appears to decrease from baseline to first response, and then appears to increase at disease progression. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 6074.

Abstract Abstract #56 Background: Recent findings from NSABP B-31 suggested that breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) with c-MYC (MYC)/HER2 co-amplification in their primary tumors may benefit more in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) from adjuvant trastuzumab (n=471; p&lt;0.0001, HR 0.24; 13 vs. 51 events) than those pts with only HER2 amplification in their primary tumors (n=1078, p=0.007, HR 0.63; 55 vs. 82 events).&#x2028; Purpose: The overall objective of this analysis is to determine the association between MYC/HER2 co-amplification and outcome of pts randomized to receive chemotherapy alone (Arm A) or chemotherapy with concurrent trastuzumab (Arm C) on N9831.&#x2028; Patients/Methods: This analysis included 868 pts from the HER2+ NCCTG N9831 Intergroup adjuvant trastuzumab phase III clinical trial on Arms A or C. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed at a central laboratory, Mayo Clinic Clinical Cytogenetics Laboratory, using dual probe mixtures for HER2 (17q11.2-12/centromere 17) and for MYC (8q24/centromere 8). The HER2 amplification status in whole tissue sections was evaluated to determine eligibility of pts for N9831. Tissue microarrays containing three cores from each patient's tumor were analyzed for MYC amplification status. The gene and centromere copy number as well as the distribution of the signals for each marker were determined in sixty non-overlapping interphase nuclei.&#x2028; Results: Of 273 pts with completed FISH analyses, 34 (12%) pts had MYC amplification. The rate of MYC amplification was similar across arms (18/135 [13%] vs. 16/138 [12%]; ChiS p=0.66). Co-amplification of MYC/HER2 was observed in 32 (12%) pts with similar co-amplification rates across arms (17/135 [13%] vs. 15/138 [11%]; ChiS p=0.66). Based on preliminary analyses, MYC amplification and MYC/HER2 co-amplification do not appear to be associated with race, menopausal status, hormone receptor status, nodal status, tumor histology, tumor grade, or tumor size (all ChiS p&gt;0.05); however, MYC amplified pts were significantly younger than MYC non-amplified pts (mean 46.4 vs. 51.0, t-test p=0.02) and MYC/HER2 co-amplified pts were significantly younger than MYC/HER2 non-co-amplified pts (mean 45.9 vs. 51.0, t-test p=0.01).&#x2028; Conclusions: In our initial analyses of 239 pts, we observed a lower frequency of MYC/HER2 co-amplification than the previously reported 30% for NSABP B-31. Complete FISH analyses of 868 pts in N9831 and association with DFS will be presented. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 56.

Abstract Abstract #2109 Background: Despite the impressive results of the recently released trastuzumab adjuvant therapy trials, 15% of patients with HER2 overexpressing or amplified breast cancer developed tumor relapse at 4 years. Lapatinib is a small molecule reversible TKI that inhibits both ErbB1 and ErbB2. The current study was developed to assess the cardiac safety and feasibility of adding lapatinib to paclitaxel and trastuzumab following as part of adjuvant therapy.&#x2028; Methods: A single-arm phase II study of doxorubicin (A, 60 mg/m2 day 1) and cyclophosphamide (C, 600 mg/m2 day 1) [q2w or q3w for 4 cycles]; followed by paclitaxel (P, 80 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15), trastuzumab (T, 4 mg/kg loading dose then 2 mg/kg days 1, 8, 15), and lapatinib (L, 1000 mg days 1-21) [12 weeks]; followed by T (6 mg/kg day 1) and L (1000 mg days 1-21) [40 weeks] was conducted. The primary endpoint was the incidence of congestive heart failure. The current unplanned safety analysis was undertaken due to the observance of a high rate of G3/4 diarrhea.&#x2028; Results: From April 2007 to June 2008, 98 pts were enrolled and initiated study treatment. Median age was 51 (range 32-72). Among 83 pts with adverse event (AE) data available, 50 (60%) pts have experienced a G3/4 non-hematologic AE. During post-AC treatment, among 53 pts with AE data available, 31 (58.5%) patients have experienced a G3/4 non-hematologic AE with 24 (45%) patients reporting G3/4 diarrhea. Median cycle of onset of G3/4 diarrhea was cycle 5 (first cycle of PTL) with 16 (64%) cases first reported during cycle 5 and 5 (20%) cases first reported during cycle 6. Among 57, 46, 38, and 32 pts receiving treatment with PTL during cycles 5-8, 65%, 57%, 61%, and 72% of patients received the full L dose, respectively. 31 patients have ended active treatment with 10 due to patient refusal and 8 due to adverse events.&#x2028; Conclusions: Preliminary data suggest that L given concurrently with P and T at a dose of 1000 mg per day induces an unacceptable rate of moderate to severe diarrhea. Careful monitoring of diarrhea as well as L dose reduction and initiation of loperamide at first occurrence of diarrhea are recommended. The dose of L when given concurrently with P and T has been amended to 750 mg per day in the current study and safety data for the 1000 mg and 750 mg per day cohorts will be presented. Implications for the ongoing ALTTO study will also be presented. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 2109.