Menefee, Michael E.

e17580 Background: Cabozantinib is a small molecule multiple-receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that primarily targets MET and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2). We evaluated the effect of cabozantinib on BTM in RAIR DTC. We also assessed the response of BM to cabozantinib using 18F Sodium Fluoride (NaF) PET and radionuclide bone scans. Methods: This prospective analysis was performed as part of a multicenter International Thyroid Oncology Group phase II study of cabozantinibin patients with RAIR DTC who progressed on prior VEGFR-targeted therapy (NCT01811212). BTM [serum C-telopeptide (CTx), osteocalcin, N-telopeptide (NTx), procollagen type 1 (Pc1) and urinary NTx] and NaF PET or Tc-MDP scans were done at baseline and after 8 weeks of therapy. A paired t-test was used between baseline and week 8 BTM. Results: Primary study results were presented elsewhere (Shah, et al. 2015, International Thyroid Congress) showing a response rate of 36% with cabozantinib. Of 25 patients (pts) enrolled, 21 had BM, 10 of whom were on bone-modifying agents (BMA) prior to week 8. Only 2 pts had elevated BTM at baseline. In all pts who had paired BTM, there was a statistically significant decline in all BTM except NTx by week 8 (table). Pts not on BMA also had a significant decline in CTx (p 0.0003), urine NTx (p 0.0300), and Pc1 (p 0.0030) compared to baseline. 19 pts were evaluable for overall response and there was no correlation between BTM and response rate. 6/21 patients underwent paired NaF PET scans and 4/6 had minor reduction in lesion uptake at 8 weeks. Conclusions: Interestingly, most of our patients had normal baseline BTM despite BM. Cabozantinib was associated with a strikingly significant reduction in all BTM (even when BTM were within normal limits at baseline) except NTx by week 8. Minor decreases in bone lesion uptake was noted on NaF PET in 4/6 evaluable patients. Clinical trial information: NCT01811212. [Table: see text]

Abstract Purpose: To determine the dose limiting toxicities (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of veliparib in combination with weekly topotecan in patients with solid tumors. Correlative studies were included to assess the impact of topotecan and veliparib on poly(ADP-ribose) levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, serum pharmacokinetics of both agents, and potential association of germline repair gene mutations with outcome. Experimental Design: Eligible patients had metastatic nonhematologic malignancies with measurable disease. Using a 3 + 3 design, patients were treated with veliparib orally twice daily on days 1–3, 8–10, and 15–17 and topotecan intravenously on days 2, 9, and 16 every 28 days. Tumor responses were assessed by RECIST. Results: Of 58 patients enrolled, 51 were evaluable for the primary endpoint. The MTD and RP2D was veliparib 300 mg twice daily on days 1–3, 8–10, and 15–17 along with topotecan 3 mg/m2 on days 2, 9, and 16 of a 28-day cycle. DLTs were grade 4 neutropenia lasting >5 days. The median number of cycles was 2 (1–26). The objective response rate was 10%, with 1 complete and 4 partial responses. Twenty-two patients (42%) had stable disease ranging from 4 to 26 cycles. Patients with germline BRCA1, BRCA2, or RAD51D mutations remained on study longer than those without homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene mutations (median 4 vs. 2 cycles). Conclusions: Weekly topotecan in combination with veliparib has a manageable safety profile and appears to warrant further investigation.

Purpose Sorafenib and lenvatinib are oral multikinase inhibitors targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and approved for radioiodine (RAI)-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). However, there are no approved second- or third-line therapies. MET is implicated in resistance to VEGFR inhibitors. Cabozantinib is an oral multikinase inhibitor targeting MET in addition to VEGFR and is approved for medullary thyroid cancer. In a phase I study of cabozantinib, five of eight patients with DTC previously treated with a VEGFR-targeted therapy had an objective response to cabozantinib. Patients and Methods Patients with RAI-refractory disease with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) measurable disease and evidence of progression on prior VEGFR-targeted therapy were enrolled in this single-arm phase II study. The cabozantinib starting dose was 60 mg/day orally but could be escalated to 80 mg if the patient did not experience a response. Patients underwent tumor assessment according to RECIST v1.1 every 8 weeks. In this study, if at least five of 25 response-evaluable patients had an objective response, cabozantinib would be considered a promising agent in this patient population. Results Twenty-five patients were enrolled. The median age was 64 years, and 64% of patients were men. Twenty-one patients had received only one prior VEGFR-targeted therapy (sorafenib, pazopanib, or cediranib), and four patients had received two such therapies. The most common treatment-related adverse events were fatigue, weight loss, diarrhea, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, and hypertension. One drug-related death was noted. Of the 25 patients, 10 (40%) had a partial response, 13 (52%) had stable disease, and two (8%) had nonevaluable disease. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 12.7 months and 34.7 months, respectively. Conclusion Cabozantinib demonstrated clinically significant, durable objective response activity in patients with RAI-refractory DTC who experienced disease progression while taking prior VEGFR-targeted therapy.

