Singh, Parminder

Abstract Purpose: This multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of cabazitaxel and carboplatin followed by abiraterone, plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), in patients with high-volume metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). Patients and Methods: Eligible patients had high-volume mCSPC and ≤3 months of prior ADT. Patients received six 21-day cycles of cabazitaxel (20 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC 4) with continuous ADT, followed by maintenance abiraterone (1,000 mg daily) and prednisone (5 mg daily). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients free of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or radiographic progression at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included complete PSA response (≤0.2 ng/mL), objective response, progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. Overall survival (OS) was also reported. Results: Sixty-one participants were enrolled at eight sites. The median age was 64 years, median baseline PSA was 6.6 ng/mL (0.07–745.7 ng/mL), 73.3% had Gleason grade group 5, 69.5% had 10 or more metastases, and 19.6% had a homologous recombination repair (HRR) mutation. PSA PFS at 12 months was 84.6% [95% confidence interval (CI), 72.5%–91.7%], and OS at 12 months was 94.8% (84.7%–98.3%). Complete PSA response was 66.7%, and complete objective response was 30.7%. Contrary to our hypothesis, relative to HRR wild-type patients, HRR-mutated patients (19.6%) had numerically fewer complete PSA responses (33.3% vs. 70.3%) and inferior PFS (HR, 2.43; 95% CI, 0.93–6.39). Common side effects of this quadruplet regimen included fatigue, nausea, and diarrhea. Conclusions: Cabazitaxel and carboplatin followed by abiraterone, together with ADT, were feasible, safe, and efficacious in patients with high-volume mCSPC and warrant further study in larger randomized trials.

Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) comprises approximately 75% of new bladder cancer cases and generally carries a favorable prognosis, yet high rates of recurrence and progression necessitate close surveillance with frequent cystoscopies and repeated transurethral resections. Upfront treatment for high-risk disease is typically Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), although combinations with immune checkpoint inhibitors have reported results. Patients with BCG-unresponsive, intolerant, or refractory disease represent a subset of patients with high risk of progression, with early radical cystectomy being the standard approach for this setting. Global BCG shortages and the substantial impact of cystectomy on quality of life underscore the need for therapeutic alternatives. Over the past decade, investigational trials in immunotherapy have expanded treatment options for BCG-unresponsive NMIBC with CIS, leading to FDA approval of intravesical nadofaragene firadenovec, nogapendekin alfa-inbakicept, and systemic pembrolizumab. This narrative review summarizes developments in intravesical and systemic immunotherapies for NMIBC, highlights ongoing trials, and addresses controversies in trial design, treatment sequencing, comparative efficacy, and safety.

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasingly being used to monitor minimal residual disease (MRD) in various solid tumors, including urothelial carcinoma (UC). It has emerged as a promising biomarker for MRD and may serve as a valuable tool to guide treatment decisions, particularly in patients at high risk of recurrence after definitive therapy or those experiencing favorable responses to systemic therapy in the setting of locally advanced or metastatic disease. ctDNA technology is largely agnostic to the type of tumor, which can be either hematologic or solid organ malignancies. Its clinical utility requires validation across different tumor types as ctDNA release kinetics and threshold values for testing often vary. Moreover, it is essential to evaluate ctDNA testing across a range of clinical scenarios, including screening, diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic decision making. The optimal frequency and duration of testing also need to be defined, particularly in settings such as postdefinitive therapy and ongoing chemotherapy for metastatic disease. In this study, we will summarize the current literature on the role of ctDNA in urothelial cancer. We will discuss the data that inform us of current clinical practice. Furthermore, we will explore evolving developments in the field from other tumor types and potential future directions in UC. Finally, we will highlight selected clinical scenarios for applications of ctDNA testing and its interpretation.

Abstract The combination of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab (EVP) has recently revolutionized care for patients with previously untreated locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma. However, predictive biomarkers of response, the optimal duration of EVP for patients who respond well to therapy, and the role of circulating tumor DNA to monitor treatment response have not yet been fully elucidated. In this molecular tumor board, we summarize 6 patients from 4 different academic institutions with unresectable or oligometastatic urothelial carcinoma who achieved long-term remission on surveillance after a short duration of EVP treatment that resulted in complete response on follow-up imaging followed by consolidative radical cystectomy. We discuss potential predictive biomarkers for patients with exceptional response to EVP. These findings highlight the need to determine an optimal duration of EVP to maximize efficacy while minimizing adverse events. We aim to further define and explore the value of local therapy with consolidative cystectomy in the setting of unresectable, locally advanced, oligometastatic disease, or those with metastatic disease who achieve complete response of disease outside of the bladder. Identifying this subset of patients who may be candidates for this type of multidisciplinary management may result in durable treatment-free remission.

