Ou, Fang‐Shu

3593 Background: CUB domain-containing protein 1 (CDCP1) is a transmembrane protein shown to be over-expressed in colorectal cancer (CRC), with an important role in tumor initiation, growth and metastasis. Through interactions with EGFR, CDCP1 promotes nuclear translocation of the key regulators of Wnt signaling, β-catenin and E-cadherin. High CDCP1 expression has been associated with poor survival outcomes in multiple solid tumors but data in CRC remains limited. We investigated associations between CDCP1 level and survival outcomes in patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) in the phase III clinical trial CALGB/SWOG 80405 (Alliance). Methods: Data from 433 mCRC patients in the CALGB/SWOG 80405 (Alliance) trial were analyzed. Patients received bevacizumab (n = 226) or cetuximab (n = 207) plus chemotherapy as 1st-line treatment. Tumor RNA was extracted from FFPE samples and processed through the HiSeq 2500 (Illumina) platform. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) curves were evaluated in all treatment subgroups and stratified according to high or low CDCP1 expression. Likelihood ratio tests, hazard ratios (HRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards multivariate models, adjusting for age, sex, ECOG performance status, tumor location, number of metastatic sites, KRAS status, consensus molecular subtypes, and treatment arm. Results: Overall, low CDCP1 expression was associated with better OS compared to high expression (HR = 1.38; 95% CI 1.07-1.77; 35.8 vs 25.0 months, p = 0.045). Subgroup analysis re-demonstrated this pattern in males (HR = 1.64; 95% CI 1.64-2.28; 35.9 vs 23.6 months, p = 0.01), patients with MSS tumors (HR = 1.56; 95% CI 1.17-2.08; 36.7 vs 25.1 months, p = 0.0094), and patients treated with cetuximab+FOLFOX (HR = 1.79; 95% CI 1.16-2.77; 40.8 vs 24.0 months, p = 0.03). The effect of CDCP1 expression on PFS was less pronounced. Relative to high expression, low expression was associated with better PFS in males (HR = 1.49; 95% CI 1.10-2.03; 13.1 vs 9.8 months, p = 0.027) and left-sided tumors (HR = 1.50; 95% CI 1.10-2.04; 14.4 vs 10.1 months, p = 0.034). Conclusions: Our findings represent real-world data of the predictive role of CDCP1 in patients with mCRC undergoing anti-EGFR or anti-VEGF treatment. Consistent with studies of other cancers, we show that low CDCP1 expression is predictive of better survival outcomes, with subgroup analysis revealing associations in males, MSS tumors, and left-sided tumors. Among treatment groups, low CDCP1 expression is predictive of better OS in cetuximab+FOLFOX-treated patients, a key finding given CDCP1’s close mechanistic ties to EGFR. Further studies should explore whether these associations are seen in other treatment modalities and whether CDCP1 blockade could represent a viable strategy in patients with high expression.

