Mikulík, Robert

Abstract Aims Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) reduce cardiovascular risk in patients with Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and are recommended in guidelines. We evaluated the real-world effectiveness of GLP-1RA therapy on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with T2D after myocardial infarction (MI) or ischaemic stroke and examined trends and disparities. Methods and results Using nationwide Czech registry data (2015–24), we identified patients with incident nonfatal MI or ischaemic stroke and confirmed T2D. GLP-1RA users—initiating therapy within 12 months post-event—were propensity score matched to non-users. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, cardiovascular death); secondary outcomes included individual components and all-cause mortality. GLP-1RA therapy was initiated in only ∼2% of MI and stroke survivors with T2D. Among 126 845 MI survivors, 28 206 had T2D; the matched cohort comprised 2271 patients (401 GLP-1RA; median follow-up 35 months). GLP-1RA use was associated with lower risk of MACE (HR 0.7; 95% CI, 0.52–0.93), all-cause (HR 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47–0.80), and cardiovascular death (HR 0.54; 95% CI, 0.36–0.80). Among 177 115 stroke survivors, 73 750 had T2D; the matched cohort comprised 2235 patients (385 GLP-1RA; median follow-up 27 months). GLP-1RA use was associated with lower risk of MACE (HR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.54–0.94), all-cause (HR 0.59; 95% CI, 0.46–0.76), and cardiovascular death (HR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.37–0.81). Conclusion GLP-1RA therapy after MI or stroke in T2D was associated with substantially lower risks of MACE, cardiovascular, and all-cause death in real-world practice. Utilization remained low, particularly among women and older adults, underscoring the need for broader and more equitable implementation in secondary prevention.

Abstract Background Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic many countries reported a decline in myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke admissions. Factors leading to the decline remain uncertain. Purpose In this nationwide study spanning the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic we evaluated the changes in MI and stroke admissions as the effect of pandemic intensity and nationwide lockdown. We also investigated sex and age differences. We benefited from the fact that the Czech Republic had both, the lowest and one of the highest COVID-19 incidence. Methods We compared the first (March 1, 2020, to February 28, 2021) and the second (March 1, 2021, to February 28, 2022) pandemic years overall and during the COVID-19 waves with the preceding year (March 1, 2019, to February 28, 2020). The occurrence of MI and stroke, patient characteristics, and mortality data were obtained from two nationwide registers covering every hospitalization and every death in the Czech Republic. Results During the first and second pandemic year as compared to the preceding year there were 13,856 and 14,123 vs 15,499 MI admissions, representing a -10,6% (p<0.001) and -8,9% (p<0.001) decline; and 23,194 and 23,231 vs 25,046 stroke admissions, representing a -7.4% (p<0.001) and -7.2% (p<0.001) decline respectively. The significant decline appeared in both MI and stroke in all COVID-19 waves (spring 2020, spring 2021, autumn 2020/winter 2021, -autumn 2021/winter 2022). The greatest MI hospitalization decline (-16%) occurred during the first strict national lock down, during the first COVID-19 wave (spring 2020), the pandemic wave with the lowest COVID-19 incidence. Both, MI and stroke admissions reversed to pre-pandemic numbers during the summer (2020, 2021) when most lockdown restrictions were lifted. The decline in MI was greater in women than in men during both the first (-11.8%, -10%; p<0.001) and second (-10.8%, -7.9%; p<0.001) pandemic years, also for stroke in women greater than in men during the first (-9%, -5.9%; p<0.001) and second (-9.7%, -4.8%; p<0.001) pandemic years. The 30-day all-cause mortality in patients with MI was higher during the first (10.6%; p<0.001) but not the second (9.6%; p=0.34) pandemic year as compared to the preceding year (9.3%), whereas the 30-day mortality in patients with stroke remained unchanged. Conclusions There was a decline in both MI and stroke admissions during the first two years of the pandemic, but such decline was not related to COVID-19 incidence. The greatest reduction in both, MI and stroke admissions, appeared during the first lockdown in the first COVID-19 wave (spring 2020), the period of the lowest COVID-19 incidence. Moreover, the decline in MI and stroke admissions was greater in women. This highlights potential sex differences in health effect. Health authorities should be aware of these findings, in order to adapt their message and restriction measures in case of future major epidemics.Myocardial infarction casesStroke cases

