Back to Authors

Arenberg, Douglas A.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7707-5092

Mayo Clinic

U-M Rogel Cancer Center

Citations 2

Smoking Cessation, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Shields, Peter G. , Balis, David S. , Davis, James M. , Edmondson, Donna, Feliciano, Joy, Hudmon, Karen Suchanek , Jaklitsch, Michael T. , McCarthy, Danielle E. , Ong, Michael , Prochaska, Judith J. , Sandoval, Argelia, Sheffer, Christine E. , Spencer, Sharon, Tindle, Hilary A. , Tong, Elisa K. , Triplette, Matthew , Urbanic, James J., Videtic, Gregory M.M. , Whitlock, C. Will, McCullough, Beth, Darlow, Susan, Warner, David, Thomas, Timothy K , Sheffer, Christine E , Davis, James M , Bierut, Laura Jean , Arenberg, Douglas A. , Cinciripini, Paul M , Hitsman, Brian L. , Leone, Frank T. , Ling, Pamela May , Park, Elyse R , Studts, Jamie L. , Tanvetyanon, Tawee , Warner, David O.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | March 10, 2023 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 297-322

10.6004/jnccn.2023.0013 Get It

Although the harmful effects of smoking after a cancer diagnosis have been clearly demonstrated, many patients continue to smoke cigarettes during treatment and beyond. The NCCN Guidelines for Smoking Cessation emphasize the importance of smoking cessation in all patients with cancer and seek to establish evidence-based recommendations tailored to the unique needs and concerns of patients with cancer. The recommendations contained herein describe interventions for cessation of all combustible tobacco products (eg, cigarettes, cigars, hookah), including smokeless tobacco products. However, recommendations are based on studies of cigarette smoking. The NCCN Smoking Cessation Panel recommends that treatment plans for all patients with cancer who smoke include the following 3 tenets that should be done concurrently: (1) evidence-based motivational strategies and behavior therapy (counseling), which can be brief; (2) evidence-based pharmacotherapy; and (3) close follow-up with retreatment as needed.
Diagnosis of Acute Cellular Rejection Using Probe-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy in Lung Transplant Recipients: A Prospective, Multicenter Trial
Keller, Cesar A., Khoór, András , Arenberg, Douglas A. , Smith, Michael A. , Islam, Shaheen U.

Transplantation | May 31, 2018 | Volume: 103 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 428-434

10.1097/tp.0000000000002306 Get It

Background Acute cellular rejection (ACR) in lung transplant recipients requires demonstration of perivascular lymphocytic infiltration in alveolar tissue samples from transbronchial biopsies (TBBs). Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) allows in vivo observation of alveolar, vascular, and cellular microstructures in the lung with potential to identify ACR. The objective of our prospective, blinded, multicenter observational study was to identify pCLE findings in patients with ACR diagnosed histopathologically by TBB. Methods Lung transplant recipients undergoing diagnostic bronchoscopies within 1 year posttransplant for suspected ACR had pCLE video imaging obtained immediately prior to tissue sampling via TBB. Findings of 2 pCLE criteria, abundant alveolar cellularity and perivascular cellularity (PVC), were assessed by 4 investigators familiar with pCLE and compared with histopathologic criteria of ACR to derive sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and accuracy. Interobserver agreement was assessed by calculating intraclass coefficient and Fleiss κ. Findings were analyzed before and after a consensus meeting of investigators on interpreting images. Results Thirty pCLE procedures were performed on 24 patients, 8 showing ACR in TBB. Diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement using pCLE to identify PVC were significantly higher than those of abundant alveolar cellularity (P < 0.01). The number of blood vessels identified with PVC on pCLE was significantly correlated with histopathologic activity grading of ACR (P < 0.01). Perivascular cellularity agreement among investigators significantly improved after consensus meeting (P < 0.01). Conclusions When found on pCLE, PVC is a feasible and reproducible criterion for assessment of ACR in vivo, but there is a learning curve for image interpretation.