Abstract Introduction: Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 and 3 (FGFR2 and FGFR3) are metabolic genes overexpressed in malignant epithelia. In colorectal cancer (CRC), intimate crosstalk between FGFR2/3 and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathways has been suggested but is not fully elucidated. As a result, this study investigated associations between FGFR2/3 expression levels and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) enrolled in the phase III clinical trial CALGB /SWOG 80405. Methods: Data from 433 patients with mCRC enrolled in the CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial were analyzed. Patients received either bevacizumab (bev, n = 226) or cetuximab (cet, n = 207) plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment. Tumor RNA was extracted from FFPE samples and processed through the HiSeq 2500 (Ilumina) platform. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) curves were evaluated in all treatment subgroups and stratified according to high (H), medium (M), and low (L) FGFR 2 and 3 gene expression levels. Likelihood ratio tests, hazard ratios (HRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards multivariate models, adjusting for age, sex, ECOG performance status, tumor location, number of metastatic sites, KRAS status, consensus molecular subtypes, and treatment arm. Results: Both FGFR2 and FGFR3 expression levels were associated with outcomes in patients treated with cetuximab. FGFR2-L tumors showed significantly longer OS compared to the M (HR = 1.04; 95%CI 0.71-1.51) and H (HR = 1.56; 95%CI 1.06-2.28) expression groups (35.7 vs. 31.2 vs. 23.7 months, p = 0.017). In contrast, FGFR3-L tumors were associated with shorter OS compared to the M (HR = 0.63; 95%CI 0.44-0.92) and H (HR = 0.59; 95%CI 0.41-0.85) expression groups (24.7 vs 32.4 vs 37.1 months, p = 0.0009). Significant differences in PFS were not observed. A nominally significant interaction was found between treatment and FGFR3 expression for both PFS (p = 0.02) and OS (p = 0.0003), but no interaction with FGFR2 expression. No significant associations were detected in patients treated with bev. Neither FGFR2 nor FGFR3 suggested to be prognostic markers after multivariate adjustment analyses. Conclusions: Our findings suggest a predictive role of FGFR3 in patients with mCRC undergoing anti-EGFR treatment. Differences in survival within the cet subgroup suggest that EGFR inhibitor efficacy may be modulated by FGFR2/3 signaling activity. Interestingly, FGFR2 and FGFR3 expressions were inversely and positively correlated with improved OS. The findings suggest that FGFR2 signaling minimizes the specific effects of cetuximab, while FGFR3 signaling amplifies its therapeutic effects. Further studies should determine whether these associations are seen in other anti-EGFR inhibitors and detail the mechanistic interaction between FGFR and EGFR pathways. Citation Format: Steve Soto Trujillo, Yan Yang, Michela Bartolini, Shivani Soni, Pooja Mittal, Fang-Shu Ou, Lesly Torres-Gonzalez, Unnati Hemant Shah, Jae Ho Lo, Yitzhar Goretsky, Wu Zhang, Alan Venook, Sandra Algaze, Joshua Millstein, Heinz-Josef Lenz. Differences in survival outcomes among metastatic colorectal cancer patients across fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 and 3 expression levels [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 6751.

Abstract Background. Mitophagy plays a crucial role in removing dysfunctional mitochondria to maintain cellular homeostasis but also has been implicated in cancer tumorigenesis. Previously, we showed that genetic variation in mitophagy pathway genes holds a predictive value in metastatic CRC (mCRC) patients (pts) treated with bevacizumab-based chemotherapy. In this study, we analyzed the correlation between tumor expression profiles of genes associated with PINK1/Parkin and BNIP3/NIX/FUNDC1 mitophagy pathways with clinical outcome in a large phase III randomized clinical trial CALGB SWOG 80405. Method. We analyzed 433 pts with mCRC treated with first-line chemotherapy in combination with the targeted agents bevacizumab (Bev, n = 226) or cetuximab (Cet, n = 207). Tumor RNA isolated from FFPE samples was sequenced using the HiSeq 2500 platform (Illumina). Median Overall survival (mOS) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) were compared across pts groups divided into high, medium, and low tertiles based on mitophagy-related gene (BNIP3, BNIP3L, PINK1, PRKN) expression levels. Likelihood ratio tests, hazard ratios (HRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for age, sex, ECOG performance status, tumor location, number of metastatic sites, KRAS status, Consensus Molecular Subtypes, and treatment