Carlson, Matthew L.

Objective: To evaluate the ethical implications, clinical benefits, and challenges associated with centralizing the surgical care of vestibular schwannoma (VS) care. Databases reviewed: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane, Scopus. Methods: A scoping review was conducted per the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. A comprehensive search of 6 electronic databases yielded 1,231 articles using keywords related to vestibular schwannoma, centralization of care, centers of excellence, and ethical considerations. After removing duplicates (n=344) and screening titles and abstracts (n=887), 17 full-text articles were reviewed. Two additional articles were identified through manual screening. A total of 15 studies were included in the final analysis. Results: Hospitals were categorized by surgical case volume (high, medium, low) to compare patient demographics and clinical outcomes. Patients seen at low-volume hospitals (LVHs) were generally older and more racially diverse, and more likely to have public insurance (Medicare or Medicaid), whereas high-volume hospitals (HVHs) served a younger, predominantly White, and privately insured population. Of the 14 studies evaluating outcomes, 12 demonstrated a positive association between higher surgical volume and improved outcomes, including reduced complications, lower mortality, shorter length of stay, and decreased hospitalization costs. High-volume hospitals also had significantly higher rates of routine discharge. Conclusion: Centralization of vestibular schwannoma care to high-volume centers is associated with improved clinical outcomes and reduced health care costs. However, these benefits must be carefully weighed against potential ethical concerns, including disparities in access related to socioeconomic status, insurance coverage, and geographic location.

Objective: The Complete Cochlear Implant Care (CCIC) model is a highly coordinated care delivery model reducing and condensing in-person visits for cochlear implant (CI) patients, leveraging telehealth and remote programming. Clinical, quality-of-life, implementation, patient experience, and financial outcomes of the clinical trial are reported. Study design: Prospective, nonrandomized, 2-arm clinical trial Setting: Tertiary referral CI center Patients: Adult CI candidates Interventions: Cochlear implantation Main outcome measures: Speech perception, quality of life, implementation, patient experience, and financial outcomes for both CCIC and traditional care delivery models. Results: Patients participating in the traditional and CCIC delivery models demonstrated 12-month postoperative speech perception scores comparable to nationally reported outcomes (CNC 61% and 72% and AzBio in quiet 75% and 87% for traditional and CCIC cohorts, respectively). Quality-of-life evaluation using the CIQOL-10 demonstrated similar 12-month postoperative scores between groups (52 and 54 for traditional and CCIC cohorts, respectively). The CI Patient Experience Survey demonstrated high satisfaction outcomes in ease of communication, preparedness for surgery, and overall care in both cohorts. Implementation analysis of the CCIC model revealed perceived benefits from staff and clinicians; however, support for expansion of the program was contingent upon the availability of app-based or web-based remote programming technology. Finally, financial analysis revealed decreased out-of-pocket costs for CCIC patients. Conclusion: The CCIC model has the potential to dramatically streamline hearing health care delivery and reduce out-of-pocket costs for CI recipients. Clinical outcomes between cohorts were comparable in this feasibility study; however, a sufficiently powered trial is required to definitively comment on clinical outcomes with the new care delivery model.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Surgery in NF2-related schwannomatosis (NF2-SWN) vestibular schwannoma (VS) carries a higher risk of facial nerve damage, hearing loss, and partial resection, than in sporadic cases. Radiosurgery is also associated with higher failure compared with sporadic schwannomas. Nowadays, bevacizumab (BEV) is frequently considered in the NF2-SWN population. However, some patients experience progression despite treatment. Among other surgical risks, in BEV-treated patients, hemorrhage and impaired healing are specific considerations. These concerns have led manufacturers to recommend stopping BEV 6 to 8 weeks preoperatively. The aim of our multicentric study was to assess the perioperative bleeding risk and postoperative outcomes in NF2-SWN patients undergoing VS surgery after preoperative BEV treatment. METHODS: Our retrospective analysis included medical and surgical records along with imaging reviews from 4 high-volume tertiary academic referral centers for NF2-SWN and VS. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients met the inclusion criteria. VS had a mean volume of 13.2 ±7.6 cm 3 corresponding to 1 KOOS III and 20 KOOS IV. BEV was stopped at a mean of 5.8 ± 4.0 months before surgery with a total mean treatment duration of 33.7 ± 20.7 months and a monthly dose of 10.2 ± 4.1 mg/kg. Intraoperatively, the tumor was assessed to be bloody by the operating surgeons in 7 patients. Late BEV discontinuation and high cumulative dose independently predicted perioperative bleeding and longer surgery duration. No other complication such as wound dehiscence was reported. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that a higher cumulative BEV dose (∼600 mg/kg) and a longer interval between BEV discontinuation and surgery (∼8 months) are associated with a modest but statistically significant increase in intraoperative bleeding risk. Based on these observations, a BEV-free window between 6 weeks and 6 months (depending on the clinical scenario) before tumor resection seems optimal, particularly for patients with high cumulative exposure.

