McCord, Molly

ABSTRACT Background Risk for medication error increases during care transitions. Error susceptibility increases in pediatrics due to age and weight‐based dosing. Governing bodies acknowledge errors endanger patients, and transplant pharmacotherapy experts are mandated by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Pharmacist‐led medication histories reduce errors; however, pharmacists' roles in the transitions of care between transplant centers are unaddressed by CMS. We assessed the impact of transplant pharmacist involvement in medication histories for pediatrics transitioning between transplant centers. Methods Pediatric patients pre‐ or post‐heart transplant transitioning to our center were proactively identified. Transplant pharmacists conducted medication histories by phone with caregivers and tracked discrepancies between existing medication lists and interview responses. Descriptive statistical analyses were completed. Results Of 27 patients identified, seven caregivers were uncontactable, one declined participation, and 19 underwent transplant pharmacist medication history. Medication list errors were detected in 100% of patients ( n = 19), with a median [IQR] of 5 [3–11] issues per patient. Of 122 issues, 72 (59%) were inaccurate or missing data, 17.2% ( n = 21) listed stopped drugs, 9.8% ( n = 12) revealed incorrect administration routes, 7.4% ( n = 9) were duplicate medications, and 6.6% ( n = 8) of errors were medications needing to be added. Corrections included updating 84 inaccuracies (68.8%); removing/adding drugs (30 [24.6%] and 8 [6.6%], respectively); and team communication. Conclusions Complex dosing strategies in pediatrics confer error vulnerability. Designing transition of care processes with transplant pharmacist involvement in medication histories can assist in ensuring medication list accuracy, thereby improving pediatric patient safety.

Background. Surgical-site infection (SSI) is the most common early infectious complication after pancreas transplantation (PT). Although SSI has been shown to worsen outcomes, little data exist to guide optimal choices in perioperative prophylaxis. Methods. We performed a retrospective cohort study of PT recipients from 2010–2020 to examine the effect of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis with Enterococcus coverage. Enterococcus coverage included antibiotics that would be active for penicillin-susceptible Enterococcus isolates. The primary outcome was SSI within 30 d of transplantation, and secondary outcomes were Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) and a composite of pancreas allograft failure or death. Outcomes were analyzed by multivariable Cox regression. Results. Of 477 PT recipients, 217 (45.5%) received perioperative prophylaxis with Enterococcus coverage. Eighty-seven recipients (18.2%) developed an SSI after a median of 15 d from transplantation. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, perioperative Enterococcus prophylaxis was associated with reduced risk of SSI (hazard ratio [HR] 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.96; P = 0.034). Anastomotic leak was also significantly associated with elevated risk of SSI (HR 13.95; 95% CI, 8.72-22.32; P < 0.001). Overall, 90-d CDI was 7.4%, with no difference between prophylaxis groups (P = 0.680). SSI was associated with pancreas allograft failure or death, even after adjusting for clinical factors (HR 1.94; 95% CI, 1.16-3.23; P = 0.011). Conclusions. Perioperative prophylaxis with Enterococcus coverage was associated with reduced risk of 30-d SSI but did not seem to influence risk of 90-d CDI after PT. This difference may be because of the use of beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations, which provide better activity against enteric organisms such as Enterococcus and anaerobes compared with cephalosporin. Risk of SSI was also related to anastomotic leak from surgery, and SSI itself was associated with subsequent risk of a poor outcome. Measures to mitigate or prevent early complications are warranted.