arm. Results: Overall, BNIP3L demonstrated significant prognostic value for both PFS and OS after adjustment for multiple testing (false discovery rate [FDR] < 0.05). Tumors with low BNIP3L expression showed longer PFS and OS compared to those with medium or high expression levels (mPFS 14.8 vs. 10.0 vs. 9.2 months, HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.04 - 1.29p = 0.0182; mOS: 37.4 vs. 30.2 vs. 24.4 months, HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.09 - 1.38, p = 0.0036), independent of treatment. In pts treated with Cet, high PRKN expression was associated with improved PFS and OS (mPFS: 8.9 vs. 10.3 vs. 14.6 months, HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.69 - 0.91, p = 7.3e-05; mOS: 21.2 vs. 27.7 vs. 41.1 months, HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.75 - 1.01, p = 0.00084), whereas low PINK1 expression was significantly associated with longer OS (mOS: 24.9 vs. 30.9 vs. 39.2 months, HR 1.23; 95% CI 1.04 -1.46, p = 0.013). No significant associations were observed in Bev-treated patients for PRKN or PINK1. No significant results were found for BNIP3 expression analysis. Conclusion. Mitophagy is a crucial player in CRC biology due to its tumor-intrinsic (mitochondrial bioenergetics) and microenvironment (interacts with immune components) effects. Our study highlights the prognostic value of BNIP3L and predictive potential of PINK1 and PRKN, suggesting a potential combinatorial therapeutic approach using mitochondrial targeting drugs and targeted agents e.g Cet, which warrants further investigation. Support: Genentech; Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00265850 Citation Format: Shivani Soni, Yan Yang, Michela Bartolini, Pooja Mittal, Fang-Shu Ou, Lesly Torres-Gonzalez, Unnati Hemant Shah, Jae Ho Lo, Steve Soto Trujillo, Yitzhar Goretsky, Wu Zhang, Alan P. Venook, Sandra Algaze, Joshua Millstein, Heinz-Josef Lenz. Correlation of mitophagy related genes expression and clinical outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer patients enrolled in CALGB (Alliance)/SWOG 80405 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 1011.

561 Background: For patients with aHCC, second-line treatment options are not well established. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Futi, an FGFR 1-4 inhibitor, in combination with Pem as a second line therapy in patients with FGF19-expressing aHCC. Methods: Patients aged ≥ 18 years, with histological/cytological diagnosis or radiological diagnosis of HCC, Child-Pugh (CP) class A-B7, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) A, B or C, ECOG performance status of 0-2, and FGF19+, by in-situ hybridization or immunohistochemistry, received Futi 20 mg once daily plus i.v. Pem 200mg every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS6). Secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS). The study was designed to enroll 22 evaluable patients to detect PFS6 from 25% (historical control) to 47%, assuming a 1-sided alpha of 0.1 with 80% power. All patients provided written consent. Eligible patients with consent who started treatment are considered evaluable. Results: The study was closed to enrollment early at the request of funding agency due to poor accrual. Between 8/2021 and 3/2024, 14 patients enrolled with 1 patient withdrawing consent before beginning protocol treatment. Among 13 evaluable patients, median age was 72 (range: 60-87) years, 7 (53.8%) were male, 12 CP A (92.3%), 7 BCLC C (53.8%), with 7 (53.8%) having received prior liver directed therapy. Median PFS was 15 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.0-Not Estimable) and PFS6 was 23.1% (95% CI: 8.6%, 62.3%). Objective response rate was 0% (95% CI: 0%, 24.71%) and stable disease occurred in 7 (53.9%) of patients. Median OS was 55.7 weeks (95% CI: 47.3-NE). Nine (69.2%) patients experienced at least 1 grade 3+ adverse event (AE), and 2 (15.4%) patients experienced at least a grade 4+ AE. One patient had a grade 5 AE unrelated to study treatment (acute kidney injury). Most commonly reported AEs (occurring in more than 31% of patients) were hyperphosphatemia (76.9%), fatigue (69.3%), diarrhea (61.6%), AST (53.9%) and ALT (46.2%), dry eye (38.5%), nail changes (38.5%), rash-maculo-papular (38.5%), and mucositis oral (38.5%). Conclusions: This prospective study evaluated the use of a targeted treatment in combination with immunotherapy following first line immune-based therapy. This combination had modest activity as a second line therapy for patients with aHCC but did not meet the primary endpoint. The safety profile was acceptable and consistent with prior reports. An optimal second-line regimen remains a critical need. Clinical trial information: NCT04828486 .