Importance In the literature, there is a lack of data reporting tumor control rates after radiotherapy in actively growing vestibular schwannomas (VS). Data for this rarely studied population are needed. Objective To estimate tumor control rates in radiologically growing VS treated with first-line radiotherapy. Design, Setting, and Participants This international, multicenter cohort study used prospectively collected data from patients with growing unilateral VS treated first-line with radiotherapy between January 2000 and December 2023 from 8 tertiary referral skull base units. The data were analyzed in June 2025. Exposures Radiotherapy as an initial treatment for VS. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was treatment failure, ie VS growth postradiotherapy, which was predefined as an increase in maximum intracranial tumor diameter (ICTD) of 3 mm or greater within the first 2 years after radiotherapy or 2 mm or greater thereafter. Secondary outcomes were treatment failure based on different definitions of VS growth: (1) an increase in ICTD of 2 mm or greater, (2) an increase in ICTD of 3 mm or greater, and (3) conversion to surgery. Results A total of 1883 patients (975 female individuals [51.8%]; median age at diagnosis, 63 years [IQR, 53-71 years]) were included in the study. Using the primary definition of treatment failure (an increase in ICTD of ≥3 mm within the first 2 years postradiotherapy or ≥2 mm thereafter), the Kaplan-Meier estimate yielded a 10-year tumor control rate of 76.1% (95% CI, 72.7%-79.2%). For secondary outcome definitions, 10-year tumor control rates were 60.1% (95% CI, 57.5%-64.3%) for an ICTD increase of 2 mm or greater, 78.3% (95% CI, 75.0%-81.2%) for an increase of 3 mm or greater, and 92.6% (95% CI, 90.4%-94.3%) for conversion to surgery. Neither pretreatment tumor size nor tumor location (intracanalicular vs extracanalicular) were significantly associated with treatment failure. Conclusions and Relevance The results of this cohort study provide tumor control outcomes for radiologically growing VS treated with radiotherapy using several clinically relevant definitions of growth. By focusing exclusively on this rarely isolated subgroup, the findings offer targeted data to potentially inform treatment expectations and future research.

Objectives To compare electrical stimulation and speech perception in vestibular schwannoma (VS) patients across treatment modalities and standard cochlear implant (CI) patients. Study Design Retrospective review. Setting Tertiary academic center. Patients Sixty-seven CI ears consisting of 23 standard CI controls and 44 VS patients with ipsilateral CI. VS patients were separated by treatment modality: 24 microsurgical resection, 15 radiation therapy, and 5 observation. Eleven VS patients with CI did not receive auditory sensation from electrical stimulation. Interventions VS microsurgical resection, radiation therapy, and observation. Main Outcome Measures Threshold (T-levels), comfort (C-levels), consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) word score, and AzBio sentence recognition scores. Results Patients who underwent microsurgical resection required significantly higher (p < 0.001) T-levels and C-levels compared with the standard CI group. Stimulation levels in the VS radiation therapy and observation groups were higher but not significantly different compared with standard CI controls. Overall rate of CI nonstimulation across all VS patients was 25%: 38% for microsurgery and 13% for radiation. Average CNC score for microsurgery group was 18% compared with 44% for radiation, 55% for observation, and 68.5% for standard CI controls. CNC word and AzBio scores were significantly lower (p < 0.001) for the microsurgery group compared with standard CI group. Conclusions Resection may negatively affect auditory nerve function, leading to higher stimulation levels, increased risk of nonstimulation, and poorer postoperative CI speech outcomes compared with observation or radiosurgery. When medically appropriate, nonsurgical VS management may be used to allow for optimization of CI programming and postoperative hearing outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Given the increasing prevalence and shifting disease demographic of vestibular schwannoma toward smaller tumors in people with less advanced symptoms, increasing emphasis has been placed on functional hearing preservation. OBJECTIVE: To provide an update to the 2018 CNS Guideline on hearing preservation outcomes in patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma. METHODS: Systematic review and clinical practice guideline summarizing data pertaining to hearing preservation outcomes within the first 10 years after contemporary stereotactic radiation, microsurgery, or observation with serial imaging. The analysis incorporates studies included in the 2018 guideline and additional literature published up to May 20, 2022, providing a comprehensive up-to-date review of published clinical outcome data over time. RESULTS: Pooled estimated rates of serviceable hearing preservation are presented for observation, radiosurgery, and microsurgery for adults with sporadic vestibular schwannoma who have documented serviceable hearing in the ipsilateral ear at the time of diagnosis. Overall estimated rates of maintaining serviceable hearing are 78% at 2 years, 59% at 5 years, and 47% at 10 years during observation; 71% at 2 years, 59% at 5 years, and 38% at 10 years after radiosurgery; and 48% at 2 years, 40% at 5 years, and 32% at 10 years after microsurgery. In addition, features portending hearing outcome among management modalities are reported to guide accurate patient counseling. CONCLUSION: Regardless of treatment modality, fewer than half of patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma who present with serviceable hearing will maintain useful hearing by 10 years. Across all studies, microsurgery and radiosurgery seem to accelerate this decline over the natural history, although further research is needed given limitations of available evidence. The full guideline can be seen online at https://www.cns.org/guidelines/treatment-adults-vestibular-schwannoma/4-hearing-preservation-outcomes-in-patients-with-s

