Back to Authors

Triplette, Matthew

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7421-4720

Mayo Clinic

Fred Hutch Cancer Center

Citations 2

A31-10 Patient Navigation to Improve Lung Cancer Screening Uptake in Urban American Indian/Alaska Native Adults in the Pacific Northwest
Fonseca, G A, Tsosie, U, Anderson, N, Omernik, B, Echo-Hawk, A, Baker, L, Rusk, A M, DeCell, K, Barrington, W, Parker, M, Triplette, M, Fonseca, Giuseppe Allan, Tsosie, Ursula , Omernik, Brandon , Echo‐Hawk, Abigail, Baker, Lannesse, DeCell, Katie , Barrington, Wendy E. , Triplette, Matthew

American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine | May 18, 2026 | Volume: 212 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/ajrccm/aamag162.3626 Get It

Abstract Rationale American Indians and Alaska Native (AI/AN) people have the highest prevalence of tobacco use of any US racial or ethnic minoritized group, though this varies regionally. Smoking, and smoking-related cancers including lung cancer are more common in AI/AN people than non-Hispanic whites in the Pacific Northwest. Lung cancer screening (LCS) is effective but broadly under-utilized in AI/AN eligible adults. This study’s objective was to evaluate a AI/AN community co-designed patient navigation intervention to bridge community healthcare settings to a LDCT-capable LCS program. Methods We conducted a single-arm pilot study of the patient navigation intervention, grounded in community-based participatory research principles. The intervention was formalized in a living handbook, co-created with input from patients and providers at an AI/AN Urban Indian Organization and primary care clinic, Seattle Indian Health Board. Two community health workers served as navigators to deliver culturally sensitive support, link to shared decision-making with a nurse practitioner at the academic LCS program, coordinate transportation, interface with insurance and provide other barrier-directed activities. Patients eligible for LCS (n = 44) were recruited from the AI/AN clinic setting through on-site outreach. Enrolled participants completed pre-navigation surveys which assessed baseline knowledge, attitudes, experiences and barriers. Those who engaged with the central program completed an additional post-navigation survey (n = 15). Electronic health records were reviewed for all navigation and LCS-related data. Results Between July 2023 - November 2024, 44 participants were enrolled in the study. The median age of the participants was 65 (IQR 58-70), 66% reported current smoking, and 76% reported an annual household income <$30,000. All participants reported at least one barrier that delayed care in the past 12 months. On review, two participants were up-to-date on LCS prior to enrollment. Within 6 months, 13 participants completed a shared decision-making appointment and 11 went forward with LDCT. On post-intervention surveys, barriers most commonly addressed were: scheduling (100%), transportation (80%), explaining LCS (80%) and cost/insurance (73%). Participants reported high acceptability, measured by Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM median 5.0, IQR 5-5) and patient satisfaction measured by Patient Navigation Satisfaction Measured-Instrument (PNS-I median 45, IQR 42-45). Conclusion A culturally tailored patient navigation program for LCS was feasible and highly acceptable among urban AI/AN adults. Navigation addressed multiple barriers and successfully connected some patient participants from a community clinic to tertiary screening centers for shared decision-making and/or screening. These findings support the effectiveness of academic-community partnered navigation to increase LCS uptake in AI/AN clinic settings. This abstract is funded by: ATS/ALA/Chest Foundation: Respiratory Health Equity Research Award (Triplette)
Smoking Cessation, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Shields, Peter G. , Balis, David S. , Davis, James M. , Edmondson, Donna, Feliciano, Joy, Hudmon, Karen Suchanek , Jaklitsch, Michael T. , McCarthy, Danielle E. , Ong, Michael , Prochaska, Judith J. , Sandoval, Argelia, Sheffer, Christine E. , Spencer, Sharon, Tindle, Hilary A. , Tong, Elisa K. , Triplette, Matthew , Urbanic, James J., Videtic, Gregory M.M. , Whitlock, C. Will, McCullough, Beth, Darlow, Susan, Warner, David, Thomas, Timothy K , Sheffer, Christine E , Davis, James M , Bierut, Laura Jean , Arenberg, Douglas A. , Cinciripini, Paul M , Hitsman, Brian L. , Leone, Frank T. , Ling, Pamela May , Park, Elyse R , Studts, Jamie L. , Tanvetyanon, Tawee , Warner, David O.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | March 10, 2023 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 297-322

10.6004/jnccn.2023.0013 Get It

Although the harmful effects of smoking after a cancer diagnosis have been clearly demonstrated, many patients continue to smoke cigarettes during treatment and beyond. The NCCN Guidelines for Smoking Cessation emphasize the importance of smoking cessation in all patients with cancer and seek to establish evidence-based recommendations tailored to the unique needs and concerns of patients with cancer. The recommendations contained herein describe interventions for cessation of all combustible tobacco products (eg, cigarettes, cigars, hookah), including smokeless tobacco products. However, recommendations are based on studies of cigarette smoking. The NCCN Smoking Cessation Panel recommends that treatment plans for all patients with cancer who smoke include the following 3 tenets that should be done concurrently: (1) evidence-based motivational strategies and behavior therapy (counseling), which can be brief; (2) evidence-based pharmacotherapy; and (3) close follow-up with retreatment as needed.