554 Background: Atezo/Bev is the 1 st -line standard for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). Optimal 2 nd -line therapy post-Atezo/Bev remains undefined. This study evaluates continuation of atezolizumab with a MKI versus MKI alone in the 2 nd -line setting. Methods: This multicenter, randomized phase II trial enrolled patients with unresectable aHCC who progressed on Atezo/Bev. Patients were randomized 2:1 to atezolizumab plus MKI (cabozantinib or lenvatinib; Arm A) or MKI alone (Arm B). Stratification factors included MKI choice, viral etiology, and alpha-fetoprotein levels. Dual primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and safety. With 84 death and 89 PFS events, from 122 patients, this trial had 80% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.556 in OS and HR of 0.571 in PFS with a one-sided type I error (alpha) of 0.05 for each endpoint. Results: Twenty patients were accrued across 5 U.S. centers, between 01/2022 and 03/2025, before early closure due to slow accrual. Eighteen received treatment (Arm A: n=13; Arm B: n=5). Baseline characteristics: median age 68 yr, extrahepatic 56%, Hep B+ 0%, Hep C+ 33%, NASH 33% and CP A (5 to 6) 100%. MKIs used were cabozantinib (Arm A: 6/13; Arm B: 4/5) and lenvatinib (Arm A: 7/13; Arm B: 1/5). Median follow-up was 28.0 months (mo), with 14 deaths reported. Median (95% CI) OS were 13.9 (7.1-Not Estimable [NE]) and 6.2 (5.1-NE) mo (Arm A and B respectively); and that of PFS 4.3 (2.3-NE) and 4.1 (3.7-NE) mo. ORR was 7.7% (1/13) in Arm A (responder received lenvatinib) and 0% (0/5) in Arm B. Grade ≥3 adverse events (at least possibly related) occurred in 46.2% of Arm A and 60.0% of Arm B patients. G3+ events occurring in >10% of patients included hypertension, fatigue, anorexia, and ALT elevation in Arm A; and hypertension, hallucination, nausea, hypomagnesemia, hypokalemia, mucositis, AST increased and colitis in Arm B. Conclusions: In this limited cohort, continuation of atezolizumab with MKI showed relative activity and manageable safety in aHCC post-Atezo/Bev. The AE profile for atezo/MKI is consistent with the known profile of respective agents. These findings support further investigation of immunotherapy-based combinations in the 2nd-line setting. Clinical trial information: NCT05168163 .

392 Background: PAC+RAM is the standard second-line therapy for advanced GEA. However, PAC-related neuropathy is a major challenge, particularly since many pts have pre-existing neuropathy from prior platinum exposure. An effective “neuropathy-free” regimen remains an unmet need. We evaluated FTD-TPI+RAM as an alternative to PAC+RAM. Methods: This multi-center, randomized, phase II study enrolled GEA pts who progressed on or were intolerant to fluoropyrimidine+ platinum therapy. Pts were randomized to FTD-TPI+RAM (Arm A) or PAC+RAM (arm B) at a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), defined as time interval between randomization date and the date of disease progression or death; Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs). The design hypothesized non-inferiority (NI) of Arm A to Arm B with a NI margin of hazard ratio 1.19. 90 PFS events from 116 pts provide 80% power with a one-sided alpha of 0.15. The interim futility analysis, conducted in December 2024 with 20 events, did not cross the futility boundary (Z statistic ≥ 1.172 ) and continued enrolling pts. The trial closed enrollment in March 2025 due to slow accrual. At the time of interim analysis, 20 events had occurred and the Z statistic was 0.4532. Final analysis included the 29 pts that were eligible, consented, randomized, and received any protocol treatment. Results: Among 29 pts (15 Arm A; 14 Arm B), baseline characteristics were balanced (in Arms A vs B, median age 64 vs 63; 80% vs 85.7% male; 86.7%% vs 78.6% White; 80% vs 78.6% ECOG 1). At data freeze of 8/4/2025, 26 PFS events were reported. Median PFS was 3.2 vs. 3.9 months in Arm A vs. Arm B (HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.61-3.02). NI was not demonstrated (Z =0.34, threshold for NI<-1.036). Median OS was 8.4 vs. 10.7 months, in Arms A and B, respectively. Grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 93% (Arm A) vs 71% (Arm B) with hematologic AEs occurring more frequently in Arm A than Arm B (53% vs 29%). Peripheral sensory neuropathy (any grade) occurred more frequently in Arm B (86%) vs. Arm A (47%). Conclusions: Although NI was not achieved due to early closure and small sample size, FTD-TPI+RAM was relatively safe and associated with less neuropathy compared with PAC+RAM. This regimen warrants further evaluation for pts in whom neuropathy limits taxane use. Clinical trial information: NCT04660760 .

