Meeusen, J

Abstract Background Calculated LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) is a standard component of the lipid panel and an important risk factor in managing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Due to the assumptions in the derivation of the Friedwald formula, fasting (≥8 hours) and triglyceride levels ≤400mg/dL have long been recommended. More recent data have shown that in most cases fasting has minimal effect on results, leading to the endorsement of non-fasting lipid panels for routine evaluation of ASCVD risk in clinical practice guidelines. Furthermore, newer equations (e.g. Sampson-NIH) allow for more accurate estimation of LDL-C even in the presence of hypertriglyceridemia. Mayo Clinic has implemented the Sampson-NIH LDL-C calculation and removed fasting/non-fasting designation from lipid panel orders. We hypothesized that the change to fasting designation would allow more afternoon draws for routine lipid panels and that increased non-fasting collections may increase triglyceride levels, but that the Sampson-NIH equation would prevent bias in LDL-C estimation. In order to test these hypotheses, we analyzed patient data from 1 year prior and 1 year post-implementation. Methods Results of lipid panels performed for one year preceding (n=334,719) and one year after (n=381,804) removal of the fasting/non-fasting designation and implementation of Sampson-NIH equation were collected. Median, 10th, and 90th percentile of draw time, triglyceride, and LDL-C calculated by either Sampson-NIH or Friedwald formulas were compared by quantile regression. Results Draw times shifted post-implementation at the 10th percentile (7:06 vs. 7:10, p<0.0001), median (8:49 vs. 9:08, p<0.0001) and 90th (12:02 vs. 13:46, p<0.0001). No difference in median triglyceride measurement was observed between pre-and post-implementation (110mg/dL), but slight differences were observed in the 10th and 90th percentile values (60 vs 59mg/dL and 224 vs 229mg/dL, p<0.0001). No difference was observed in 10th, 50th, or 90th percentile LDL values when calculated by Sampson-NIH equation (56, 99, 153mg/dL); however, if the Friedwald formula is used, a slight shift is observed in the 10th and 50th percentile LDL values (54 vs. 53, 97 vs. 96; p<0.0001) but not the 90th (150mg/dL). Conclusions Changing to the Sampson/NIH formula for LDL-C and removing fasting vs. non-fasting designation from routine lipid panels had minimal effect on reported triglyceride and LDL-C values, while allowing increased flexibility in draw time and reporting of LDL-C on patients with triglycerides ≥400mg/dL. Patients with TG ≥400mg/dL represented 1.7% of the dataset overall, including 5,387 patients before the change in which LDL-C could not be reported and 6,697 patients in the year post-implementation for whom LDL-C was reported based on the Sampson-NIH formula. Using an equation that is robust in patients with elevated triglyceride levels and removing fasting requirements from routine lipid panels allows greater flexibility and convenience for patients while allowing for more even distribution of phlebotomy workload and reporting of LDL-C results for patients with hypertriglyceridemia without evidence of clinically significant bias in reported results.

Abstract Background Glycerol kinase deficiency (GKD) is a rare X-linked recessive disorder biochemically characterized by hyperglycerolaemia. Adults with GKD are usually asymptomatic. However, they often present with pseudohypertriglyceridemia because most clinical triglyceride methods measure enzymatically generated glycerol from triglycerides. Currently, assays for measuring plasma glycerol are lacking. We describe a preliminary validation of glycerol measured by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR). Methods Serum glycerol was measured by NMR (Numares AG, Regensberg, Germany) using a Ascend 600 NMR (Bruker, Billerica, MA). Stability and matrix effects were determined by repeat measurement of 10 freshly collected samples following various storage conditions. Normal donors were recruited for reference interval (n = 143). Analytical specificity was assessed by spiking red cell lysate, bilirubin and intralipid. Precision was assessed by measuring three pools five times for five days. Accuracy was performed by spiking known concentrations of glycerol. Accuracy was assessed using an enzymatic method (Randox Laboratories, Ltd. County Antrim, UK) on a Roche Cobas c501 (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) as reference. Results Measured glycerol increased over time in both serum and plasma, however, prepared samples were stable on the instrument for up to 24 hours. Measured glycerol was not impacted by hemoglobin (1000 mg/dL) or bilirubin (625 mg/dL), however, spiking Intralipid® prevented any measurement. NMR and enzymatic assays strongly correlated, with a constant bias (Table 1). Repeatability and reproducibility were <10% CV and % recovery from glycerol standard were >80% for all concentrations. Conclusion Pre-analytical stability, imprecision and accuracy were acceptable for clinical measurement of glycerol using NMR. While there is a significant systematic bias with enzymatic methods, further studies in normal and disease populations will be necessary to determine clinical impact.

