Boakye‐Agyeman, Felix

Abstract Purpose: To determine the dose limiting toxicities (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of veliparib in combination with weekly topotecan in patients with solid tumors. Correlative studies were included to assess the impact of topotecan and veliparib on poly(ADP-ribose) levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, serum pharmacokinetics of both agents, and potential association of germline repair gene mutations with outcome. Experimental Design: Eligible patients had metastatic nonhematologic malignancies with measurable disease. Using a 3 + 3 design, patients were treated with veliparib orally twice daily on days 1–3, 8–10, and 15–17 and topotecan intravenously on days 2, 9, and 16 every 28 days. Tumor responses were assessed by RECIST. Results: Of 58 patients enrolled, 51 were evaluable for the primary endpoint. The MTD and RP2D was veliparib 300 mg twice daily on days 1–3, 8–10, and 15–17 along with topotecan 3 mg/m2 on days 2, 9, and 16 of a 28-day cycle. DLTs were grade 4 neutropenia lasting >5 days. The median number of cycles was 2 (1–26). The objective response rate was 10%, with 1 complete and 4 partial responses. Twenty-two patients (42%) had stable disease ranging from 4 to 26 cycles. Patients with germline BRCA1, BRCA2, or RAD51D mutations remained on study longer than those without homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene mutations (median 4 vs. 2 cycles). Conclusions: Weekly topotecan in combination with veliparib has a manageable safety profile and appears to warrant further investigation.

Abstract Background: The combination of a microtubule stabilizing agent and an mTOR inhibitor has been identified as a synergistic combination in preclinical models. Additional studies have further evaluated the impact of treatment sequence with paclitaxel and rapamycin where administration of rapamycin after paclitaxel was associated with synergy. In our preclinical studies, apoptosis was greater with the combination of ixabepilone and temsirolimus than with either single agent. Thus, a Phase I study of the combination of Ixabepilone (IXB) and Temsirolimus (TEM) was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), describe the toxicity profile and characterize the pharmacokinetics of each agent in patients with advanced cancer. Methods: Eligible patients included adults with a histologically confirmed solid tumor malignancy that was metastatic or unresectable who have received ≤ 2 chemotherapy regimens and had ECOG PS ≤ 2 with adequate bone marrow, renal and hepatic function. Using a standard 3+3 design, patients were treated with IXB IV over 3 hours on day 1 and TEM IV over 0.5 hours on days 2 and 9 (schedule A) or days 1 and 8 (schedule B) every 21 days. Pharmacokinetics (PK) was performed in patients on schedule B. Results: 22 evaluable patients were enrolled between August 24, 2011 and November 7, 2014. The final 7 patients were treated on schedule B. Patients were treated at 3 dose levels of IXB (mg/m2)/TEM (mg): DL1- 24/15 (A- 6 pts, B- 2 pts); DL2- 32/15 (A- 3 pts, B- 5 pts); DL3- 32/20 (A- 6 pts). One patient had DLT (grade 3 hypophosphatemia) and 1 patient expired due to disease progression in DL1A. No DLTs were seen in DL2A. The dose was escalated to DL3 and 1 patient had DLT (grade 3 hypokalemia). Following a change to schedule B, 5 patients were enrolled to DL2B and 1 experienced DLT (grade 4 neutropenia, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, grade 4 sepsis). The dose was reduced to DL1B and 2 more patients were enrolled, both of whom experienced DLTs (grade 5 bronchopulmonary hemorrhage and grade 4 neutropenia). Grade 4 events considered at least possibly related to treatment occurred in 6 of 22 patients (27%) and included cardiac arrest, dyspnea, hypokalemia, hypoxia, multi-organ failure, decreased platelets, acute renal failure, neutropenia, neutropenic fever, sepsis, and decreased WBCs. Patients received a median of 4 cycles (range, 1-10+). Partial response was noted in 1 patient and stable disease was noted in 11 patients. One patient remains on treatment after 11 cycles. IXB (plasma), TEM (whole blood) and sirolimus (whole blood) concentrations were measured by a sensitive, specific lc/ms/ms assay. A 24 and 32 mg/m2 IXB dose yields Cmax of 159 and 312 ng/ml, respectively. The IXB CLp and t1/2 values were 31 L/h and 76 h, respectively. The Cmax, Cl and t1/2 values after a 15 mg TEM dose were 518 ng/ml, 6.4 L/h and 11 h, respectively. The Cmax and t1/2 values of sirolimus after a 15 mg TEM dose were 37.6 ng/ml and 49 h, respectively. The PK of IXB and TEM in combination were similar to those reported for each drug alone. Conclusions: The reasons for the unpredictable, severe toxicity of the IXB/TEM combination are unclear. The MTD could not be determined, and enrollment was discontinued. This trial exemplifies challenges associated with development of drug combinations with mTOR inhibitors. Supported in part by UM1 CA186686 and P30 CA15083. Clinical trial information: NCT01375829 Citation Format: Joel M. Reid, Michael E. Menefee, Felix Boakye-Agyeman, Chad A. Walden, Charles Erlichman, Keith C. Bible. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of ixabepilone and temsirolimus in adult patients with advanced solid tumors. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2015 Nov 5-9; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2015;14(12 Suppl 2):Abstract nr B113.

Abstract Purpose: Effective sensitizing strategies potentially can extend the benefit of temozolomide (TMZ) therapy in patients with glioblastoma (GBM). We previously demonstrated that robust TMZ-sensitizing effects of the [poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase] (PARP) inhibitor veliparib (ABT-888) are restricted to TMZ-sensitive GBM xenografts. The focus of this study is to provide an understanding for the differential sensitization in paired TMZ-sensitive and -resistant GBM models. Experimental Design: The impact of veliparib on TMZ-induced cytotoxicity and DNA damage was evaluated in vitro and in vivo in models of acquired TMZ resistance (GBM12TMZ-mgmtHigh, GBM12TMZ-mgmtLow, and U251TMZ), inherent TMZ resistance (T98G), and TMZ-sensitive (U251 and GBM12). In vivo drug efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics were analyzed using clinically relevant dosing regimens. Results: Veliparib enhanced TMZ cytotoxicity and DNA-damage signaling in all GBM models in vitro with more pronounced effects in TMZ-resistant lines at 3 to 10 μmol/L veliparib. In vivo, combined TMZ/veliparib, compared with TMZ alone, significantly delayed tumor growth and enhanced DNA-damage signaling and γH2AX levels in the sensitive GBM12 xenograft line but not in the resistant GBM12TMZ lines. The pharmacokinetic profile of veliparib was similar for GBM12 and GBM12TMZ tumors with Cmax (∼1.5 μmol/L) in tissue significantly lower than concentrations associated with optimal in vitro sensitizing effects for resistant tumors. In contrast, robust suppression of PARP-1 expression by shRNA significantly increased TMZ sensitivity of U251TMZ in vitro and in vivo. Conclusions: In vitro cytotoxicity assays do not adequately model the therapeutic index of PARP inhibitors, as concentrations of veliparib and TMZ required to sensitize TMZ-resistant cancer cells in vivo cannot be achieved using a tolerable dosing regimen. Clin Cancer Res; 20(14); 3730–41. ©2014 AACR.