Bernard, Stacy A.

Introduction: Reversible and irreversible nephrotoxicity are known complications of tacrolimus. Approaches to reduce the incidence of nephrotoxicity include the reduction or avoidance of tacrolimus but must be weighed against risk of rejection. Infrequently, basiliximab has been used outside of the induction period to facilitate temporary tacrolimus cessation in the setting of acute kidney injury (AKI). Objective: The primary objective of this study was to describe renal recovery after temporary tacrolimus cessation with non-induction basiliximab (NIB) compared to a matched cohort. Methods: We conducted a single-center study of adult cardiothoracic transplant recipients that received basiliximab beyond post-operative day 7 for temporary tacrolimus cessation in the setting of AKI between January 2019 and November 2023 and matched them to acontrol cohort. Results: Twelve patients underwent temporary tacrolimus cessation with NIB. In total, 7 (58%) patients achieved initial renal recovery at tacrolimus resumption compared to 15 (42%) patients in the matched cohort at an equivalent time point. No difference between treated rejection (17% vs. 19%, p = 0.80) or infection (75% vs. 50%, p = 0.32) was observed between tacrolimus cessation and its matched cohort. Conclusions: The use of NIB for tacrolimus cessation can allow for potential renal recovery after an AKI or in patients at risk of AKI. This approach does not appear to significantly increase the risk of rejection but may increase the risk of infection in the long term.

ABSTRACT Background Risk for medication error increases during care transitions. Error susceptibility increases in pediatrics due to age and weight‐based dosing. Governing bodies acknowledge errors endanger patients, and transplant pharmacotherapy experts are mandated by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Pharmacist‐led medication histories reduce errors; however, pharmacists' roles in the transitions of care between transplant centers are unaddressed by CMS. We assessed the impact of transplant pharmacist involvement in medication histories for pediatrics transitioning between transplant centers. Methods Pediatric patients pre‐ or post‐heart transplant transitioning to our center were proactively identified. Transplant pharmacists conducted medication histories by phone with caregivers and tracked discrepancies between existing medication lists and interview responses. Descriptive statistical analyses were completed. Results Of 27 patients identified, seven caregivers were uncontactable, one declined participation, and 19 underwent transplant pharmacist medication history. Medication list errors were detected in 100% of patients ( n = 19), with a median [IQR] of 5 [3–11] issues per patient. Of 122 issues, 72 (59%) were inaccurate or missing data, 17.2% ( n = 21) listed stopped drugs, 9.8% ( n = 12) revealed incorrect administration routes, 7.4% ( n = 9) were duplicate medications, and 6.6% ( n = 8) of errors were medications needing to be added. Corrections included updating 84 inaccuracies (68.8%); removing/adding drugs (30 [24.6%] and 8 [6.6%], respectively); and team communication. Conclusions Complex dosing strategies in pediatrics confer error vulnerability. Designing transition of care processes with transplant pharmacist involvement in medication histories can assist in ensuring medication list accuracy, thereby improving pediatric patient safety.

Background. Surgical-site infection (SSI) is the most common early infectious complication after pancreas transplantation (PT). Although SSI has been shown to worsen outcomes, little data exist to guide optimal choices in perioperative prophylaxis. Methods. We performed a retrospective cohort study of PT recipients from 2010–2020 to examine the effect of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis with Enterococcus coverage. Enterococcus coverage included antibiotics that would be active for penicillin-susceptible Enterococcus isolates. The primary outcome was SSI within 30 d of transplantation, and secondary outcomes were Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) and a composite of pancreas allograft failure or death. Outcomes were analyzed by multivariable Cox regression. Results. Of 477 PT recipients, 217 (45.5%) received perioperative prophylaxis with Enterococcus coverage. Eighty-seven recipients (18.2%) developed an SSI after a median of 15 d from transplantation. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, perioperative Enterococcus prophylaxis was associated with reduced risk of SSI (hazard ratio [HR] 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.96; P = 0.034). Anastomotic leak was also significantly associated with elevated risk of SSI (HR 13.95; 95% CI, 8.72-22.32; P < 0.001). Overall, 90-d CDI was 7.4%, with no difference between prophylaxis groups (P = 0.680). SSI was associated with pancreas allograft failure or death, even after adjusting for clinical factors (HR 1.94; 95% CI, 1.16-3.23; P = 0.011). Conclusions. Perioperative prophylaxis with Enterococcus coverage was associated with reduced risk of 30-d SSI but did not seem to influence risk of 90-d CDI after PT. This difference may be because of the use of beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations, which provide better activity against enteric organisms such as Enterococcus and anaerobes compared with cephalosporin. Risk of SSI was also related to anastomotic leak from surgery, and SSI itself was associated with subsequent risk of a poor outcome. Measures to mitigate or prevent early complications are warranted.

Introduction: Contemporary dosing strategies for rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) in kidney transplantation aim to reduce cumulative exposure, minimizing long-term adverse events. The use of ideal body weight-based dosing has been trialed, however concern for increased rejection post-transplant exists due to lower doses of rATG. Research Questions: The primary aim of this study was to compare rejection rates between rATG dosing protocols using actual body weight and ideal body weight and secondarily to evaluate cost savings following protocol implementation. Design: This was a retrospective study surrounding implementation of an ideal body weight-based dosing protocol for rATG. We compared 75 kidney transplant recipients in whom rATG was dosed based on actual body weight (pre-protocol group) to 64 in whom dosing was based on ideal body weight (post-protocol group), following a nine-month washout. Results: The mean cumulative rATG dose in the pre-protocol group was 6.3 mg/kg of actual body weight. When ideal body weight was used in the post-protocol group, the mean dose was 4.5 mg/kg of actual body weight. The rejection rate was 18.7% pre-protocol and 23.4% postprotocol, which did not represent a statistically significant difference (p = 0.491). The actual annual cost savings after protocol implementation exceeded $162,000, approximately $2,500 per patient. Conclusion: Results suggest ideal body weight-based dosing of rATG may reduce exposure and cost, without significantly impacting the risk of rejection in kidney transplant recipients. More studies are needed to confirm these findings.