King, Andrew Thomas

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Surgery in NF2-related schwannomatosis (NF2-SWN) vestibular schwannoma (VS) carries a higher risk of facial nerve damage, hearing loss, and partial resection, than in sporadic cases. Radiosurgery is also associated with higher failure compared with sporadic schwannomas. Nowadays, bevacizumab (BEV) is frequently considered in the NF2-SWN population. However, some patients experience progression despite treatment. Among other surgical risks, in BEV-treated patients, hemorrhage and impaired healing are specific considerations. These concerns have led manufacturers to recommend stopping BEV 6 to 8 weeks preoperatively. The aim of our multicentric study was to assess the perioperative bleeding risk and postoperative outcomes in NF2-SWN patients undergoing VS surgery after preoperative BEV treatment. METHODS: Our retrospective analysis included medical and surgical records along with imaging reviews from 4 high-volume tertiary academic referral centers for NF2-SWN and VS. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients met the inclusion criteria. VS had a mean volume of 13.2 ±7.6 cm 3 corresponding to 1 KOOS III and 20 KOOS IV. BEV was stopped at a mean of 5.8 ± 4.0 months before surgery with a total mean treatment duration of 33.7 ± 20.7 months and a monthly dose of 10.2 ± 4.1 mg/kg. Intraoperatively, the tumor was assessed to be bloody by the operating surgeons in 7 patients. Late BEV discontinuation and high cumulative dose independently predicted perioperative bleeding and longer surgery duration. No other complication such as wound dehiscence was reported. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that a higher cumulative BEV dose (∼600 mg/kg) and a longer interval between BEV discontinuation and surgery (∼8 months) are associated with a modest but statistically significant increase in intraoperative bleeding risk. Based on these observations, a BEV-free window between 6 weeks and 6 months (depending on the clinical scenario) before tumor resection seems optimal, particularly for patients with high cumulative exposure.

Objective The objective of the current study was to present the results of an international working group survey identifying perceived limitations of existing facial nerve grading scales to inform the development of a novel grading scale for assessing early postoperative facial paralysis that incorporates regional scoring and is anchored in recovery prognosis and risk of associated complications. Study Design Survey. Setting A working group of 48 multidisciplinary clinicians with expertise in skull base, cerebellopontine angle, temporal bone, or parotid gland surgery. Results House-Brackmann grade is the most widely used system to assess facial nerve function among working group members (81%), although more than half (54%) agreed that the system they currently use does not adequately estimate the risk of associated complications, such as corneal injury, and confidence in interrater and intrarater reliability is generally low. Simplicity was ranked as the most important attribute of a novel postoperative facial nerve grading system to increase the likelihood of adoption, followed by reliability and accuracy. There was widespread consensus (91%) that the eye is the most critical facial region to focus on in the early postoperative setting. Conclusions Members were invited to submit proposed grading systems in alignment with the objectives of the working group for subsequent validation. From these data, we plan to develop a simple, clinically anchored, and reproducible staging system with regional scoring for assessing early postoperative facial nerve function after surgery of the skull base, cerebellopontine angle, temporal bone, or parotid gland.

OBJECTIVE Preoperative differentiation of facial nerve schwannoma (FNS) from vestibular schwannoma (VS) can be challenging, and failure to differentiate between these two pathologies can result in potentially avoidable facial nerve injury. This study presents the combined experience of two high-volume centers in the management of intraoperatively diagnosed FNSs. The authors highlight clinical and imaging features that can distinguish FNS from VS and provide an algorithm to help manage intraoperatively diagnosed FNS. METHODS Operative records of 1484 presumed sporadic VS resections between January 2012 and December 2021 were reviewed, and patients with intraoperatively diagnosed FNSs were identified. Clinical data and preoperative imaging were retrospectively reviewed for features suggestive of FNS, and factors associated with good postoperative facial nerve function (House-Brackmann [HB] grade ≤ 2) were identified. A preoperative imaging protocol for suspected VS and recommendations for surgical decision-making following an intraoperative FNS diagnosis were created. RESULTS Nineteen patients (1.3%) with FNSs were identified. All patients had normal facial motor function preoperatively. In 12 patients (63%), preoperative imaging demonstrated no features suggestive of FNS, with the remainder showing subtle enhancement of the geniculate/labyrinthine facial segment, widening/erosion of the fallopian canal, or multiple tumor nodules in retrospect. Eleven (57.9%) of the 19 patients underwent a retrosigmoid craniotomy, and in the remaining patients, a translabyrinthine (n = 6) or transotic (n = 2) approach was used. Following FNS diagnosis, 6 (32%) of the tumors underwent gross-total resection (GTR) and cable nerve grafting, 6 (32%) underwent subtotal resection (STR) and bony decompression of the meatal facial nerve segment, and 7 (36%) underwent bony decompression only. All patients undergoing subtotal debulking or bony decompression exhibited normal postoperative facial function (HB grade I). At the last clinical follow-up, patients who underwent GTR with a facial nerve graft had HB grade III (3 of 6 patients) or IV facial function. Tumor recurrence/regrowth occurred in 3 patients (16%), all of whom had been treated with either bony decompression or STR. CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative diagnosis of an FNS during a presumed VS resection is rare, but its incidence can be reduced further by maintaining a high index of suspicion and undertaking further imaging in patients with atypical clinical or imaging features. If an intraoperative diagnosis does occur, conservative surgical management with bony decompression of the facial nerve only is recommended, unless there is significant mass effect on surrounding structures.