Neff, Brian A.

Objective: Characterize pathogenic variants, rates of mosaicism, genetic testing yield, and disease severity among patients with NF2-related schwannomatosis dichotomized by diagnosis before or after the age of 30. Study design: Retrospective analysis. Setting: Tertiary referral center multidisciplinary NF2 clinic from 2021 to 2024. Patients: Patients with NF2-related schwannomatosis. Intervention: Next-generation sequencing. Main outcome measure: Rates of mosaicism, genetic testing rates and yield, and overall disease severity by tumor burden. Results: From 2021 to 2024, there were 32 patients ≥30 years of age and 39 patients diagnosed at younger ages. Patients diagnosed ≥30 years exhibited decreased likelihood of receiving genetic testing (53% vs. 85%; P =0.009) and decreased genetic yield (defined as identification of a pathogenic genetic variant in those undergoing testing; 65% vs. 85%; P =0.20). Both age groups demonstrated similar rates of pathogenic variant type with loss-of-function being the predominant variant detected in 73% vs. 67%, for ≥30 vs. <30 years of age; P =0.90. Those ≥30 years harbored fewer number of average anatomic regions involved by tumor (2.3 vs. 3.4; P <0.001) and decreased total number of tumors (7 vs. 12; P <0.001). Conclusions: Patients diagnosed with NF2-related schwannomatosis at age ≥30 years exhibited reduced disease severity compared with those diagnosed at a younger age despite harboring similar distributions of genetic pathogenic variants inclusive of loss-of-function pathogenic variants. These observations emphasize the importance of considering patient age in addition to genetic testing for diagnostic framing tailored to patients’ biology and clinical context to optimize care in the setting of NF2-related schwannomatosis.

Objective: Auditory nerve monitoring through electrically evoked compound action potentials (eCAP) can be used to assess cochlear neural integrity during vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection. Herein, we report on 5 cochlear implant (CI) patients who underwent VS resection with present eCAP responses both intraoperatively and postoperatively. Patients either did not perceive any sound through their CI or rapidly adapted to electrical stimulation, suggesting that the presence of eCAP does not guarantee auditory nerve function in patients with VS resection. Patients: Five patients who underwent simultaneous VS translabyrinthine resection and cochlear implantation. Interventions: Simultaneous cochlear implantation and translabyrinthine microsurgical VS resection. Main outcome measure: Electrically evoked compound action potential. Results: All patients had eCAP responses present during their VS resection and for at least 50 days post-surgery. Three of the 5 patients did not perceive any sound with their cochlear implant. This shows that the presence of an eCAP alone does not guarantee a functional auditory nerve or auditory perception. The other 2 patients could hear non-speech sounds, but these sounds quickly became inaudible, indicating that their auditory nerve lacked the ability to integrate the electrical stimulus over time. Conclusions: The presence of an eCAP response does not guarantee auditory sensation through a CI. Although eCAP measurements provide insight into the function of the distal end of the nerve, it does not ascertain integrity or function of the larger auditory nerve pathway. Therefore, eCAPs should not be used in isolation to monitor auditory nerve function during VS resection.

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to describe the long-term efficacy of single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for the primary treatment of sporadic vestibular schwannoma. METHODS Adult (≥ 18 years of age) patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma who underwent SRS from 2000 through 2022 were included. RESULTS A total of 749 patients met inclusion criteria, the majority (n = 566, 76%) of whom had tumors extending into the cerebellopontine angle at SRS. The median patient age at SRS was 62 years, half (50%) of the patients were women, and 744 (99%) exhibited House-Brackmann grade I facial nerve function at SRS. A total of 42 patients experienced radiosurgical failure and underwent salvage treatment; the median duration of follow-up for the patients who did not undergo salvage treatment was 7.0 years. Overall tumor control rates (95% CI, number still at risk) at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 15 years after SRS were 100% (100%–100%, 718), 98% (97%–99%, 589), 96% (94%–97%, 464), 92% (90%–95%, 258), and 91% (89%–94%, 125), respectively. Patient age (hazard ratio [HR] for a 10-year increase of 0.92, 95% CI 0.71–1.19; p = 0.5), presence of a macrocystic tumor (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.14–2.46; p = 0.5), and treated tumor volume (HR for a 1-cm 3 increase of 1.02, 95% CI 0.88–1.18; p = 0.8) were not significantly associated with the risk of salvage. Three distinct post-SRS tumor behavior patterns were observed, with 13% of patients demonstrating tumor pseudoprogression, all but 4 of whom demonstrated pseudoprogression by year 5 post-SRS. CONCLUSIONS SRS demonstrates durable tumor control through 15 years of follow-up in most patients (91%); however, a minority are found to still experience SRS failure even beyond 10 years of surveillance. Although occurring in only a minority of patients, tumor pseudoprogression can be evident out to 5 years or longer post-SRS.

