Komforti, Miglena K.

Introduction. Recent trials demonstrated clinically significant benefits in HER2-nonamplified breast cancer with HER2-low expression using novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates. Thus, HER2-low breast cancer was proposed as a separate diagnostic entity. Herein, we reclassify HER2-negative cancers according to the new HER2-low category using a modified system and further investigate HER2-very-low expression. Methods. 114 HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC)-negative invasive breast tumors were identified from the pathology database of Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, between January 2019 and August 2022. Two blinded breast pathologists (BP) independently rescored HER2 IHC slides at 200x and 400x magnification. Discordant cases between the two BPs were rescored together. The most recent 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 scoring criteria were used. HER2 (0) was subdivided into HER2 (absent) and HER2 (very low). HER2 FISH testing was performed in all cases. Results. The cohort comprised of 38 (33.3%) HER2 (0) and 76 (66.7%) HER2 (1+) tumors. The first round of rescoring at 200x and 400x magnification resulted in 17 (14.9%) HER2 (absent), 31 (27.2%) HER2 (very low), and 64 (56.2%) HER2 (1+) and 2 (1.8%) HER2 (2+) tumors by BP1 and 20 (17.5%) HER2 (absent), 33 (28.9%) HER2 (very low), and 61 (53.5%) HER2 (1+) tumors by BP2. The combined final rescoring by BP1 and BP2 was as follows: 15 (13.2%) HER2 (absent), 35 (30.7%) HER2 (very low), 63 (55.3%) HER2 (1+), and 1 (0.9%) HER2 (2+) cases. A comparison of the first round of rescoring between two BPs showed substantial agreement with Cohen’s kappa value of 0.67. Both comparisons of first rescoring by BP1 and by BP2 to combined final rescoring showed almost perfect agreement with Cohen’s kappa value of 0.83.Follow-up FISH studies showed one amplified tumor. Conclusion. Our data support the need for finer granularity, classification, and understanding of HER2-low breast cancers. We also show that reproducibility between trained BP can be obtained, albeit with scoring at high power and low threshold for showing challenging interpretations.

AimsDue to its rarity and non‐specific clinical and pathological features, low‐grade adenosquamous carcinoma (LGASC) of the breast continues to pose diagnostic challenges. Unlike other triple‐negative breast carcinomas, LGASC tends to have an indolent clinical behaviour. It is essential to recognise this lesion for accurate diagnosis and appropriate management.Methods and resultsTwenty‐five cases of LGASC were identified in our archives and collaborating institutes. Cases of LGASC with dominant coexisting other type carcinomas were excluded. We studied the clinical presentation, morphological features, patterns of the commonly used immunohistochemical stains and follow‐up. In our cohort, LGASC was commonly located at the outer aspect of the breast and associated with intraductal papilloma. The morphology of LGASC is characterised by infiltrating small glands and nests with variable squamous differentiation. We also found cuffing desmoplastic (fibrolamellar) stromal change in 75% of patients and peripheral lymphocytic aggregates in 87.5% of patients. P63 and smooth muscle myosin (SMM) were the most common myoepithelial markers used to assist in diagnosis. P63 often stained peripheral tumour cells surrounding invasive glands (circumferential staining in 80% of the cases), mimicking myoepithelial cells. It also stained the small nests with squamous differentiation. However, SMM was negative in 63% of the cases. The vast majority of our cases were triple‐negative; only a few had focal and weak expressions of ER and PR. One patient who did not have excision developed lymph node metastasis. Most patients underwent excision or mastectomy with negative margins as surgical treatment; there were no recurrences or metastases in these patients with clinical follow‐ups up to 108 months.ConclusionsLGASC has some unique, although not entirely specific, morphological features and immunohistochemical staining patterns. Fibrolamellar stromal change, peripheral lymphocytic aggregates and variable staining of p63 and SMM are valuable features to facilitate the diagnosis.

Among gynecologic cancers, uterine serous carcinoma (USC) has been shown to be human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplified and trastuzumab has been included in the recent National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for treatment of advanced stage or recurrent USC with HER2 overexpression/amplification. There is limited literature suggesting that a subset of high-grade endometrioid carcinomas with aberrant p53 expression may also be HER2 amplified and these patients could benefit from the addition of targeted therapy. We identified 59 p53-aberrant (mismatch repair proficient) FIGO 3 endometrioid carcinomas of the uterus. HER2 immunohistochemistry was performed in all 59 tumors and HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed in 52 of the 59 cases. Four of the 59 cases were HER2 3+ by immunohistochemistry (6.7%), using the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) 2007, 2013, and 2018 criteria. HER2 FISH was performed in 3 of the 4 cases and was amplified in all 3. Nine, 8, and 7 tumors showed 2+ HER2 staining when applying 2018, 2013, and 2007 criteria, respectively, FISH was performed in 7 tumors and none were amplified. An additional 4 cases did not perfectly meet the 2018 ASCO/CAP criteria but were assigned a score of 2+, none were amplified by HER2 FISH. The remaining 42 cases showed 1+ or no staining for HER2, FISH was successfully performed in 38 tumors and none showed amplification. Approximately half of the tumors fulfilled criteria for HER2-low or HER2-very low (10 HER2-low and 20 HER2-very low). Our data shows that a subset of p53-aberrant high-grade endometrial endometrioid carcinoma express HER2 and these patients may benefit from the addition of targeted therapy. The role of targeted therapy in HER2-low gynecologic carcinoma is currently unexplored.