Cernigliaro, Joseph G.

Purpose: To investigate the potential for decreasing radiation dose when utilizing a third-generation vs second-generation dual-source dual-energy CT (dsDECT) scanner, while maintaining diagnostic image quality and acceptable image noise. Materials and Methods : Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent dsDECT for clinical suspicion of urolithiasis from October 2, 2017, to September 5, 2018. Patient demographics, body mass index, abdominal diameter, scanning parameters, and CT dose index volume (CTDIvol) were recorded. Image quality was assessed by measuring the attenuation and standard deviation (SD) regions of interest in the aorta and in the bladder. Image noise was determined by averaging the SD at both levels. Patients were excluded if they had not undergone both third- and second-generation dual-energy CT (DECT), time between DECT was more than 2 years, or scan parameters were outside the standard protocol. Results: A total of 117 patients met the inclusion criteria. Examinations performed on a third-generation DECT had an average CTDIvol 12.3 mGy, while examinations performed on a second-generation DECT had an average CTDIvol 13.3 mGy ( p < 0.001). Average image noise was significantly lower for the third-generation DECT (SD = 10.3) compared with the second-generation DECT (SD = 13.9) ( p < 0.001). Conclusions: The third-generation dsDECT scanners can simultaneously decrease patient radiation dose and decrease image noise compared with second-generation DECT. These reductions in radiation exposure can be particularly important in patients with urinary stone disease who often require repeated imaging to evaluate for stone development and recurrence as well as treatment assessment.

174 Background: AA/P is an FDA approved treatment for mCRPC. Since markers of early resistance to AA/P are unknown, we report initial findings of androgen receptor (AR) based associations with short term (12 week) progression on AA/P. Methods: mCRPC stage patients (pts) initiating pre-chemotherapy AA/P underwent metastatic site biopsies at baseline (pre AA/P) and after 12 weeks. Baseline somatic whole exome DNA, tumor gene expression for AR full length (ARFL), AR splice variant 7 (ARV7) and ARV7/ARFL ratios were compared in progessors versus non-progressors. Progression at or within 12 weeks of AA/P therapy was defined as death or disease progression by PCWG2 “composite progression (CP)” and/or “radiographic progression” endpoints. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to test for differences in the two groups for comparing ARFL, ARV7 expressions and ARV7/ARFL ratios and chi square tests were used for differences in copy number variation. Results: Between 1/2013 and 6/2014, 59 pts were enrolled of which 44 have disease assessment data at the12-week time point. CP was observed in 17/44 patients. DNA seq and clinical data was available for 42/44 pts. Using radiographic progression at 12 weeks, AR Amplification/Gain was observed in 20/26 non-progressors (13 with Amplification) and in 9/16 progressors (P-value = 0.19; OR 2.5). ARFL and ARV7 gene expressions in both groups is provided in table. Conclusions: A trend towards higher ARV7/ARFL gene expression ratio in metastases was observed with early progression on AA/P. AR gain/amplification is observed less often in pts with early progression. Validation of these findings is on-going in this prospective trial. Clinical trial information: NCT# 01953640. [Table: see text]

The purpose of this work was to investigate the performance of currently available magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting kidney stones, compared to computed tomography (CT) results, and to determine the characteristics of successfully detected stones. Patients who had undergone both abdominal/pelvic CT and MRI exams within 30 days were studied. The images were reviewed by two expert radiologists blinded to the patients’ respective radiological diagnoses. The study consisted of four steps: (1) reviewing the MRI images and determining whether any kidney stone(s) are identified; (2) reviewing the corresponding CT images and confirming whether kidney stones are identified; (3) reviewing the MRI images a second time, armed with the information from the corresponding CT, noting whether any kidney stones are positively identified that were previously missed; (4) for all stones MRI-confirmed on previous steps, the radiologist experts being asked to answer whether in retrospect, with knowledge of size and location on corresponding CT, these stones would be affirmed as confidently identified on MRI or not. In this best-case scenario involving knowledge of stones and their locations on concurrent CT, radiologist experts detected 19% of kidney stones on MRI, with stone size being a major factor for stone identification.

Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) has recently been suggested as the imaging modality of choice for kidney stones due to its ability to provide information on stone composition. Standard postprocessing of the dual-energy images accurately identifies uric acid stones, but not other types. Cystine stones can be identified from DECT images when analyzed with advanced postprocessing. This case report describes clinical implications of accurate diagnosis of cystine stones using DECT.