Echo‐Hawk, Abigail

Abstract Rationale American Indians and Alaska Native (AI/AN) people have the highest prevalence of tobacco use of any US racial or ethnic minoritized group, though this varies regionally. Smoking, and smoking-related cancers including lung cancer are more common in AI/AN people than non-Hispanic whites in the Pacific Northwest. Lung cancer screening (LCS) is effective but broadly under-utilized in AI/AN eligible adults. This study’s objective was to evaluate a AI/AN community co-designed patient navigation intervention to bridge community healthcare settings to a LDCT-capable LCS program. Methods We conducted a single-arm pilot study of the patient navigation intervention, grounded in community-based participatory research principles. The intervention was formalized in a living handbook, co-created with input from patients and providers at an AI/AN Urban Indian Organization and primary care clinic, Seattle Indian Health Board. Two community health workers served as navigators to deliver culturally sensitive support, link to shared decision-making with a nurse practitioner at the academic LCS program, coordinate transportation, interface with insurance and provide other barrier-directed activities. Patients eligible for LCS (n = 44) were recruited from the AI/AN clinic setting through on-site outreach. Enrolled participants completed pre-navigation surveys which assessed baseline knowledge, attitudes, experiences and barriers. Those who engaged with the central program completed an additional post-navigation survey (n = 15). Electronic health records were reviewed for all navigation and LCS-related data. Results Between July 2023 - November 2024, 44 participants were enrolled in the study. The median age of the participants was 65 (IQR 58-70), 66% reported current smoking, and 76% reported an annual household income <$30,000. All participants reported at least one barrier that delayed care in the past 12 months. On review, two participants were up-to-date on LCS prior to enrollment. Within 6 months, 13 participants completed a shared decision-making appointment and 11 went forward with LDCT. On post-intervention surveys, barriers most commonly addressed were: scheduling (100%), transportation (80%), explaining LCS (80%) and cost/insurance (73%). Participants reported high acceptability, measured by Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM median 5.0, IQR 5-5) and patient satisfaction measured by Patient Navigation Satisfaction Measured-Instrument (PNS-I median 45, IQR 42-45). Conclusion A culturally tailored patient navigation program for LCS was feasible and highly acceptable among urban AI/AN adults. Navigation addressed multiple barriers and successfully connected some patient participants from a community clinic to tertiary screening centers for shared decision-making and/or screening. These findings support the effectiveness of academic-community partnered navigation to increase LCS uptake in AI/AN clinic settings. This abstract is funded by: ATS/ALA/Chest Foundation: Respiratory Health Equity Research Award (Triplette)