6087 Background: NTRK1-3 fusions, identified in pediatric radiation-associated thyroid cancers, are low frequency oncogenic drivers that can trigger constitutive activation of TrK1-3 tyrosine kinase domains with responsively heightened downstream signaling through RAS-MAPK, PI3K-AKT, and/or PLCγ-PKC. NTRK point mutations are rare and of largely uninvestigated oncogenic potential, but some appear oncogenic. Methods: Advanced thyroid cancer (TC) patients (pts) requiring systemic therapy at Mayo Clinic sites underwent tumor genetic interrogation using Foundation One analyses with the goal of informing salvage therapeutic strategies. In this IRB-approved study, data from pts with TCs bearing NTRK point mutations were retrospectively analyzed, as this occurrence was unexpected but potentially of prognostic and/or therapeutic relevance. Results: Five of 55 pts (9%) with advanced TCs subject to Foundation One tumor interrogation had NTRK1-3 point mutations (allele frequency, AF, 15-49%); none had fusions. All 5 tumors had microsatellite stability; 4/5 had low tumor mutation burden (2-5 mutations/megabase). NTRK mutations in 3 anaplastic TC (ATC) pts (15% prevalence) were: NTRK3 I749M (AF 15%; overall survival, OS, 15 mos), NTRK1 R744H (AF not available; OS 9.5 mos), and NTRK1 R583H (AF 20.1%; OS > 4.9 mos); NTRK2 S167Y (AF 49%; OS > 51 mos) or NTRK1 R6W (AF 42%; OS > 60 mos) were found in one papillary (PTC) and one Hürthle cell (HCC) TC pt respectively (summary table below). Conclusions: NTRK point mutations, but not fusions, were unexpectedly identified in 9% of assessed advanced TCs - but remarkably in 15% of ATCs. Mutated NTRKs, along with oncogenic p53 and TERT, may contribute to TC progression, especially in ATC, consequent to downstream activation of MAPK and PI3K-AKT pathways. We posit that NTRK point mutations may have therapeutic implications for treatment of refractory disease. [Table: see text]

