Arjomandi, Mehrdad

Abstract Rationale Among tobacco-exposed persons with preserved spirometry (TEPSs), we previously demonstrated that different lung volume indices—specifically, elevated total lung capacity (TLC) versus elevated ratio of functional residual capacity to TLC (FRC/TLC)—identify different lung disease characteristics in the COPDGene cohort. Objective We sought to determine differential disease characteristics and trajectories associated with lung volume indices among TEPSs in the SPIROMICS cohort. Methods We categorized TEPSs (n = 814) by tertiles (low, intermediate, and high) of TLC or residual volume–to-TLC ratio (RV/TLC) derived from baseline computed tomography images and then examined clinical and spirometric disease trajectories in mutually exclusive categories of participants with high TLC without high RV/TLC ([TLC]high) versus high RV/TLC without high TLC ([RV/TLC]high). We examined differences in computed tomography–measured emphysema (Hounsfield units [HU] ⩽−950; parametric response mapping [PRM] of emphysema), air trapping (HU⩽−856; PRM of functional small airway disease; a disease probability measure for non-emphysematous gas trapping), airway geometry (the mean square root of wall area of a hypothetical airway with 10 mm internal perimeter), respiratory symptoms (on the modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale; COPD Assessment Test [CAT]; St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ]; and Short Form-12 [SF12]), and outcomes (annualized exacerbation rate) between the two categories at baseline and over follow-up time up to 8.5 years, using regression modeling adjusted for age, sex, height, weight, and smoking status (current vs. former smoker) and burden (pack-years). Results In TEPSs, the pattern of spirometric disease progression differed between participants with [TLC]high and those with [RV/TLC]high: There was increased forced vital capacity with stable forced expiratory volume in 1 second in participants with [TLC]high, versus unchanged forced vital capacity but nominally decreased forced expiratory volume in 1 second in those with [RV/TLC]high. Compared with participants with [TLC]high, TEPSs with [RV/TLC]high had less emphysema (by HU ⩽−950) but more airway disease (by HU ⩽−856; PRM of functional small airway disease; disease probability measure for gas trapping, and mean square root of wall area of a hypothetical airway with 10 mm internal perimeter), more respiratory symptoms (on the modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale, CAT, SGRQ, and SF12), and more severe exacerbations at baseline. Over an average follow-up of 4.1 ± 2.4 years (range = 0.5–8.5 yr), TEPSs with [RV/TLC]high also had a higher likelihood of developing more severe spirometric disease (preserved ratio impaired spirometry or Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Classification 2) and worsening of their respiratory symptoms (on the CAT and SGRQ). Although the incidence rates of respiratory exacerbations, hospitalizations, and mortality were not significantly different between the two categories over the follow-up period, TEPSs with [RV/TLC]high were more likely to have been prescribed a respiratory inhaler at their last follow-up visit. Conclusions In these TEPSs from the SPIROMICS cohort, lung volume stratification by TLC versus RV/TLC identifies two pre-COPD phenotypes with distinct respiratory symptoms, radiographic features, and clinical trajectories. The characteristics of these pre-COPD phenotypes match those previously described in the COPDGene cohort using TLC versus FRC/TLC stratification.