OBJECTIVE Wait-and-scan surveillance is now commonly employed for initial management of small- and medium-sized vestibular schwannomas. Although small differences in tumor size are unlikely to impact outcomes significantly, treatment with either radiosurgery or microsurgery is usually recommended following radiological detection of tumor growth. The objective of the current study was to identify potential inflection points in vestibular schwannoma tumor size, where the risks of treatment with single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) accelerate to inform timing of intervention. METHODS Adult (≥ 18 years old) patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma who underwent SRS from 2000 through 2022 were included. RESULTS A total of 749 patients with a median age at SRS of 62 years were studied, the majority (n = 566 [76%]) of whom had tumors extending into the cerebellopontine angle (CPA) at SRS. The optimal tumor size cut point to predict SRS failure and need for salvage treatment was 4 mm or more of CPA extension (c-index 0.59, HR 3.60, p = 0.01). The optimal tumor size cut point to predict the outcome of facial nerve paresis was 13 mm or more of CPA extension, resulting in a c-index of 0.63 (HR 2.88, p = 0.01). Among patients with at least 3 months of surveillance before SRS, those with a tumor growth rate ≥ 2.5 mm/year were more likely to undergo salvage treatment than those with a growth rate < 2.5 mm/year, although this difference did not achieve statistical significance (HR 1.82, p = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS The risk of SRS failure requiring salvage treatment and the risk of post-SRS facial nerve paralysis increase at sizes of approximately 4 and 13 mm extension into the CPA, respectively, providing a size threshold anchor to help guide treatment decision-making regarding timing of SRS. Furthermore, rapid tumor growth during the initial wait-and-scan period may be associated with an increased risk of radiosurgical failure, which may influence choice of treatment.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of cochlear implantation (CI) and simultaneous endolymphatic sac decompression (ELSD) on vestibular and audiometric outcomes in patients with advanced Ménière disease (MD). Study design: Historical cohort. Setting: Tertiary academic medical center. Patients: Patients with medically refractory MD who underwent CI with or without simultaneous ELSD from 2000 through 2024. Interventions: CI with or without ELSD. Main outcome measures: Post-CI patient-reported changes in vertigo severity and frequency, Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant word (CNCw) scores, and AzBio sentences in quiet scores. Results: Ninety-nine patients with preoperative vertigo secondary to MD were eligible for study, including 17 (17%) who underwent simultaneous ELSD. In total, 15 (88%) and 2 (12%) of the 17 patients with simultaneous ELSD reported improvement and stability in vertigo severity, respectively; in comparison, 26 (32%), 40 (49%), and 16 (20%) of the 82 patients with CI alone reported improvement, stability, and worsening in vertigo severity, respectively ( P <0.001). Likewise, 15 (88%) and 2 (12%) of the patients with simultaneous ELSD reported improvement and stability in vertigo frequency, respectively, whereas 21 (26%), 43 (52%), and 18 (22%) of patients with CI alone reported improvement, stability, and worsening in vertigo frequency, respectively ( P <0.001). Post-CI speech recognition scores were not significantly different between the simultaneous ELSD and CI alone groups [median (IQR) CNCw 70 (38 to 82) vs. 72 (58 to 82) and median (IQR) AzBio quiet 87 (67 to 96) vs. 87 (73 to 94), respectively]. Conclusions: In patients with MD, CI with simultaneous ELSD provides improvement in vertigo symptoms and similar audiometric outcomes when compared with CI alone. In appropriately selected patients with both refractory vestibular symptoms and sensorineural hearing loss meeting criteria for implantation, CI with simultaneous ELSD offers improvement in severity and frequency of vertigo as well as successful auditory rehabilitation.

Objective: The Complete Cochlear Implant Care (CCIC) model is a highly coordinated care delivery model reducing and condensing in-person visits for cochlear implant (CI) patients, leveraging telehealth and remote programming. Clinical, quality-of-life, implementation, patient experience, and financial outcomes of the clinical trial are reported. Study design: Prospective, nonrandomized, 2-arm clinical trial Setting: Tertiary referral CI center Patients: Adult CI candidates Interventions: Cochlear implantation Main outcome measures: Speech perception, quality of life, implementation, patient experience, and financial outcomes for both CCIC and traditional care delivery models. Results: Patients participating in the traditional and CCIC delivery models demonstrated 12-month postoperative speech perception scores comparable to nationally reported outcomes (CNC 61% and 72% and AzBio in quiet 75% and 87% for traditional and CCIC cohorts, respectively). Quality-of-life evaluation using the CIQOL-10 demonstrated similar 12-month postoperative scores between groups (52 and 54 for traditional and CCIC cohorts, respectively). The CI Patient Experience Survey demonstrated high satisfaction outcomes in ease of communication, preparedness for surgery, and overall care in both cohorts. Implementation analysis of the CCIC model revealed perceived benefits from staff and clinicians; however, support for expansion of the program was contingent upon the availability of app-based or web-based remote programming technology. Finally, financial analysis revealed decreased out-of-pocket costs for CCIC patients. Conclusion: The CCIC model has the potential to dramatically streamline hearing health care delivery and reduce out-of-pocket costs for CI recipients. Clinical outcomes between cohorts were comparable in this feasibility study; however, a sufficiently powered trial is required to definitively comment on clinical outcomes with the new care delivery model.

