Back to Authors

Brandely, Maud

https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6058-1681

Mayo Clinic

Transgene (France)

Citations 3

Abstract LB205: Feasibility and immunogenicity of adjuvant TG4050, a patient tailored cancer vaccine in head and neck and ovarian cancer
Jamet, Camille , Ottensmeier, Christian H. , Delord, Jean‐Pierre , Block, Matthew S. , Colón‐Otero, Gerardo , Knutson, Keith L. , Tavernaro, Annette, Lacoste, G, Grellier, Benoît, Noiriel, Xavier, Huss, Thierry, Burtin, Bernard, Yamashita, Yoshiko, Onoue, Kousuke, Onoguchi, Kazuhide, Malone, Brandon, Baker, Oliver, Quéméneur, Éric , Brandely, Maud , Lalanne, Ana Inés , Tourneau, Christophe Le , Knutson, Keith L. , Onoue, Kousuke, Lantz, Olivier J , Yamagata, Naoko, Tanaka, Yuki , Bendjama, Kaidre

Cancer Research | April 14, 2023 | Volume: 83 | Issue: 8_Supplement | Pages: LB205-LB205

10.1158/1538-7445.am2023-lb205 Get It

Abstract Background: Head and Neck (HNSCC) and Ovarian cancer (OC) are two indications for which immunotherapy had limited impact so far. Current treatments achieve high rates of initial success through surgery and adjuvant chemo/radiotherapy, but patients (pts) remain at high risk of relapse in both indications. Immune stimulation using a vaccine is a promising strategy to a clinically meaningful improvement. Herein we report phase I data of TG4050, a vaccine engineered to carry a pt tailored antigen payload, in pts with HNSCC (NCT04183166) or OC (NCT03839524). Methods: Tumor specific variants are identified using next generation sequencing of tumor and normal samples whereby immune relevant mutations are predicted using a machine learning algorithm factoring in parameters known to affect immunogenicity including MHC binding, level of expression, prevalence across clones, and antigen processing. DNA sequences of the mutations of interest, typically 30 per pt, are cloned in a viral vector (Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara). Following curative intent treatment, HNSCC pts in complete remission were randomized to an immediate vaccination arm to receive weekly doses of TG4050 for 6 weeks followed by a maintenance period of one dose every 3 weeks for up to 20 doses or to a delayed vaccination arm where the same vaccination regimen is initiated at relapse. OC pts received the vaccine upon onset of signs of relapse. PBMC were collected at Baseline and after 6 doses of vaccine. Primary endpoint was vaccine safety and secondary endpoints included feasibility, immunogenicity. Results: 18 pts received TG4050 (5 OC and 13 HNSCC) treatment with no related grade ≥ 3 adverse events. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was on average 3.00±0.98 and 2.43±0.69 mutations per megabase for HNSCC and OC respectively. Despite this low TMB, all pts had sufficient cancer specific neoantigens to design a vaccine. Ex-vivo ELISPOT was completed for 7 pts at the time of submission. A mean of 44% of selected mutations were associated with a reactive T cell responses either spontaneously or after TG4050 stimulation ranging from 6 to 22 mutations per pt. Vaccination induced a stimulation of T cell response in all tested pts on an average of 10 targeted mutations, induction of de novo responses was seen in all 7 tested pts and amplification of pre-existing response in 6/7 pts. None of the evaluable HNSCC pts receiving TG4050 immediately after first line treatment had relapse after a median follow-up of 7 months while 2 pts had relapse in the delayed vaccination arm. Furthermore, in OC pts treated at early relapse, TG4050 has normalized disease markers (ctDNA and/or CA-125) for 2/4 pts with stable disease for 9 and 11 months. Conclusion: TG4050 treatment is feasible and immunogenic in pts with low to moderate TMB. It is effective in inducing T cell responses and first signs of antitumor activity are encouraging for the continuation of development. Citation Format: Ana Lalanne, Camille Jamet, Christian H. Ottensmeier, Jean-Pierre Delord, Christophe Le Tourneau, Matthew S. Block, Gerardo Colon-Otero, Keith L. Knutson, Annette Tavernaro, Gisele Lacoste, Benoit Grellier, Xavier Noiriel, Thierry Huss, Bernard Burtin, Yoshiko Yamashita, Kousuke Onoue, Kazuhide Onoguchi, Brandon Malone, Olivier Lantz, Oliver Baker, Naoko Yamagata, Yuki Tanaka, Eric Quemeneur, Maud Brandely, Kaidre Bendjama. Feasibility and immunogenicity of adjuvant TG4050, a patient tailored cancer vaccine in head and neck and ovarian cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr LB205.
Abstract CT045: A randomized phase II trial of TG4001 plus avelumab versus avelumab alone in recurrent/metastatic (R/M) human papilloma virus (HPV)-16 positive anogenital cancers
Daste, Amaury , Cassier, Philippe A. , Salas, Sébastien , Sánchez, Luis Manso, Colón‐Otero, Gerardo , Eberst, Lauriane , Tavernaro, Annette, Makhloufi, Hakim, Brandely, Maud , Delord, Jean‐Pierre , Tourneau, Christophe Le , Rolland, Frédéric , Sánchez, Luis Manso, Lantz, Olivier J , Lalanne, Ana Inés , Bendjama, Kaidre

