Shaburishvili, Tamaz

ImportanceGreater splanchnic nerve ablation may improve hemodynamics in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).ObjectiveTo explore the feasibility and safety of endovascular right-sided splanchnic nerve ablation for volume management (SAVM).Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis was a phase 2, double-blind, 1:1, sham-controlled, multicenter, randomized clinical trial conducted at 14 centers in the US and 1 center in the Republic of Georgia. Patients with HFpEF, left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or greater, and invasively measured peak exercise pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) of 25 mm Hg or greater were included. Study data were analyzed from May 2023 to June 2024.InterventionSAVM vs sham control procedure.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary efficacy end point was a reduction in legs-up and exercise PCWP at 1 month. The primary safety end point was serious device- or procedure-related adverse events at 1 month. Secondary efficacy end points included HF hospitalizations, changes in exercise function and health status through 12 months, and baseline to 1-month change in resting, legs-up, and 20-W exercise PCWP.ResultsA total of 90 patients (median [range] age, 71 [47-90] years; 58 female [64.4%]) were randomized at 15 centers (44 SAVM vs 46 sham). There were no differences in adverse events between groups. The primary efficacy end point did not differ between SAVM or sham (mean between-group difference in PCWP, −0.03 mm Hg; 95% CI, −2.5 to 2.5 mm Hg; P = .95). There were also no differences in the secondary efficacy end points. There was no difference in the primary safety end point between the treatment (6.8% [3 of 44]) and sham (2.2% [1 of 46]) groups (difference, 4.6%; 95% CI, −6.1% to 15.4%; P = .36). There was no difference in the incidence of orthostatic hypotension between the treatment (11.4% [5 of 44]) and sham (6.5% [3 of 46]) groups (difference, 4.9%; 95% CI, −9.2% to 18.8%; P = .48).Conclusions and RelevanceResults show that SAVM was safe and technically feasible, but it did not reduce exercise PCWP at 1 month or improve clinical outcomes at 12 months in a broad population of patients with HFpEF.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04592445

Background : Modulation of the cardiac autonomic nervous system (ANS) is a promising adjuvant therapy in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). In pre-clinical models, pulsed field (PF) energy has the advantage of selectively ablating the epicardial ganglionated plexi (GP) that govern the ANS. Objective: This study aims to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of epicardial ablation of the GPs with PF during cardiac surgery with a primary efficacy outcome of prolongation of the atrial effective refractory period (AERP). Methods : In a single-arm, prospective analysis, patients with or without a history of AF underwent epicardial GP ablation with PF during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). AERP was determined immediately pre- and post- GP ablation to assess cardiac ANS function. Holter monitors were performed to determine rhythm status and Heart Rate Variability (HRV) at baseline and at 1 month post-procedure. Conclusions : This study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of epicardial ablation of the GP using PF to modulate the ANS during cardiac surgery. Large, randomized analyses are necessary to determine whether epicardial PF ablation can offer a meaningful impact on the cardiac ANS and reduce AF. Results : Of 24 patients, 23 (96%) received the full ablation protocol. No device-related adverse effects were noted. GP ablation resulted in a 20.7% ± 19.9% extension in AERP (P < 0.001). Post-operative AF was observed in 7 (29%) patients. Holter monitoring demonstrated an increase in mean heart rate (74.0±8.7 vs 80.6±12.3, P=0.01). There were no significant changes in HRV. There were no study-related complications.

Aims In heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), excessive redistribution of blood volume into the central circulation leads to elevations of intracardiac pressures with exercise limitations. Splanchnic ablation for volume management (SAVM) has been proposed as a therapeutic intervention. Here we present preliminary safety and efficacy data from the initial roll‐in cohort of the REBALANCE‐HF trial. Methods and results The open‐label (roll‐in) arm of REBALANCE‐HF will enrol up to 30 patients, followed by the randomized, sham‐controlled portion of the trial (up to 80 additional patients). Patients with HF, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50%, and invasive peak exercise pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) ≥25 mmHg underwent SAVM. Baseline and follow‐up assessments included resting and exercise PCWP, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), 6‐min walk test, and N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP). Efficacy and safety were assessed at 1 and 3 months. Here we report on the first 18 patients with HFpEF that have been enrolled into the roll‐in, open‐label arm of the study across nine centres; 14 (78%) female; 16 (89%) in NYHA class III; and median (interquartile range) age 75.2 (68.4–81) years, LVEF 61.0 (56.0–63.2)%, and average (standard deviation) 20 W exercise PCWP 36.4 (±8.6) mmHg. All 18 patients were successfully treated. Three non‐serious moderate device/procedure‐related adverse events were reported. At 1‐month, the mean PCWP at 20 W exercise decreased from 36.4 (±8.6) to 28.9 (±7.8) mmHg ( p < 0.01), NYHA class improved by at least one class in 33% of patients ( p = 0.02) and KCCQ score improved by 22.1 points (95% confidence interval 9.4–34.2) ( p < 0.01). Conclusion The preliminary open‐label results from the multicentre REBALANCE‐HF roll‐in cohort support the safety and efficacy of SAVM in HFpEF. The findings require confirmation in the ongoing randomized, sham‐controlled portion of the trial.

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – EU funding. Main funding source(s): EU Horizon 2020 SME Instrument. Background Epicardial ganglionated plexi (GP) play a significant role in the initiation and maintenance of atrial fibrillation. However, modulation of this effect, through GP ablation, has had limited success; outcomes being confounded by unnecessary atrial tissue ablation and inability to access and ablate all of the atrial GPs. Selective pulsed field ablation (PFA) of GPs, using epicardial access, provides the opportunity to better identify the role of GP ablation in the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Purpose This study aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of selective GP ablation in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). It was hypothesized that GP ablation would provide an acute extension of atrial tissue refractoriness, which constitutes its antiarrhythmic effect. Methods Using a monopolar, monophasic PFA system, atrial GPs were ablated in nineteen patients with or without atrial fibrillation, undergoing CABG. The Oblique Sinus GP, Right Superior GP, Transverse Sinus GP, Left Superior GP and Ligament of Marshall GP were each ablated with up to sixty PFA pulses of 1000 V amplitude and 100 µs pulse width. Atrial Effective Refractory Period (AERP) was measured before and after all GP ablations, at the left atrial appendage (LAA) and on the right atrium (RA). Patients were monitored through to discharge for post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF). Results Complete ablation of the GPs was performed in nineteen patients (aged 63.4 ± 6.6 years, 63.1% male) immediately after sternotomy. Electric field pulses were ECG-gated, with energy delivery during the ventricular refractory period. All GP sites were successfully accessed and ablated; all patients progressed immediately to their planned elective surgery and were discharged on schedule. Procedure time, for all GP ablations and AERP measurements was in the range 35-45 minutes. Thirteen valid pre- and post-ablation datasets were obtained. AERP (LAA and RA combined) increased upon GP ablation on average by 23% (220 ± 46 ms pre-ablation versus 269 ± 59 ms post-ablation, p = 0.002). Four patients experienced POAF; there was no evident correlation between POAF and AERP data. Only three of the enrolled patients had a prior history of AF; none of these exhibited AF on 24-hour Holter monitoring at 3-month follow-up. Conclusions Selective epicardial PFA of GPs is feasible and safe. An acute increase in atrial tissue refractoriness is promising but further studies are required to see how this translates to longer term outcomes in symptomatic AF patients and in a percutaneous epicardial access setting.