Objectives To compare electrical stimulation and speech perception in vestibular schwannoma (VS) patients across treatment modalities and standard cochlear implant (CI) patients. Study Design Retrospective review. Setting Tertiary academic center. Patients Sixty-seven CI ears consisting of 23 standard CI controls and 44 VS patients with ipsilateral CI. VS patients were separated by treatment modality: 24 microsurgical resection, 15 radiation therapy, and 5 observation. Eleven VS patients with CI did not receive auditory sensation from electrical stimulation. Interventions VS microsurgical resection, radiation therapy, and observation. Main Outcome Measures Threshold (T-levels), comfort (C-levels), consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) word score, and AzBio sentence recognition scores. Results Patients who underwent microsurgical resection required significantly higher (p < 0.001) T-levels and C-levels compared with the standard CI group. Stimulation levels in the VS radiation therapy and observation groups were higher but not significantly different compared with standard CI controls. Overall rate of CI nonstimulation across all VS patients was 25%: 38% for microsurgery and 13% for radiation. Average CNC score for microsurgery group was 18% compared with 44% for radiation, 55% for observation, and 68.5% for standard CI controls. CNC word and AzBio scores were significantly lower (p < 0.001) for the microsurgery group compared with standard CI group. Conclusions Resection may negatively affect auditory nerve function, leading to higher stimulation levels, increased risk of nonstimulation, and poorer postoperative CI speech outcomes compared with observation or radiosurgery. When medically appropriate, nonsurgical VS management may be used to allow for optimization of CI programming and postoperative hearing outcomes.

ImportanceVestibular migraine has no established treatments.ObjectiveTo test the efficacy of rizatriptan for treating vestibular migraine attacks.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis double-blind, randomized clinical trial of rizatriptan vs placebo was conducted from December 2014 through July 2020 (data analyses in 2021 and sensitivity analyses in 2022 and 2024) at 2 tertiary neurotologic centers. Adults with vestibular migraine were included.InterventionAll participants underwent prospective observation to confirm diagnosis and illness activity and were then randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive rizatriptan 10 mg or placebo to treat up to 3 vestibular migraine attacks per participant.Main Outcomes and MeasuresParticipants rated symptoms as absent, mild, moderate, or severe at scheduled intervals. Primary outcomes were the percentage of attacks with reductions in vertigo and unsteadiness/dizziness from moderate or severe to absent or mild at 1 hour. Secondary outcomes were the percentage of attacks with complete resolution of vestibular symptoms at 1 hour; reductions in headache and associated symptoms at 1 hour; use of rescue medications after 1 hour; reductions in vestibular, headache, and associated symptoms at 24 hours without rescue medications; treatment satisfaction and quality of life at 48 hours; and rates of serious adverse effects and discontinuation due to adverse effects.ResultsOf 222 total participants (mean [SD] age, 42.3 [11.7] years; 70.7% were women), 134 (60.4%) with active illness treated 307 attacks. Efficacy was tested using 240 attacks with vestibular symptoms rated as moderate or severe when participants took study drug. At 1 hour, rizatriptan did not differ from placebo for reducing vertigo (73/151 [48.3%] vs 50/88 [56.8%] attacks; odds ratio [OR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.42-1.21]), unsteadiness/dizziness (29/151 [19.2%] vs 11/89 [12.4%] attacks; OR, 1.69 [95% CI, 0.80-3.57]), or any secondary outcomes. Similar percentages of participants in rizatriptan and placebo groups (26.4% for both groups) added rescue remedies after 1 hour. At 24 hours, rizatriptan had medium effects over placebo for unsteadiness/dizziness (OR, 2.65) and motion sensitivity (OR, 3.58). Post hoc analyses of all treated attacks found a medium effect favoring rizatriptan for headache and photophobia or phonophobia at 24 hours. Treatment satisfaction was equivocal. Quality of life was mixed. No participants experienced serious adverse effects or discontinued treatment for adverse effects.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this study, rizatriptan was ineffective at 1 hour for treating vestibular migraine attacks and had limited benefit on symptoms at 24 hours. Findings do not support using rizatriptan for vestibular migraine attacks.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02447991

ABSTRACTObjectiveThe primary objective of this study is to review the evidence for aspirin use to prevent the growth of vestibular schwannomas (VS) and to propose a prospective trial to determine the progression‐free survival of VS patients after up to 42 months of treatment with aspirin. Secondary study objectives are to determine the effect of aspirin on VS growth, hearing function, serum biomarker levels, and the quality of life, as well as to determine the tolerability of aspirin treatment and whether serum biomarker and salicylate levels predict the response to aspirin.Study DesignLiterature review.SettingSix academic and private medical centers.MethodsReview of recent English literature regarding prophylactic aspirin use for VS.ResultsThe retrospective reviews on the utility of aspirin to prevent VS growth are inconclusive. Eighty‐four patients have been enrolled in a prospective double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled trial thus far to determine the effect of aspirin on VS.ConclusionsCompletion of a robust study design is necessary. The current aspirin dose has been well tolerated, with minimal adverse events to date.Level of EvidenceReview of retrospective studies: Level 4; Proposed randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blinded clinical trial: Level 2.