Following lung cancer, prostate cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in men. High-risk localized tumor burden or metastatic disease often progresses, refractory to initial treatment regimens. There is ongoing development of technology to appropriately identify high-risk patients, stage them correctly, and offer appropriate treatments to obtain the best clinical outcomes. Prostate cancer-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a transmembrane glutamate carboxypeptidase, which helps regulate folate absorption, and its overexpression is pathologically directly proportional and associated with prostate cancer. Increased PSMA expression is a known independent risk factor for poorer survival, and most metastatic lesions in CRPC are PSMA positive. Over the last decade, several PSMA-based PET radiopharmaceuticals have demonstrated superior sensitivities and specificities compared to traditional imaging methods. These outcomes have been demonstrated by several large clinical trials. As the data emerges, these diagnostics are being integrated into standard of care protocol to facilitate nuanced identification of malignant lesions. PSMA is also being targeted through several therapeutics, including radioligands and immunotherapies such as CAR-T, BiTEs, and ADCs. This review will discuss the landscape of PSMA-based theranostics in the context of prostate cancer.

Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is the most common malignancy of the urinary tract, with urothelial bladder cancer accounting for approximately 90% of cases. Metastatic UC (mUC) is a particularly aggressive subset that presents significant treatment challenges, especially in patients who are often older than 70 years and have multiple comorbidities. For several decades, cisplatin-based chemotherapy has been the standard first-line treatment for locally advanced (LA) mUC. However, its utility has been limited as many patients are ineligible owing to their health status, and overall survival rates remain suboptimal. Recent advancements, including antibody-drug conjugates and immunotherapies, have begun to reshape the treatment landscape for LA/mUC. The combination of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab has shown promising clinical outcomes. The approval of multiple novel drugs and combination therapies not only provides new opportunities for patient care but also creates the need for physicians to adapt to this evolving therapeutic paradigm. This review explores the latest clinical data on the management of LA/mUC and offers insights into sequencing therapies for patients with LA/mUC.

PURPOSE The COSMIC-021 study assessed the safety and efficacy of cabozantinib plus atezolizumab in advanced solid tumors. Presented here are results from the expansion cohorts with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). METHODS This phase Ib study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03170960 ) enrolled patients with inoperable locally advanced/metastatic UC into four tumor cohorts: first-line cisplatin-eligible (cis-eligible), first-line cisplatin-ineligible (cis-ineligible), previous platinum-containing chemotherapy (previous chemotherapy-treated), and previous immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)–treated. Patients received oral cabozantinib 40 mg once daily and intravenous atezolizumab 1,200 mg once every 3 weeks. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR), as assessed by the investigator per RECIST v1.1 every 6 weeks for 12 months and every 12 weeks thereafter; the secondary end point was safety. RESULTS A total of 121 patients (previous ICI-treated cohort, n = 31, and each of the other cohorts, n = 30) received study treatment from March 2018 to November 2021. The ORR (95% CI) was 30% (15 to 49) for cis-eligible, 20% (8 to 39) for cis-ineligible, 27% (12 to 46) for previous chemotherapy-treated, and 10% (2 to 26) for previous ICI-treated cohorts. The median progression-free survival (95% CI) was 5.5 (1.6 to 11.6), 5.6 (3.1 to 11.1), 5.4 (1.6 to 7.6), and 3.0 (1.8 to 5.5) months, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were experienced by 43%, 67%, 57%, and 45% of patients, respectively. TRAEs led to discontinuation of all treatment components in 17%, 13%, 3%, and 19%, respectively. No grade 5 TRAEs were reported in any cohort. CONCLUSION The novel combination of cabozantinib plus atezolizumab exhibited clinical activity in advanced UC that is cis-eligible, cis-ineligible, or previously treated with platinum-containing chemotherapy; clinical activity in previous ICI-treated UC was modest. The toxicity profile was consistent with that previously reported for the combination.

PURPOSE Globally, cancer drug expenditure exceeds $185 in US dollars (USD) billion, with the United States contributing $75 (USD) billion. Many cancer drug doses are calculated on the basis of body weight or body surface area, which often results in leftover drug in partially used single-dose vials (SDVs). The cost of wasted drug is a huge financial burden on the US health care system. We evaluated the cost savings resulting from the reduction of SDV wastage, achieved through the implementation of automated dose rounding rules in electronic health records (EHRs). METHODS Mayo Clinic implemented automated dose rounding rules within the EHR. These rules were designed to round calculated doses to the nearest SDV if the vial size closely matched the original calculated dose, within a 10% threshold. We assessed doses administered between January 2019 and December 2021, and computed cost-savings, waste reduction, and cost of waste for chemotherapy drugs. RESULTS In 3 years, 36.1% of doses were rounded down, 35.8% were rounded up, and 28.1% were exact doses. By rounding doses down to a vial size, we achieved cost-savings of $39.75 (USD) million and prevented 62,065 SDV of cancer drugs from going to waste. By rounding doses up, we avoided wasting $9.95 (USD) million worth of drugs. However, there were still instances where the rounding fell outside of the 10%, resulting in wasted drugs worth $25 (USD) million. CONCLUSION The substantial burden imposed on patients and the US health care system because of cancer drug wastage is of significant concern. Although the automated dose rounding system represents a partial solution for this issue, a comprehensive approach involves the imperative development of policy and legislative solutions to effectively mitigate the challenges associated with cancer drug waste.