Objective To assess integration of a single-use robotic-assisted cochlear implant (RA-CI) electrode array insertion system into surgical workflows, identify potential challenges, and inform best practices. Study Design Survey. Setting Survey data from 16 surgeons across 10 US hospitals. Patients CI candidates 12 years and older with radiographically normal cochleae. Intervention CI surgery with single-use RA-CI insertion system during electrode array insertion. Main Outcome Measures Number of RA-CI to achieve proficiency, estimated additional time for RA-CI, and best practices to successfully incorporate the RA insertion system into CI surgery. Results A total of 121 RA-CI cases were performed. All surgeons completed the survey. Most surgeons (62.5%) reported they would feel comfortable using the device within five cases. Eight (50%) reported use of the RA system added 5 to 10 minutes to the case, and seven (44%) reported an added 10–15 minutes. Providing adequate incision size to secure the unit base superior to the temporal line and maximizing exposure of the facial recess were the most recommended best practices. Additional recommendations included pulling the receiver/stimulator forward within the pocket to facilitate a full electrode array insertion and considering drive head placement and mastoidectomy size to maximize overall visibility during electrode array insertion. Conclusions Proficiency with an RA electrode array insertion system during CI surgery can be achieved with minor adjustments to the surgical approach, within relatively few use cases (generally <5) and with minimal time addition (between 5 and 15 min). Training to specific best practices is important before initial clinical use.

AbstractObjectiveTo examine associations with changes in quality‐of‐life (QOL) outcomes following treatment of vestibular schwannoma (VS) using stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).Study DesignProspective longitudinal study.SettingTertiary academic center.MethodsPatients who were treated for sporadic VS using SRS from 2015 to 2022 were included. QOL outcomes were measured using the disease‐specific Penn Acoustic Neuroma QOL (PANQOL) scale.ResultsSeventy‐nine patients with pre‐SRS and at least one post‐SRS PANQOL assessments were available for analysis. The mean change in total PANQOL scores was −2 (SD 13) on a 100‐point scale. The mean duration between assessments was 4.6 years (SD 2.0). Age at SRS, sex, and SRS treatment doses were not significantly associated with changes in total PANQOL scores. Total PANQOL scores improved a mean of 4 points for patients with tumors confined to the internal auditory canal but declined a mean of 5 points for patients with tumors extending into the cerebellopontine angle (P = .01); however, these changes did not exceed the minimum clinically significant threshold of 11 points. The correlation coefficient between treated tumor volume at SRS and change in total PANQOL scores was −0.30 (P = .007). Changes in PANQOL total (P = .5) and hearing domain (P = .3) scores for patients who maintained serviceable hearing or progressed to nonserviceable hearing did not significantly differ.ConclusionTumor extent and treated volume at SRS had a statistically significant but likely not clinically important impact on total PANQOL scores. Progression to nonserviceable hearing did not have a significant impact on PANQOL total or hearing domain scores.

To address the limitations of existing instruments, the authors developed the Vestibular Schwannoma Quality of Life (VSQOL) Index. The Index captures the multifaceted impacts of vestibular schwannoma (VS) on daily life across eight categories: hearing problems; dizziness and imbalance; pain, discomfort, and tinnitus; problems with face or eyes; impact on physical, emotional, and social well-being; difficulty with thinking and memory; satisfaction or regret; and impact on employment. Initially developed in English, this digital supplement of the Journal of Neurosurgery presents translations of the VSQOL Index to Simplified Chinese, Spanish, Japanese, Arabic, French, and Norwegian. These translations aim to improve access to VS quality of life (QOL) research globally with enhanced racial, ethnic, and geographic representation. The goal is to comprehensively evaluate the impact of VS diagnosis and management on well-being and QOL by offering the VSQOL Index in patients’ native, or first-learned, languages. The English version and these translations may be used for noncommercial research, clinical, or educational purposes without written permission from the authors. Investigators interested in translating the VSQOL Index to other languages should contact the corresponding author for translation methodology instructions.

The authors developed a new disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure to capture the multifaceted impacts of vestibular schwannoma on daily life, the Vestibular Schwannoma Quality of Life (VSQOL) Index, which contains 40 items grouped into eight categories: hearing problems; dizziness and imbalance; pain, discomfort, and tinnitus; problems with face or eyes; impact on physical, emotional, and social well-being; difficulty with thinking and memory; satisfaction or regret; and impact on employment. 1 The VSQOL Index was developed in English, although the availability of this instrument in other languages can improve access to quality of life (QOL) research worldwide with enhanced racial, ethnic, and geographic representation. The authors partnered with FACITtrans, a component of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) group with more than 25 years of experience in translation, cultural adaptation, and linguistic validation of patient-reported outcome measures, to translate the VSQOL Index to Norwegian using a rigorous translation methodology. 2–5 The translation of the VSQOL Index presented at the end of this article may be used for noncommercial research, clinical, or educational purposes without seeking written permission from the authors. By providing a suite of translations in this digital supplement of the Journal of Neurosurgery , the authors hope to increase the reach and breadth of vestibular schwannoma QOL research and facilitate international collaborations.