Abstract Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have shown promising single-agent activity in ovarian cancers with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations (C. Scott, JCO 33:1397, 2015). Ongoing studies are testing the efficacy of PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancers with other genetic or epigenetic alterations that impair the homologous recombination (HR) pathway of DNA repair. It is less clear whether PARP inhibitor clinical activity can be enhanced in HR deficient cancers or even extended to HR proficient ovarian cancers through judicious combinations. Our preclinical studies have demonstrated that PARP inhibitors enhance the cytotoxic effects of selected therapeutic agents through a variety of mechanisms: By trapping PARP at sites of DNA damage, PARP inhibitors enhance the cytotoxicity of topotecan (A. Patel, J. Biol. Chem. 287: 4198, 2012).By inhibiting base excision repair, PARP inhibitors enhance the cytotoxicity of floxuridine (A. Huehls, Cancer Res. 71: 4944, 2011), an agent previously shown to have clinical activity in ovarian cancer. Building on the first of these observations, we conducted a phase 1 clinical trial of topotecan weekly x 3 in combination with veliparib (NCT01012817). Using a standard 3+3 design, patients were treated with veliparib PO twice daily on days 1-3, 8-10 and 15-17 and topotecan IV on days 2, 9 and 16 every 28 days. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia. The MTD was veliparib 300 mg PO twice daily and topotecan 3 mg/m2/dose. Among 52 evaluable patients, objective responses (1 CR, 3 PRs) and stable disease (22 patients, 6 lasting ≥ 8 cycles) were observed. While there was no clear correlation between germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and clinical benefit, a patient with a germline RAD51D mutation had stable disease for 14 cycles. A phase 2 cohort in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer has just opened. Building on the second set of preclinical observations, we are also conducting a phase 1 trial of veliparib and IP floxuridine in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer confined to the peritoneal cavity (NCT01749397). Using a rolling 6 design, patients are treated with veliparib PO twice daily on days 1-10 and floxuridine IP on days 3-5 every 21 days. The trial is currently enrolling at dose level 5 (veliparib 300 mg PO twice daily on days 1-10 and floxuridine 3 gm/dose IP on days 3-5). Grade 3 toxicities in any cycle have included nausea (1), fatigue (1) and neutropenia (3). Among 20 evaluable patients, treatment duration has ranged from 2-33 cycles. These studies, which build on two different aspects of PARP1 function, illustrate two different approaches to potentially enhancing the activity of PARP inhibitors in relapsed ovarian cancer. These studies were funded in part by NIH grants P50 CA136393, R01 CA190423, and UM1 CA186686 as well as SU2C-AACR DT16-15. Citation Format: Scott H. Kaufmann, Andrea E. Wahner Hendrickson, Maria I Harrell, Michael E. Menefee, Edward J. Tanner, David G, Mutch, Elizabeth M. Swisher, and Larry M. Karnitz. PARP INHIBITOR COMBINATIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF OVARIAN CANCER [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Ovarian Cancer Research Symposium; Sep 12-13, 2016; Seattle, WA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2017;23(11 Suppl):Abstract nr IS04.

271 Background: MEDI-573 is a dual-targeting human antibody that neutralizes IGF-I/-II ligands and inhibits IGF-1R and insulin receptor-A (IR-A) signaling pathways, which play a role in breast and other epithelial cancers. By sparing IR-B and its hybrid receptors, MEDI-573 is expected to achieve antitumor activity without perturbing glucose homeostasis. Methods: In a 3 + 3 dose-escalation trial ( NCT00816361 ), patients with advanced solid tumors, KPS ≥ 60, received MEDI-573 as a weekly 1-hr IV infusion at 0.5, 1.5, 5, 10, or 15 mg/kg every 21 days. Objectives included determination of MTD, safety profile, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and tumor response. In a separate biomarker study, mRNA expression of IR-A and IR-B was compared in HR+/HER- breast cancers. Results: Patients included 13M/12F (17 evaluable for efficacy at data cutoff); median age 59 yrs (range 37-78). No DLTs, drug-related SAEs, or significant toxicity patterns were reported. Forty-five AEs were considered treatment-related (% of patients): decreased appetite (28%), fatigue (24%), nausea (20%), diarrhea (16%), and anemia (12%). Hyperglycemia occurred in 2 patients, 1 with evidence of prestudy insulin resistance. No other significant changes in plasma glucose levels occurred. MEDI-573 had dose-proportionality, with AUC of 415 ± 165, 597 ± 298, and 1940 ± 904 d*μg/mL at 5, 10, and 15 mg/kg, respectively. Suppression of free IGF-1 and -2 was fully achieved at doses ≥ 5 mg/kg. Stable disease spanning ≥ 12 wks (range 12-36+) was seen in 6/17 patients. No antidrug antibodies were reported. In a study to identify breast cancer subsets that are dependent on IGF signaling, the IR-A:IR-B ratio was significantly higher in HR+/HER2- breast cancer than matched adjacent normal tissues and in proliferative luminal B than in luminal A breast cancer. Conclusions: MEDI-573 showed acceptable safety and favorable PK profiles without significant changes in glucose levels. The IR-A:IR-B ratio supports a biomarker approach for MEDI-573 patient stratification. A biomarker-rich phase Ib/II study of MEDI-573 with an aromatase inhibitor in patients with advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer opens in 2011.