Background: Most strokes and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are potentially preventable if their risk factors are identified and well controlled. Digital platforms, such as the PreventS-MD web app (PreventS-MD) may aid health care professionals (HCPs) in assessing and managing risk factors and promoting lifestyle changes for their patients. Methods: This is a mixed-methods cross-sectional two-phase survey using a largely positivist (quantitative and qualitative) framework. During Phase 1, a prototype of PreventS-MD was tested internationally by 59 of 69 consenting HCPs of different backgrounds, age, sex, working experience, and specialties using hypothetical data. Collected comments/suggestions from the study HCPs in Phase 1 were reviewed and implemented. In Phase 2, a near-final version of PreventS-MD was developed and tested by 58 of 72 consenting HCPs using both hypothetical and real patient (n = 10) data. Qualitative semi-structured interviews with real patients (n = 10) were conducted, and 1 month adherence to the preventive recommendations was assessed by self-reporting. The four System Usability Scale (SUS) groups of scores (0–50 unacceptable; 51–68 poor; 68–80.3 good; >80.3 excellent) were used to determine usability of PreventS-MD. Findings: Ninety-nine HCPs from 27 countries (45% from low- to middle-income countries) participated in the study, and out of them, 10 HCPs were involved in the development of PreventS before the study, and therefore were not involved in the survey. Of the remaining 89 HCPs, 69 consented to the first phase of the survey, and 59 of them completed the first phase of the survey (response rate 86%), and 58 completed the second phase of the survey (response rate 84%). The SUS scores supported good usability of the prototype (mean score = 80.2; 95% CI [77.0–84.0]) and excellent usability of the final version of PreventS-MD (mean score = 81.7; 95% CI [79.1–84.3]) in the field. Scores were not affected by the age, sex, working experience, or specialty of the HCPs. One-month follow-up of the patients confirmed the high level of satisfaction/acceptability of PreventS-MD and (100%) adherence to the recommendations. Interpretation: The PreventS-MD web app has a high level of usability, feasibility, and satisfaction by HCPs and individuals at risk of stroke/CVD. Individuals at risk of stroke/CVD demonstrated a high level of confidence and motivation in following and adhering to preventive recommendations generated by PreventS-MD.

AbstractBackground and PurposeDuring the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic many countries reported a decline in stroke volumes. The aim of this study was to analyze if the decline was related to the intensity of the COVID‐19 pandemic.MethodsThe first pandemic year (1 March 2020 to 28 February 2021) overall and during the three COVID‐19 waves were compared with the preceding year. Volumes of acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage and recanalization treatments (intravenous thrombolysis [IVT] and mechanical thrombectomy [MT]) were obtained from the National Register of Reimbursed Health Services. Door‐to‐needle time, onset‐to‐door time and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at admission were obtained from the Registry of Stroke Care Quality.ResultsDuring the pandemic year compared to the preceding year there were 26,453 versus 28,771 stroke admissions, representing an 8.8% decline (p < 0.001). The declines (−10%, −11%, −19%) appeared in COVID‐19 waves (spring 2020, autumn 2020, winter 2021) except for an increase (2%) during summer 2020. Admissions for AIS declined by 10.2% (p < 0.001), whilst hemorrhagic stroke volumes were minimally decreased. The absolute volumes of IVT and MT decreased by 9.4% (p < 0.001) and 5.7% (p = 0.16), respectively. However, the proportions of ischaemic stroke patients receiving IVT (18% vs. 18%; p = 0.72) and MT (6% vs. 6%; p = 0.28) remained unchanged.ConclusionsThere was a decline in stroke admissions, but such decline was not related to COVID‐19 incidence. The frequency of use of recanalization procedures (IVT, MT) and times (onset‐to‐door time, door‐to‐needle time) in AIS were preserved in the Czech Republic during the first year of the pandemic.