Menefee, Michael E.

Abstract Metastatic solid tumors are aggressive and mostly drug resistant, leading to few treatment options and poor prognosis as seen with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Therefore, the identification of new therapeutic regimes for the treatment of metastatic disease is desirable. ccRCC and TNBC cell lines were treated with the HDAC inhibitor romidepsin and the methyltransferase inhibitor decitabine, two epigenetic modifying drugs approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of various hematologic malignancies. Cell proliferation analysis, flow cytometry, quantitative PCR, and immunoblotting techniques were used to evaluate the antitumor synergy of this drug combination and identify the reexpression of epigenetically silenced tumor suppressor genes. Combinatorial treatment of metastatic TNBC and stage IV ccRCC cell lines with romidepsin/decitabine leads to synergistic inhibition of cell growth and induction of apoptosis above levels of individual drug treatments alone. Synergistic reexpression of the tumor suppressor gene secreted frizzled-related protein one (sFRP1) was observed in combinatorial drug-treated groups. Silencing sFRP1 (short hairpin RNA) before combinatorial drug treatment showed that sFRP1 mediates the growth inhibitory and apoptotic activity of combined romidepsin/decitabine. Furthermore, addition of recombinant sFRP1 to ccRCC or TNBC cells inhibits cell growth in a dose-dependent manner through the induction of apoptosis, identifying that epigenetic silencing of sFRP1 contributes to renal and breast cancer cell survival. Combinatorial treatment with romidepsin and decitabine in drug resistant tumors is a promising treatment strategy. Moreover, recombinant sFRP1 may be a novel therapeutic strategy for cancers with suppressed sFRP1 expression. Mol Cancer Ther; 11(10); 2105–15. ©2012 AACR.

Abstract Background: ABT-888 is an inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase1 (PARP1) and PARP2, two highly conserved enzymes implicated in DNA repair, maintenance of genomic stability, and regulation of transcription. Topotecan (TPT) is a water soluble camptothecin derivative with antitumor activity against ovarian tumors. The combination of ABT-888 with TPT is under investigation in phase I trials because PARP inhibition sensitizes tumors cells to TPT in vitro and in vivo. In those trials, the pharmacokinetics of TPT and ABT-888 are being studied to determine if ABT-888 levels are sufficient to modulate PARP activity and to investigate the potential interaction between TPT and ABT-888. Methods: Advanced cancer patients with ECOG performance scores 0-2, adequate hematological, renal and hepatic function were treated with ABT-888 on days 1-3, 8-10, and 15-17 every 28 days. Topotecan was administered on days 2, 9 and 16 every 28 days. DLTs were defined as grade 4 neutropenia, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, grade 4 anemia or ≥ grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities despite maximal supportive care. ABT-888 and Toptoecan pharmacokinetics were characterized in all patients. Analysis of urinary recovery is ongoing. Results: In this ongoing Phase I trial, 13 female patients with ovarian (n=12) or breast (n=1) cancer have been enrolled to date and pharmacokinetic data is available for 12 of those patients. ABT-888/TPT dose levels are: Level 1- 10 mg/ 2 mg/m2, Level 2- 20 mg/2 mg/m2, Level 3- 10 mg/3 mg/m2, and Level 4- 20 mg/3 mg/m2. The combination of ABT-888 with topotecan has been tolerable, with no dose limiting toxicity, and dose escalation continues at dose level 5. Topotecan t1/2 and clearance values were 3.0 ± 0.5 hrs and 9.50 ± 1.51 L/hr/m2 when administered alone, and were not affected by administration with ABT-888. When administered alone, ABT-888 t1/2, Cmax, AUC0-∞ values after the 10 mg dose were 8.2 ± 2.4 hrs, 432 ± 217 nM, and 2568 ± 1300 nM*hr, respectively. ABT-888 t1/2, Cmax, AUC values after the 20 mg dose were 5.7 ± 3.1 hrs, 600 ± 165 nM, and 3870± 934 respectively. When administered with TPT, ABT-888 t1/2, Cmax, AUC values after the 10 mg dose were 7.2 ± 2.1 hrs, 412 ± 283 nM, and 2705± 1089 nM*hr are: nM*hr respectively. ABT-888 t1/2, Cmax and AUC values after the 20 mg dose combined with TPT were 5.8 ± 2.2 hrs, 664 ± 97.6 nM, and 4283± 936 nM*hr respectively. Conclusions: Plasma clearance of TPT and ABT-888 does not appear to be altered when they are administered together. The effect of co-administration of these agents on renal clearance is presently under investigation and those results will be presented. This work was supported by NIH grants R25 GM75148-04, U01CA069912-16S and MM01-RR00585. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1301. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-1301