Cancer Research | April 14, 2023 | Volume: 83 | Issue: 8_Supplement | Pages: CT045-CT045

10.1158/1538-7445.am2023-ct045 Get It

Abstract Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the PD1/PD-L1 axis have made a breakthrough in advanced solid tumors, leading to improved overall survival (OS) in several cancer types. However, only a minority of patients experience durable responses, requiring further development of anti-tumoral immunotherapies to overcome tumor immune escape. We hypothesized that priming the immune system with TG4001, a vaccine using the highly attenuated Modified Vaccinia virus Ankara as vector expressing the HPV16 E6 and E7 proteins (rendered non-oncogenic) and interleukin-2, would increase the clinical benefit associated with PD-L1 blockade in HPV16+ cancer patients. In the single-arm part of the trial evaluating the combination of TG4001 and avelumab in terms of response rate, the overall response rate (ORR) was 22%. Presence of liver metastases had a profound impact on outcome in terms of ORR and Progression Free Survival (PFS). In patients (pts) without liver metastases an ORR of 32% was observed versus 0% in pts with liver metastases, warranting further development of this combination in this patient population (SITC 2020, Abstract ID 793). Methods: We have designed a randomized open-label two-arms trial evaluating the efficacy of the combination of TG4001 and avelumab versus avelumab alone (NCT03260023). Eligible pts have R/M HPV-16 positive anogenital cancer including cervical, vulvar, vaginal, penile, and anal cancers with no more than one prior line of chemotherapy for R/M disease and no previous exposure to cancer immunotherapy. HPV-16 positivity is determined in a central laboratory. Patients are randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either TG4001 plus avelumab or avelumab alone. Randomization is stratified by primary tumor type (cervical, anal, genital). TG4001 is administered subcutaneously (SC) at 5 × 107 plaque forming units (pfu) Q1w for 5 weeks, Q2w until month 6 and Q12w until progressive disease and avelumab intravenously (IV) at 800 mg Q2w until progressive disease. A total of up to 140 pts are currently being recruited into two cohorts (A and B) in France, Spain, and USA. For Cohort A, consisting of pts without liver metastases at Baseline (BL), a 2-stage sample size adjustment design is used with PFS by RECIST 1.1 as primary endpoint. Plans are to accrue 120 patients following Interim Analysis and Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) review. Cohort B recruits pts with liver metastases at BL. To be eligible, hepatic disease is restricted in terms of extent and number of lesions. A total of 20 pts will be recruited and analyzed for the percentage of early progressors. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, objective response rate according to RECIST1.1, duration of response, disease control rate. Exploratory endpoints comprise analyses of blood-based parameters and tumor-based proteins and RNA expression and their impact on clinical outcomes. Citation Format: Christophe Le Tourneau, Frédéric Rolland, Amaury Daste, Philippe Cassier, Sébastien Salas, Luis Manso Sánchez, Gerardo Colon-Otero, Lauriane Eberst, Olivier Lantz, Ana Lalanne, Annette Tavernaro, Hakim Makhloufi, Kaïdre Bendjama, Maud Brandely, Jean-Pierre Delord. A randomized phase II trial of TG4001 plus avelumab versus avelumab alone in recurrent/metastatic (R/M) human papilloma virus (HPV)-16 positive anogenital cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT045.
Abstract CT182: Phase I trials of personalized cancer vaccine TG4050 in surgically treated high-risk head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and relapsing ovarian cancer (OvC) patients
Block, Matthew S. , Delord, Jean‐Pierre , Knutson, Keith L. , Lacoste, G, Tavernaro, Annette, Brandely, Maud , Silvestre, Nathalie , Grellier, Benoît, Yamashita, Yoshiko, Kousuke, Onoue, Quéméneur, Éric , Ottensmeier, Christian H. , Tourneau, Christophe Le , Lalanne, Ana Inés , Lantz, Olivier J , Knutson, Keith L. , Yamagata, Naoko, Bendjama, Kaidre