Abstract Background: The combination of a microtubule stabilizing agent and an mTOR inhibitor has been identified as a synergistic combination in preclinical models. Additional studies have further evaluated the impact of treatment sequence with paclitaxel and rapamycin where administration of rapamycin after paclitaxel was associated with synergy. In our preclinical studies, apoptosis was greater with the combination of ixabepilone and temsirolimus than with either single agent. Thus, a Phase I study of the combination of Ixabepilone (IXB) and Temsirolimus (TEM) was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), describe the toxicity profile and characterize the pharmacokinetics of each agent in patients with advanced cancer. Methods: Eligible patients included adults with a histologically confirmed solid tumor malignancy that was metastatic or unresectable who have received ≤ 2 chemotherapy regimens and had ECOG PS ≤ 2 with adequate bone marrow, renal and hepatic function. Using a standard 3+3 design, patients were treated with IXB IV over 3 hours on day 1 and TEM IV over 0.5 hours on days 2 and 9 (schedule A) or days 1 and 8 (schedule B) every 21 days. Pharmacokinetics (PK) was performed in patients on schedule B. Results: 22 evaluable patients were enrolled between August 24, 2011 and November 7, 2014. The final 7 patients were treated on schedule B. Patients were treated at 3 dose levels of IXB (mg/m2)/TEM (mg): DL1- 24/15 (A- 6 pts, B- 2 pts); DL2- 32/15 (A- 3 pts, B- 5 pts); DL3- 32/20 (A- 6 pts). One patient had DLT (grade 3 hypophosphatemia) and 1 patient expired due to disease progression in DL1A. No DLTs were seen in DL2A. The dose was escalated to DL3 and 1 patient had DLT (grade 3 hypokalemia). Following a change to schedule B, 5 patients were enrolled to DL2B and 1 experienced DLT (grade 4 neutropenia, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, grade 4 sepsis). The dose was reduced to DL1B and 2 more patients were enrolled, both of whom experienced DLTs (grade 5 bronchopulmonary hemorrhage and grade 4 neutropenia). Grade 4 events considered at least possibly related to treatment occurred in 6 of 22 patients (27%) and included cardiac arrest, dyspnea, hypokalemia, hypoxia, multi-organ failure, decreased platelets, acute renal failure, neutropenia, neutropenic fever, sepsis, and decreased WBCs. Patients received a median of 4 cycles (range, 1-10+). Partial response was noted in 1 patient and stable disease was noted in 11 patients. One patient remains on treatment after 11 cycles. IXB (plasma), TEM (whole blood) and sirolimus (whole blood) concentrations were measured by a sensitive, specific lc/ms/ms assay. A 24 and 32 mg/m2 IXB dose yields Cmax of 159 and 312 ng/ml, respectively. The IXB CLp and t1/2 values were 31 L/h and 76 h, respectively. The Cmax, Cl and t1/2 values after a 15 mg TEM dose were 518 ng/ml, 6.4 L/h and 11 h, respectively. The Cmax and t1/2 values of sirolimus after a 15 mg TEM dose were 37.6 ng/ml and 49 h, respectively. The PK of IXB and TEM in combination were similar to those reported for each drug alone. Conclusions: The reasons for the unpredictable, severe toxicity of the IXB/TEM combination are unclear. The MTD could not be determined, and enrollment was discontinued. This trial exemplifies challenges associated with development of drug combinations with mTOR inhibitors. Supported in part by UM1 CA186686 and P30 CA15083. Clinical trial information: NCT01375829 Citation Format: Joel M. Reid, Michael E. Menefee, Felix Boakye-Agyeman, Chad A. Walden, Charles Erlichman, Keith C. Bible. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of ixabepilone and temsirolimus in adult patients with advanced solid tumors. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2015 Nov 5-9; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2015;14(12 Suppl 2):Abstract nr B113.

