Parikh, N

Abstract Introduction Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation is a common and effective surgical treatment for erectile dysfunction. However, the presence of comorbidities and the use of anti-thrombotic therapy (AT) can complicate surgical decision-making. Due to the correlation between erectile dysfunction and cardiovascular disease, the preoperative comorbidities of surgical patients are important to examine. Objective The goal of this study was to assess the outcomes of IPP implantation in men on active AT therapy compared to a non-AT therapy cohort. Methods A retrospective analysis from 2015 to 2023 was conducted using data from three high-volume implant centers. The study focused on men who underwent three-piece IPP placement. Demographics, comorbidities, secondary procedures, drain information, and complications were recorded. The three centers each have different techniques and approaches to the surgery. Center 1 utilizes a penoscrotal approach, never places a drain, and places the reservoir in an ectopic location. Center 2 utilizes an infra-pubic approach, places a drain which remains in place for 3 days, and utilizes various reservoir locations depending on patient profile. Lastly, center 3 utilizes a penoscrotal approach, places a drain with removal when output is less than 50 mL over 8 hours, and places the reservoir in an ectopic location. Outcomes were analyzed using multivariate and univariate analysis. Results A total of 210 patients on active AT therapy and 128 non-AT patients were included. The AT and non-AT groups showed significant differences in baseline comorbidities, with the AT group exhibiting higher rates of cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and thrombosis (p<0.05). Among patients on anti-thrombotic therapy, 27.6% required revision surgeries and had increased rates of ectopic reservoir placement compared to the non-AT group (p<0.001). Despite these differences, there were no statistically significant variations in overall complication rates between the two groups. Drain output was notably higher in the AT cohort on postoperative days 1 (mean 110.5 cc vs 60 cc, p<0.001) and 2 (mean 78 cc vs 20 cc, p<0.001); however, hematoma rates remained comparable between both groups (p=0.667). Importantly, neither the type of anti-thrombotic therapy nor the surgical approach used appeared to influence postoperative outcomes. Eleven patients (5.2%) experienced complications in the AT arm and 5 patients (3.9%) experienced complications in the non-AT arm (p=0.793). Conclusions IPP implantation is feasible and safe in men on active anti-thrombotic therapy when performed in high-volume centers with appropriate perioperative management. Further studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up are needed to refine protocols and determine long-term outcomes for these high-risk patients. Disclosure No

ABSTRACT Introduction Peyronie's disease (PD) is a connective tissue disorder of the penile tunica albuginea, that can often cause penile deformity, pain, sexual dysfunction, and shortening. Therapies available include penile traction, oral medications, intralesional therapy, and surgical management. Many patients undergo multiple therapies for this disease due to poor satisfaction or lack of subjective improvement. Objective We thus sought out to delineate which patients were more likely to undergo a second therapy. Methods A cohort of 385 men who underwent therapy for Peyronie's disease from 2014-2018 were analyzed. A univariate analysis of patient demographics, subjective complaints, IIEF score parameters, primary treatments, and secondary treatment approaches was conducted. Results Of the 385 men identified, 29 patients ultimately decided to undergo a secondary treatment approach with 14 patients undergoing penile traction therapy, 7 intralesional therapy (Xiaflex) and 9 surgical therapy (5 penile plication, 2 insertion of inflatable penile prosthesis, and 2 grafting). 17 patients initially underwent surgery for PD with 23.53% of these patients undergoing a second line therapy (p<0.0469). 148 patients initially underwent Xiaflex injections with 12.16% of these patients undergoing a second line therapy (p<0.0227). Patients with poor orgasmic function as determined by IIEF questionnaire (median scores 8 vs 2, p<0.0420), men with greater objective curvature (median curvature 45 vs 35, p<0.0220), and men with greater stretched penile length (13.5 cm vs 12 cm, p=0.0284) were also more likely to undergo secondary therapy. Table 1 shows all factors associated with increased likelihood for secondary therapy. Conclusions Peyronie's disease is often a complex condition to treat due to the mental, emotional, and physical toll this disease takes on patients. It is helpful to determine which patients could likely require secondary therapy as this may help guide patient counseling and further management. Disclosure No