198 Background: The Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway regulates tissue patterning, growth and differentiation, including within gastrointestinal tract. Mammalian homologs include Sonic (SHH), Indian (IHH) and Desert (DHH) Hedgehog, which signal through PTCH and SMO and the GLI transcription factors. In the digestive tract, both SHH and IHH are expressed, but the functional role of Hh signaling in mCRC remains incompletely defined. Methods: We analyzed 433 mCRC patients treated with either bevacizumab (bev = 226) or cetuximab (cet = 207) plus first line chemotherapy in CALGB/SWOG 80405 (NCT00265850). RNA expression (Illumina HiSeq 2500) of 9 Hh pathway genes (SHH, IHH, DHH, PTCH1, PTCH2, SMO, GLI1, GLI2, GLI3) was evaluated. Median overall survival (mOS) and progression free survival (mPFS) in months (mo) were compared across expression tertiles (low [L], medium [M], high [H]). Likelihood ratio tests, hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were computed from multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for age, sex, ethnicity, ECOG PS, tumor location, number of metastatic sites, KRAS , microsatellites instability status and treatment. Prognostic effects were modeled as marginal terms; predictive effects were modeled as multiplicative interactions. Results: Overall, IHH and GLI2 demonstrated prognostic value for OS after adjusting for multiple testing (Benjamini-Hochberg False Discovery Rate (FDR) < 0.05). High IHH expression (H group, n = 143) correlated with improved mOS (H: 36.0 mo vs M: 32.8 mo vs L: 23.5 mo; p= 0.031), whereas low GLI2 expression (L group, n = 145) was associated with longer mOS (H: 25.6 mo vs M: 33.9 mo vs L: 33.7 mo; p= 0.0016). Moreover, IHH showed predictive value for cet benefit in both OS (mOS H: 38.1 mo vs M: 34.0 mo vs L: 18.4 mo; p= 0.0032) and PFS (mPFS H: 12.6 mo vs M: 12.9 mo vs L: 8.8 mo; p= 0.0025) with significant treatment interaction for OS and PFS (p= 0.0046 and p= 0.0049, respectively; FDR< 0.05). No significant associations were found in bev treated pts. No other Hh genes showed significant prognostic or predictive effects after FDR correction. Conclusions: These results highlight a dual role of Hh pathway in mCRC. Consistent with prior preclinical evidence, reduced IHH expression appears to mark poor prognosis, likely reflecting the loss of IHH-mediated restraint on Wnt signaling, which drives proliferation and dedifferentiation. Conversely, low GLI2, a downstream transcription factor, was linked with favorable outcomes, underscoring context-specific effects of Hh signaling. The strong predictive association of IHH with cet efficacy supports its potential as a biomarker in RAS wild type mCRC. These results suggest that Hh pathway modulation, particularly IHH signaling, may influence disease biology and treatment response. Validation in independent cohorts and mechanistic studies is warranted to clarify implications.

