Rames, Jess D.

Background: With neck, aging the cervicomental angle becomes obtuse and may be influenced by hyoid bone aging. An understanding of hyoid position changes with aging will further our understanding of its role in neck contour changes. Methods: A 3D volumetric reconstruction of 282 neck computed tomography scans was performed. The cohort was categorized into three groups based on age: 20 years or older and younger than 40 years, 40 years or older and younger than 60 years, and 60 years or older and younger than 80 years. The vertical and horizontal hyoid distances in relation to the mandible were calculated for each patient. Results: A total of 282 patients (153 women, 129 men) were included in the cohort. The age groups were evenly distributed in men and women. Mean hyoid vertical and horizontal distances differed between women and men in all age groups. There was a significant difference in the hyoid vertical distance between 20–39 years old to 40–59 years old in men (P < 0.01), and 20–39 years old to 60–79 years old in both genders (women P = 0.005, men P < 0.01). Hyoid horizontal distance was not affected by age and sex (age and sex: P > 0.05), but rather by body mass index (BMI). Every 5 BMI points corresponded to a forward movement of 2 mm. Conclusions: As individuals age, the hyoid bone descends in both sexes, and an increase in BMI is associated with forward movement. Additional studies are needed to assess the correlation of the hyoid position between upright and supine positions.

Summary: Prior studies on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) lymphography for preoperative mapping before lymphaticovenous anastomosis surgery in patients with extremity lymphedema have been limited to using only Lumason and Sonazoid as microbubble contrast agents. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of using two other Food & Drug Administration–approved microbubble agents, Optison and Definity, for imaging lymphatic vessels in the upper extremities. Nine female adults with unilateral upper extremity lymphedema anticipating lymphaticovenous anastomosis surgery underwent CEUS lymphography of the unaffected upper extremity randomized to either Lumason, Definity, or Optison. Lymphatic vessels were visualized in all but one case when undilated Definity was used. In the eight upper extremities where lymphatic vessels were visualized, an average of eight intradermal injections of microbubbles were performed in the extremity. Lymphatic vessels could be identified in 57% (36 of 63) of the injections. The effective dilution for each of the microbubble agents is provided. This was the first successful demonstration of lymphatic vessel visualization using either Definity or Optison. Broadening the range of available microbubble agents for CEUS lymphography could improve accessibility to the procedure and provide potentially safer alternatives.

Summary: Lymphedema following oncologic intervention can cause significant lifelong morbidity for patients in whom conservative management fails. The associated swelling, discomfort, pain, and recurrent cellulitis greatly diminish quality of life. Surgical procedures, including suction-assisted lipectomy, lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA), and vascularized lymph node transfers, show effectiveness in both volume reduction in affected extremities and symptom relief. However, the success of procedures like LVA is dependent on effective preoperative lymphatic mapping to identify suitable vessels for anastomosis. Traditional superficial lymphatic mapping uses near infrared fluorescence indocyanine green (ICG) imaging. Moreover, recent advances in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) lymphography increased lymphovenous bypass target identification for LVA in the extremities.7 CEUS lymphography uses microbubbles as a contrast-enhancing agent injected intradermally into the affected extremity with subsequent identification of superficial collecting lymphatic vessels using ultrasound. Although a recent report noted an uptick in severe and critical adverse drug reactions to an ultrasound contrast agent injected intravenously in stress echocardiography, adverse drug reactions associated with ultrasound contrast-enhancing agents in body ultrasound are rare. The safety profile and potential complications from CEUS lymphography in the lymphedema population have yet to be fully characterized. In this case report, the authors present the first cutaneous adverse drug event following a secondary exposure to the contrast used for CEUS imaging. Mechanisms and justifications for an immune-mediated process are explored, and a review of similar manifestations in other related contrast applications is discussed.

Abstract Background Surgical drains are a key component for recovery in breast reconstruction procedures. However, they are often cumbersome and carry a risk of infection with prolonged use. We aimed to develop a more thorough understanding of patient and health care provider perspectives on surgical drains, to inform future efforts in improving the breast reconstruction patient experience. Methods Twenty-nine breast reconstruction patients and eight plastic surgery providers were recruited to complete surveys focused on surgical drains. Likert scales ranging from 1 to 5 were developed to gauge how bothersome drains felt, as well as concern for infection. Ordinal variable and categorical multiple-choice analyses were applied as appropriate. Results Fifteen (51.7%) patients underwent implant-based breast reconstruction, and 14 (48.3%) patients underwent autologous breast reconstruction. The most common duration of drain placement was 2 weeks (N = 13). The surgical site infection (SSI) rate requiring antibiotics was 28% (N = 8). On a scale of 1 to 5, both patients (median = 3) and providers (median = 2.5) viewed drains as bothersome. Patients were “frequently” concerned about infection risk (median = 3). Other high-frequency patient concerns included general pain and discomfort. Conclusion Surgical drains are a common component of breast reconstruction procedures and are viewed as cumbersome by both patients and providers. Patients expressed concerns about drain site pain, discomfort, and tugging on clothing. Patients and providers both believed that drains could contribute to SSI. Overall, these data provide insight to drive future improvements in the patient drain experience.

Abstract Goals/Purpose The imperative for precision in aesthetic surgery necessitates a robust framework for evaluating the impact of facial interventions on perceived age. Our study introduces a cutting-edge AI model aimed at discerning an individual's perceived age from facial characteristics. This tool is designed to augment the assessment of various plastic surgery procedures, facilitating the tailoring of interventions to each patient's unique facial aging pattern. Methods/Technique We harnessed a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN), pre-trained on the extensive ImageNet dataset, and further refined using 523,051 pre-annotated facial images from the IMBD-WIKI database, normalized as per the Mathias et al. face detection paradigm. Faces were processed into a 299x299 pixel matrix, maintaining a 40% margin around the face for uniformity. The Xception architecture was employed for its advanced feature extraction capabilities. The model was refined and tested against a diverse set of 100 patient faces from the Mayo Clinic's database, categorized by demographic and procedural data. The AI model employed regression analysis and softmax probability for precise age estimation. Results/Complications The AI model exhibited a remarkable accuracy rate of 92.5% in age estimation for pre procedural patients, with a standard deviation of 3.2 years. It significantly outperformed traditional methods in identifying fine-grained age-related features. The AI model discerned an average perceived age reduction of 3.5 years across all patients post-procedure, with a notable variance among different types of surgeries. Certain procedures, such as rhytidectomy and blepharoplasty, showed a more pronounced age-reduction effect. Conclusion The AI model presents an accurate and objective method for quantifying perceived age, serving as a significant benchmark in facial aesthetic evaluation. By illustrating measurable age reduction following various procedures, with some surgeries yielding more substantial changes in perceived age, the model stands as a testament to the effectiveness of plastic surgery interventions. The precision of our model in predicting age pre- and post-procedure underscores its potential to assist surgeons in custom-tailoring surgeries to individual aging patterns. This innovation is poised to refine the decision-making process in aesthetic surgery, ensuring treatments are aligned with the desired outcomes for rejuvenation and patient-specific needs, ultimately advancing the frontier of personalized plastic surgery.