Abstract Background: Activation of the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor receptor (MET) pathway promotes tumor growth, invasion and dissemination. Emibetuzumab is a humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody that binds to and inhibits ligand-dependent and ligand-independent activation of MET. In the first-in-human dose escalation study NCT0128756, emibetuzumab demonstrated favorable tolerability when administered up to 2000mg Q2W IV in unselected patients. The study was expanded to evaluate emibetuzumab in expansion cohorts for patients with tumors positive for MET expression. Methods: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) with bone metastasis, renal cell carcinoma (RCC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) received 2000 mg emibetuzumab Q2W IV on a 28-day cycle. RCC, NSCLC, and HCC patients were required to have measurable disease as defined by RECIST v1.1 and have MET positive tumors (≥50% of cells to be ≥2+ for MET expression) as determined by a MET IHC assay (Ventana). The objectives were to evaluate the safety and activity of emibetuzumab in patients with MET positive tumors. Additional objectives included pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD). Results: A total of 62 patients received emibetuzumab across the 4 cohorts: CRPC n = 15, RCC n = 19, NSCLC n = 19,and HCC n = 9, with a median of prior systemic oncology therapies of 6, 3, 5, and 3, respectively. Common possibly related treatment-emergent adverse events included fatigue (29% all grades, 3% Gr3/4), nausea (13% all grades, no Gr3/4), edema of limbs (8% all grades, 2% Gr3/4), and anorexia (8%, no Gr3/4) and were similar among cohorts. No evidence of clinical activity was observed in CRPC patients. For RCC, NSCLC, and HCC patients with MET positive tumors, an overall disease control rate (DCR = partial response [PR] + stable disease [SD]) of 32% (15/47) was observed. In the individual cohorts, DCR was 26% (5/19) in RCC, 26% (5/19) in NSCLC, and 56% (5/9) in HCC. The median duration of disease stabilization in the 3 cohorts was: 4.2 months (range 1.6-24.6) in RCC, 3.9 months (range 2.5-6.4) in NSCLC, and 3.7 months (range 1.2-6.6) in HCC. One PR was observed in an HCC patient with MET amplification. After a single dose of 2000 mg emibetuzumab, PK parameters were similar among these cohorts and also comparable to patients treated at this dose during dose escalation. Conclusions: In cohorts enriched for tumor MET expression, limited single-agent activity of emibetuzumab was observed indicating that MET positivity by IHC (Ventana assay) at the cut-point employed here might not be a sufficient predictive biomarker to select patients receiving benefit from emibetuzumab monotherapy for the tumor types studied. Further evaluation of biomarkers/assays to identify patients who may benefit from treatment with emibetuzumab may be warranted. Citation Format: Michaela S. Banck, Rashmi Chugh, Ronald B. Natale, Alain Algazi, Bradley C. Carthon, Lee S. Rosen, Michael E. Menefee, Andrew Xiuxuan Zhu, Takami Sato, Brian Moser, P. Kellie Turner, Jay Tuttle, Xuejing Aimee Wang, Volker Wacheck, Frederick E. Millard. Phase 1 results of emibetuzumab (LY2875358), a bivalent MET antibody, in patients with advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer, and MET positive renal cell carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2015 Nov 5-9; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2015;14(12 Suppl 2):Abstract nr A55.

Abstract Purpose: This phase I, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, dose-escalation, and dose-expansion study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and antitumor activity of MEDI-573 in adults with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapy or for which no standard therapy exists. Experimental Design: Patients received MEDI-573 in 1 of 5 cohorts (0.5, 1.5, 5, 10, or 15 mg/kg) dosed weekly or 1 of 2 cohorts (30 or 45 mg/kg) dosed every 3 weeks. Primary end points included the MEDI-573 safety profile, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and optimal biologic dose (OBD). Secondary end points included MEDI-573 pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and antitumor activity. Results: In total, 43 patients (20 with urothelial cancer) received MEDI-573. No dose-limiting toxicities were identified, and only 1 patient experienced hyperglycemia related to treatment. Elevations in levels of insulin and/or growth hormone were not observed. Adverse events observed in >10% of patients included fatigue, anorexia, nausea, diarrhea, and anemia. PK evaluation demonstrated that levels of MEDI-573 increased with dose at all dose levels tested. At doses >5 mg/kg, circulating levels of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and IGFII were fully suppressed. Of 39 patients evaluable for response, none experienced partial or complete response and 13 had stable disease as best response. Conclusions: The MTD of MEDI-573 was not reached. The OBD was 5 mg/kg weekly or 30 or 45 mg/kg every 3 weeks. MEDI-573 showed preliminary antitumor activity in a heavily pretreated population and had a favorable tolerability profile, with no notable perturbations in metabolic homeostasis. Clin Cancer Res; 20(18); 4747–57. ©2014 AACR.