179 Background: Neuroligins are a family of postsynaptic cell adhesion molecules that play a crucial role in synapse formation and function. Recent studies suggest Neuroligin family genes (NLGN1,2,3,4X) may promote cancer cell growth and metastasis in various cancers, including colorectal cancer. Here, we investigated the association between neuroligin family gene expression and first-line treatment outcomes in mCRC. Methods: We evaluated the expression of 4 genes in the neuroligin family (NLGN1, NLGN2, NLGN3 and NLGN4X) on treatment outcomes of 433 pts with mCRC treated with either bevacizumab (Bev, n = 226) or cetuximab (Cet, n = 207) in combination with first-line chemotherapy within the CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial. mRNA was isolated from FFPE tumor samples and sequenced on the HiSeq 2500 (Illumina). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between groups of pts categorized by low expression (Q1) (≤25 percentile), medium expression (Q2-3) (25th-75th percentile) and high expression (Q4)(>75th percentile) of NLGN family genes. The associations between gene expression and clinical outcomes were assessed via the multivariable Cox model and plotted with Kaplan-Meier curve. Treatment-gene interactions were evaluated using the likelihood ratio test. False discovery rate (FDR) was controlled through the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. Results: High NLGN2 expression was associated with shorter PFS (median 10.0 mos, 95% CI (8.3, 11.3)) and OS (median 25.2mos, 95%CI (20.9, 30.0)) compared to low NLGN2 expression (PFS: median 11.2mos, 95% CI (9.8,14.3))(HR 1.41, 95% CI (1.06, 1.89)), P = 0.029). (OS: (median 31.8mos, 95%CI (26.8, 37.5)( HR 1.49, 95% CI (1.10, 2.01) P =0.0095) in multivariate analysis. Patients treated in the cetuximab arm(n=207), high HLGN2 expression significantly associated with shorter PFS (median 8.0 vs 13.4, HR 2.02, 95% CI (1.35, 3.03), P = 0.0021) and OS (median19.6 vs 36.3, HR 2.30, 95% CI (1.50, 3.53), P =8.3e-05). High NLGN3 expression was associated with shorter OS (23.9 vs 36.0 mos, P =0.0083) in cetuximab treatment arms, no significance found in PFS. We found significant treatment interaction for OS with NLGN2 and NLGN3 favoring cetuximab. In pts treated with cetuximab, High NLGN2 expression was significantly associated with shorter OS (median 29.1vs 36.3) (p=0.024) compared to pts treated with bevacizumab. For NLGN3, pts treated with cetuximab, high NLGN3 expression was significantly associated with shorter OS (median 25.0 vs 36.0) (p=0.018) compared to pts treated with bevacizumab. No significant association was found in NLGN1 and NLGN4X. Conclusions: Our results suggest NLGN2/3 gene expression may predict mCRC treatment outcomes. Potential therapeutic drug target NLGN in combination with anti-EGFR treatment in mCRC is warranted.

Abstract Background The increasing reliance on accelerated approvals and surrogate endpoints for Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer therapies raises concerns about their clinical benefit and long-term patient outcomes. The shift toward single-arm trials in regulatory decisions further complicates treatment evaluation. Material and Methods This retrospective observational study evaluated all FDA approvals for GI cancer therapies from January 2006 through January 2025. Data were extracted from FDA archives, ClinicalTrials.gov, and PubMed. Approvals were categorized by regulatory pathway (accelerated vs regular), trial design (single-arm vs randomized), and primary endpoint (surrogate vs overall survival [OS]). Clinical benefit was assessed based on OS improvement and the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS). The primary outcome was the proportion of approvals based on surrogate versus OS endpoints. Secondary outcomes included use of single-arm designs, frequency of accelerated approvals, OS gain, and the proportion meeting ESMO-MCBS substantial benefit (score ≥ 4). Results The FDA granted 60 GI cancer drug approvals from 67 trials. Approvals rose from 15 (25%) in 2006-2014 to 45 (75%) in 2015-2025. Single-arm trials increased to 24%, and surrogate endpoints were used in 41.8% (ORR 20.9%, PFS 19.4%). Median OS improvement was 2.1 months (IQR: 1.6-2.65). Only 24.3% of trials met ESMO-MCBS substantial benefit. Of 15 accelerated approvals, 66.7% remained pending, 13.3% received full approval, and 20% were withdrawn. Conclusion Expedited approvals have improved drug access in GI oncology, but modest benefits highlight the need to balance speed with outcomes that truly matter to patients.