Cancer Research | June 15, 2022 | Volume: 82 | Issue: 12_Supplement | Pages: CT182-CT182

10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-ct182 Get It

Abstract Background: Cancer mutations acquired during carcinogenesis are not subject to central tolerance and thus, are cornerstone in cancer immunosurveillance. The use of mutation-derived neoepitopes to design cancer vaccines is an unprecedented opportunity to target efficient antigens, but the stochastic occurrence of mutations implies that a tailored vaccine needs to be designed and manufactured for each patient. We used next generation sequencing, machine learning based genomic data analysis and advances in genome editing to systematically identify private neoepitopes in high-risk HPV negative HNSCC and relapsing OvC patients. Methods: Mutations were identified by DNA and RNA sequencing and putative epitopes were selected for vaccine design on their likelihood to elicit a class I or II response based on HLA binding, allelic frequency, prediction of processing and expression at RNA level. The vaccine was a recombinant virus of the modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) strain encoding for up to 30 sequences of 29 amino acids centred on the predicted epitope and flanked with the normal germline sequence in case of missense mutations, and of the mutated protein sequence in case of frameshift mutations. The viral vaccine was amplified under GMP conditions and administered to patients after curative intent treatment in two phase I trials. Treatment was started for OvC patients at relapse defined as elevation of CA-125 or onset of suspicious radiological findings and, after first line therapy for HNSCC patients with locally advanced disease with either extracapsular extension or positive resection margins following upfront surgery. The vaccine was administered for 6 weeks and a booster dose every three weeks over a year, in absence of other cancer therapy. Results: Six patients (4 OvC and 2 HNSCC) were treated and experienced only mild related adverse events. After 6 doses of vaccine, we measured immunoreactive T cells in PBMCs against each of the targeted epitopes using an ex vivo IFNγ ELISPOT showed robust responses in all evaluable patients. Positive responses to vaccination were observed for a total of 46 epitopes over 115 tested with a median of 11 epitopes (6 to 18) per patient. Responses were directed against both class I and II epitopes and were either de novo responses (64%) or amplification of pre-existing responses (36%). In parallel, phenotyping of patient PBMCs showed, in all treated patients, a decline in naïve CD4 and CD8 cells and the onset of effector CD27- CD4 and CD27-/CD57+ CD8; similarly, CD56dim NK cells increased suggesting a stimulation of antitumor innate immunity. In one ovarian cancer patient, these immune changes correlated with a normalization of CA-125 that lasted 7 months. Conclusions: These data show that the personalized approach with TG4050 is feasible, safe and immunogenic. The two phase I trials are ongoing. Citation Format: Matthew S. Block, Jean-Pierre Delord, Christian H. Ottensmeier, Christophe Le Tourneau, Ana Lalanne, Olivier Lantz, Keith L. Knutson, Gisèle Lacoste, Annette Tavernaro, Maud Brandely, Nathalie Silvestre, Benoit Grellier, Yoshiko Yamashita, Onoue Kousuke, Naoko Yamagata, Eric Quemeneur, Kaidre Bendjama. Phase I trials of personalized cancer vaccine TG4050 in surgically treated high-risk head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and relapsing ovarian cancer (OvC) patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT182.