Meschia, James F.

Background Rather than considering carotid stenting and endarterectomy to be rival procedures, they ought to be seen as complementary, with some patients more suited to one procedure over another. The respective patient populations best suited for optimal outcomes with stenting and endarterectomy differ substantially. Hence, the CREST‐2 (Carotid Revascularization, Endarterectomy Versus Stent Trial‐2) ( study was designed as 2 separate 2‐arm randomized trials run in parallel. One trial compares intensive medical management with and without stenting; the other, intensive medical management with and without endarterectomy. Each trial has a recruitment target of 1240 patients with ≥70% asymptomatic carotid stenosis, randomized 1:1 in each arm. To ensure patient safety and give stenting the best possible chance of demonstrating net benefits in stroke prevention, CREST‐2 adopted a rigorous procedure for evaluating, monitoring, and approving operators to enroll in the trial. The CREST‐2 Registry was established to allow for recent experience for applicant stent operators. Methods The CREST‐2 Registry is a prospective, multicenter, short‐term observational study of carotid stenting allowing use of multiple devices. Results The registry enrolled its first patient in September 2014, and as of October 2, 2023, a total of 9830 patients have been treated by 207 different stent operators from 103 different clinical centers. In this mixed cohort of asymptomatic (61.1% of the cohort) and symptomatic (38.9%) patients, the 30‐day stroke rate is 1.8% and the combined 30‐day stroke or death rate is 2.6%. At its peak in March 2016, the registry achieved an enrollment rate of 142 cases/month. As of October 20, 2023, a total of 104 patients remain to be enrolled in the CREST‐2 stenting trial. Conclusion The registry has facilitated assembly of a high‐performing team of stent operators for the CREST‐2 trial. With continued support of the many operators, we anticipate completing enrollment by the summer of 2024.

Introduction: Collateral cerebrovasculature is important for the survival of penumbral tissue in patients with large vessel occlusive (LVO) stroke, and adequate collateralization is associated with favorable outcomes. The presence of cerebral microbleeds (CMB) have been implicated in vessel wall remodeling and impaired vasoreactivity. We investigated whether the presence of deep and/or lobar CMB predicts poor collateral recruitment in patients with LVO stroke who underwent thrombectomy (MT). Methods: We performed a retrospective, single-center study of adults who presented with LVO stroke and had MT between January 2012-June 2020. CT angiography of head prior to MT was used to assess collateral status with poor status defined as ≤50% filling and good status as >50% filling. CMBs were assessed using T2*-weighted gradient echo or susceptibility weighted magnetic resonance images. Location of CMB was further characterized as deep vs. lobar using consensus definitions. Poor stroke outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≥3 at 90 days. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to evaluate the associations between CMB, CMB types (lobar, deep, lobar+deep) and poor collaterals after adjusting for vascular risk factors. Results: Consecutive 151 subjects were included (mean age 68±15 years, 47% women), with a median NIHSS of 18. CMB were identified in 57 subjects (37.4%). Of these, 20.5% had lobar CMB, 5.3% had deep CMB and 11.9% had combined lobar & deep CMB. Patients with CMB had higher odds of having poor collaterals compared to those without CMB (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.09-2.23, P=0.015). The association of CMB with poor collaterals was strongest in patients with combined lobar & deep CMB (OR 4.78, 95% CI 1.43-15.93, P=0.011), compared with those with exclusively deep CMB (OR 2.78, 95% CI 0.44-17.62, P=0.278) or lobar CMB (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.19-1.38, P=0.188). Patients with poor collaterals were more likely to have poor outcome compared with those with good collaterals (48.4% vs. 31.0%, P=0.03). Conclusion: Cerebral microbleeds are independently associated with poor collateral recruitment when adjusted for traditional vascular risk factors. Further study is warranted to elucidate the differential effects of CMB types on collateral recruitment.

Background and Objectives: Acute small subcortical infarcts (SSI) result in high rates of early neurological deterioration (END) despite best medical management. Those with SSI-related END have worse functional outcomes after stroke leading to increased morbidity. Presently, it is unknown in a robust manner the incidence or risk factors for END within this demographic. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to understand the incidence and risk factors of SSI-related END. Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar between January 1, 2000, and June 1, 2022, including both retrospective cross-sectional and prospective observational studies. The primary outcome was development of END based on publishing authors’ definition. Abstracted data included age, sex, cohort size, diagnoses of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, study definition of END and SSI, and presence of branch atheromatous disease (BAD) and lesion diameter. Results: We identified 31 studies enrolling 6376 patients. Most studies were conducted in East Asia (27/31, 87%) and had a least some concern for risk of bias. Funnel plot illustrated a high level of publication bias favoring high incidence studies. END was commonly defined as ≥ 2 overall NIHSS change or ≥ 1 motor change within 3 to 7 days from admission (average: 5 days). A pooled proportion of END was 22% (95%CI 0.19 - 0.25, I2 = 91.2%, 31 studies). Meta-regression identified that female sex [risk ratio (RR) 1.23, 95%CI 1.09-1.39, I2=30.8%, 31 studies], diabetes mellitus (RR 1.16 95%CI 1.01-1.33, I2=38.4%, 30 studies), and BAD (RR 1.99 95%CI 1.61-2.46, I2=50.7%, 17 studies) as risk factors for END. Discussion: Our data identified primarily within an East Asian cohort that risk factors for SSI-related END include diabetes mellitus and branch atheromatous disease with a pooled prevalence of END occurring in 1 in 4 patients. Future studies are needed to understand treatment and preventative strategies for this patient population.

Background and Objectives: It is unclear whether induced hypertension in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) may improve long-term outcomes. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of induced hypertension vs standard medical care in patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke within 72 hours of symptom onset. Methods: Two reviewers systematically searched PubMed using the prespecified terms “induced hypertension” or “blood pressure augmentation” plus “ischemic stroke” for clinical trials that reported functional independence (mRS 0-2) at 90 days. The safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI across trials were synthesized using fixed-effect model based on Mantel-Haenszel methods. Forest plots were constructed. Results: Three clinical trials with 270 AIS patients treated with induced hypertension (n=126) or standard medical care (n= 144) were included. Mean age was 66.6 years, 35.2% were women, and the mean initial NIHSS was 7.5. The rate of functional independence at 90 days was higher in patients treated with induced hypertension (70.6%) versus control (54.9%) (OR 1.88; 95% CI 1.13-3.11; p=0.01). sICH did not differ between patients treated with induced hypertension (<1%) versus control (<1%) (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.14-7.45; p=0.98). Discussion: Among patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke with 72 hours of symptoms onset, induced hypertension resulted in better functional outcome at 90 days than standard medical care and did not increase risk of sICH. Large RCTs to test this observation are ongoing and needed to guide clinical practice.