Back to Authors

Silvestre, Nathalie

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4696-7586

Mayo Clinic

Transgene (France)

Citations 2

Abstract CT182: Phase I trials of personalized cancer vaccine TG4050 in surgically treated high-risk head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and relapsing ovarian cancer (OvC) patients
Block, Matthew S. , Delord, Jean‐Pierre , Knutson, Keith L. , Lacoste, G, Tavernaro, Annette, Brandely, Maud , Silvestre, Nathalie , Grellier, Benoît, Yamashita, Yoshiko, Kousuke, Onoue, Quéméneur, Éric , Ottensmeier, Christian H. , Tourneau, Christophe Le , Lalanne, Ana Inés , Lantz, Olivier J , Knutson, Keith L. , Yamagata, Naoko, Bendjama, Kaidre

Cancer Research | June 15, 2022 | Volume: 82 | Issue: 12_Supplement | Pages: CT182-CT182

10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-ct182 Get It

Abstract Background: Cancer mutations acquired during carcinogenesis are not subject to central tolerance and thus, are cornerstone in cancer immunosurveillance. The use of mutation-derived neoepitopes to design cancer vaccines is an unprecedented opportunity to target efficient antigens, but the stochastic occurrence of mutations implies that a tailored vaccine needs to be designed and manufactured for each patient. We used next generation sequencing, machine learning based genomic data analysis and advances in genome editing to systematically identify private neoepitopes in high-risk HPV negative HNSCC and relapsing OvC patients. Methods: Mutations were identified by DNA and RNA sequencing and putative epitopes were selected for vaccine design on their likelihood to elicit a class I or II response based on HLA binding, allelic frequency, prediction of processing and expression at RNA level. The vaccine was a recombinant virus of the modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) strain encoding for up to 30 sequences of 29 amino acids centred on the predicted epitope and flanked with the normal germline sequence in case of missense mutations, and of the mutated protein sequence in case of frameshift mutations. The viral vaccine was amplified under GMP conditions and administered to patients after curative intent treatment in two phase I trials. Treatment was started for OvC patients at relapse defined as elevation of CA-125 or onset of suspicious radiological findings and, after first line therapy for HNSCC patients with locally advanced disease with either extracapsular extension or positive resection margins following upfront surgery. The vaccine was administered for 6 weeks and a booster dose every three weeks over a year, in absence of other cancer therapy. Results: Six patients (4 OvC and 2 HNSCC) were treated and experienced only mild related adverse events. After 6 doses of vaccine, we measured immunoreactive T cells in PBMCs against each of the targeted epitopes using an ex vivo IFNγ ELISPOT showed robust responses in all evaluable patients. Positive responses to vaccination were observed for a total of 46 epitopes over 115 tested with a median of 11 epitopes (6 to 18) per patient. Responses were directed against both class I and II epitopes and were either de novo responses (64%) or amplification of pre-existing responses (36%). In parallel, phenotyping of patient PBMCs showed, in all treated patients, a decline in naïve CD4 and CD8 cells and the onset of effector CD27- CD4 and CD27-/CD57+ CD8; similarly, CD56dim NK cells increased suggesting a stimulation of antitumor innate immunity. In one ovarian cancer patient, these immune changes correlated with a normalization of CA-125 that lasted 7 months. Conclusions: These data show that the personalized approach with TG4050 is feasible, safe and immunogenic. The two phase I trials are ongoing. Citation Format: Matthew S. Block, Jean-Pierre Delord, Christian H. Ottensmeier, Christophe Le Tourneau, Ana Lalanne, Olivier Lantz, Keith L. Knutson, Gisèle Lacoste, Annette Tavernaro, Maud Brandely, Nathalie Silvestre, Benoit Grellier, Yoshiko Yamashita, Onoue Kousuke, Naoko Yamagata, Eric Quemeneur, Kaidre Bendjama. Phase I trials of personalized cancer vaccine TG4050 in surgically treated high-risk head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and relapsing ovarian cancer (OvC) patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT182.
Phase 1 studies of personalized neoantigen vaccine TG4050 in ovarian carcinoma (OC) and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).
Delord, Jean‐Pierre , Block, Matthew S. , Colón‐Otero, Gerardo , Jamet, Camille , Knutson, Keith L. , Lacoste, G, Tavernaro, Annette, Brandely-Talbot, Maud, Silvestre, Nathalie , Grellier, Benoît, Malone, Brandon, Onoue, Kousuke, Yamashita, Yoshiko, Quéméneur, Éric , Ottensmeier, Christian H. , Tourneau, Christophe Le , Lalanne, Ana Inés , Lantz, Olivier J , Knutson, Keith L. , Tanaka, Yuki , Bendjama, Kaidre

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 6, 2022 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: 2637-2637

10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.2637 Get It

2637 Background: Mutation-associated neoantigens (MANAs) constitute attractive antigens for the design of cancer vaccines. However, clinical implementation remains challenging because of the patient specific nature of MANAs, hereby requiring that a bespoke vaccine is designed for each subject. We developed a pipeline for the genomic characterization and the design of tailored vaccine using a modified vaccinia Ankara viral vector. Methods: Immunogenicity, safety and early clinical activity of personalized cancer vaccines are being assessed in two phase I trials, respectively in high grade serous OC and HPV-negative HNSCC. Patients (Pts) at high risk of relapse are enrolled in the study being in remission following surgical primary treatment. High risk is defined as stage IIIC or IVA for OC and stage III or IVA for HNSCC. A vaccine is manufactured for each patient. OC pts are treated at asymptomatic relapse based on radiological finding or elevation of CA-125 with the vaccine alone; HNSCC pts in complete remission after surgery and adjuvant therapy are randomized to receive the vaccine either at the end of locoregional treatment or in combination with standard of care at relapse. The vaccine was administered weekly for 6 weeks and a booster dose every three weeks over a year or until progression, whichever occurred first. Results: At the time of the data cut-off, a total of 8 pts were treated: 4 relapsing OC pts, 3 HNSCC pts in complete remission and 1 relapsing HNSCC pt. AE attributable to the vaccine were mainly grade 1 injection site reactions and fatigue. One OC pt displayed an objective response 6 weeks after initiation of vaccine and for 9 months with a normalization of CA-125 until death from an unrelated cause; 1 other OC pt remains on treatment with a stable radiological disease for 11 months. The 2 other OC progressed at the first evaluation on day 43. HNSCC pts treated in complete remission received respectively 20, 15 and 4 doses, and remain on treatment and disease free. One HNSCC patient received 9 doses of vaccine after relapse in conjunction with chemotherapy and anti-PD-1 therapy and remains on treatment with stable disease after 5 months. Immune monitoring demonstrates priming of a polyepitopic T cell response against class I and II antigens. Responses were observed regardless of HLA and without cross-reactivity to the germline protein. Adaptive response was associated with a shift of CD4 and CD8 T cells toward an effector phenotype and innate cellular immunity was activated with a strong maturation and activation of NK cells. Immune changes were stronger in pts with controlled disease versus progressors. Conclusions: Data demonstrate that TG4050 is safe, well tolerated and able to induce T cell responses whatever the HLA haplotype. Early signs of clinical activity were observed in OC pt. These data pave the way for further development and synergistic immunotherapeutic combinations. Clinical trial information: NCT04183166.