Abstract Src transduces activated HER tyrosine kinase and phosphorylates HER to further increase its activity. Src also is involved in osteoclast differentiation. We hypothesized that combining a HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor with a Src inhibitor would result in increased therapeutic activity. To address this hypothesis we performed a phase I trial of D and L to: 1)determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of D combined with L; 2)describe the toxicities associated with this combination; 3)assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction of L and D; 4) assess the effect of the L and D combination on circulating tumor cells (CTC) and on osteoclast precursor activation; 5)study the association of toxicity and/or tumor response with PK, and/or pharmacodynamic parameters; and 6)describe the responses of this combination. Eligibility criteria included ≥ 18 years of age, incurable solid tumors not amenable to other therapies, ANC ≥ 1500/ L, PLT ≥ 100,000/ L, total bilirubin ≤ ULN, AST ≤ 3 × ULN or AST ≤5 × ULN if liver involvement, creatinine ≤ 1.5 × ULN, Hgb ≥ 9.0 g/dL, K+ and Mg++ WNL, life expectancy ≥ 12 weeks, ejection fraction > 50%, ECOG PS 0–2, and able to swallow pills whole. In addition to standard phase I exclusion criteria patients could not have received erlotinib, sunitinib, sorafenib, gefitinib, imatinib ≤ 4 weeks prior to registration. Each agent was administered once daily on a 28 day schedule. At the MTD patients were treated with D day 1, and day 9–28 and L day 2–28 to assess PK interaction. Dose levels (mg) were #1 D 70, L 1000, #2 D 100, L 1000, #3 D 140, L 1000. 12 patients were entered on the dose escalation portion of the trial and 15 were entered at the MTD. 5 patients entered at the MTD are too early to be fully evaluable. Characteristics of evaluable patients were: median age, 63; 46% female; PS 0 (64%) 1 (27%), 1 (9%); ≥ 3 prior chemotherapies (59%). DLT was seen in 2 patients at # 3 (1 patient, grade 3 hypermagnesemia, 1, grade 3 rash) and 1 patient at # 2 (grade 3 dyspnea). The MTD was determined to be # 2. No grade 4 or 5 events have been observed in this study. 6 patients had stable disease in the dose escalation cohort. 1 (RCC) was stable disease for 6 cycles, 2 (colorectal) were stable for 5 cycles, 1 (esophagus) was stable for 3 cycles, and 2 (GIST & leiomyosarcoma) were stable for 2 cycles. Analysis of drug levels, CTCs and circulating osteoclast precursors is ongoing. There was a consistent increase in the percentage of CD11b (monocyte/macrophage/osteoclast lineage marker) positive cells in circulation as treatment progressed. However, the late osteoclast lineage marker c-Fms was not similarly increased, suggesting that the elevated CD11b reflects an inflammatory response and not activation of osteoclastogenesis. D and L is a tolerable combination at nearly full doses of each drug. Funded by a grant from Glaxo Smith Kline and Bristol Myers Squibb. Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8(12 Suppl):B56.

The development of subspecialty tumor groups for uncommon malignancies represents an effective approach to building experience, increasing patient volumes and referrals, and fostering development of increased therapeutic options and clinical trials for patients afflicted with otherwise historically neglected cancers.

Abstract Introduction: Despite significant progress over the last decade in the development of therapeutics for metastatic cancers including breast cancer (MBC), non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and renal cell carcinoma (RCC), most patients will ultimately succumb to their malignancy; more effective therapeutics are sorely needed. The microtubule (MT) is a well-validated target for anti-cancer therapeutics. Ixabepilone (Ixa), a MT stabilizer is approved for MBC and has demonstrated efficacy against other solid tumors. mTOR is another validated target for anti-cancer therapeutics. Temsirolimus (Tem) inhibits mTOR and is approved for advanced RCC. We tested the hypothesis that the addition of Ixa to Tem might augment its anti-tumor activity in vitro. Methods: The cell lines, A498 (RCC), MDA-MB-231 (MBC), and A549 (NSCLC) were treated with Tem alone, Ixa alone, or the combination. All cell lines were also treated with the combination of Tem and Ixa in a fixed ratio of 1:20; Tem doses ranged from 0.125 [nM] to 5 [nM] and Ixa doses ranged from 2.5 [nM] to 100 [nM]. The effects of the treatments were evaluated with clonogenic assays. Synergism was evaluated using CalucSyn 2.0 in accord with the isobologram method of Chou and Talalay. Results: Both Tem and Ixa inhibited cell growth in all tested cell lines as single agents in dose-dependent fashions. Moreover, the combination of Tem and Ixa synergistically enhanced cytotoxicity in all tested lines (see table below).Cell LineED50 [nM]CI (lowest value)A4980.449280.404A5490.285440.263MDA-MB-2310.483550.373 Conclusion: The combination of Ixa and Tem displayed promising activity in all tested cell lines. These findings support the further evaluation of this combination in a phase I clinical trial. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4480.