Abstract Background An accurate and reliable measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is essential to monitor for rejection and disease progression post-kidney transplantation. Measured GFR (mGFR) is the current gold standard. However, it has scarce availability at many centers and is labor intensive. Newer estimated GFR (eGFR) methods containing cystatin-C and/or other biomarkers have not been clinically validated in a post-transplant cohort. In this study, we evaluated a new NMR-based GFR (GFRNMR) equation that contains serum creatinine, cystatin C, myoinositol, and valine in post-kidney transplant recipients in a clinical routine setting. Methods Venipuncture for serum collection was performed immediately prior to mGFR measurement with urinary iothalamate clearance in 67 post-kidney transplant recipients. Serum was stored at 4°C and measured by NMR no later than four days after collection. eGFR was assessed using the following equations: i) GFRNMR, ii) CKD-EPI2021Cr (creatinine) and iii) CKD-EPI2021Cr,Cys (creatinine and cystatin-C). Bias was calculated as “eGFR—mGFR” for all equations. The Bootstrap method was employed to assess pairwise significance levels between bias distributions interquartile ranges (IQR), and P-value correction was determined with the Benjamini & Hochberg method. Precision, which was defined as percentage of samples within ±30% and ±15% from the mGFR value (P30 and P15, respectively), was calculated for each equation. Pairwise comparisons were made using McNemar’s Chi-squared and Benjamini & Hochberg correction. Precision was defined as the proportion of eGFR values concordant with mGFR values by CKD clinical stage. Results P30 for GFRNMR was significantly higher than CKD-EPI2021 Cr,Cys (97% vs 84%, P < 0.01) and higher than CKD-EPI2021 Cr (88%, P = 0.08). Similarly, P15 for GFRNMR was 63%; higher than for CKD-EPI2021 Cr (54%, P = 0.35) and CKD-EPI2021 Cr,Cys (51%, P = 0.19). Bias IQR for GFRNMR was 9.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 (median bias 2.0 mL/min/1.73 m2); significantly smaller than for CKD-EPI2021 Cr (Bias IQR 15.55 mL/min/1.73 m2, P < 0.05; median bias 1.47 mL/min/1.73 m2), and smaller than CKD-EPI2021 Cr,Cys (Bias IQR 14.4 mL/min/1.73 m2, P = 0.09; median bias 2.3 mL/min/1.73 m2). A broad range of medications such as immune modulators, and comorbidities such as hypertension, thyroid dysfunction, and coronary artery disease, did not interfere with GFRNMR performance. Conclusion NMR-based eGFR was less biased, more precise, and more accurate compared to creatinine and cystatin-C CKD-EPI eGFR equations in a post-kidney transplant setting. These findings suggest GFRNMR may more closely resemble mGFR in post-transplant patients and warrants further study on its potential use to improve clinical management in this patient group.

Abstract Background Elevated Lp(a) is an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic (ASCVD) events and associates with aortic stenosis. Accurate immunochemical measurement of Lp(a) is complicated by heterogeneity of Lp(a) molecular size. The objective of this study was to validate the analytical performance of an electrophoretic assay for measurement of ApoB-containing lipoprotein particles including Lp(a)-P, LDL-P, and VLDL-P and to compare results to other standard clinical methods. Method Lp(a)-P, LDL-P, and VLDL-P were quantified by electrophoretic serum separation followed by immuno-staining with an ApoB antibody using the SPIFE Touch (Helena Laboratories, Beaumont, TX). Stability was evaluated by comparison to results at time zero (n = 10). Precision was assessed by 5 measurements twice daily for five days. Limit of quantitation (LoQ) was determined by 20 replicate measurements. Linearity was assessed by mixing high and low concentrations at various ratios. Accuracy was assessed by split sample comparison (n = 126) with Helena Laboratories. Lp(a)-P and LDL-P results were compared to nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) using a Bruker Ascend 600 NMR (Bruker, Billerica, MA) with AXINON software (numares, AG, Regensberg, Germany) (n = 114). Lp(a)-P is included with LDL-P by NMR. Therefore, the SPIFE Lp(a)-P + LDL-P was compared to NMR LDL-P. SPIFE Lp(a)-P was compared directly to Roche cobas c501 Lp(a) immunoassay calibrated to molar units (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) (n = 126). Results The analytical performance of Lp(a)-P, LDL-P, and VLDL-P measured on the SPIFE Touch met all acceptance criteria. Bias to the reference method was <20% with R2 > 0.98. All analytes were stable 14 days refrigerated and 14 days frozen. Lipoprotein particle measurements on SPIFE Touch correlated to those obtained by both NMR and Roche assays. Conclusion The analytical performance of the SPIFE Touch for measuring the concentration of ApoB-containing lipoproteins is acceptable. Further studies are needed to determine clinical implications and utility compared to NMR and Roche assays.