Griggs, Robert C.

Abstract Introduction Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation is a common and effective surgical treatment for erectile dysfunction. However, the presence of comorbidities and the use of anti-thrombotic therapy (AT) can complicate surgical decision-making. Due to the correlation between erectile dysfunction and cardiovascular disease, the preoperative comorbidities of surgical patients are important to examine. Objective The goal of this study was to assess the outcomes of IPP implantation in men on active AT therapy compared to a non-AT therapy cohort. Methods A retrospective analysis from 2015 to 2023 was conducted using data from three high-volume implant centers. The study focused on men who underwent three-piece IPP placement. Demographics, comorbidities, secondary procedures, drain information, and complications were recorded. The three centers each have different techniques and approaches to the surgery. Center 1 utilizes a penoscrotal approach, never places a drain, and places the reservoir in an ectopic location. Center 2 utilizes an infra-pubic approach, places a drain which remains in place for 3 days, and utilizes various reservoir locations depending on patient profile. Lastly, center 3 utilizes a penoscrotal approach, places a drain with removal when output is less than 50 mL over 8 hours, and places the reservoir in an ectopic location. Outcomes were analyzed using multivariate and univariate analysis. Results A total of 210 patients on active AT therapy and 128 non-AT patients were included. The AT and non-AT groups showed significant differences in baseline comorbidities, with the AT group exhibiting higher rates of cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and thrombosis (p<0.05). Among patients on anti-thrombotic therapy, 27.6% required revision surgeries and had increased rates of ectopic reservoir placement compared to the non-AT group (p<0.001). Despite these differences, there were no statistically significant variations in overall complication rates between the two groups. Drain output was notably higher in the AT cohort on postoperative days 1 (mean 110.5 cc vs 60 cc, p<0.001) and 2 (mean 78 cc vs 20 cc, p<0.001); however, hematoma rates remained comparable between both groups (p=0.667). Importantly, neither the type of anti-thrombotic therapy nor the surgical approach used appeared to influence postoperative outcomes. Eleven patients (5.2%) experienced complications in the AT arm and 5 patients (3.9%) experienced complications in the non-AT arm (p=0.793). Conclusions IPP implantation is feasible and safe in men on active anti-thrombotic therapy when performed in high-volume centers with appropriate perioperative management. Further studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up are needed to refine protocols and determine long-term outcomes for these high-risk patients. Disclosure No

Abstract Introduction Penile prosthesis placement in men on active anti-coagulation (AC) is controversial. The bleeding risk of continued blood thinners must be weighed against the increased thrombotic risk for patients when stopping them. Previously utilized techniques to decrease complication rates from AC include the use of a malleable implant only, leaving the IPP partially inflated for hemostasis, and placement of a drain. Objective We sought to assess outcomes of penile implant placement in men on clopidogrel, warfarin, apixaban, enoxaparin, and rivaroxaban in a multi-institutional study. Methods Data from 3 high volume implant centers were retrospectively obtained. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, case information including secondary procedures, placement of drain, drain output, and complications were recorded. Data on patients with aspirin any dose alone were not included as all 3 centers do not routinely discontinue ASA at time of penile implant. One center never placed drains and used a penoscrotal approach, one center left a drain at least one day and removed when output was < 50 ml/8 hours and used a penoscrotal approach, and the last center placed a drain for 3 days and utilized an infra-pubic approach. Results 202 patients were continued on AC throughout surgery. 112 patients were on clopidogrel, 35 warfarin, 38 apixaban, 1 enoxaparin, 15 rivaroxaban, and 1 on combination therapy with clopidogrel and enoxaparin. AC requirement included peripheral vascular disease (55%), CHF (11%), cardiac stents (11.6%), DVT/PE/history of thrombosis (7%), atrial fibrillation (11%), cardiac valves (2.2%), stroke (1.3%), and preventive (0.9%). Nine patients on AC (3.98%) experienced complications including 4 significant events (1.9%): 1 major retropubic bleed requiring transfusion, 3 IPP infections and 5 minor events: 3 minor hematomas, 1 minor wound dehiscence and 1 CT negative stroke event. Drain outputs for the 3 day center averaged 113 ml, 81 ml and 30 ml of output per day respectively with a total average output average of 223 ml and experienced no hematomas nor infections. Drain output for the center with removal when < 50 ml/8 hours averaged 121 ml with the majority or patients having the drain for only one day. Drain output was significantly higher than historical non AC controls (121 vs. 72 ml p=.001) but there was no difference in hematoma rate. Three hematomas and 1 infection occurred in this group. AC type, revision surgery, scrotoplasty, or reservoir technique did not affect outcomes nor drainage (P>.05). Complication rate (IPP infection and hematoma rate) where not different when compared to large cohorts from respective institutions. Conclusions Our data shows a 1.9% rate of major complications in patients undergoing IPP placement on anticoagulation in high volume implant centers. Although this approach appears feasible and similar in complication rates in men not on AC, careful consideration of the risk benefit ratio should be undertaken. Our data indicate closed suction draining for 3 days may be warranted. Additionally, the retropubic bleed case argues for only submuscular reservoirs placed under direct vision which minimizes occult bleeding risk. In the majority of cases, elective IPP surgery should be delayed until it is safe to discontinue anticoagulation therapy. Disclosure No