Abstract Rationale Individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have airflow obstruction and maldistribution of ventilation. For those living at high altitude, any gas exchange abnormality is compounded by reduced partial pressures of inspired oxygen. Objectives Does residence at higher altitude exposure affect COPD outcomes, including lung function, imaging characteristics, symptoms, health status, functional exercise capacity, exacerbations, and mortality? Methods From the SPIROMICS (Subpopulation and Intermediate Outcome Measures in COPD Study) cohort, we identified individuals with COPD living below 1,000 ft (305 m) elevation (n = 1,367) versus above 4,000 ft (1,219 m) elevation (n = 288). Multivariable regression models were used to evaluate associations of exposure to high altitude with COPD-related outcomes. Measurements and Main Results Living at higher altitude was associated with reduced functional exercise capacity as defined by 6-minute-walk distance (−32.3 m [95% confidence interval, −49.8 to −14.8 m]). There were no differences in patient-reported outcomes as defined by symptoms (COPD Assessment Test and modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale), or health status (St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire). Higher altitude was not associated with a different rate of FEV1 decline. Higher altitude was associated with lower odds of severe exacerbations (incidence rate ratio, 0.65 [95% confidence interval, 0.46 to 0.90]). There were no differences in small airway disease, air trapping, or emphysema. In longitudinal analyses, higher altitude was associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio, 1.25 [95% confidence interval, 1.0 to 1.55]); however, this association was no longer significant when accounting for air pollution. Conclusions Long-term altitude exposure is associated with reduced functional exercise capacity in individuals with COPD, but this did not translate into differences in symptoms or health status. In addition, long-term high-altitude exposure did not affect progression of disease as defined by longitudinal changes in spirometry. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01969344).

Importance People who smoked cigarettes may experience respiratory symptoms without spirometric airflow obstruction. These individuals are typically excluded from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) trials and lack evidence-based therapies. Objective To define the natural history of persons with tobacco exposure and preserved spirometry (TEPS) and symptoms (symptomatic TEPS). Design, Setting, and Participants SPIROMICS II was an extension of SPIROMICS I, a multicenter study of persons aged 40 to 80 years who smoked cigarettes (>20 pack-years) with or without COPD and controls without tobacco exposure or airflow obstruction. Participants were enrolled in SPIROMICS I and II from November 10, 2010, through July 31, 2015, and followed up through July 31, 2021. Exposures Participants in SPIROMICS I underwent spirometry, 6-minute walk distance testing, assessment of respiratory symptoms, and computed tomography of the chest at yearly visits for 3 to 4 years. Participants in SPIROMICS II had 1 additional in-person visit 5 to 7 years after enrollment in SPIROMICS I. Respiratory symptoms were assessed with the COPD Assessment Test (range, 0 to 40; higher scores indicate more severe symptoms). Participants with symptomatic TEPS had normal spirometry (postbronchodilator ratio of forced expiratory volume in the first second [FEV 1 ] to forced vital capacity >0.70) and COPD Assessment Test scores of 10 or greater. Participants with asymptomatic TEPS had normal spirometry and COPD Assessment Test scores of less than 10. Patient-reported respiratory symptoms and exacerbations were assessed every 4 months via phone calls. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was assessment for accelerated decline in lung function (FEV 1 ) in participants with symptomatic TEPS vs asymptomatic TEPS. Secondary outcomes included development of COPD defined by spirometry, respiratory symptoms, rates of respiratory exacerbations, and progression of computed tomographic–defined airway wall thickening or emphysema. Results Of 1397 study participants, 226 had symptomatic TEPS (mean age, 60.1 [SD, 9.8] years; 134 were women [59%]) and 269 had asymptomatic TEPS (mean age, 63.1 [SD, 9.1] years; 134 were women [50%]). At a median follow-up of 5.76 years, the decline in FEV 1 was −31.3 mL/y for participants with symptomatic TEPS vs −38.8 mL/y for those with asymptomatic TEPS (between-group difference, −7.5 mL/y [95% CI, −16.6 to 1.6 mL/y]). The cumulative incidence of COPD was 33.0% among participants with symptomatic TEPS vs 31.6% among those with asymptomatic TEPS (hazard ratio, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.76 to 1.46]). Participants with symptomatic TEPS had significantly more respiratory exacerbations than those with asymptomatic TEPS (0.23 vs 0.08 exacerbations per person-year, respectively; rate ratio, 2.38 [95% CI, 1.71 to 3.31], P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance Participants with symptomatic TEPS did not have accelerated rates of decline in FEV 1 or increased incidence of COPD vs those with asymptomatic TEPS, but participants with symptomatic TEPS did experience significantly more respiratory exacerbations over a median follow-up of 5.8 years.