Back to Authors

Miller, C.

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 2

Enhanced detection of dermal-binding autoantibodies in pemphigoid diseases with a modified indirect immunofluorescence cell-based mosaic assay using IgG4 and optimized testing conditions: a single-centre retrospective study
Agrawal, Shruti , Camilleri, M. J., Comfere, Nneka I. , Johnson, Emma F. , Kalaaji, Amer N., Wieland, Carilyn N. , Lange, Colleen R., Miller, C., Shore, Carly J, Guerrico, Anatilde M Gonzalez, Lange, Colleen, Miller, Cameron, Gonzalez Guerrico, Anatilde M, Lehman, Julia S. , Guerrico, Anatilde M. Gonzalez

British Journal of Dermatology | January 9, 2026 | Volume: 195 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 187-188

10.1093/bjd/ljag007 Get It

Patzelt et al. previously characterized dermal-binding autoantibodies using an indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) mosaic assay with cells transfected with p200-laminin β4, laminin-332 or collagen VII subunits among specimens showing a dermal pattern on IIF using salt-split skin (IIF-SSS) and IgG. This study expanded testing to include specimens with either a dermal or mixed pattern on IIF-SSS and demonstrated improved test sensitivity with modified testing methods.
Impact of adding an IgG4 conjugate to routine direct immunofluorescence testing for subepithelial and intraepithelial autoimmune blistering disorders
Lehman, Julia S. , Johnson, Emma F. , Camilleri, Michael , Gibson, Lawrence E. , Comfere, Nneka I. , Kalaaji, Amer N., Peters, Margot S. , Cervenka, Derek J., Doppler, Joseph M., Lange, Colleen R., Miller, C., Wieland, Carilyn N. , Miller, Cameron J, Lehman, Julia S

Journal of Cutaneous Pathology | November 25, 2021 | Volume: 49 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 358-362

10.1111/cup.14176 Get It

AbstractBackgroundCertain autoimmune bullous dermatoses are mediated by autoantibodies of the IgG4 subclass. We determined the diagnostic impact of adding IgG4 to our conventional direct immunofluorescence (DIF) panel.MethodsFor all cases submitted to our referral laboratory for DIF over 1 month (n = 630), we performed IgG4 testing and collected consecutive biopsy specimens showing definite or indeterminate linear or cell‐surface deposition of IgG, IgG4, and/or C3. On retrospective blinded review, we classified the pattern and whether the findings were definite, indeterminate, or negative. When present, substantial background staining was recorded.ResultsSeventy DIF specimens met the inclusion criteria. Of 22 (31.4%) specimens equivocal for linear or cell‐surface deposition, 9 (40.9%) had definitive IgG4 findings, either linear (3 of 14 equivocal linear cases; 21.4%) or cell‐surface (6 of 8 equivocal cell‐surface cases; 75.0%). Background deposition was substantial in 14 cases (20.0%) for IgG but in none for C3 or IgG4.ConclusionIgG4 allowed the classification of over 40% of DIF cases that were otherwise equivocal by IgG and C3. IgG4 staining showed lower levels of non‐specific background staining than IgG or C3. IgG4 appears to contribute most value in cases with cell‐surface deposition or with equivocal linear IgG deposition and negative C3 results.